the second level borel isomorphism problem an encounter
play

The Second Level Borel Isomorphism Problem An Encounter of Recursion - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

. The Second Level Borel Isomorphism Problem An Encounter of Recursion Theory and Infinite Dimensional Topology . . . Takayuki Kihara Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (JAIST) Joint Work with Arno Pauly (University of


  1. . The Second Level Borel Isomorphism Problem — An Encounter of Recursion Theory and Infinite Dimensional Topology — . . . Takayuki Kihara Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (JAIST) Joint Work with Arno Pauly (University of Cambridge, UK) Constructivism and Computability 2015, Kanazawa Takayuki Kihara The Second Level Borel Isomorphism Problem

  2. . . Let B α ( X ) be the Banach space of bounded real valued Baire class α functions on X w.r.t. the supremum norm. . Main Problem (Motto Ros) . . Suppose that X is a Polish space which cannot be written as a union of countably many finite dimensional subspaces. Then, is B n ( X ) linearly isometric to B n ([ 0 , 1 ] N ) for some n ∈ N ? . . . Takayuki Kihara The Second Level Borel Isomorphism Problem

  3. Let B α ( X ) be the Banach space of bounded real valued Baire class α functions on X w.r.t. the supremum norm. . Main Problem (Motto Ros) . . Suppose that X is a Polish space which cannot be written as a union of countably many finite dimensional subspaces. Then, is B n ( X ) linearly isometric to B n ([ 0 , 1 ] N ) for some n ∈ N ? . . . . We apply Recursion Theory (a.k.a. Computability Theory) to solve Motto Ros’ problem! More specifically, an invariant which we call degree co-spectrum , a collection of Turing ideals realized as lower Turing cones of points of a Polish space, plays a key role. The key idea is measuring the quantity of all possible Scott ideals ( ω -models of RCA + WKL ) realized within the degree co-spectrum (on a cone) of a given space. . . . Takayuki Kihara The Second Level Borel Isomorphism Problem

  4. . . . . . . . . . . . . Background in Abstract Banach Space Theory . . The basic theory on the Banach spaces B α ( X ) has been studied by Bade, Dachiell, Jayne and others in 1970s. Suppose that X is an uncountable Polish space: B α ([ 0 , 1 ]) ≃ li B α ( X ) for α ≥ ω . If X is a union of countably many finite dim. subspaces B n ([ 0 , 1 ]) ≃ li B n ( X ) � li B n ([ 0 , 1 ] N ) for 2 ≤ n < ω , (Motto Ros) Does there exist an X such that B n ([ 0 , 1 ]) � li B n ( X ) � li B n ([ 0 , 1 ] N ) for 2 ≤ n < ω ? . . . Takayuki Kihara The Second Level Borel Isomorphism Problem

  5. . Background in Abstract Banach Space Theory . . The basic theory on the Banach spaces B α ( X ) has been studied by Bade, Dachiell, Jayne and others in 1970s. Suppose that X is an uncountable Polish space: B α ([ 0 , 1 ]) ≃ li B α ( X ) for α ≥ ω . If X is a union of countably many finite dim. subspaces B n ([ 0 , 1 ]) ≃ li B n ( X ) � li B n ([ 0 , 1 ] N ) for 2 ≤ n < ω , (Motto Ros) Does there exist an X such that B n ([ 0 , 1 ]) � li B n ( X ) � li B n ([ 0 , 1 ] N ) for 2 ≤ n < ω ? . . . . (Jayne) An α -th level Borel isomorphism is a bijection f : X → Y s.t. E ⊆ X is of additive Borel class α iff f [ E ] ⊆ Y is of additive Borel class α . . . . By Jayne’s theorem (1974), Motto Ros’ problem is reformulated as: . The Second-Level Borel Isomorphism Problem . . Find an uncountable Polish space which is second-level Borel isomorphic neither to [ 0 , 1 ] nor to [ 0 , 1 ] N . . . . Takayuki Kihara The Second Level Borel Isomorphism Problem

  6. . . . . . Consequently, Motto Ros’ problem is the problem on the second level Borel isomorphic classification of Polish spaces. . . . Takayuki Kihara The Second Level Borel Isomorphism Problem

  7. . . . Consequently, Motto Ros’ problem is the problem on the second level Borel isomorphic classification of Polish spaces. . . . . “We show that any two uncountable Polish spaces that are countable unions of sets of finite dimension are Borel isomorphic at the second level, and consequently at all higher levels. Thus the first level and zero-th level (i.e. homeomorphisms) appear to be the only levels giving rise to nontrivial classifications of Polish spaces.” J. E. Jayne and C. A. Rogers, Borel isomorphisms at the first level I, Mathematika 26 (1979), 125-156. . . . Takayuki Kihara The Second Level Borel Isomorphism Problem

  8. . Consequently, Motto Ros’ problem is the problem on the second level Borel isomorphic classification of Polish spaces. . . . . “We show that any two uncountable Polish spaces that are countable unions of sets of finite dimension are Borel isomorphic at the second level, and consequently at all higher levels. Thus the first level and zero-th level (i.e. homeomorphisms) appear to be the only levels giving rise to nontrivial classifications of Polish spaces.” J. E. Jayne and C. A. Rogers, Borel isomorphisms at the first level I, Mathematika 26 (1979), 125-156. . . . . At that time, almost no nontrivial proper infinite dimensional Polish spaces had been discovered yet. Therefore, it had been expected that the structure of proper infinite dim. Polish spaces is simple . . . Takayuki Kihara The Second Level Borel Isomorphism Problem

  9. . Consequently, Motto Ros’ problem is the problem on the second level Borel isomorphic classification of Polish spaces. . . . . “We show that any two uncountable Polish spaces that are countable unions of sets of finite dimension are Borel isomorphic at the second level, and consequently at all higher levels. Thus the first level and zero-th level (i.e. homeomorphisms) appear to be the only levels giving rise to nontrivial classifications of Polish spaces.” J. E. Jayne and C. A. Rogers, Borel isomorphisms at the first level I, Mathematika 26 (1979), 125-156. . . . . At that time, almost no nontrivial proper infinite dimensional Polish spaces had been discovered yet. Therefore, it had been expected that the structure of proper infinite dim. Polish spaces is simple — this conclusion was too hasty! By using Recursion Theory, we reveal that the second level Borel isomorphic classification of Polish spaces is highly nontrivial! . . . Takayuki Kihara The Second Level Borel Isomorphism Problem

  10. . . . . Main Theorem (K. and Pauly) . . There exists a 2 ℵ 0 collection ( X α ) α< 2 ℵ 0 of topological spaces s.t. . . X α is an infinite dimensional Cantor manifold for any α < 2 ℵ 0 , 1 i.e., X α is compact metrizable, and if X α \ C = U 1 ⊔ U 2 for some nonempty open U 1 , U 2 , then C must be infinite dimensional. . . . Takayuki Kihara The Second Level Borel Isomorphism Problem

  11. . . . Main Theorem (K. and Pauly) . . There exists a 2 ℵ 0 collection ( X α ) α< 2 ℵ 0 of topological spaces s.t. . . X α is an infinite dimensional Cantor manifold for any α < 2 ℵ 0 , 1 i.e., X α is compact metrizable, and if X α \ C = U 1 ⊔ U 2 for some nonempty open U 1 , U 2 , then C must be infinite dimensional. . . X α possesses Haver’s property C (hence, weakly infinite 2 dimensional) for any α < 2 ℵ 0 . . . . Takayuki Kihara The Second Level Borel Isomorphism Problem

  12. . . Main Theorem (K. and Pauly) . . There exists a 2 ℵ 0 collection ( X α ) α< 2 ℵ 0 of topological spaces s.t. . . X α is an infinite dimensional Cantor manifold for any α < 2 ℵ 0 , 1 i.e., X α is compact metrizable, and if X α \ C = U 1 ⊔ U 2 for some nonempty open U 1 , U 2 , then C must be infinite dimensional. . . X α possesses Haver’s property C (hence, weakly infinite 2 dimensional) for any α < 2 ℵ 0 . . . 0 0 If α � β , then ( X α , Σ n ( X α )) is not isomorphic to ( X β , Σ n ( X β )) 3 ∼ ∼ for any n ∈ ω , i.e., X α is not n -th level isomorphic to X β . . . . Takayuki Kihara The Second Level Borel Isomorphism Problem

  13. . Main Theorem (K. and Pauly) . . There exists a 2 ℵ 0 collection ( X α ) α< 2 ℵ 0 of topological spaces s.t. . . X α is an infinite dimensional Cantor manifold for any α < 2 ℵ 0 , 1 i.e., X α is compact metrizable, and if X α \ C = U 1 ⊔ U 2 for some nonempty open U 1 , U 2 , then C must be infinite dimensional. . . X α possesses Haver’s property C (hence, weakly infinite 2 dimensional) for any α < 2 ℵ 0 . . . 0 0 If α � β , then ( X α , Σ n ( X α )) is not isomorphic to ( X β , Σ n ( X β )) 3 ∼ ∼ for any n ∈ ω , i.e., X α is not n -th level isomorphic to X β . . . If α � β , then the Banach space B n ( X α ) is not linearly 4 isometric to B n ( X β ) for any n ∈ ω . . . . Takayuki Kihara The Second Level Borel Isomorphism Problem

  14. . . . . Decomposition Theorem (K.; Gregoriades and K.; K. and Ng) . . Let X be a Souslin space and Y be a Polish space. If f : X → Y is a function s.t. 0 m ( Y ) ⇒ f − 1 [ A ] ∈ Σ 0 A ⊆ Σ n ( X ) ∼ ∼ then, there exists a countable partition ( X i ) i ∈ ω of X such that the 0 restriction f | X i is Σ n − m + 1 -measurable for every i ∈ ω . . . . ∼ Takayuki Kihara The Second Level Borel Isomorphism Problem

  15. . Decomposition Theorem (K.; Gregoriades and K.; K. and Ng) . . Let X be a Souslin space and Y be a Polish space. If f : X → Y is a function s.t. 0 m ( Y ) ⇒ f − 1 [ A ] ∈ Σ 0 A ⊆ Σ n ( X ) ∼ ∼ then, there exists a countable partition ( X i ) i ∈ ω of X such that the 0 restriction f | X i is Σ n − m + 1 -measurable for every i ∈ ω . . . . ∼ . Proof Methods . . K. showed a weaker version by applying the Shore-Slaman join theorem on the Turing degrees (the Kumabe-Slaman forcing). . . . Takayuki Kihara The Second Level Borel Isomorphism Problem

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend