Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre
The UK perspective on health research prioritisation
Matt Westmore, NIHR
@matt_westmore matthew.westmore@nihr.ac.uk
The UK perspective on health research prioritisation Matt - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The UK perspective on health research prioritisation Matt Westmore, NIHR Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre @matt_westmore matthew.westmore@nihr.ac.uk What is priority setting? @matt_westmore matthew.westmore@nihr.ac.uk
Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre
The UK perspective on health research prioritisation
Matt Westmore, NIHR
@matt_westmore matthew.westmore@nihr.ac.uk
@matt_westmore matthew.westmore@nihr.ac.uk
Organisation and programme remits Long term strategic themes and challenges Short-medium term themed calls Targeted and specific calls
Research community specify the research question Funder specifies the research question Long term priority => Portfolio of studies Short term priority => Small number of projects @matt_westmore matthew.westmore@nihr.ac.uk
@matt_westmore matthew.westmore@nihr.ac.uk
@matt_westmore matthew.westmore@nihr.ac.uk
How quickly the research community will react Money available
@matt_westmore matthew.westmore@nihr.ac.uk
@matt_westmore matthew.westmore@nihr.ac.uk
Health related research matters
Sir Iain Chalmers and Paul Glasziou
‘Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence’, The Lancet, Volume 374, Issue 9683, Pages 86 - 89, 4 July 2009,
Funding is wasted avoidably
@matt_westmore matthew.westmore@nihr.ac.uk
Principle 1: Health-related research agendas and priorities should be set with the meaningful involvement of those who will use and be affected by health-related research. www.ensuringvalueinresearch.org
@matt_westmore matthew.westmore@nihr.ac.uk
@matt_westmore matthew.westmore@nihr.ac.uk
@matt_westmore matthew.westmore@nihr.ac.uk
@matt_westmore matthew.westmore@nihr.ac.uk
Organisation and programme remits Long term strategic themes and challenges Short-medium term themed calls Targeted and specific calls
Research community specify the research question Funder specifies the research question Long term priority => Portfolio of studies Short term priority => Small number of projects
https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2147.html
Organisation and programme remits Long term strategic themes and challenges Short-medium term themed calls Targeted and specific calls
Research community specify the research question Funder specifies the research question Long term priority => Portfolio of studies Short term priority => Small number of projects
https://www.nihr.ac.uk/funding-and-support/themed-calls/
Organisation and programme remits Long term strategic themes and challenges Short-medium term themed calls Targeted and specific calls
Research community specify the research question Funder specifies the research question Long term priority => Portfolio of studies Short term priority => Small number of projects
@matt_westmore matthew.westmore@nihr.ac.uk
@matt_westmore matthew.westmore@nihr.ac.uk
Health research platform
Research users Funders Patients and public Health Researchers Database providers and data experts Regulators Tool developers and providers
Jordan’s story (Distant future)
@matt_westmore matthew.westmore@nihr.ac.uk
@matt_westmore matthew.westmore@nihr.ac.uk
@matt_westmore matthew.westmore@nihr.ac.uk
Sir Iain Chalmers and Paul Glasziou
‘Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence’, The Lancet, Volume 374, Issue 9683, Pages 86 - 89, 4 July 2009,
Funding is wasted avoidably
Adding Value in Research framework
Th Themed Calls alls
Priority themes specified and boards determine importance of research led proposals to NHS, scientific quality feasibility and value for money.
NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme
Health Technology Assessment in the UK, Raftery J, Powell J, The Lancet Volume 382, No. 9900, p1278–1285, 12 October 2013Pa Pane nel criteria for asse ssessi ssing ng impo portanc nce
(e.g. outcomes for patients and carers, costs effectiveness to the NHS)
the time needed to perform the technology assessment and to bring about change in practice
national priorities and policy considerations, prevalence of the disease/conditions, social/ethical considerations)
Identification of potential topics (priorities)
Adding Value in Research framework
Lau 1992 (i.v. streptokinase)
Support the Evidence Based Research Network www.ebrnetwork.org
Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre Completed Partnerships Asthma Urinary incontinence Vitiligo Prostate cancer Schizophrenia Type 1 diabetes ENT aspects of balance Life after stroke Eczema Tinnitus Cleft lip and palate Lyme disease Pressure ulcers Sight loss and vision Dementia Dialysis Multiple sclerosis Hidradenitis suppurativa Acne Pre-term birth Childhood disability
Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre Current Partnerships Anaesthesia Depression Hip and knee replacement for osteoarthritis Inflammatory bowel disease Intensive care Late stillbirth Mesothelioma Neuro-oncology Palliative and end of life care Parkinson’s disease Spinal cord injury Common Shoulder problems Alopecia Renal Transplantation Surgical Treatment for Early Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis Endometrial Cancer Teenage and Young Adult cancer Mild to moderate hearing loss Alcohol related liver disease Non alcohol related liver and gall bladder diseases Cavernoma
Priority setting
UK Health Research Analysis 2009/10 – UK Clinical Research Collaboration 2012
Organisation and programme remits Long term strategic themes and challenges Short-medium term themed calls Targeted and specific calls
Research community specify the research question Funder specifies the research question Long term priority => Portfolio of studies Short term priority => Small number of projects
Organisation and programme remits Long term strategic themes and challenges Short-medium term themed calls Targeted and specific calls
Research community specify the research question Funder specifies the research question Long term priority => Portfolio of studies Short term priority => Small number of projects
2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Identifying appropriate people Determining sufficient input Differences in terminology Resource limitations Research culture Ensuring meaningful engagement Coalescing competing views
“This issue has been a challenge for my organization”
Agree Neutral Disagree @matt_westmore matthew.westmore@nihr.ac.uk
Tallon, D. et al. (2000) ‘Relation between agendas of the research community and the research consumer’, The Lancet, Vol. 355. pp. 2037-40
@matt_westmore matthew.westmore@nihr.ac.uk
@matt_westmore matthew.westmore@nihr.ac.uk
@matt_westmore matthew.westmore@nihr.ac.uk