Technology use in higher education Technology is ubiquitous. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

technology use in higher education
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Technology use in higher education Technology is ubiquitous. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS Technology use in higher education Technology is ubiquitous. Top-down push to increase access INSTRUCTOR IDP in Educational


slide-1
SLIDE 1
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Technology use in higher education

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 1

Image Credits:Shutterstock-Teacher-icon, Shutterstock-building, Top Differences, Freepik

  • Top-down push to increase

access

INSTRUCTOR

  • Technology is ubiquitous.

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Technology use in higher ed. classrooms

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 2

Image Created by:Shutterstock-students,

  • Students as consumers of

technology!!

  • Research results on

benefits of technology, if used effectively

RESEARCH

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The Indian context

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 3

Source: https://www.facilities.aicte-india.org/dashboard/pages/dashboardaicte.php

  • INSTRUCTOR-MEDIATED
  • SCALE
  • IN-SERVICE TRAINING

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Existing initiatives

  • National Missions

n NMEICT (T10KT, AAQ, Spoken Tutorials,..), NPTEL,

PMMMNMTT, TEQIP

  • Institutional

n National Institute of Technical Teachers Training &

Research (NITTTR), CEP, QIP

  • Local/individual efforts (STTPs, TLCs)

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 4

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Operating Context

  • Train 10000 Teachers (T10KT)
  • Goal: Empowerment of

teachers

  • Hub (IITB) and Spoke (Remote

Centre) model

  • Synchronous Workshops

through A-VIEW and MOODLE

  • Blended courses using IITBX

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 5

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Problem Statement

  • How to improve the design and delivery of

large-scale training programs to in-service faculty in engineering education within India to enable them in effectively integrating Information and Communication Technology (ICT) tools within their teaching-learning context?

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 6

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Solution

  • Development of Attain-Align-Integrate-Investigate (A2I2)

Model

  • Implementation of Training based on A2I2

n

1 face-to-face

n

3 blended-online

n

1 massive open online

  • Evaluation of model via 5 studies

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 7

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Overview of Research

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 8

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Flow of Research

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 9

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-11
SLIDE 11

POSITIONING THE RESEARCH

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 10

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-12
SLIDE 12

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 11

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

  • Lit. Review

Barriers in effective technology integration Improving Teaching-Learning in Engg. Education Existing work on TPD: best practices & recommendation, Models

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Barriers to effective ICT integration

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 12

Effectively integrating ICT tools is challenging because:

  • Access to ICT tools (Ertmer, 2005)
  • Teachers feel inadequately prepared for:
  • Using new technology (Mumtaz, 2000)
  • Teachers belief and attitude towards technology (Ertmer, 2005)
  • Design of lessons using Student-centric strategies (Brown & Warschauer, 2006; Gao,

Choy, Wang, & Wu, 2009; Lim & Chai, 2008 ) 2nd Order barrier 3rd Order barrier 1st Order barrier

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Improving Teaching-Learning in Engg. Edu.

  • Levels of T-L practice in engg.

education (Streveler et. al., 2012)

  • Recommendation to operate above

“scholarly teaching”

  • Assess own teaching and make

improvements

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 13

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Existing work

  • Best practices and recommendations

n

Constructivist use (Jung, 2005; Jonassen et. al., 2008), Need for collaboration (Tseng & Kuo, 2014)

  • Available Models

n

Reflective Practice (Avalos, 2011; Gibbs, 1988; Schon, 1987), Communities of Practice (Wenger, 1998), Action Research (Rock & Levin,2002; Zeichner, 1987), TPACK (Mishra & Koehler, 2009)

  • Existing programmes in higher ed

n

Course Design Workshop at McGill University (Saroyan et. al., 2004), National Effective Teaching Institute – NETI (Brent & Felder, 2009), MarchET (Reinties

  • et. al., 2013)

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 14

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-16
SLIDE 16

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 15

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

  • Lit. Review

Barriers in effective technology integration Need for focusing on 2nd and 3rd

  • rder barriers

Improving Teaching-Learning in Engg. Education Aiming for scholarship of teaching- learning through constructive alignment and action research Existing work on TPD: best practices & recommendation, Models Use of constructivist practices and ensuring collaboration

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Positioning the current research

A model for:

  • Going beyond best practices and

recommendations

  • Tackling second and third order barriers
  • Scaling and Sustaining the training

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 16

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-18
SLIDE 18

EXPLORATORY PHASE

Identifying problems within operating context

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 17

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Summary of studies

  • Two research studies to:

n

What is the perception of instructors, in Indian engineering education, towards active learning strategies?

n

How effective are the instructors in reflecting on their own technology integration practice?

  • Operating context – T10KT

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 18

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Details of exploratory studies

Research Study 1

  • Goal: Training CS instructors in active

learning for teaching programming (2014, 7633 registered)

  • Mixed-method research

n

Quant (6 Ques Survey, Likert scale; N=3688)

n

Qual (Content analysis of open-ended question; N=1802)

  • High perception of usefulness of Active

Learning (AL) strategies; Need support in AL

  • Misconceptions about AL

Research Study 2

  • Goal: Training instructors in Research

Methods in ET (2013, 5675 registered)

  • Mixed-method research

n

Quant (18 Ques Survey, Likert scale; N= 3688, Evaluation of participant submissions; N=1287)

n

Qual (Content Analysis of participant submissions; N=242)

  • Improvement of teacher reflection
  • Dominance of teacher-centered ideas
  • (Warriem, Murthy & Iyer, 2013a; 2013b)

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 19

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Need for a new metric for evaluation

  • Not all registered participants

participate

  • Common phenomena in

large-scale efforts

  • Completion rate is insufficient
  • “Persistence Rate” as a new

metric

  • Persistence Rate – Number
  • f people completed/Number
  • f active participants

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 20

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Goals

  • Research

n

Design and development of a scalable model that will assist in implementation of TPD programmes for technology integration

n

Evaluate the effectiveness of training programmes developed from the model

  • Practice

n

Scaffolds for assisting in implementation

n

Promote higher persistence

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 21

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-23
SLIDE 23

ATTAIN-ALIGN-INTEGRATE-INVESTIGATE (A2I2) MODEL

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 22

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Theoretical Basis

  • Constructive Alignment (Biggs, 1996)
  • Spiral Curriculum (Bruner, 1977)
  • Active Learning (Meltzer & Thornton, 2012)

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 23

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Design Principles (Warriem, Murthy & Iyer, 2015; 2017)

  • Immersivity

n

Helps in designing learning environment

n

Experience as learner first, teacher next

  • Pertinency

n

Helps in designing training content

n

Immediate relevance of training content

  • Transfer of Ownership

n

Helps in sustaining training benefits

n

Promoting ownership of the change needed in practice

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 24

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-26
SLIDE 26

A2I2 MODEL

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 25

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-27
SLIDE 27

A2I2 MODEL

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 26

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

IMMERSIVITY PERTINENCY

slide-28
SLIDE 28

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 27

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-29
SLIDE 29

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 28

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-30
SLIDE 30

DBIR: IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION CYCLES

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 29

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-31
SLIDE 31

DBIR: Single Iteration

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 30

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-32
SLIDE 32

The five iterations of Educational Technology for Engineering Teachers (ET4ET)

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 31

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

Face-to-face Blended-online Massive Open Online

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Overview of Research in each iteration

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 32

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Model evolution with each iteration

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 33

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-35
SLIDE 35

ITERATIONS

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 34

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-36
SLIDE 36

ITERATION 3

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 35

  • Jan 5 – Jan 31, 2015
  • 4358 Teachers from 148 institutions (remote centres)

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-37
SLIDE 37

ITERATION 3

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 36

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-38
SLIDE 38

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 37

Evaluation Questions

  • Persistence Rate

n

What is the completion rate in the programme?

n

What is the persistence rate in the programme?

  • Perception

n

Does participants’ perceived competence in the use of technology, increase after the training programme?

  • Learning

n

Do the participants produce effective wiki integration plans during the training programme?

  • Behaviour

n

How has the participants’ learning from the ET4ET program transferred into actual practice?

  • Sustainability

n

How pertinent is the ET4ET2 programme?

n

How immersive is the ET4ET2 programme?

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-39
SLIDE 39

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 38

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-40
SLIDE 40

RESULTS

  • ET4ET2 has completion rate of 12.7% and persistence

rate of 15.6%

  • Statistically significant increase in the perception of

competence of wiki and screencasts.

  • Participants are able to align the technology

affordances with the learning outcomes

  • Participants find the training highly immersive and

pertinent

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 39

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-41
SLIDE 41

RESULTS

  • Changes in practice after training felt at three levels – At

student level, At teacher level and At institution level

n

“I was able to engage the backbenchers with the activities and that was reflected in their exam results.”

n

In each class I am successful in grabbing the attention of every student in the class by making them to involve in one or the

  • ther activity.

n

We also conducted a training program for about 120 faculty members out of 350 in our College and shared the important topics of this workshop.

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 40

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-42
SLIDE 42

ITERATION 4

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 41

  • 53 Participants
  • Shortlisted from Iteration 2 and 3
  • Asynchronous training (June to October)
  • Face-to-Face training (3 days)

Idea proposal Study Planning Study Implementation

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Research Design

  • Research Question

n

What changes were observed in the ownership of problem from trainer to the teacher over the course of training?

  • Qualitative method
  • Data Analysis

n

Content analysis of participant submissions and focus group discussions

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 42

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-44
SLIDE 44

RESULTS

  • Impact of immersivity
  • Changes seen in student behaviour
  • Out of 9 study plans submitted, 4 went on to implement

and disseminate in peer reviewed international conferences (LaTiCE, ICCE; 2016)

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 43

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-45
SLIDE 45

IMPLICATIONS

  • Immersivity and Pertinency required in

Investigate phase

  • Scaffolds needed for moving from practice to

research

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 44

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-46
SLIDE 46

DISCUSSION

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 45

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-47
SLIDE 47

SUMMARY OF RESULTS

  • Completion and Persistence rates

n Completion rates similar to existing large-scale

programmes

n Best completion happening in final iteration

  • Learner Reaction

n High perception of relevance and application of

training

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 46

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-48
SLIDE 48

SUMMARY OF RESULTS

  • Participant Learning

n

Improved display of aligning strategies with outcome

  • Participant Behaviour

n

Changes at Teacher level, Student-level, and Institution level

  • Sustainability

n

High pertinence and immersivity indicator of sustainability

n

Classroom action research helps in transfer of ownership

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 47

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-49
SLIDE 49

CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE

  • A2I2 is an effective

model for TPD

  • A2I2 is scalable
  • Significance of

design principles

  • Evaluation research

done in 5 iterations

  • Operated in 3 modes
  • Perception, Learning

and Behaviour results

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 48

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-50
SLIDE 50

CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE

  • A2I2 is an effective

model for TPD

  • A2I2 is scalable
  • Significance of

design principles

  • Evaluation research

done in 5 iterations

  • Operated in 3 modes
  • Perception, Learning

and Behaviour results

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 49

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-51
SLIDE 51

IMPLICATIONS

  • DBIR for scaled

interventions

  • Design principles of

Immersivity and Pertinency for assisting diffusion of practice

  • Pedagogic adaptations

for various modes

  • Use of scaffolds for

planning classroom practice

  • Classroom action research

as a thread for sustaining

  • Developing communities
  • f inquiry, beyond practice

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 50

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

RESEARCH PRACTICE

slide-52
SLIDE 52

RECOMMENDATIONS

  • Blended approach worked better in scale
  • Examples closer to participants’ domain - Pertinency
  • Student role first, teacher role next – Immersivity
  • Ensuring collaboration to tackle complex task like

lesson design, study plan

  • Leveraging peer learning through peer review and

discussion forums

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 51

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-53
SLIDE 53

LIMITATIONS

  • Content mastery of participants has been

assumed

  • Self-reported data on practice
  • Few secondary implementations

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 52

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-54
SLIDE 54

FUTURE WORK

  • Extending A2I2 for synchronous collaboration

tools

  • Extending sustainability beyond medium term

(i.e. more than 3 years)

  • Incorporating content knowledge in A2I2

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 53

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-55
SLIDE 55

CONTRIBUTIONS

RESEARCH

  • A2I2 Model for design and

implementation of technology integration training programs

  • Design principles of

Immersivity and Pertinency

  • Model for adaptation of active

learning in blended mode

PRACTICE

  • Activity constructors for

scaffolding practice

  • Training resource for other

trainers

  • Portals for building

communities of practice

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 54

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-56
SLIDE 56

PUBLICATIONS FROM THE THESIS

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 55

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

Warriem, J, Murthy, S., & Iyer, S. (2013). A model for active learning in synchronous remote classrooms: Evidence from a large-scale

  • implementation. In Proceedings of 21st International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE 2013), Bali, Indonesia, Nov

18-22. Warriem, J, Murthy, S., & Iyer, S. (2013) Training in-service teachers to do action research in educational technology. In IEEE Fifth International Conference on Technology for Education (T4E 2013), Kharagpur, Dec. 18-20. Warriem, J, Murthy, S., & Iyer, S. (2013). A2I: A Model for Teacher Training in Constructive Alignment for Use of ICT in Engineering

  • Education. In Proceedings of 22nd International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE 2014), Nara, Japan, Nov 30- Dec 4.

Murthy, S., Iyer, S., & Warriem, J. (2015). ET4ET: A Large-Scale Faculty Professional Development Program on Effective Integration

  • f Educational Technology. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 16-28.

Warriem, J, Murthy, S., & Iyer, S. (2015). Sustainability at Scale: Evidence from a Large Scale Teacher Professional Development

  • Program. In Proceedings of 23rd International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE 2015), Hangzhou, China, pp. 651-660.

Warriem, J, Murthy, S., & Iyer, S. (2016). Shifting the focus from Learner Completion to Learner Perseverance: Evidences from a Teacher Professional Development MOOC. In Proceedings of 24th International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE 2016), Mumbai, India. Murthy, S., Warriem, J., & Iyer, S. (2017). Technology Integration for Student-Centered Learning: A Model for Teacher Professional Development Programs. in Kong, S.C., Wong, T.L., Yang, M., Chow, C.F., Tse, K.H. (Eds.) Emerging Practices in Scholarship of Learning and Teaching in a Digital Era, 55-74.

slide-57
SLIDE 57

CURRENT WORK

  • FDPs in IITBombayX

n Separating Technology and Pedagogy n Faculty Mentor-Mentee

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 56

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-58
SLIDE 58

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 57

  • Prof. Sahana Murthy and Prof. Sridhar Iyer
  • Prof. Kannan Moudgalya and Prof. Chetan Solanki
  • Prof. Deepak B Phatak
  • T10KT, IITBOMBAYX Team, Participating instructors
  • Dr. Madhuri Mavinkurve, Dr. Mrinal Patwardhan, Dr. Rekha

Ramesh and Ms. Anita Diwakar, Dr. Gargi Banerjee

  • Dr. Rwitajit Majumdar, Ms. Aditi Kothiyal, Mr. Shitanshu Mishra,
  • Mr. Kapil Kadam, Dr. Yogendra Pal, Dr. Sameer Sahasrabudhe
  • RS.ET
  • My better half, My family
slide-59
SLIDE 59

REFERENCE

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 58

slide-60
SLIDE 60

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 59

THANK YOU!!!

slide-61
SLIDE 61

EXTRA SLIDES

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 60

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-62
SLIDE 62

61

¡ Training Computer Science instructors in student-centered practices

with Visualizations for Introductory Computer Science Programming

¡ Goal: Identify beliefs and practices towards active learning strategies ¡ 3688 instructors responding to survey on beliefs and practices towards

active learning at end of training

Training in Student-centered Practices

[Teach 10k Teachers (T10KT)] Blended Online Large-Scale Introductory CS content

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Research Question

¡ What are instructors’ perceptions of usefulness and need

for support in active learning and ICT integration?

¡ What are instructors’ understandings about meaning of active

learning? Mixed-method Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Instruments: 6-question survey + Open-ended feedback Data Analysis: Frequency Analysis, Correlation, Content Analysis of

  • pen-ended feedback

62

slide-64
SLIDE 64

¡ High perception of usefulness of active learning (88%) ¡ Significant correlation between perception of usefulness of ICT and

usefulness of active learning (ρ = 0.6573, p <0.05)

¡ 5 different categories of conceptions about understanding of active learning

– Category A (Mere use of ICT), Category B (Use of in-class assessment), Category C (Providing home assignments), Category D (Instructor directed interactions with students), Category E (Identical Conceptions as active learning)

¡ Instructors lack confidence in implementing active learning with ICT in their

  • teaching. They self-report requirement of scaffolds (nearly 70%) for effective

ICT integration.

63

slide-65
SLIDE 65

¡ Training engg. college instructors in systematic reflection on

practice through “Research Methods in Educational Technology”

¡ Familiarize engineering college teachers with research methods

in performing classroom action research while integrating technology.

¡ Out of 3896 active teachers only 241 did all assignments

64

Training in Action Research

[Teach 10k Teachers (T10KT)] Blended Online Large-Scale Research Methods in Educational Technology (RMET)

slide-66
SLIDE 66

RQs

¡ What was the rate of participation in the workshop? ¡ What was the improvement in the participant’s knowledge of

research methods, both (a) measured and (b) perceived?

¡ How satisfied were the participants with the workshop? ¡ How do participants’ perceptions of the usefulness of active

learning strategies affect their overall satisfaction? Mixed-Method Research Instruments: Perception survey questionnaire with open-ended feedback, Idea and Study Planning Assignments

65

slide-67
SLIDE 67

66

  • High perception of learning and satisfaction (>85%) in Blended

Online Mode

  • Statistically significant learning gains with large effect size

(Z=-12.4969, r=0.566, p<0.001)

  • Adaptation of Active Learning Strategies in Blended Online

mode

slide-68
SLIDE 68

67

  • Median of change was from 3 to 4 (out of 12), which was

considered Low within the grading rubric

  • Most ideas were teacher-centric (i.e. use of Technology for

Presentation) and not involving students in meaningful activities in class

  • Most teachers predominantly uses Presentation tools
  • Persistence rate* = 6.2% (N=3896)

* Persistence Rate = (No of Completions / No of people who did at least 1 activity)

How can we improve the design and delivery of large-scale training programs to the in-service faculty in engineering

education within India to enable them in effectively integrating Information and Communication Technology (ICT) tools within

their teaching-learning context?

slide-69
SLIDE 69

68

¡ Challenges in Technology Selection

§ Majority of Indian engineering teachers primarily rely on

presentation tools in teacher-centric mode.

¡ Implication for training

§ Needs to consider challenges in introducing complex ICT tools

along with use of student-centered practices

slide-70
SLIDE 70

69

¡ Challenges for effective Teaching-Learning Practices

§ Teacher-centric Attitude § Alternate conception of active learning

¡ Implication for Training

§ Needs to bring in attitude shift towards learner-centeredness § Provide student experiences of active learning during training to

avoid alternate conceptions

slide-71
SLIDE 71

70 How can we improve the design and delivery of large-scale training programs to the in-service faculty in engineering

education within India to enable them in effectively integrating Information and Communication Technology (ICT) tools within

their teaching-learning context?

¡ Challenges for training practices § Lack of Constructive Alignment § Support during training § Participation and persistence in Large-Scale Training ¡ Implication for Training § Knowledge and Skill of Constructive Alignment § Need for Scaffolds during design § Adapting pedagogies for scaling up

slide-72
SLIDE 72

¡ In terms of design § To train the engineering educators in research-based student-centered

practices while integrating technology.

§ To design scaffolds for these student-centered strategies that will assist

participants during training as well as implementation in their classrooms

§ To train teachers in action research of teaching-learning practices in the use of

technology tools to ensure sustainability

¡ In terms of implementation § Adaptable in multiple instructional modes, viz. face-to-face, Blended Online

Mode, Online Mode, etc. to achieve scalability.

§ Promote higher persistence rates

71

slide-73
SLIDE 73

PHASES IN A2I2 MODEL

Attain

FOCUS Introduction to LO, IS, AS FORMAT (Type of T-L Interaction) Majority are Instructor-driven (Explanation, Summary etc.) Role of Participant Student Mode (Try to ensure activeness) OUTPUT Participant creates LO for own course Participant identifies possible IS and AS for own course

72

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-74
SLIDE 74

Align

FOCUS Pairwise Alignment Type of T-L Interaction Majority are Participant-driven individual (Presentation, Practice etc.) Role of Participant Teacher Mode OUTPUT Participant creates IS aligned to LO for own course Participant creates AS aligned to LO for own course

73

PHASES IN A2I2 MODEL

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-75
SLIDE 75

Integrate

FOCUS Integration of LO-IS-AS Type of T-L Interaction Majority are Participant-driven collaborative (Think-Pair-Share, Groupwork etc.) Role of Participant Shuttles between Teacher and Student Mode OUTPUT Participant creates IS aligned to Lesson plan for own course

74

PHASES IN A2I2 MODEL

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-76
SLIDE 76

Investigate

FOCUS Evaluation of Own practice Type of T-L Interaction Majority are Participant-driven collaborative (Think-Pair-Share, Groupwork etc.) Role of Participant Shuttles between Teacher and Evaluator Mode OUTPUT Participant generates an idea to evaluate within their own practice.

75

PHASES IN A2I2 MODEL

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-77
SLIDE 77

Implications for stakeholders

  • Researchers

n Pedagogic adaptation while scaling n Increasing collaboration in discussion forum

  • Trainers and Administrators

n A2I2 Model n Existing workshop design and resources n Avenues for developing communities of practice

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 76

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS

slide-78
SLIDE 78

Implications for stakeholders

  • Teachers

n Scaffolds for student-centered practices n Participation in A2I2 based workshop helps in

developing communities of practice

  • Technology Developers

n Immersivity principle to design and disseminate

technology

IDP in Educational Technology, IIT Bombay 77

PROBLEM LITERATURE EXPLORATION A2I2 MODEL DBIR ITERATIONS DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTION MISCELLANEOUS