Evaluating Technology Impacts on the Distribution System: PNNL’s GridLAB-D Simulation Tool
Hosted by Nate Hausman, Project Director, CESA March 19, 2019
the Distribution System: PNNLs GridLAB-D Simulation Tool Hosted by - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
CESA Webinar Evaluating Technology Impacts on the Distribution System: PNNLs GridLAB-D Simulation Tool Hosted by Nate Hausman, Project Director, CESA March 19, 2019 Housekeeping Join audio: Choose Mic & Speakers to use VoIP
Hosted by Nate Hausman, Project Director, CESA March 19, 2019
Join audio:
information provided Use the orange arrow to open and close your control panel Submit questions and comments via the Questions panel This webinar is being recorded. We will email you a webinar recording within 48
CESA’s website at www.cesa.org/webinars
www.cesa.org
4
www.cesa.org Learn more at: www.cesa.org/projects/locational-value-of-distributed-energy-resources
Nate Hausman Project Director, Clean Energy States Alliance (moderator) nate@cleanegroup.org Frank Tuffner Staff Research Engineer, Electricity Infrastructure Group, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory francis.tuffner@pnnl.gov
Frank Tuffner Staff Research Engineer CESA Webinar March 19, 2019
PNNL-SA-141993
2
3
4
Unifies models of the key elements of a smart grid:
Smart grid analyses
Time scale: ms to years Open source (BSD-style) Contributions from
Vendors can add or extract own modules
Over 80,000 downloads in over 150 countries
Power Systems Loads & DERs DSO Markets
loads & distributed energy resources, in unprecedented detail
1) power flow 2) control systems 3) retail markets 4) electromechanical dynamics 5) end-use load behavior in tens of thousands of buildings and devices
5
Typical Use Cases
(e.g., DSOs)
efficiency
reduction design
restoration
Power Systems Loads and DERs Markets
Unifies models of the key elements of a smart grid:
6
complexity of simulator
behind the scenes
develop an easy-to-use DG integration tool
accelerate PV adoption
8
Smart Cities Model – Meshed urban core and outlying feeders
Appliances HVAC/heating type
9
2% – 4%
2% – 70%
7% – 17%
21% – 77%
25% – 50%
15% – 20%
up to 5%
(0.1% - 3% annual energy saved)
manner, can increase system losses
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Percent of Total Benefit Percent of Total Feeders
Percent Total Benefit vs. Percent Total Number of Feeders in the United States
commercial buildings.
wholesale cost reductions.
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Total Hourly Energy Consumption (kWh) Hour of Day
Fixed TOU/CPP
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 Total Hourly Energy Consumption (kWh) Hour of Day Fixed_A TOU_A_Group_1
Traditional CPP program – “rebound” from peak prices can set new, even higher peak! Staggering CPP start times over four hours reduced peak distribution demand by 11.5%
Installed Cost Cost per kW Installed Cost Cost per kW (kW) (%) (kW/ea.) ($/ea.) ($/kW) ($/ea.) ($/kW)
Residential
23,318 79,120 15.7% 0.53 $441 $825 $135 $253
SFg
10,532 36,280 15.6% 0.54 $415 $773 $135 $251
MHg
3,511 9,762 11.5% 0.32 $415 $1,302 $135 $424
MFe
2,358 6,189 14.8% 0.39 $480 $1,237 $135 $348
Sfe
5,188 21,491 17.3% 0.71 $480 $672 $135 $189
MHe
1,729 5,397 11.4% 0.36 $480 $1,347 $135 $379
Commercial
1,903 24,843 5.3% 0.69 $916 $1,329 $385 $559
COg
951 14,575 5.1% 0.78 $1,210 $1,542 $525 $669
CRg
951 10,268 5.1% 0.55 $622 $1,123 $245 $442
All
25,221 103,963 13.9% 0.57 $477 $834 $178 $311 Customer Type N Peak Demand Peak Demand Reduction Existing Customers New Customers
Compare the cost-to-benefits ratio of household types
under-frequency load shedding
need to arm response across time & space
frequency regulation
Grid Friendly Appliances™ Loads as a Resource Transactive Control for Ancillary Services
distribution feeders
model and verify system performance
400+ times (2010)
VVO as part of the SGIG grant projects (2011)
as an impartial 3rd party evaluator
improved on existing methods
in partnership with AEP (patent pending)
Volt-VAr Optimization
Validating and improving the performance of control systems
integration (w/ SCE, GridUnity [formerly Qado Energy])
circuit issues
Voltage flicker and rise, overloads, power factor
penetration levels in an economically efficient manner
DR, DS, smart inverters, traditional upgrades
DOE-OE
deploy to other utilities
Solar Integration
Helping utilities to speed-up interconnection and adoption
14
provide resiliency in extreme events
ensuring they are operable in practice
examine practical, operating potential of “optimized” designs … including full system dynamics
infrastructure
4 6 8 10 57 58 59 60 61 62 Time (sec) Freq (Hz) Generator Frequency (Hz) ZIP 2,000 kW 1,800 kW 1,500 kW 1,200 kW
15
2009
compared
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0:00 3:00 6:00 9:00 12:00 15:00 18:00 21:00 0:00 Real Power [kW] Time of Day
Feeder Active Power - January 1, 2009
Baseline Solar Included
16
17
18
Nate Hausman CESA Project Director nate@cleanegroup.org Find us online: www.cesa.org facebook.com/cleanenergystates @CESA_news on Twitter
Read more and register at: www.cesa.org/webinars
Thursday, March 28, 1-2pm ET In this webinar, Nader Samaan, a power systems engineer and the lead for PNNL’s Grid Analytics team, will present CReST-VCT and how it works in a real- world use case for Duke Energy.