The MMS consensus guidelines review and updates Amel Karaa, MD. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the mms consensus guidelines review and updates
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The MMS consensus guidelines review and updates Amel Karaa, MD. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The MMS consensus guidelines review and updates Amel Karaa, MD. Disclosures President, Mitochondrial Medicine Society Board member, Mitochondrial care network Acknowledgement } Some slide are courtesy of Dr. Sumit Parikh Optimizing


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The MMS consensus guidelines review and updates

Amel Karaa, MD.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Disclosures

  • President, Mitochondrial Medicine Society
  • Board member, Mitochondrial care network
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Acknowledgement

} Some slide are courtesy of Dr. Sumit Parikh

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Optimizing Mitochondrial Disease Care

} Practice Patterns, Challenges and Consensus

Mitochondrion 2013 Genetics in Medicine 2015 Genetics in Medicine 2017

slide-5
SLIDE 5

v How is mitochondrial medicine practiced in North America? v Is there an optimal way of practicing mitochondrial medicine? v Is care standardized? v Who is in charge of care?

Optimizing Mitochondrial Disease Care

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Mitochondrion 2013

slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Variability in diagnostic care

Biochemical testing protocol Genetic testing protocol Muscle biopsy testing Interpretation of muscle biopsy Use of diagnostic criteria

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Variability in treatment

Use of supplements Cocktail vs no cocktail Monitoring of organ system involvement Monitoring lab work

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Mitochondrion 2013

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Agreement in care v Clinic structures and organization v Physician perceptions of various diagnostic laboratories v Care requires significantly more time v Shortage of adult trained experts Similarities in practice but a general lack of consensus

Results

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Establishing Consensus?

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Methods to develop consensus

} Evidence-based } Eminence based (grey heads in the room) } Committee based (may the strongest personality win) } NIH style consensus (non-experts decide) } Individual (I’ll decide)

borrowed from Georgianne Arnold

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Delphi Method

“Pooled intelligence enhances individual judgement and captures the collective

  • pinion of a group of experts”.

Developing consensus in the absence of sufficient evidence utilizing a committee of content experts Consensus? Survey Committee forms subgroups Literature review and data summary Items without consensus Survey with group’s responses revealed Consensus? Discussion when needed

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Genetics in Medicine 2015

slide-16
SLIDE 16

US & Canada

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Diagnostic Consensus Criteria

Biochemical Testing in Blood, Urine and Spinal fluid Genetic Testing Pathology and Biochemical Testing of Tissue Neuroimaging Treatment of Acute Stroke Exercise Anesthesia Treatment During Illness Treatment with vitamins and supplements

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Prevention and Care Guidelines

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Genet Med 2017

slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Audiology

Sensorineural hearing loss

Neuromuscular

Myopathy Neuropathy

Cardiology

Arrhythmia Cardiomyopathy Conduction defects Heart block

Nephrology

Fanconi syndrome Glomerular dysfunction Tubulopathy

Ophthalmology

Cataracts Ophthalmoplegia Optic nerve atrophy Ptosis Retinopathy

Endocrinology

Adrenal insufficiency Diabetes mellitus Growth hormone deficiency Hypoparathyroidism Hypothyroidism Osteopenia Short stature

Hematology

Iron deficiency Pancytopenia Sideroblastic anemia

Immunology

Recurrent infections

Central Nervous System

Abnormal tone Ataxia Autonomic dysfunction Brainstem dysfunction Developmental disability Epilepsy Headaches Mood disorder Movement Disorders Spasticity Strokes (metabolic)

Gastroenterology

Constipation Dysphagia Dysmotility Failure to thrive Liver dysfunction Pancreatic insufficiency Pseudo-obstruction

Pulmonology

Apnea Aspiration Hypoventilation Pulmonary hypertension Sleep Disorders

Pregnancy

Gestational diabetes Preeclampsia Preterm labor

Orthopedic

Contractures Fractures Scoliosis

Systemic

Exercise intolerance Fatigue

Psychiatry

Mood Anxiety

slide-22
SLIDE 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23
slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26

v Who manages mitochondrial patients? v Where is their medical home? v Who will deliver these guidelines?

What’s new?

slide-27
SLIDE 27

vStandardization and excellence of care vImprove quality and consistency of health services delivered vImproved care coordination vClinical research and trial infrastructure vFacilitate Outcome and Natural History research fluidly

M i t o c h o n d r i a l c a r e n e t w o r k

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Preparation } Review of criteria used by most established centers

  • f excellence for other diseases

} Review of pitfalls and challenges } Establishing new network based on best practices for other organizations } Step-wise/staged execution

M i t o c h o n d r i a l c a r e n e t w o r k

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Planning } Focus groups of patients and families Families want multi-disciplinary care, better social support and care coordination } Survey from clinicians (93% support idea) } Input from Advocacy Groups (MitoAction, UMDF, FMM)

M i t o c h o n d r i a l c a r e n e t w o r k

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Selection Criteria

M i t o c h o n d r i a l c a r e n e t w o r k

} Clinic site based on number of patients, level of clinician experience, academic engagement and availability of comprehensive care resources } Physician-clinician driven with Patient Advocacy Group partnership } Governance Committee

slide-31
SLIDE 31

M i t o c h o n d r i a l c a r e n e t w o r k

slide-32
SLIDE 32

N E X T S T E P S ?

v Creation of a Mitochondrial Care Network (MCN) v Announcement of Mitochondrial Medicine Centers

slide-33
SLIDE 33

An observational database of phenotype, genotype, and natural history. Supported by NIH, governed by physicians and scientists experts in mitochondrial disease 1343 patients (adults and children/males an females)

N E X T S T E P S ?

slide-34
SLIDE 34

The changing paradigm in healthcare: From evidence-based medicine to value-based medicine

} Effect of healthcare reform } Interventions and therapies are judged by payers and

society by metrics of Value-Based Medicine

} The effect of therapy on patient-centered outcomes = the

incidence of disease complications, QOL, and survival vs. adverse events

} Evidence-based medicine = The effect of intervention and

therapies on surrogate markers, i.e., cholesterol in CAD strict glucose level in diabetes

slide-35
SLIDE 35

On behalf of the MMS, Thank you!