CDD ambiguity and irrelevant CDD ambiguity and irrelevant - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

cdd ambiguity and irrelevant cdd ambiguity and irrelevant
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

CDD ambiguity and irrelevant CDD ambiguity and irrelevant - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CDD ambiguity and irrelevant CDD ambiguity and irrelevant deformations of 2D QFT deformations of 2D QFT IGST2017, Paris Tateo Roberto Based on: M. Caselle, D. Fioravanti, F. Gliozzi, JHEP [arXiv:1305.1278] A. Cavagli, S. Negro, I.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

CDD ambiguity and irrelevant CDD ambiguity and irrelevant deformations of 2D QFT deformations of 2D QFT

Tateo Roberto

Based on:

  • M. Caselle, D. Fioravanti, F. Gliozzi, JHEP [arXiv:1305.1278]
  • A. Cavaglià, S. Negro, I. Szécsényi, JHEP [arXiv:1608.05534]

Torino

IGST2017, Paris

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Other relevant references

A.B. Zamolodchikov, Expectation value of composite field TT in two- dimensional quantum field theory, [hep-th/0401146];

  • S. Dubovsky, R. Flauger and V. Gorbenko, Solving the simplest

theory of quantum gravity, JHEP 2012 (2012);

  • S. Dubovsky, V. Gorbenko and M. Mirbabayi, Natural tuning: towards

a proof of concept, [hep-th/1305.6939];

  • F. A. Smirnov and A. B. Zamolodchikov, On space of integrable

quantum field theories, Nucl.Phys. B915 (2017), [hep-th/1608.05499];

  • L. McGough, M. Mezei, H. Verlinde, Moving the CFT into the bulk

with TT, [hep-th/1611.03470];

  • A. Giveon, N. Itzhaki, D. Kutasov, TT and LST, [hep- th/1701.05576];
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Main motivations

The effective string theory for the quark-antiquark potential; Emergence of singularities in RG/TBA flows with irrelevant perturbations; Relation between irrelevant perturbations and S-matrix CDD (scalar phase factor) ambiguity; AdS3/CFT2 duality;

CFTUV CFTIR CFTIR

?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Exact S-matrix and CDD ambiguity

Consider a relativistic integrable field theory with factorised scattering: The simplest possibility, consistent with the crossing and unitarity relations is: Castillejo-Dalitz-Dyson ambiguity:

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

The sine-Gordon NLIE

The finite-size properties of the sine-Gordon model are encoded in the single counting function f(θ), solution to the following nonlinear integral equation: For the ground state and , but more more complicated contours appear for excited states. and [A. Klủmper, M. T. Batchelor and P. A. Pearce; C. Destri, H. DeVega]

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Zero-momentum case: which allows to compute the exact form of the t-deformed energy level once its R-dependence is known at t = 0. replacing we get with

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

The latter equation is the implicit form of a solution of a well-known hydrodynamic equation, the invicid Burgers equation: the deformation parameter t plays the role of “time” variable, and the undeformed energy level serves as initial condition at t = 0. For the general case: with Then and ,

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

we now have an implicit form of the solution of the inviscid Burgers equation with a source term: again the undeformed energy E(R,0) plays the role of initial condition at t = 0. source term

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Shock singularities

To see the emergence of the wave-breaking phenomenon in the inviscid Burgers equation, let’s consider the P = 0 case. For a generic initial condition, E(R,0): with the map has in general a number of square-root branch points in the complex R-plane. To find their location, consider the inverse map: Then, a singularity is characterised by the condition Indeed, around a solution of this equation, we have: for , .

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

In typical hydrodynamic applications, the initial profile is smooth on the real-R axis, and for short times all branch points lie in the complex plane. The time evolution however in general brings one of the singularities on the real domain in a finite time, producing a shock in the physical solution. Therefore: and

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Typical t=0 finite-volume spectrum:

R E(R)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

The energy levels display a pole at R = 0: where, ceff= c – 24Δ is the “effective central charge” of the UV CFT state. This behaviour implies that, for small times t > 0, the equation has two solutions very close to and correspondingly the solution is singular at In other words, as soon as t > 0, the pole at R = 0 resolves into a pair of branch points.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Real part of E(R, t) for t = 0 (dashed line) and t = 0.025 (solid line), for ceff = 1 Real part of E(R, t) for t = 0 (dashed line) and t = 0.025 (solid line), for ceff = −1

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

An extra CDD factor couples left (-) with right (+) movers scattering, any NLIE or TBA equation leads to a pair of coupled algebraic equations: ceff= c – 24 Δ(primary), obtained by an energy-dependent shift:

which matches the form of the (D=26, cef=24) Nambu Goto spectrum, for generic CFT, with t=1/(2σ), where σ is the string tension.

The CFT case

The total energy: .

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

SU(2) at β = 16. Solid curves are continuum NG; dashed curves are NG with a ‘lattice’ dispersion relation. Thick vertical line is deconfining transition; thin vertical line is NG tachyonic transition. Best figure from:

  • A. Athenodoroua and M. Teper

arXiv:1602.07634

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Identification of the perturbing operator

Start from the equation and use the standard relations then

with

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Use Zamolodchikov's definition for the composite operator: which fulfils the following factorization property:

Proof:

Consider that together with the conservation laws: keeping z and z’ separated:

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Therefore, up to total derivatives: Putting all this information together: and then and sending we get the desired factorisation result. which generalises the near CFT perturbative result:

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Classical Action: one bosonic field

Starting from:

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Nambu Goto action in 3D target space: and with in the static gauge:

N free massless boson →Nambu Goto in (N+2) taget space:

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

The Lagrangian is very complicated, but we already know that its quantum spectrum is:

Single boson field with generic potential

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Generalisations

Many known scattering models differ only by CDD factors CDD factors admit an expansion in terms of the spin of the local integrals of motion: with Thermally perturbed Ising model (c=1/2) Sinh-Gordon (c=1) ADE minimal Scattering models Simply-Laced Affine Toda models

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

  • F. Smirnov, A. Zamolodchikov: adding CDD factors leads to well-identified effective field
  • theories. The corresponding perturbing fields are the composite operators:

Generalised Burgers equation

(i.e. a Generalized Gibbs ensemble )

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Conclusions

  • Adding CDD factors generates interesting, often UV incomplete, QFT

s.

  • While the study of generic irrelevant perturbations in QFT remains very

problematic, the perturbation appears to be surprisingly easy to treat also in non-integrable models.

  • The research on this topic may clarify important aspects concerning the

appearance of singularities in efective QFT (Landau pole and tachyon singularity).

  • It may be useful in the efective string framework since contributions from

higher-dimension integrable composite operators can be added (Virasoro, W-algebra ...).

  • It may help to understand the origin of massive modes propagating on the

fmux tube.