the debate
play

The debate! Ajay Singh YES, WE CAN Dr. Locatelli NO, WE CAN T - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The debate! Ajay Singh YES, WE CAN Dr. Locatelli NO, WE CAN T Should hemoglobin targets for anemia patients with chronic kidney disease be changed? DISCLOSURES PI of the CHOIR study, received research support and


  1. The debate! Ajay Singh � YES, WE CAN � Dr. Locatelli � NO, WE CAN � T � Should hemoglobin targets for anemia patients with chronic kidney disease be changed?

  2. DISCLOSURES � PI of the CHOIR study, received research support and consulting income from J and J � Member, Executive Steering Committee of the TREAT study, received research support and consulting income from Amgen � Consultant for Rockwell, Fibrogen, GSK, Sandoz, AHSP, ConCert. Past income from Watson, Roche, AMAG � Member of MEDCAC � Steering Committee for the National Quality Forum � Member Scientific Advisory Board, National Kidney Foundation 2

  3. Gerard Dou 1662, Louvre � Doctors are men who prescribe medicines of which they know little, to cure diseases of which they know less, in human beings of whom they know nothing � Voltaire (French Philosopher and Writer. One of the greatest of all French authors, 1694-1778)

  4. The clinical context � Patient with CKD, either non-dialysis or dialysis � Anemic iron replete � What level of Hb should treatment be initiated? � What target Hb should you aim for?

  5. Should Hb targets be changed? � Yes! � Initiate ESA at 9 g/dL not at 10 g/dL � Aim for >9 g/dL and <12 g/dL � Because the evidence supports it! � Lower Hb threshold should be 9 g/dL � Data from Normal Hematocrit in dialysis patients � Data from TREAT in non-dialysis CKD patients � Upper Hb level should be left unchanged at 12 g/dL � Focus should be on using lower doses of ESA

  6. Lower Hb threshold should be 9 g/dL � Normal Hematocrit Study � Symptomatic, high-risk dialysis patients � Similar mortality to the USRDS dialysis population � Representative, generalizible study Besarab et al. N Engl J Med 339:584-590, 1998

  7. Normal Hematocrit Study Randomization was to 2 Hb arms: 27-33% -- versus 39-45% Ie, >9 g/dL and <11 g/dL versus >13 g/dL and <15 g/dL

  8. Normal Hematocrit Study � Tested hypothesis that patients with normal Hb 13-15 g/dL will have better outcomes than patients with Hb 9-11 g/dL � 1233 HD patients with CAD or CHF � Primary end-point: Death or MI 8 Besarab et al. N Engl J Med 339:584-590, 1998

  9. Normal Hematocrit Study Low Hct Normal Hct n 618 615 Hct 30 42 (achieved 39%) Epoetin dose 160 460 Total deaths 150 183 Non-fatal MI 14 19 RR 1.3 (0.9-1.9) Study terminated early due increased risk Higher rate of vascular access thrombosis in normal Hct group: (243 patients, or 39 percent, vs. 176 patients, or 29 percent; P=0.001). 9 Besarab et al. N Engl J Med 339:584-590, 1998

  10. Normal Hematocrit Study

  11. In dialysis patients, the only well powered study, demonstrates that patients treated to a range of 9-11 g/dL have better outcomes than those treated to a range of 13-15 g/dL

  12. Lower Hb threshold should be 9 g/dL � What about non-dialysis patients? � TREAT study � Type 2 diabetic patients with kidney disease � Over 50% of kidney disease patients have type 2 diabetes

  13. Hypothesis In patients with type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease not requiring dialysis, and concomitant anemia, raising hemoglobin with darbepoetin alfa would lower the rates of death and cardiovascular morbidity and/or death and end- stage renal disease 13 Pfeffer MA, et al N Engl J Med. Oct 30. 2009

  14. TREAT Pfeffer MA, et al N Engl J Med. Oct 30. 2009

  15. TREAT tested maintaining a Hb of > 9g/dL versus 13 g/dL Achieved Hb of Hb Median: 10.6 IQR [9.9 � 11.3] versus Hb Median: 12.5 IQR [12.0 � 12.8]

  16. TREAT: Hemoglobin levels 13.5 Darbepoetin alfa Placebo 13.0 Mean Hemoglobin (g/dL) 12.5 12.0 Median dose: 176 � g IQR [104 � 305] Hb Median: 12.5 IQR [12.0 � 12.8] Mean: 225 � g ± 208 11.5 11.0 10.5 Median dose: 0 � g IQR [0 � 5] Hb Median: 10.6 IQR [9.9 � 11.3] Mean: 5 � g ± 11 10.0 9.5 0 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 Month Pfeffer MA, et al N Engl J Med 2009; 361:2019-203 16

  17. TREAT: Composite endpoints 17 Pfeffer MA, et al N Engl J Med. Oct 30. 2009

  18. Sensitivity Analysis around endpoints (Source: Amgen) 18

  19. Fatal and Nonfatal Stroke 50 Darbepoetin alfa 101 (5.0%) Patients With Events (%) Placebo 53 (2.6%) 40 30 HR: 1.92 (1.38 � 2.68) P < 0.001 20 10 0 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 Months 19

  20. MACE Analysis (Source FDA) 20

  21. Stroke Analysis Type of stroke in TREAT DPO Control Overall 101 (2.6%) 101 (5.0%) Non Hem 38 74 Hemorrhagic 8 13 Unknown 7 14 21

  22. � Dr. Locatelli might argue that in TREAT, stroke was not a primary endpoint � and TREAT was not powered for reduction in the rate of stroke, the highly significant P value associated with the increased hazard of a stroke with darbepoietin treatment should be ignored. � Stroke was a pre-specified cardiovascular outcome. � Stroke safety signal is meaningful, don � t need to power for safety signal � TREAT well powered study N=1026 Hazard ratio 1.30 (95% C: 1.06, 1.58)

  23. Malignancy in TREAT Darbepoetin alfa Placebo P-value Overall 139/2012 130/2026 Cancer-related AE 0.53 6.9% 6.4% Deaths attributed to 39/2012 25/2026 0.08 cancer 1.9% 1.2% Subgroup: Baseline � History of malignancy (n = 348) 60/188 37/160 All cause mortality 0.13 31.9% 23.1% Deaths attributed to 14/188 1/160 0.002 cancer 7.4% 0.6% 23

  24. In non-dialysis patients, TREAT demonstrates that patients maintaining a Hb>9 g/dL have improved outcomes over those treated to a range of >13 g/dL

  25. Minimal Improvement in QOL Hb >9 g/dL FACT-Fatigue Score at 25 Weeks 4.2 ± 10.5 P < 0.001 2.8 ± 10.3 Less fatigue 54.7% 49.5% Mean Change P = 0.002 30.2 30.4 Placebo Darbepoetin alfa n = 1769 n = 1762 FACT-Fatigue range: 0: most fatigued, to 52: least fatigued 25

  26. Patient Reported Outcomes Supportive Analysis Short-Form 36 Mean Change at 25 Weeks in 2 Domains Darbepoetin alfa Placebo Domains n = 1138 n = 1157 P-value 2.6 ± 9.9 2.1 ± 9.7 Energy 0.20 1.3 ± 9.2 1.1 ± 8.8 Physical Function 0.51 26

  27. What Dr. Locatelli might say � A cautious approach of treating anemia to a lower target 9 to 12 g/dL with conservative doses of ESA might return us to a pre-ESA era. On the contrary: Hb of 9 g/dL is not returning us to the pre-ESA era of Hb � s of 5 to 9 g/dL Singh et al CJASN 2010 Low Low ESA ESA Patients Patients dose dose % of % of 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 Hb g/dL Hb g/dL � TREAT and other studies show minimal QOL benefit of rasing Hb above 9 g/dL � Individualizing treatment is essential; besides, no-one is arguing that we abandon ESAs

  28. � Dr. Locatelli might dismiss the TREAT study � He might argue that since subjects assigned to the placebo rescue arm achieved an Hb � very close � to the levels recommended in the guidelines, the Hb guidelines should not be changed . � But, the target Hb and achieved Hb are two different concepts � Target Hb should be >9 g/dL, the achieved Hb will likely by in the 10 to 11 g/dL range � The guidelines should be changed to recommend, � In most non-dialysis CKD patients anemia can be treated without the use of ESAs; in those in whom treatment is necessary the target Hb should be >9 g/dL and <12 g/dL � .

  29. Is there risk with achieving Hb >12 g/dL YES! � CHOIR and CREATE � Non-dialysis patients � Diabetic and non-diabetic � CREATE very under-powered

  30. 1432 patients, 130 centers, US only Epoetin-alfa Randomization High target Hgb Low target Hgb (13.5 g/dl) (11.3 g/dl) Median f/u 16 months n=715 n=717 Singh et al,New Engl J Med 2006; 355:2085-98 30

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend