The Economic Impact of COVID on the US economy Nick Bloom - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the economic impact of covid on the us economy
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Economic Impact of COVID on the US economy Nick Bloom - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Economic Impact of COVID on the US economy Nick Bloom (Stanford) SIEPR, May 2020 Warning depressing economic forecasts. Take precautions 2 Key Points 1. Massive uncertainty - medical progress, policy response, industrial impact etc 2.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The Economic Impact of COVID on the US economy

Nick Bloom (Stanford) SIEPR, May 2020

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Warning – depressing economic forecasts. Take precautions

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Key Points

3

  • 1. Massive uncertainty - medical progress, policy response, industrial impact etc
  • 2. Short-run - unemployment rising to about 20% and GDP down about 20% in 2020Q2
  • 3. Long-run – likely U-shaped (very slow recovery) or W-shaped (double-dip)
  • 4. Recovery headwinds – bankruptcies, skills erosion, trade, immigration, taxes, politics
slide-4
SLIDE 4

I asked a friend who is a senior forecaster about his views: “Since the beginning of March we basically quit trying – if you ask me, it is a stupid exercise and the only reason anyone would even attempt a forecast at any horizon is because they are getting paid, have no shame, are drunk, or likely all three.”

slide-5
SLIDE 5

My PhD was on uncertainty – these are incredible figures

5

Notes: Weekly US economic policy uncertainty index, monthly average data 1/2/1990 to 5/7/2020. This reports the normalized share of US daily newspaper articles discussing economic policy

  • uncertainty. Source: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/USEPUINDXD

Notes: Weekly implied volatility on the S&P500 index from the Chicago Board of Options Exchange 1/2/1990 to 5/7/2020. This is the 1 month VIX (implied volatility over the next 30 days) in annualized units. Source: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/VIXCLS

S&P500 Implied Volatility (VIX) Economic Policy Uncertainty (EPU)

20 40 60 80 VIX 1990 2000 2010 2020 Year 200 400 600 Daily US Economic Policy Uncertainty Index 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 Year

slide-6
SLIDE 6

COVID now the largest source of uncertainty for 90% of firms

6

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 6 March (29%) 7-11 March (20%) 12-16 March (30%) 17-20 March (20%) 3 April (29%) 4-8 April (15%) 9-15 April (28%) 16-17 April (28%)

Survey submission date

March survey April survey

Source: Decision Maker Panel Survey conducted by the Bank of England, Nottingham University and Stanford University, Details in Bloom, Bunn, Chen, Mizen, Smietanka and Thwaites (2019) and on www.decisionmakerpanel.com .

% U.K. firms reporting Covid-19 as their top source of uncertainty

3 April

slide-7
SLIDE 7

This uncertainty is leading firms to abandon earnings guidance

Source: https://www.wsj.com/articles/stocks-keep-rallying-despite-lack-of-visibility-on-economy-11588498201?mod=hp_lead_pos1

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Key Points

8

  • 1. Massive uncertainty - medical progress, policy response, industrial impact etc
  • 2. Short-run - unemployment rising to about 20% and GDP down about 20% in 2020Q2
  • 3. Long-run – likely U-shaped (very slow recovery) or W-shaped (double-dip)
  • 4. Recovery headwinds – bankruptcies, skills erosion, trade, immigration, taxes, politics
slide-9
SLIDE 9

One way to see the damage is the share of daily lost GDP, which has risen to about 30%

9

Source: https://www.wsj.com/articles/state-coronavirus-shutdowns-have-taken-29-of-u-s-economy-offline-11586079001

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Happened incredibly fast - went from February 2020, a 60 year low rate of unemployment, to April 2020, an 80 year high

10

Source: Survey of Business Uncertainty (March 9-20 & April 13-24, 2020), (Atlanta Fed, Chicago University and Stanford University). Details in Altig, Barrero, Bloom, Davis, Meyer, Mihaylov and Parker (2020) and https://www.frbatlanta.org/blogs/macroblog

What is your best guess for the impact of coronavirus developments on your firm’s sales revenue in 2020?

slide-11
SLIDE 11

COVID has a hugely varied impact on firms and industries

11

Source: Stanford-Stripe survey of US 2,000 firms forecast for impact of COVID on 2020Q2 sales. Details in Bloom, Fletcher and Yeh (2020) and on (https://siepr.stanford.edu/research/projects/stanford-stripe-study-internet-entrepreneurship).

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Also variation across firms by founder types (driven by industry mix)

12

Source: Stanford-Stripe survey of US 2,000 firms forecast for impact of COVID on 2020Q2 sales. Details in Bloom, Fletcher and Yeh (2020) and on (https://siepr.stanford.edu/research/projects/stanford-stripe-study-internet-entrepreneurship).

slide-13
SLIDE 13

COVID → “Frankenstein recession”: combines the size of the Great Depression, the speed of Katrina and the reallocation of WWII

13

Great Depression COVID (so far) Hurricane Katrina COVID (so far) “The coronavirus pandemic is forcing the fastest reallocation of labor since World War II, with companies and governments mobilizing an army of idled workers into new activities that are urgently needed.” (Wall Street Journal, 3/29/2020 https://bfi.uchicago.edu/working-paper/covid- 19-is-also-a-reallocation-shock/

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Hence, I am less optimistic than the market

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Key Points

15

  • 1. Massive uncertainty - medical progress, policy response, industrial impact etc
  • 2. Short-run - unemployment rising to about 20% and GDP down about 20% in 2020Q2
  • 3. Long-run – likely U-shaped (very slow recovery) or W-shaped (double-dip)
  • 4. Recovery headwinds – bankruptcies, skills erosion, trade, immigration, taxes, politics
slide-16
SLIDE 16

faster

16

Source: https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-the-economic-recovery-will-be-more-of-a-swoosh-than-v-shaped-11589203608?mod=hp_lead_pos1

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Key Points

17

  • 1. Massive uncertainty - medical progress, policy response, industrial impact etc
  • 2. Short-run - unemployment rising to about 20% and GDP down about 20% in 2020Q2
  • 3. Long-run – likely U-shaped (very slow recovery) or W-shaped (double-dip)
  • 4. Recovery headwinds – bankruptcies, skills erosion, trade, immigration, taxes, politics
slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Taxes: another long run concern as they eventually will need to rise

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Deficits from Great Depression and World War II led to sharp rises in income taxes that only came fully back down in the 1980s

19

Source: Bradford Tax Institute https://bradfordtaxinstitute.com/Free_Resources/Federal-Income-Tax-Rates.aspx

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Political extremism: 50% of Americans are facing real hardship, which risks political disasters (think 1930s politics)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

I’m guessing you finished your drink…

slide-22
SLIDE 22

The Promise of Working From Home Post COVID

Nick Bloom (Stanford) SIEPR, May 2020

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Working from home traditionally had a bad image (a 2017 search)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

In 2012 I ran a randomized control trial of WFH on Ctrip, China’s largest travel agency ($15bn on NASDAQ, 40,000 employees)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

CTrip – inside like a typical US office

slide-26
SLIDE 26

The experiment was public: Chairman James Liang pulls the ball

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Individuals randomized home (even birthdays)

Working at home Working at home Working at home Working at home

slide-28
SLIDE 28

First, massive improvement in performance – 13% more output

  • 20
  • 10

10 20

  • 20
  • 15
  • 10
  • 5

5 10 15 20 25 30 35

% Improvement in performance Weeks after the start of the experiment

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Second, quit rates drop by 50%

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38

Home (♦) Office (●) Cumulative quit rate (percent) Weeks after the start of the experiment

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Third, choice doubled the impact – after the experiment the firm let all employees choose

  • 10

10 20 30 40 50

  • 20
  • 12
  • 4

4 12 20 28 36 44 52 60 68 76 84 92 100

% Improvement in performance During the experiment Company roll-out Before the experiment Weeks after the start of the experiment

slide-31
SLIDE 31

CTrip increased profits by $2,000 per employee working from home, and actively rolled this out

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Firms with more employees WFH are now less negative on COVID

Source: Decision Maker Panel Survey conducted by the Bank of England, Nottingham University and Stanford University and Bloom, Bunn, Chen, Mizen, Smietanka and Thwaites (2019) and www.decisionmakerpanel.com

  • 80
  • 60
  • 40
  • 20

Expected impact of Covid-19 on sales in Q2 (%) Percentage of employees working from home 0-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 90-100

slide-33
SLIDE 33

But working from home under COVID is hard for four reasons

slide-34
SLIDE 34

1) Kids

slide-35
SLIDE 35

2) Job match – only a third of jobs can (and are) working from home

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Accom & Food Recreational Services Construction Wholesale & Retail Manufacturing Transport & Storage Real Estate Admin & Support Other Services Prof & Scientific Health Finance & Insurance Other Production Info & Comms All firms Furloughed Unable to work (eg sick, self isolating) Working on business premises Working from home Percentage of employees Source: Headline: How many jobs can be done at home” Dingel and Nieman (2020), Covid Journal

  • f

Economics https://cepr.org/sites/default/files/news/CovidEcon1%20final.pdf, Graph: Decision Maker Panel Survey conducted by the Bank of England, Nottingham and Stanford Universities, and Bloom, Bunn, Chen, Mizen, Smietanka and Thwaites (2019) and www.decisionmakerpanel.com

slide-36
SLIDE 36

3) Space

If you have any photos to share of WFH challenges please send them to me at nbloom@stanford.edu thanks

slide-37
SLIDE 37

85.3 8.1 2.6 1.9 2.1

20 40 60 80 mean of share Never Occasionally (e.g. monthly) 1 to 2 days per week 3 to 4 days per week 5+ days per week

4) Full-time – pre-COVID only 2% of people were full time

Source: BLS data https://www.bls.gov/news.release/flex2.htm

Why? Office time important for 1) Creativity 2) Motivation 3) Loyalty

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Three key tips of WFH post COVID 1) Part-time – regular 2 days per week at home (e.g. T,Th) 2) Optional – only about 50% of employees want to WFH 3) Privilege – under-performers warned, recalled to the office

slide-39
SLIDE 39

COVID will shrink the modern office, not eliminate it

Pre-COVID 5% of working days from home During COVID 35% of working days at home Post COVID I predict about 15% to 20% of working days at home

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Further Reading References

40

COVID related blogs: “COVID induced economic uncertainty”, Scott Baker, Nicholas Bloom, Steve Davis and Stephen Terry, April 2020, https://nbloom.people.stanford.edu/sites/g/files/sbiybj4746/f/covid-induced_economic_uncertainty_4_april_2020.pdf “The productivity pitfalls of working from home in the age of COVID-19”, Nick Bloom, March 2020 https://news.stanford.edu/2020/03/30/productivity-pitfalls-working-home-age-covid-19/ “The bright future of working from home”, Nick Bloom, May 2020 https://siepr.stanford.edu/research/publications/bright-future-working-home “COVID is also a reallocation shock” Jose Barrero, Nicholas Bloom and Steve Davis, May 2020 https://bfi.uchicago.edu/working-paper/covid-19-is-also-a-reallocation-shock/ Background: Recent background of slowing US productivity growth https://blogs.wsj.com/cio/2018/07/13/in-an-era-of-tech-innovation-whispers-of-declining-research-productivity/ Three Surveys feeding into this briefing www.decisionmakerpanel.com https://www.frbatlanta.org/research/surveys/business-uncertainty https://siepr.stanford.edu/research/projects/stanford-stripe-study-internet-entrepreneurship Three uncertainty databases www.economicuncertainty.com www.worlduncertaintyindex.com www.stockmarketjumps.com