The Case for Tailoring Ex-Post Patent Strength to Innovation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the case for tailoring ex post patent strength to
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Case for Tailoring Ex-Post Patent Strength to Innovation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Case for Tailoring Ex-Post Patent Strength to Innovation Diffusion Laura Pedraza-Faria Patent law as ex ante incentive R&D Patent filing Incentive to Incentive to carry out disclose R&D Ex ante 1 Patent law as ex post


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The Case for Tailoring Ex-Post Patent Strength to Innovation Diffusion

Laura Pedraza-Fariña

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Patent law as ex ante incentive

1

Incentive to carry out R&D Incentive to disclose R&D Patent filing Ex ante

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Patent law as ex post incentive

2

Incentive to carry out R&D Incentive to disclose R&D Patent filing Patent licensing/ Commercialization of product Embedding invention Ex ante Ex post

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The (ex post, ongoing) Duty to Diffuse in Patent Law

  • Ex post information diffusion as a positive

explanation for current patent law doctrine,

  • sp. remedies jurisprudence.
  • Ex post information diffusion as a

normatively desirable duty that should be encouraged by patent doctrine.

3

slide-5
SLIDE 5

What is “diffusion”?

  • Useful studies of information diffusion in

both economics and sociology.

  • 3 Types of diffusion “channels”

– Codified knowledge – Tacit knowledge or “know-how” transfer – Commercial products

4

slide-6
SLIDE 6

How available is information content from different diffusion channels?

5

Codified knowledge:

  • best for

established tech areas

  • stylizes discovery

process (hides failures) Tacit knowledge:

  • best for emerging

Tech areas

  • learning by doing
  • Requires demonstrations/
  • In person teaching

Patent Document (low availability) Scientific publications Laboratory visits/demonstrations Know-how contracts; trade shows Commercial product (can be reverse engineered) (high availability) Commercial product

  • Can be very information rich if

Reverse engineering is allowed

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Ex post Efforts to Diffuse as a Guide to eBay

  • Studies on permanent injunction grant rates

suggest non-practicing entities receive injunctions a lower frequency than practicing entities – could this be explained by a diffusion model?

  • Model predicts: injunctions should be granted

to good ”diffusers” and denied o bad

  • diffusers. Good diffusers may include

universities and failed start-ups but exclude traditional NPEs.

6

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Efforts to diffuse should result in patent strength adjustments ex post

  • Remedies:

– Injunctions for strong diffusers – Damages for weak diffusers – Diffusion as factor to consider in remedies calculation.

  • Experimental Use Defense

– Should be available if patent holder is a “non-diffuser”

  • Unavailability to expand claim during litigation

through DOE for weak diffusers

  • Reverse Engineering and publication of
  • Other levers?

7