The SYK models of non-Fermi liquids and black holes
QMATH13: Mathematical Results in Quantum Physics, Georgia Tech, Atlanta, October 9, 2016
Subir Sachdev
HARVARD
Talk online: sachdev.physics.harvard.edu
The SYK models of non-Fermi liquids and black holes QMATH13: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The SYK models of non-Fermi liquids and black holes QMATH13: Mathematical Results in Quantum Physics, Georgia Tech, Atlanta, October 9, 2016 Subir Sachdev Talk online: sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Conventional quantum matter: 1.
HARVARD
Talk online: sachdev.physics.harvard.edu
Figure credit: L. Balents
N
i,j=1
icj + . . .
j + c† jci = δij
i
ici = Q
Feynman graph expansion in tij.., and graph-by-graph average, yields exact equations in the large N limit: G(iω) = 1 iω + µ − Σ(iω) , Σ(τ) = t2G(τ) G(τ = 0−) = Q. G(ω) can be determined by solving a quadratic equation.
Now add weak interactions H = 1 (N)1/2
N
X
i,j=1
tijc†
icj +
1 (2N)3/2
N
X
i,j,k,`=1
Jij;k` c†
ic† jckc`
Jij;k` are independent random variables with Jij;k` = 0 and |Jij;k`|2 = J2. We compute the lifetime of a quasiparticle, τ↵, in an exact eigenstate ψ↵(i) of the free particle Hamitonian with energy E↵. By Fermi’s Golden rule, for E↵ at the Fermi energy 1 τ↵ = πJ2ρ3 Z dEdEdEf(E)(1 − f(E))(1 − f(E))δ(E↵ + E − E − E) = π3J2ρ3 4 T 2 where ρ0 is the density of states at the Fermi energy.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 12 13 14
J3,5,7,13
Ye, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3339 (1993)
A fermion can move only by entangling with another fermion: the Hamiltonian has “nothing but entanglement”.
To obtain a non-Fermi liquid, we set tij = 0: HSYK = 1 (2N)3/2
N
X
i,j,k,`=1
Jij;k` c†
ic† jckc` − µ
X
i
c†
ici
Q = 1 N X
i
c†
ici
HSYK is similar, and has identical properties, to the SY model.
Ye, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3339 (1993)
Ye, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3339 (1993)
Ye, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3339 (1993)
Holographic Metals and the Fractionalized Fermi Liquid
Subir Sachdev
Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA (Received 23 June 2010; published 4 October 2010) We show that there is a close correspondence between the physical properties of holographic metals near charged black holes in anti–de Sitter (AdS) space, and the fractionalized Fermi liquid phase of the lattice Anderson model. The latter phase has a ‘‘small’’ Fermi surface of conduction electrons, along with a spin liquid of local moments. This correspondence implies that certain mean-field gapless spin liquids are states of matter at nonzero density realizing the near-horizon, AdS2 R2 physics of Reissner- Nordstro ¨m black holes.
151602 (2010) P H Y S I C A L R E V I E W L E T T E R S
week 8 OCTO
105, 151602 (2010)
ζ
~ x
ζ = ∞
charge density Q T 2
AdS2 × T 2 ds2 = (d⇣2 − dt2)/⇣2 + d~ x2 Gauge field: A = (E/⇣)dt
Einstein-Maxwell theory + cosmological constant
PRB 59, 5341 (1999)
After integrating the fermions, the partition function can be writ- ten as a path integral with an action S analogous to a Luttinger- Ward functional Z = Z DG(τ1, τ2)DΣ(τ1, τ2) exp(NS) S = ln det [δ(τ1 τ2)(∂τ1 + µ) Σ(τ1, τ2)] + Z dτ1dτ2Σ(τ1, τ2) ⇥ G(τ2, τ1) + (J2/2)G2(τ2, τ1)G2(τ1, τ2) ⇤ At frequencies ⌧ J, the time derivative in the determinant is less important, and without it the path integral is invariant under the reparametrization and gauge transformations τ = f(σ) G(τ1, τ2) = [f 0(σ1)f 0(σ2)]1/4 g(σ1) g(σ2) G(σ1, σ2) Σ(τ1, τ2) = [f 0(σ1)f 0(σ2)]3/4 g(σ1) g(σ2) Σ(σ1, σ2) where f(σ) and g(σ) are arbitrary functions.
PRB 59, 5341 (1999)
After integrating the fermions, the partition function can be writ- ten as a path integral with an action S analogous to a Luttinger- Ward functional Z = Z DG(τ1, τ2)DΣ(τ1, τ2) exp(NS) S = ln det [δ(τ1 τ2)(∂τ1 + µ) Σ(τ1, τ2)] + Z dτ1dτ2Σ(τ1, τ2) ⇥ G(τ2, τ1) + (J2/2)G2(τ2, τ1)G2(τ1, τ2) ⇤ At frequencies ⌧ J, the time derivative in the determinant is less important, and without it the path integral is invariant under the reparametrization and gauge transformations τ = f(σ) G(τ1, τ2) = [f 0(σ1)f 0(σ2)]1/4 g(σ1) g(σ2) G(σ1, σ2) Σ(τ1, τ2) = [f 0(σ1)f 0(σ2)]3/4 g(σ1) g(σ2) Σ(σ1, σ2) where f(σ) and g(σ) are arbitrary functions.
Let us write the large N saddle point solutions of S as Gs(τ1 − τ2) ∼ (τ1 − τ2)1/2 , Σs(τ1 − τ2) ∼ (τ1 − τ2)3/2. These are not invariant under the reparametrization symmetry but are in- variant only under a SL(2,R) subgroup under which f(τ) = aτ + b cτ + d , ad − bc = 1. So the (approximate) reparametrization symmetry is spontaneously broken. Reparametrization zero mode Expand about the saddle point by writing G(τ1, τ2) = [f 0(τ1)f 0(τ2)]1/4Gs(f(τ1) − f(τ2)) (and similarly for Σ) and obtain an effective action for f(τ). This action does not vanish because of the time derivative in the determinant which is not reparameterization invariant.
See also A. Kitaev, unpublished, and J. Polchinski and
Let us write the large N saddle point solutions of S as Gs(τ1 − τ2) ∼ (τ1 − τ2)1/2 , Σs(τ1 − τ2) ∼ (τ1 − τ2)3/2. These are not invariant under the reparametrization symmetry but are in- variant only under a SL(2,R) subgroup under which f(τ) = aτ + b cτ + d , ad − bc = 1. So the (approximate) reparametrization symmetry is spontaneously broken. Reparametrization zero mode Expand about the saddle point by writing G(τ1, τ2) = [f 0(τ1)f 0(τ2)]1/4Gs(f(τ1) − f(τ2)) (and similarly for Σ) and obtain an effective action for f(τ). This action does not vanish because of the time derivative in the determinant which is not reparameterization invariant.
See also A. Kitaev, unpublished, and J. Polchinski and
See also A. Kitaev, unpublished, and J. Polchinski and
Let us write the large N saddle point solutions of S as Gs(τ1 − τ2) ∼ (τ1 − τ2)1/2 , Σs(τ1 − τ2) ∼ (τ1 − τ2)3/2. These are not invariant under the reparametrization symmetry but are in- variant only under a SL(2,R) subgroup under which f(τ) = aτ + b cτ + d , ad − bc = 1. So the (approximate) reparametrization symmetry is spontaneously broken. Reparametrization zero mode Expand about the saddle point by writing G(τ1, τ2) = [f 0(τ1)f 0(τ2)]1/4Gs(f(τ1) − f(τ2)) (and similarly for Σ) and obtain an effective action for f(τ). This action does not vanish because of the time derivative in the determinant which is not reparameterization invariant.
Wenbo Fu, Yingfei Gu, S. Sachdev, unpublished
T
µ
With g(⌧) = eiφ(τ), the action for (⌧) and f(⌧) = 1 ⇡T tan(⇡T(⌧ + ✏(⌧)) fluctuations is Sφ,f = K 2 Z 1/T d⌧(@τ + i(2⇡ET)@τ✏)2 −
Z 1/T d⌧ {f, ⌧}, where {f, ⌧} is the Schwarzian: {f, ⌧} ≡ f 000 f 0 − 3 2 ✓f 00 f 0 ◆2 .
AdS black hole of Einstein-Maxwell theory in 4 dimensions, after a dimensional direction to AdS2 × T 2, valid when the temperature is smaller than a scale set by the size of T 2.
in the SYK model and in the gravity theory. τL = 1 2π ~ kBT
Wenbo Fu, Yingfei Gu, S. Sachdev, unpublished
With g(⌧) = eiφ(τ), the action for (⌧) and f(⌧) = 1 ⇡T tan(⇡T(⌧ + ✏(⌧)) fluctuations is Sφ,f = K 2 Z 1/T d⌧(@τ + i(2⇡ET)@τ✏)2 −
Z 1/T d⌧ {f, ⌧}, where {f, ⌧} is the Schwarzian: {f, ⌧} ≡ f 000 f 0 − 3 2 ✓f 00 f 0 ◆2 .