The Relevance of the Most Irrelevant BHA and Drillstring Component - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the relevance of the most irrelevant bha and drillstring
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Relevance of the Most Irrelevant BHA and Drillstring Component - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Relevance of the Most Irrelevant BHA and Drillstring Component (Why I decided to mess with the conventional blade stabiliser) Tom Newman March 10 th 2016 BAT-2 Downhole Dynamics Vibration Related Issues Directional Problems Poor BHA


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The Relevance of the Most Irrelevant BHA and Drillstring Component

(Why I decided to mess with the conventional blade stabiliser) Tom Newman March 10th 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Directional Problems

BAT-2 Downhole Dynamics

Poor BHA response, energy transfer & MWD Interference

BHA Damage

MWD/LWD, PDM, RSS failures, excessive stabiliser wear

Poor Hole Quality

Poor energy transfer, trip time (ledges), csg running issues

Vibration Related Issues

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Whirl as Shape

Is a sine wave Bit tilted by wave, reduces ROP & increases MSE Shape crosses wellbore = quiet (nodes) Mechanical Specific Energy best indicator

Source: Fred Dupriest, Thus the Lowly Stabiliser

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Fit for Purpose?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Fit for Purpose Solution?

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Poor Hydrodynamic Design

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Static Flow Modelling Research

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Rotational 100 rpm Flow Modelling Research

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Switchblade

Weight Transfer Hydrodynamic Design Enhanced Stabiliser

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Retention Method Research

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Pull and push Test blade Test bolts Test bolts

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Final Retention System

An integral, interference fit pin, with precision radii and a locking bolt array

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Run History

Run in Dutch North Sea, UAE, KSA, France, Turkey, and Belgium

Less balling up, stick/slip, vibration & little wear with more stable torque. All other BHA components in good condition.

Wells drilled 20 Hours drilled > 7,000 hrs Meters drilled > 56,000m / 183,000ft

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Case History: Weight Transfer & Less Balling

Dutch North Sea OBJECTIVE: 16" hole section 659m - 1,566m Motor BHA (1.15° ABH) + 2 x Switchblades 15" & 15 ¼" Build to and hold @ 25˚ inclination CONCERNS: Packing off Balling

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Case History: Weight Transfer & Less Balling

DRILLING OBSERVATIONS: No motor stalls No hanging up Good tool face control POOH OBSERVATIONS: No clay ball problems No packing off

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Fixedblade

Known gauge ODs Tangent sections Lower cost applications

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Case History: Weight Transfer & Less Balling

Western Gulf Region OBJECTIVE: 8 1/2" hole section 6,428ft – 9,598ft Motor BHA (1.50° ABH) + 1 x Fixedblade 7 7/8" (8") Hold horizontal with azimuthal left turn @ 27˚ CONCERNS: Sliding ROP Torque levels

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Case History: Weight Transfer & Less Balling

Run Results (Spiralblade vs. Fixedblade) Backflow induced packing off (L0 above) Minimal surface weight transfer / hang up POOH No motor stalls

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Cross Section Comparison

To see full simulation go to: https://youtu.be/eRcm44-JVok

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Questions?