TGCSA ANNUAL ASSESSOR CONFERENCE 2011 Joint Presentation by - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TGCSA ANNUAL ASSESSOR CONFERENCE 2011

Joint Presentation by Nivashnee Govender: Operations Manager & Fanie Shawe: Finance Manager 29 November 2011

STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATION

1. The year that was…. 2. Application Process 2.1. Online application 2.2. Daily Approval 2.3. Challenges 2.4. Changes to the application form 2.5. Renewal applications December 2011 to March 2012 3. Invoicing and Receipting 4. Synchronization and download to assessor laptop 5. Assessments conducted 5.1. Assessor visits 5.2. Final Grading Criteria 5.3. Dispensation and Grace Period 5.4. Downgrades 5.5. Post assessment/way forward discussion

STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATION

6. Pre-screening

6.1. Submissions 6.2. PMA feedback 6.3. Pre-screening guide 7. Awards Committee 7.1. General comments 7.2. Feedback on rejections

• 8. Post Awards Processes

8.1. Approval Letters 8.2. Certificates and Plaques 9. Assessor Payments 10. Implementation Forum 11. Change Requests CR25 (Finance) and CR26 (Operations) 12. Operations Team

• Q - QUIETLY
• I – INTERNALIZING
• T- TRAUMA
• It was actually:

– Getting used to QIT – Using criteria that establishments were not willing to accept easily – Facing irate and difficult clients – Working with a system that was not operating at its optimum

BUT WE SURVIVED AND ARE ALMOST AT THE TOP

THE YEAR THAT WAS….

APPLICATION PROCESS

2.1. Online application

• Operational since October 2010
• Initially faced time-out errors, now fixed
• Occasional interruptions due to server errors
• Resolved as soon as HELPDESK is informed

2.2. Daily Approval

• 5900 Applications approved to date
• Approved daily
• Had a delay twice in daily approval as Nivashnee and Karin were

unavailable

• Intern will be assisting with approvals as well
• Daily list sent to all assessors who can track consistency of daily

approvals

APPLICATION PROCESS

2.3. Challenges

• Applications being submitted by assessors without establishments

knowledge

• Applications being submitted multiple times
• Incorrect and/or missing information on applications
• Establishments not willing to complete new forms
• Renewal vs. New applications (joining fee)
• Assessor details

APPLICATION PROCESS

2.4. Changes to the application form

• Tool tips on what is mandatory fields
• Highlighting important information e.g. certificates will be sent to

physical address

• Submission of form only if ALL mandatory information has been

completed

• Pre-populated renewal forms

APPLICATION PROCESS

APPLICATION PROCESS

2.5. Renewal applications December 2011 to March 2012

• QiT process for renewals not completed
• Manual process implemented
• Assessor representatives on Implementation Forum requested

information to be verified by assessors

• Challenge in some assessors not responding hence resulting in a delay
• f approval and invoice generation

THANK YOU TO ALL THOSE ASSESSORS WHO ASSISTED PROMPTLY

INVOICING AND RECEIPTING

FANIE SHAWE WILL NOW GIVE YOU FEEDBACK ON THIS SECTION

INVOICING AND RECEIPTING

INVOICING 1 All invoicing is generated once QIT approval is done 1.1 Reasons for invoice delays 1.1.1 QIT /Oracle integration error 1.1.2 QIT approval not on the same day as application 1.1.3 E-mail notifications not working RECEIPTING 1 Receipting is performed on a daily basis 2 Where deposits are not reflecting the invoice number, the receipting process will be delayed until Sean receives a bank proof of payment. 3 Sean can only import the previous days bank statement. 4 Receipting challenges 4.1 Assessors performing assessment before payment.

SYNCHRONIZATION & DOWNLOAD TO ASSESSOR LAPTOP

SYNCHRONIZATION:

• Daily assessor synchronization list indicates frequency of

synchronization by assessors

• Very few problems with synchronization recorded – all resolved by

helpdesk DOWNLOAD TO ASSESSOR LAPTOP

• Biggest assessor complaint is the delays due to receipting of payments
• No major problems with downloading

ASSESSMENTS CONDUCTED

5.1. Assessor visits

• Some complaints from establishments on performance of assessors e.g. not

enough time spent on assessment

• Assessors also complimented on providing extra guidance with new criteria

5.2. Final Grading Criteria

• Grading criteria published in November 2010
• In practice assessors found that some criteria didn’t work
• Workshops held with assessors in March 2011
• There were still problems with grammar, etc
• ProServ appointed to edit documents
• Final copy was signed off on 4 November 2011
• Delay in publishing on website due to change requested by assessors during

Implementation forum regarding TVs in Guest Accommodation

• UA Technical Guide

ASSESSMENTS CONDUCTED

ASSESSMENTS CONDUCTED

5.2. Dispensation and Grace Period

• Huge problem! Some assessors not discussing this with the

establishments and giving them the option

• Other assessors submitting motivation on behalf of client without

client knowing about it

• A lot of confusion on what can be considered and what cannot
• A large number of requests received over the past year. Majority

have been approved!

ASSESSMENTS CONDUCTED

5.3. Downgrades

• More than 150 Downgrades approved in the past year
• Good sign – getting rid of “soft stars”
• Challenge – many cancellations due to downgrades
• Some assessors have been GREAT in explaining to an establishment the

reason for a downgrade and having them accept it

• Other assessors cannot face the conflict and don’t inform the

establishment they are being downgraded. This leads to very angry clients and sometimes costs the TGCSA money as an audit needs to be done with no cost to the establishment attached! 5.4. Post assessment/way forward discussion

• Needs to be thorough and informative
• Many assessors don’t carry out this step which results in irate clients

who are ill informed on way forward.

PRE-SCREENING

6.1. Submissions

• Thank you to all assessors who submit assessments as they complete

them

• Still too many assessors submitting on the final day of deadline – makes

it very difficult to pre-screen in limited period prior to meeting

• Number of submissions improved a lot over past 2 months
• Manual submissions by exception

PRE-SCREENING

6.2. PMA feedback

• TGCSA have taken cognisance of assessor comments on type of

feedback they receive from PMAS for properties not approved at pre- screening

• This is being addressed internally and more appropriate

wording/explanations/examples will be used moving forward

• Assessments submitted to the Awards meeting is a mutual decision

between PMA and assessor 6.3. Pre-screening guide

• An updated guide will be sent post this conference.

AWARDS COMMITTEE

7.1. General comments

• The submissions to the Awards Committee have improved

tremendously

• The rate of rejections from at the meeting has reduced
• There is still some assessors who consistently submit properties that

are not of the standard required. 7.2. Feedback on rejections

• The TGCSA have been made aware that the feedback received from

the Awards Committee is not always adequate enough to convey to the client when a property is rejected

• The Awards Committee have committee to providing more concise

feedback moving forward.

POST AWARDS PROCESSES

8.1. Approval Letters

• Once approval is done on QiT, automated letters are sent to all

establishments

• The templates have been amended as per discussions at the

Implementation Forum meetings e.g. “no longer CONGRATULATIONS ON YOUR DOWNGRADE”!!!

• Establishments also sent emails with a link to their visitor report

8.2. Certificates and Plaques

• Covered in Marketing Presentation

ASSESSOR PAYMENTS

FANIE SHAWE WILL NOW GIVE YOU FEEDBACK ON THIS SECTION

ASSESSOR PAYMENTS

1 This process works as follows: 1.1 Awards committee meeting gets approved on QIT. 1.2 QIT e-mails approved property PO notifications to all Assessors. 1.3 Operations distributes the final approved awards list on an excel spreadsheet to all Assessors and Finance. 1.4 Assessors need to submit their invoices based on 1.2 and 1.3 above. 1.5 Finance can start processing Assessor payments only once all the above steps are completed. CHALLENGES 1 E-mail errors on the VOX server. 2 The time it takes to approved the properties on QIT. 3 The time it takes to send out the awards lists on an excel spreadsheet.

IMPLEMENTATION FORUM

• Set-up by TGCSA in November 2010
• Chaired by Mr. Jegie Padmanathan
• Forum Members:

 Mark Goveia – SAGAA Representative  Colin Knowles - SAGAA Representative  Ruby Gangiah – Non-SAGAA members representative  Thembi Kunene – TGCSA  Nivashnee Govender – TGCSA Operations  Karin Suter – TGCSA Operations  Thekiso Rakolojane – TGCSA Marketing  Fanie Shawe – TGCSA Finance  Rachel Mathosa - Secretariat

IMPLEMENTATION FORUM

• Primary purpose is to deal with problems relating to QiT during the

implementation of the system

• Assessor representatives table agenda items on behalf of assessors
• A number of core issues raised monthly
• Some issues have been resolved, but still a number of issues that are on-

going

• Steps have been taken to expedite these unresolved issues e.g. Change

requests to G4S

• Issues raised at forum meetings are tabled at monthly Awards Meetings for

the committee to provide guidance where possible

• Monthly minutes circulated to all assessors

CHANGE REQUESTS – CR 25 AND CR 26

• 1. G4S visited SA in April 2011
• 2. A number of QIT issues discussed. Meetings held with each department.

Document of changes compiled and formed 2 change request submissions i.e. 2.1. CR 25 – FINANCE INTEGRATION 2.2. CR 26 – OPERATIONAL CHANGES CR 26:

• 3. Divided into 4 main areas:
• Application Form
• QiT Office
• QiT Laptop Tool
• Awards Committee
• 1 APRIL 2012!!!!!!!!!!!!

OPERATIONS TEAM

• Just for the record….. This is who we are and what we responsible for
• 1. Nivashnee Govender – Operations Manager – responsible for overall
• perations of TGCSA. Super User of Qit
• 2. Karin Suter – Assistant Operations Manager – deals with queries from

PMAs, QiT related CHANGES. Super User of Qit

• 3. PMAS – deals with queries from assessors working in the provinces,

communication with clients from the provinces, managing stakeholder relationships, assistance with general QiT queries and of course… PRE- SCREENING! 3.1. Lindiwe Mbele – (Gauteng/North West/Free State) 3.2. Karabo Moshoete - (Limpopo/Mpumalanga) 3.3. Philisiwe Gumede – (KZN/Eastern Cape)

• 4. Western and Northern Cape being serviced by entire operations team in

the interim

OPERATIONS TEAM

• 5. Road Ahead: 4 new PMAs to be appointed as follows:

5.1. Johannesburg based – responsible for Free State and Northern Cape (new position) 5.2. Port Elizabeth based - responsible for Eastern Cape (new position) 5.3. Cape Town based - responsible for Western Cape (replacement for Sune) 5.4. Durban based - responsible for KZN (replacement for Philisiwe)

• 6. Last but not least….

6.1. TGCSA Intern – Sherileen William 6.2. Appointed from November 2011 to October 2012 6.3. Predominantly administration functions relating to QiT. Assessors will be sent information on what areas they can communicate with her on

2012…… THERE WILL STILL BE

2012 AND BEYOND

THANK YOU