SLIDE 1 The Relevance of the Most Irrelevant BHA and Drillstring Component
(Why I decided to mess with the conventional blade stabiliser) Tom Newman March 10th 2016
SLIDE 2 Directional Problems
BAT-2 Downhole Dynamics
Poor BHA response, energy transfer & MWD Interference
BHA Damage
MWD/LWD, PDM, RSS failures, excessive stabiliser wear
Poor Hole Quality
Poor energy transfer, trip time (ledges), csg running issues
Vibration Related Issues
SLIDE 3 Whirl as Shape
Is a sine wave Bit tilted by wave, reduces ROP & increases MSE Shape crosses wellbore = quiet (nodes) Mechanical Specific Energy best indicator
Source: Fred Dupriest, Thus the Lowly Stabiliser
SLIDE 4
Fit for Purpose?
SLIDE 5
Fit for Purpose Solution?
SLIDE 6
Poor Hydrodynamic Design
SLIDE 7
Static Flow Modelling Research
SLIDE 8
Rotational 100 rpm Flow Modelling Research
SLIDE 9
Switchblade
Weight Transfer Hydrodynamic Design Enhanced Stabiliser
SLIDE 10
Retention Method Research
SLIDE 11 Pull and push Test blade Test bolts Test bolts
SLIDE 12 Final Retention System
An integral, interference fit pin, with precision radii and a locking bolt array
SLIDE 13 Run History
Run in Dutch North Sea, UAE, KSA, France, Turkey, and Belgium
Less balling up, stick/slip, vibration & little wear with more stable torque. All other BHA components in good condition.
Wells drilled 20 Hours drilled > 7,000 hrs Meters drilled > 56,000m / 183,000ft
SLIDE 14
Case History: Weight Transfer & Less Balling
Dutch North Sea OBJECTIVE: 16" hole section 659m - 1,566m Motor BHA (1.15° ABH) + 2 x Switchblades 15" & 15 ¼" Build to and hold @ 25˚ inclination CONCERNS: Packing off Balling
SLIDE 15
Case History: Weight Transfer & Less Balling
DRILLING OBSERVATIONS: No motor stalls No hanging up Good tool face control POOH OBSERVATIONS: No clay ball problems No packing off
SLIDE 16
Fixedblade
Known gauge ODs Tangent sections Lower cost applications
SLIDE 17
Case History: Weight Transfer & Less Balling
Western Gulf Region OBJECTIVE: 8 1/2" hole section 6,428ft – 9,598ft Motor BHA (1.50° ABH) + 1 x Fixedblade 7 7/8" (8") Hold horizontal with azimuthal left turn @ 27˚ CONCERNS: Sliding ROP Torque levels
SLIDE 18
Case History: Weight Transfer & Less Balling
Run Results (Spiralblade vs. Fixedblade) Backflow induced packing off (L0 above) Minimal surface weight transfer / hang up POOH No motor stalls
SLIDE 19 Cross Section Comparison
To see full simulation go to: https://youtu.be/eRcm44-JVok
SLIDE 20
Questions?