The$use$of$ar+ficial$sweeteners$and$ - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the use of ar ficial sweeteners and cancer risk a systema
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The$use$of$ar+ficial$sweeteners$and$ - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2012&World&Cancer&Congress ! Preven'on!and!early!detec'on!! $ The$use$of$ar+ficial$sweeteners$and$ cancer$risk:$a$systema+c$review$ Fabio&Gomes&(presenter), $$ Raquel$de$Souza$Mezzavilla,$Karina$Abibi$Rimes$ $


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The$use$of$ar+ficial$sweeteners$and$ cancer$risk:$a$systema+c$review$

Fabio&Gomes&(presenter),$$

Raquel$de$Souza$Mezzavilla,$Karina$Abibi$Rimes$ $ Na3onal&Cancer&Ins3tute&of&Brazil&(INCA)& $ $

2012&World&Cancer&Congress! Preven'on!and!early!detec'on!!

$

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Objec3ve$

To$review$the$scien+fic$literature$on$the$rela+onship$ between$ar+ficial$sweeteners$and$cancer.$

Methods&&

  • OVID$and$SCOPUS$plaKorms.$$
  • MeSH$ Terms:$ sweetening$ agent(s),$ ar+ficial$ sweetener(s),$ sugar$

subs+tute(s),$sweetener(s),$and$cancer$or$neoplasm.$$

  • From$ the$ resul+ng$ list$ of$ cita+ons,$ +tle$ and$ abstracts$ were$

independently$ read$ by$ two$ reviewers,$ in$ order$ to$ iden+fy$ if$ papers$ were$within$the$scope$of$this$review's$objec+ve.$$

  • ASer$ this$ first$ selec+on,$ papers$ were$ rated$ regarding$ their$ quality,$

highligh+ng$their$methodological$strengths$and$weaknesses$(STROBE,$ CONSORT$and$ARRIVE$guidelines$were$used).$

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Results$

Search$Strategy$ 575$Papers$ ASer$reading$their$ +tles$and$abstracts$

60$papers$inves+gated$ the$effect$of$ar+ficial$ sweeteners$on$cancer$/$ 32$analyzed$

Experimental$Studies$

15$Papers$

8$higher$risk/greater$expression$

  • f$oncogenes$

7$no$significant$effect$(b2$funded$

by$ILSI)$=$5$

Casebcontrol$Studies$

16$Papers$

3$posi+ve$effect$ 13$(b1$funded$by$calorie$control$

council)$=$12$

Cohort$Studies$

1$Paper$

0$posi+ve$effect$ 1$

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Conclusions/Discussion$

  • Most$ experimental$ studies$ have$ indicated$ higher$ incidence$ of$

malignant$ tumors$ amongst$ rats$ that$ have$ been$ submieed$ to$ oral$ intake$of$ar+ficial$sweeteners.$$

  • A$great$share$of$observa+onal$studies$have$not$shown$an$associa+on$

between$ar+ficial$sweeteners$intake$and$cancer$risk.$$

  • However,$it$is$noteworthy$that$methodological$weaknesses,$including$

exposure$ assessment$ and$ analysis,$ might$ have$ biased$ these$ results$ (e.g.$ only$ a$ few$ studies$ have$ analyzed$ the$ exposure$ properly$ –$ products$containing$ar+ficial$sweeteners$and$their$use$at$the$table,$ and/or$different$types$of$ar+ficial$sweeteners.$

  • Conflicts$of$interest$issue$
  • Hazard$vs.$Risk$analysis$
  • Precau+onary$principle$
  • Hyperpalatability$
  • Taste$educa+on$