The Strategic Reperfusion Early After STEMI study Implications for - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the strategic reperfusion early after stemi study
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Strategic Reperfusion Early After STEMI study Implications for - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Strategic Reperfusion Early After STEMI study Implications for clinical practice Robert C. Welsh, MD, FRCPC Associate Professor of Medicine Director, Adult Cardiac Catheterization and Interventional Cardiology Co-Chair, Vital Heart


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The Strategic Reperfusion Early After STEMI study Implications for clinical practice

Robert C. Welsh, MD, FRCPC

Associate Professor of Medicine Director, Adult Cardiac Catheterization and Interventional Cardiology Co-Chair, Vital Heart Response Co-director, U of A Chest Pain Program

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Disclosures – past 5 years Research funding:

‐ Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Eli Lilly, Johnson and Johnson, Pfizer, Portola, Regado, Roche, sanofi aventis

Consultant/honorarium:

‐ Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Edwards Lifesciences, Eli Lilly, Medtronic, Roche, sanofi-aventis

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Reperfusion Therapy

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Reperfusion Therapy

Experiments in animal models

  • Ischemic necrosis begins in the subendocardium within

20 minutes of coronary occlusion

  • Reperfusion achieved within the first hour salvages

nearly two-thirds of the myocardium at risk thereafter abrupt declining such that little or no salvage is evident after three to six hours of ischemia.

Reimer KA, Lowe JE, Rasmussen MM, et al. The wavefront phenomenon of ischemic cell death. 1. Myocardial infarct size vs duration of coronary occlusion in dogs. Circulation 1977; 56:786–794.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Primary PCI is the dominant reperfusion strategy but...

  • 1. Regional STEMI programs have diminished reperfusion treatment

delay but timely primary PCI remains improbable for many

– Primary PCI is a complex, multi-disciplinary and time-sensitive intervention only available in a minority of hospitals (one out of five U.S.

hospitals have primary PCI capacity)

  • 2. The acceptable delay for withholding pharmacological

reperfusion in anticipation of PCI is not static and is dependent upon individual patient and temporal characteristics

– In patients with high-risk clinical presentation and/or characteristics that predict complications of pharmacological reperfusion; a longer delay to mechanical reperfusion is justified – In early presenting patients (<3 hours) the acceptable delay is abbreviated

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Door-to-Balloon Time and Mortality in Patients Hospitalized with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Is 90 Minutes Fast Enough?

Rathore SS, et al, Am J Cardiol. 2009 Nov 1;104(9):1198-203 Time (min) 30-d Mortality 1-Year Mortality Adjusted Adjusted 30 7.3 (6.1–8.6) 8.8 (7.0–10.7) 60 8.8 (7.8–9.9) 12.9 (11.6–14.2) 90 10.7 (9.8–11.6) 16.6 (15.6–17.6) 120 12.8 (12.0–13.5) 19.9 (19.1–20.8) 150 15.0 (14.3–15.7) 22.9 (22.0–23.7) 180 17.2 (16.4–18.0) 25.5 (24.5–26.5) 210 19.4 (18.3–20.4) 27.7 (26.5–28.9) 240 21.4 (20.1–22.6) 29.5 (28.1–30.9) 270 23.2 (21.7–24.6) 30.9 (29.4–32.5)

1 year mortality 30 day mortality

N=1932 N=1932

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Which Early ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Therapy?

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Primary 30-day Composite

30-day Death, Re-MI, Refractory Ischemia, CHF, Cardiogenic Shock or Major ventricular arrhythmia

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Days 30 25 20 15 10 5 Primary efficacy endpoint (%) A 25.0% C 23.0% B 24.0%

Armstrong PW. Eur Heart J. 2006 Jul;27(13):1530-8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Death & Re-MI 30-days

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Days 30-day Death / MI (%) 30 25 20 15 10 5 A 13.0% B 6.7% C 4.0% p=0.02 log rank A vs C

Armstrong PW. Eur Heart J. 2006 Jul;27(13):1530-8

slide-10
SLIDE 10

A pooled analysis of an early fibrinolytic strategy versus expediated primary PCI from CAPTIM and WEST

Sx to Rand’n<2h n=364 Sx to Rand’n≥2h n=275 Sx to Rand’n≥2h n=234 Sx to Rand’n<2h n=289

Westerhout et al, Am Heart J. 2011 Feb;161(2):283-90

slide-11
SLIDE 11

p=0.021 FL<2h versus PCI<2h

A pooled analysis of an early fibrinolytic strategy versus primary PCI from CAPTIM and WEST One year survival by time to treatment

Westerhout et al, Am Heart J. 2011 Feb;161(2):283-90

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

STREAM

STRATEGIC REPERFUSION EARLY AFTER MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013
slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

A strategy of early fibrinolysis followed by coronary angiography within 6-24 hours or rescue PCI if needed was compared with standard primary PCI in STEMI patients with at least 2 mm ST-elevation in 2 contiguous leads presenting within 3 hours of symptom

  • nset and unable to undergo primary PCI within 1 hour.

STUDY AIM

Armstrong PW et al. NEJM, 2013

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

no lytic

STUDY PROTOCOL

RANDOMIZATION 1:1 by IVRS, OPEN LABEL Ambulance/ER Primary endpoint: composite of all cause death or shock or CHF or reinfarction up to day 30 ECG at 90 min: ST resolution ≥ 50% Standard primary PCI

Aspirin Clopidogrel: LD 300 mg + 75 mg QD Enoxaparin: 30 mg IV + 1 mg/kg SC Q12h

Antiplatelet and antithrombin treatment according to local standards angio >6 to 24 hrs PCI/CABG if indicated immediate angio + rescue PCI if indicated YES NO Strategy A: pharmaco-invasive Strategy B: primary PCI

Aspirin Clopidogrel: 75 mg QD Enoxaparin: 0.75 mg/kg SC Q12h

PCI Hospital STEMI <3 hrs from onset symptoms, PPCI <60 min not possible, 2 mm ST-elevation in 2 leads ≥75y: ½ dose TNK <75y:full dose Armstrong PW et al. NEJM, 2013

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

no lytic

STUDY PROTOCOL

RANDOMIZATION 1:1 by IVRS, OPEN LABEL Ambulance/ER Primary endpoint: composite of all cause death or shock or CHF or reinfarction up to day 30 ECG at 90 min: ST resolution ≥ 50% Standard primary PCI

Aspirin Clopidogrel: LD 300 mg + 75 mg QD Enoxaparin: 30 mg IV + 1 mg/kg SC Q12h

Antiplatelet and antithrombin treatment according to local standards angio >6 to 24 hrs PCI/CABG if indicated immediate angio + rescue PCI if indicated YES NO Strategy A: pharmaco-invasive Strategy B: primary PCI

Aspirin Clopidogrel: 75 mg QD Enoxaparin: 0.75 mg/kg SC Q12h

PCI Hospital STEMI <3 hrs from onset symptoms, PPCI <60 min not possible, 2 mm ST-elevation in 2 leads ≥75y: ½ dose TNK <75y:full dose

After 20% of the planned recruitment, the TNK dose was reduced by 50% among patients ≥75 years of age.

Armstrong PW et al. NEJM, 2013

slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS (1)

Pharmaco-invasive (N=944) PPCI (N=948)

Age (yrs)

59.7 (12.4) 59.6 (12.5)

Age ≥75 y (%)

14% 13%

Women (%)

21% 22%

Weight (kg)

80.5 (14.8) 80.0 (14.9)

Killip class (%) I II/III IV

94% 6% <1% 94% 5% <1%

Heart rate (bpm)

74.9 (18.4) 75.5 (18.1)

Systolic BP (mmHg)

135.0 (22.7) 135.9 (23.3)

Infarct location Anterior Inferior Other

48% 50% 2% 46% 53% 2%

Data are mean (SD) or %

Armstrong PW et al. NEJM, 2013

slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS (2)

Pharmaco-invasive (N=944) PPCI (N=948) Previous MI

9% 10%

Previous PCI

6.4% 8.8%

Previous CABG

<1% <1%

Previous congestive heart failure

<1% 2%

Hypertension

47% 44%

Diabetes

12% 13%

Data are %

Armstrong PW et al. NEJM, 2013

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

62 61

1 Hour 2 Hours

n=1892

29 9

Rx TNK

31 86

Sx onset

Rx PPCI

100 min

178 min

MEDIAN TIMES TO TREATMENT (min)

1st Medical contact

78 min difference

Randomize IVRS

Armstrong PW et al. NEJM, 2013

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

62 61

1 Hour 2 Hours

n=1892

29 9

Rx TNK

31 86

Sx onset

Rx PPCI

MEDIAN TIMES TO TREATMENT (min)

1st Medical contact Randomize IVRS

Armstrong PW et al. NEJM, 2013

36% Rescue PCI at 2.2h 64% non-urgent cath at 17h

178 min

100 min

slide-21
SLIDE 21
  • F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

TIMI FLOW RATES

TIMI before PCI TIMI after PCI P<0.001 P=0.41

Armstrong PW et al. NEJM, 2013

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

INVASIVE PROCEDURES

Pharmaco-invasive (N=944) PPCI (N=948) P-value PCI performed 80% 90% <0.001 Stents deployed 96% 96% 0.95 CABG performed 4.7% 2.1% 0.002

Armstrong PW et al. NEJM, 2013

slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

PRIMARY ENDPOINT

TNK 12.4% PPCI 14.3% TNK vs PPCI Relative Risk 0.86, 95%CI (0.68-1.09) p=0.24 Dth/Shock/CHF/ReMI (%)

Armstrong PW et al. NEJM, 2013

All cause death or shock or CHF or reinfarction up to day 30

slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

SINGLE ENDPOINTS UP TO 30 DAYS

Pharmaco-invasive (N=944) PPCI (N=948) P-value All cause death Cardiac death (43/939) 4.6% (31/939) 3.3% (42/946) 4.4% (32/946) 3.4% 0.88 0.92 Congestive heart failure (57/939) 6.1% (72/943) 7.6% 0.18 Cardiogenic shock (41/939) 4.4% (56/944) 5.9% 0.13 Reinfarction (23/938) 2.5% (21/944) 2.2% 0.74

Armstrong PW et al. NEJM, 2013

slide-25
SLIDE 25
  • F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

IN-HOSPITAL BLEEDING COMPLICATIONS

Pharmaco-invasive (N=944) PPCI (N=948) P-value Major non-ICH bleeding 6.5% 4.8% 0.11 Minor non-ICH bleeding 21.8% 20.2% 0.40 Blood transfusions 2.9% 2.3% 0.47

Armstrong PW et al. NEJM, 2013

slide-26
SLIDE 26
  • F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

> Subgroup analyses for primary endpoint within 30 days

Relative Risk (95%CI) OVERALL Age <75 years ≥75 years P(interaction) 0.63 0.81 0.71 0.16 0.23 0.06 Time to randomization 0 to <2h ≥2h Male Female Systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg 100 to <140 mmHg 140 to <160 mmHg ≥160 mmHg Killip class I II-IV Anterior MI Inferior MI Other MI TNK Better PPCI Better

Armstrong PW et al. NEJM, 2013

slide-27
SLIDE 27
  • F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

Subgroup analyses for primary endpoint within 30 days

Relative Risk (95%CI) Hypertension, Yes P(interaction) 0.34 0.24 0.68 0.13 Diabetes, Yes No Place of randomization, Ambulance Community hospital Before Amendment TNK Better PPCI Better

> >

No Weight, <60 kg 60 to <90 kg ≥90 kg TIMI Risk Score, <5 points ≥5 points After Amendment 0.35 0.71 p=0.07

Armstrong PW et al. NEJM, 2013

slide-28
SLIDE 28
  • F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

STROKE RATES

Pharmaco-invasive PPCI P-value

TOTAL POPULATION (N=1892) Total stroke fatal stroke Haemorrhagic stroke fatal haemorrhagic stroke 15/939 (1.60%) 7/939 (0.75%) 9/939 (0.96%) 6/939 (0.64%) 5/946 (0.53%) 4/946 (0.42%) 2/946 (0.21%) 2/946 (0.21%) 0.03 0.39 0.04 0.18 POST AMENDMENT POPULATION (N=1503) Total stroke fatal stroke Haemorrhagic stroke fatal haemorrhagic stroke 9/747 (1.20%) 3/747 (0.40%) 4/747 (0.54%) 2/747 (0.27%) 5/756 (0.66%) 4/756 (0.53%) 2/756 (0.26%) 2/756 (0.26%) 0.30 >0.999 0.45 >0.999

Armstrong PW et al. NEJM, 2013

slide-29
SLIDE 29
  • F. Van de Werf, ACC 2013

CONCLUSIONS - STREAM

A strategy of fibrinolysis with bolus tenecteplase and contemporary antithrombotic therapy given before transport to a PCI-capable hospital coupled with timely coronary angiography:

  • circumvents the need for an urgent procedure in about two

thirds of fibrinolytic treated STEMI patients.

  • is associated with a small increased risk of intracranial

bleeding (not observed post amendment).

  • is as effective as primary PCI in STEMI patients presenting

within 3 hours of symptom onset who cannot undergo primary PCI within one hour of first medical contact.

Armstrong PW et al. NEJM, 2013

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Clinical implications Long Term Impact of Heart Failure Post MI

Ezekowitz JA et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jan 6;53(1):13-20.

40%

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Patient Risk

Tertiary hospital

Vital Heart Response Contemporary Management of Acute MI

Community hospital

Rescue PCI

Pre-hospital fibrinolysis Pre-hospital triage for PCI

  • r in-hospital fibrinolysis

Pre-hospital fibrinolysis

higher lower

Adapted from Welsh et al AHJ, Jan 2003

Pre-hospital ambulance

Transfer for Primary PCI

Pre-hospital triage for in-hospital fibrinolysis

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Vital Heart Response -Reperfusion Strategy

Metropolitan (MP) and Non-Metropolitan patients (NM)

Shavadia et al. CJC, 2013

slide-33
SLIDE 33

In-hospital outcomes

Metro (n=1990) Nonmetro (n=1602) P Death n,(%) 136 (6.8) 69 (4.3) 0.001 Congestive heart failure n,(%) 129 (6.5) 94 (5.9) 0.448 Cardiogenic shock n,(%) 247 (12.4) 202 (12.6) 0.859 Cardiac arrest n,(%) 227 (11.4) 180 (11.2) 0.872 Re-infarction n,(%) 13 (0.65) 10 (0.62) 0.914 Cerebrovascular event n,(%) Hemorrhage n Ischemic n 21 (1) 9 12 11 (0.67) 8 3 0.838 0.055 Composite of death, re-MI, card arrest and congestive heart failure n,(%) 335 (16.8) 242 (15.1) 0.161

Shavadia et al. CJC, 2013

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Multivariable logistic regression model5 of the composite event

  • f death, re-MI, cardiogenic shock and congestive heart failure

5The overall model is significant (LR χ2 (6) = 93.25 with p-value < 0.0001). The model fits the data

well (Hosmer-Lemeshow χ2 (6) = 1.17 with p-value = 0.979; C-statistic=0.66).

Adjusted OR (95% CI) p-value Age (yrs) 1.03 (1.02, 1.04) < 0.001 Hypercholesterolemia 0.74 (0.60, 0.90) 0.003 Diabetes 1.75 (1.38, 2.21) < 0.001 Non-metropolitan site 0.81 (0.50, 1.30) 0.37 Fibrinolysis 0.41 (0.26, 0.67) < 0.0012

Shavadia et al. CJC, 2013

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Vital Heart Response Clinical impact of ‘aborted’ STEMI

* P <= 0.05 comparison between aborted MI vs. STEMI

* * *

N= 357 1878 206 1005 151 873

Bainey et al. ACC 2013, abstract

slide-36
SLIDE 36

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-6 Time of symptom onset to reperfusion therapy

Temporal analysis of aborted MI rates according to reperfusion therapy

PCI Fibrinolysis Total

P total trend <0.001

Bainey et al. ACC 2013, abstract

Vital Heart Response

slide-37
SLIDE 37
  • 1. STREAM supports maintenance of a dual

STEMI reperfusion strategy within appropriately designed systems of care

  • 2. In patients ≥ 75 yrs. ½ TNK may (should) be

considered

  • 3. Additional analysis including CVC ECG core

lab analysis and 1 year follow up will further define optimal STEMI reperfusion strategies

STREAM Implications for clinical practice