the jacobson toeplitz algebra and direct finiteness
play

The Jacobson-Toeplitz Algebra and Direct Finiteness Alex Sistko - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Jacobson-Toeplitz Algebra and Direct Finiteness Alex Sistko Miodrag Iovanov Department of Mathematics University of Iowa April 27, 2016 Auslander Conference 2016 Alex Sistko The Jacobson-Toeplitz Algebra and Direct Finiteness Notation


  1. The Jacobson-Toeplitz Algebra and Direct Finiteness Alex Sistko Miodrag Iovanov Department of Mathematics University of Iowa April 27, 2016 Auslander Conference 2016 Alex Sistko The Jacobson-Toeplitz Algebra and Direct Finiteness

  2. Notation and Definitions We’ll pick a few conventions and stick to them throughout: K is a field of arbitrary characteristic. 1 All modules are left modules. 2 R = K � x , y � / ( xy − 1 ) is the Jacobson-Toeplitz Algebra. 3 I = Soc ( R ) . Γ is the quiver: 4 Note that R ∼ = L K (Γ) , the Leavitt path algebra of Γ . Alex Sistko The Jacobson-Toeplitz Algebra and Direct Finiteness

  3. Previous Work Theorem Let I denote the socle of R. Then the following hold: I can be written as I = � ∞ i = 1 S i , where each 1 S i = R ( y i − 1 x i − 1 − y i x i ) is a faithful simple R-module. S i ∼ = S 1 for all i ≥ 1 . In fact, if we let v i = y i ( 1 − yx ) for all 2 i ≥ 0 , then { v i } i ≥ 0 is a K -basis for S 1 , with yv i = v i + 1 , xv i + 1 = v i , and xv 0 = 0 for all i ≥ 0 . I is the two-sided ideal generated by 1 − yx, and is the 3 unique minimal two-sided ideal of R. Comments See [Alahmedi et. al. 2013], [Bavula 2010], [Colak 2011]. 1 R / I ∼ = K [ x , x − 1 ] . 2 As a module over K [ x ] ⊂ R , S 1 is the injective hull of 3 K [ x ] / ( x ) . Alex Sistko The Jacobson-Toeplitz Algebra and Direct Finiteness

  4. Previous Work Theorem Let I denote the socle of R. Then the following hold: I can be written as I = � ∞ i = 1 S i , where each 1 S i = R ( y i − 1 x i − 1 − y i x i ) is a faithful simple R-module. S i ∼ = S 1 for all i ≥ 1 . In fact, if we let v i = y i ( 1 − yx ) for all 2 i ≥ 0 , then { v i } i ≥ 0 is a K -basis for S 1 , with yv i = v i + 1 , xv i + 1 = v i , and xv 0 = 0 for all i ≥ 0 . I is the two-sided ideal generated by 1 − yx, and is the 3 unique minimal two-sided ideal of R. Comments See [Alahmedi et. al. 2013], [Bavula 2010], [Colak 2011]. 1 R / I ∼ = K [ x , x − 1 ] . 2 As a module over K [ x ] ⊂ R , S 1 is the injective hull of 3 K [ x ] / ( x ) . Alex Sistko The Jacobson-Toeplitz Algebra and Direct Finiteness

  5. Previous Work (Cont.) From the Leavitt Path Algebra Literature Simple modules: S 1 and K [ x , x − 1 ] / ( p ( x )) , where p ( x ) is 1 an irreducible element of K [ x , x − 1 ] [Ara, Rang. 2014]. R is left hereditary [Ara et. al 2007]. 2 The module of finitely-generated projectives is generated 3 by R and S 1 , with the relation R ⊕ S 1 ∼ = R [Ara et. al. 2007]. Ext groups between Chen modules are known [Abrams et. 4 al. 2015]. The two-sided ideals of R can be computed [Colak 2011]. 5 Alex Sistko The Jacobson-Toeplitz Algebra and Direct Finiteness

  6. Left Ideals of R Theorem (Iovanov, Sistko 2016) Every left ideal of R can be written as Rp ( x ) ⊕ Σ , where p ( x ) is a monic polynomial and Σ is contained in the socle I. There are canonical choices for p ( x ) and Σ . Comments p ( x ) is unique if chosen of minimal degree (note that p ≡ 0 1 if and only if the left ideal is semisimple.) Σ is determined by its socle as a K [ x ] -module. 2 Since R is hereditary, this classifies arbitrary projectives. 3 Corollary: Every left ideal is either semisimple or finitely 4 generated. Alex Sistko The Jacobson-Toeplitz Algebra and Direct Finiteness

  7. Left Ideals of R Theorem (Iovanov, Sistko 2016) Every left ideal of R can be written as Rp ( x ) ⊕ Σ , where p ( x ) is a monic polynomial and Σ is contained in the socle I. There are canonical choices for p ( x ) and Σ . Comments p ( x ) is unique if chosen of minimal degree (note that p ≡ 0 1 if and only if the left ideal is semisimple.) Σ is determined by its socle as a K [ x ] -module. 2 Since R is hereditary, this classifies arbitrary projectives. 3 Corollary: Every left ideal is either semisimple or finitely 4 generated. Alex Sistko The Jacobson-Toeplitz Algebra and Direct Finiteness

  8. Finite-Length Modules and Ext Spaces Theorem (Iovanov, Sistko 2016) Let M be a finite-length R-module. Then the following hold: M is the middle term of a short exact sequence 1 0 → S ⊕ k → M → F → 0 , for some k ∈ N and 1 finite-dimensional R-module F. Let p be a (not necessarily irreducible) Laurent polynomial 2 in x. Then Ext 1 ( K [ x , x − 1 ] / ( p ) , S 1 ) ∼ = K [ T ] / ( p ∗ ( T )) , where p ∗ is the polynomial defined by p ∗ ( y ) = p ( x ) y deg ( p ) ∈ K [ y ] ⊆ R. Comments Extends results of [Abrams et. al. 2015]. 1 Can use the fact that R is hereditary to get formulas for 2 dim K Ext 1 ( M , N ) . Alex Sistko The Jacobson-Toeplitz Algebra and Direct Finiteness

  9. Finite-Length Modules and Ext Spaces Theorem (Iovanov, Sistko 2016) Let M be a finite-length R-module. Then the following hold: M is the middle term of a short exact sequence 1 0 → S ⊕ k → M → F → 0 , for some k ∈ N and 1 finite-dimensional R-module F. Let p be a (not necessarily irreducible) Laurent polynomial 2 in x. Then Ext 1 ( K [ x , x − 1 ] / ( p ) , S 1 ) ∼ = K [ T ] / ( p ∗ ( T )) , where p ∗ is the polynomial defined by p ∗ ( y ) = p ( x ) y deg ( p ) ∈ K [ y ] ⊆ R. Comments Extends results of [Abrams et. al. 2015]. 1 Can use the fact that R is hereditary to get formulas for 2 dim K Ext 1 ( M , N ) . Alex Sistko The Jacobson-Toeplitz Algebra and Direct Finiteness

  10. An Equivalence of Categories The Category WSP Any R -module M fits into a short exact sequence 1 σ π 0 → IM − → M − → M / IM → 0. Note that IM is semisimple projective, hence injective as a K [ x ] -module. Objects of WSP: Pairs ( M , α ) , α : M / IM → M a 2 K [ x ] -module morphism with π ◦ α = id M / IM . Morphisms of WSP: ( M , α ) → ( N , β ) is an R -module 3 morphism ϕ : M → N with Im ( ϕ ◦ α ) ⊂ β . The Category LRep( Γ ) The full subcategory of representations of Γ : on which f acts as an invertible map. Alex Sistko The Jacobson-Toeplitz Algebra and Direct Finiteness

  11. An Equivalence of Categories (Cont.) Theorem (Iovanov, Sistko 2016) The categories WSP and LRep (Γ) are equivalent. Comments LRep (Γ) is just the category of representations of 1 K Γ[ t ] / ( tf − 1 , ft − 1 ) . Realizes the category of R -modules as a quotient of 2 LRep (Γ) . Result of similar flavor due to [Ara, Brustenga 2010]. 3 Alex Sistko The Jacobson-Toeplitz Algebra and Direct Finiteness

  12. An Equivalence of Categories (Cont.) Theorem (Iovanov, Sistko 2016) The categories WSP and LRep (Γ) are equivalent. Comments LRep (Γ) is just the category of representations of 1 K Γ[ t ] / ( tf − 1 , ft − 1 ) . Realizes the category of R -modules as a quotient of 2 LRep (Γ) . Result of similar flavor due to [Ara, Brustenga 2010]. 3 Alex Sistko The Jacobson-Toeplitz Algebra and Direct Finiteness

  13. Kaplansky’s Direct Finiteness Conjecture Direct Finiteness Conjecture Let G be a (countable discrete) group. If a , b ∈ K G satisfy ab = 1, then ba = 1 as well. Known Results True if char ( K ) = 0 [Montgomery 1969]. 1 True in arbitrary characteristic for “finitely-generated 2 residually finite”-by-sofic groups [Berlai 2015]. “Soficity” is difficult to check; there are no known examples 3 of non-sofic groups. Alex Sistko The Jacobson-Toeplitz Algebra and Direct Finiteness

  14. Kaplansky’s Direct Finiteness Conjecture Direct Finiteness Conjecture Let G be a (countable discrete) group. If a , b ∈ K G satisfy ab = 1, then ba = 1 as well. Known Results True if char ( K ) = 0 [Montgomery 1969]. 1 True in arbitrary characteristic for “finitely-generated 2 residually finite”-by-sofic groups [Berlai 2015]. “Soficity” is difficult to check; there are no known examples 3 of non-sofic groups. Alex Sistko The Jacobson-Toeplitz Algebra and Direct Finiteness

  15. Kaplansky’s Direct Finiteness Conjecture (Cont.) R and the DFC Suppose that a , b ∈ K G satisfy ab = 1 but ba � = 1. Then 1 the map R → K G taking x �→ a , y �→ b is an injection. K G then becomes a faithful representation of R . 2 Let Σ be the sum of all simple projective submodules of 3 K G , F ⊃ Σ the R -submodule of K G such that F / Σ is the locally finite part of K G / Σ . Σ ⊂ F ⊂ K G is a filtration of left R -modules, and right 4 K G -modules. Question What sorts of G -representations must Σ , F , F / Σ , and K G / F be? Alex Sistko The Jacobson-Toeplitz Algebra and Direct Finiteness

  16. Gratitude Slide Thanks for listening! Alex Sistko The Jacobson-Toeplitz Algebra and Direct Finiteness

  17. References G. Abrams et. al., Extensions of Simples Modules over Leavitt Path Algebras , J. Algebra 431 (2015), 78-106. A. Alahmedi et. al., Structure of Leavitt Path Algebras of Polynomial Growth , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110 (2013), no. 38, 15222–15224. P . Ara, M. Brustenga, Module Theory over Leavitt Path Algebras and K-Theory , J. Pure Appl. Algebra 214 (2010), No. 7, 1131–1151. P . Ara, M.A. Moreno, E. Pardo, Nonstable K-Theory for graph algebras , Algebr. Represent. Theory 10 (2007), No.2, 157–178. P . Ara, M. Rangaswamy, Finitely Presented Simple Modules over Leavitt Path Algebras , J. Algebra 417 (2014), 333–352. V. Bavula, The Algebra of One-Sided Inverses of a Polynomial Algebra , J. Pure Appl. Algebra 214 , No. 10 (2010), 1874–1897. Alex Sistko The Jacobson-Toeplitz Algebra and Direct Finiteness

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend