The Effects of Poor Scouring Practice Dr. Jock Christoe Compromises - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the effects of poor scouring practice
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Effects of Poor Scouring Practice Dr. Jock Christoe Compromises - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Effects of Poor Scouring Practice Dr. Jock Christoe Compromises involved in Wool Scouring cleanliness vs entanglement cleanliness vs fibre damage Cleanliness vs environment Effect of Scouring on Subsequent Processing


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The Effects of Poor Scouring Practice

  • Dr. Jock Christoe
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Compromises involved in Wool Scouring § cleanliness vs entanglement § cleanliness vs fibre damage § Cleanliness vs environment

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Effect of Scouring on Subsequent Processing

§ Residual contaminants § Fibre entanglement § Fibre damage § Moisture levels

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Comparative Processing Trials

§ Commercial Wool Scours

§ IWS/CSIRO – 5 scours/two wools § ACIAR/CSIRO – 12 scours/ two series/two wools § ANDAR/CSIRO – 1 scour/ three configurations

§ CSIRO Pilot Scour

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Effect on Scoured Wool Properties

§ Residual Contaminants § Colour

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Effect of Dirt on Colour

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Effect of pH on Yellowness

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Effect of Residual Contaminants

§ Accumulation

§ reduced processing performance § maintenance issues

§ Processing additives

§ loss in wastes § change in properties

§ Dust

§ Health issues § Yield

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Relationship between Ash Content of Scoured Wool and Top

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Effect of Contaminants on Topmaking

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Effect of Fibre Entanglement

Fibre Breakage in Carding Increase in Noil (Romaine) Shorter Top Poor Spinning Performance Economic Loss

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Causes of Entanglement

§ Opening § Mechanical § Scouring Conditions § Drying Conditions

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Effect of Opening on Entanglement

G.A. Robinson 1986

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Relationship between Hauteur and Romaine

  • IWS Trials

Fleece Skirting

55 60 65 70 75 80 5 10

Romaine (%) Hauteur (mm)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Top Characteristics (ACIAR – First Series)

suction drum scour conventional long bowl scours

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Top Characteristics (ACIAR – Second Series)

65 70 75 80 5 6 7 8 9

Romaine (% noil) Hauteur (mm)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Fibre Damage

9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 6 7 8 9 10

pH Bundle Strength (N/KTex)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Effect on Spinning Performance

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Effect of Ash on Spinning

slide-20
SLIDE 20

ACIAR Trials – First Series

50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 25 30 35 40 45 50

Ends Down Hauteur (mm)

9 12 15

Tenacity (N/kTex)

Hauteur Tenacity

slide-21
SLIDE 21

ACIAR Trials – Second series

60 65 70 75 80 35 40 45 50

Ends Down Hauteur (mm)

6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9

Tenacity (N/kTex)

Hauteur Tenacity

slide-22
SLIDE 22

So What?

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Financial Implications

PLANT Reduction of 1%Romaine Plant efficiency % Product Value USD Potential Gain USD/ann. Greasy to top 1,000kg/hr +10kg/hr 80 8.00 (10.00 – 2.00) 0.67M Vertical – greasy to fabric. 350kg/h +3.5kg/hr 70 15/lin.metre (3m/kg) 1.32M

slide-24
SLIDE 24

SUMMARY

§ Scouring has a significant affect on topmaking performance § Fibre entanglement can lead to substantial monetary losses § Risk of fibre damage increases with pH