The two film theory p g p i Interface c i c l David Reckhow CEE - - PDF document

the two film theory
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The two film theory p g p i Interface c i c l David Reckhow CEE - - PDF document

CEE 577 Lecture #32 12/28/2015 Updated: 28 December 2015 Print version Lecture #32 Toxics: Volatilization, Photolysis, Hydrolysis and Biodegradation: Recapitulation and Simplified Forms (Chapra, L41, L42, L43 & L44) David Reckhow CEE 577


slide-1
SLIDE 1

CEE 577 Lecture #32 12/28/2015 1 Lecture #32 Toxics: Volatilization, Photolysis, Hydrolysis and Biodegradation: Recapitulation and Simplified Forms

(Chapra, L41, L42, L43 & L44)

David Reckhow CEE 577 #32 1

Updated: 28 December 2015

Print version

The two film theory

David Reckhow CEE 577 #32 2

Interface pi pg cl ci

slide-2
SLIDE 2

CEE 577 Lecture #32 12/28/2015 2

Two film model

 Flux from the bulk liquid to the interface  Flux from the interface ot the bulk gas

 And the K’s are related to the molecular

diffusion coefficients by:

David Reckhow CEE 577 #32 3

J K c c

l l i l

  ( )

J K RT p p

g g a g i

  ( ) Mass transfer velocities (m/d)

K D z

l l l

K D z

g g g

Two film theory (cont.)

 We want to be able to relate flux to bulk air and

water concentrations

 interface concentrations cannot be directly measured

 to do this we must substitute expressions for the

interface concentrations

David Reckhow CEE 577 #32 4

         

l e g v

c H p v J

slide-3
SLIDE 3

CEE 577 Lecture #32 12/28/2015 3

Whitman’s 2 film model (cont.)

 According to Henry’s law:  And relating this back to the bulk concentration  now combining, we get:

David Reckhow CEE 577 #32 5

p H c

i e i

p H J K c

i e l l l

       

l l l i l i l l

c K J c c c K J     ) (

g a g g i i g a g g

K RT J p p p p RT K J     ) (           

l l l e g a g g

c K J H K RT J p

Whitman’s 2 film model (cont.)

 And re‐arranging  And recall:  now solving and equating the fluxes, we get (pg.

371 in text):

David Reckhow CEE 577 #32 6

1 1 v K RT H K

v l a e g

 

The net transfer velocity across the air- water interface (m/d)

g e a l l e g

K H RT K J c H p            1

         

l e g v

c H p v J

J c H p v

l e g v

          1

slide-4
SLIDE 4

CEE 577 Lecture #32 12/28/2015 4

Whitman’s 2 film model (cont.)

 Which can be rewritten

as:

 Now, applying it to

toxicants

 pg0  cl=cd

 And converting to the

appropriate units:

David Reckhow CEE 577 #32 7

       

g l a e e l v

K K RT H H K v

Contaminant specific Environment specific

d vc

v J  

d s v

c A v dt dc V  

' ' e g l e g l v

H K K H K K v  

Where, He’=He/RT

Unitless Henry’s Law Const

  • r

Volatilization: Parameter estimation

 Liquid film mass transfer coefficient (m/d)  Gas film mass transfer coefficient (m/d)

David Reckhow CEE 577 #32 8

25 . ,

32

2

       MW K K

O l l

25 .

18 168        MW U K

W g

Compound molecular weight Wind velocity (mps) and

H K K

a O l

2

,

 

25 .

346

 MW U K

W g

  • r
slide-5
SLIDE 5

CEE 577 Lecture #32 12/28/2015 5

Volatilization: lakes

 For lakes, correlations with Ka cannot be used  Wind velocity (Uw in m/s) drives liquid phase

resistance

 Where: Cd is the drag coefficient (~0.001), Dl is the diffusivity of the

toxicant in water, and l is the kinematic viscosity of water (0.01 cm2/s)

 This reduces to:

David Reckhow CEE 577 #32 9

w l l d l

U D C K           17 .

0.017

l l w

K DU 

From Thomann & Mueller, 1987

1470*

l l w

K DU 

For Kl in m/s For Kl in m/d For Kl in m/d

Thus, the 0.017 coefficient essentially has the units: s/cm2.

correction

David Reckhow CEE 577 #32 10

Figure 20.4, page 373 in text. (atm m3 gmol-1) correction

slide-6
SLIDE 6

CEE 577 Lecture #32 12/28/2015 6  Chapra, pg. 730

David Reckhow CEE 577 #32 11

Effect of Uw and He Box and Whisker Plots

 Useful for summarizing non‐ideal data

distributions

David Reckhow CEE 577 #32 12

x

Thickness is proportional to the square root of the number of

  • bservations

Median Lower data range Upper data range

  • utlier

Upper quartile Lower quartile

slide-7
SLIDE 7

CEE 577 Lecture #32 12/28/2015 7

Summary of sorption & volatilization effects

David Reckhow CEE 577 #32 13

 Assume

 Ta=283 K  M=200 g/mole  Uw = 5 mph  vs =91 m/yr

 Assimilation refers to general rate of removal

Summary: pesticides

 Chapra,

pg.735

David Reckhow CEE 577 #32 14

slide-8
SLIDE 8

CEE 577 Lecture #32 12/28/2015 8

Summary: PCBs

 Chapra,

pg.736

David Reckhow CEE 577 #32 15

Summary: PAHs

 Chapra,

pg.736

David Reckhow CEE 577 #32 16

slide-9
SLIDE 9

CEE 577 Lecture #32 12/28/2015 9  To next lecture

David Reckhow CEE 577 #32 17