TECH FOR IMPACT: The Next Frontier in Social Innovation and Impact - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

tech for impact
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

TECH FOR IMPACT: The Next Frontier in Social Innovation and Impact - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

EIB Institute Seminar 27 April 2018 TECH FOR IMPACT: The Next Frontier in Social Innovation and Impact Investing Filipe Santos Chaired Professor of Social Entrepreneurship filipe.santos@ucp.pt 1 My Introduction: An Academic Social


slide-1
SLIDE 1

TECH FOR IMPACT: The Next Frontier in Social Innovation and Impact Investing

Filipe Santos

Chaired Professor of Social Entrepreneurship filipe.santos@ucp.pt

1

EIB Institute Seminar 27 April 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

My Introduction: An Academic Social Entrepreneur

(2007-2014) (2009-14) www.ies-sbs.org (2011-2014) www.mies.org.pt (2013-14) www.investimentosocial.pt (2015-2016) www.inovacaosocial.portugal2020.pt (2017 … onwards): Teaching and Research

  • Undegrad and Msc: Social Entrepreneurship
  • Msc and MBA: Impact Investing
  • EIB Institute: SIT Impact Bootcamp
  • EVPA: Scaling Impact for Social Investors
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Let’s Start with the Big Picture

Social Innovation and Impact Investing:

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The Big Picture: Changes in Business & Entrepreneurship

Many (1 in 4?) start-ups in Europe have societal mission / goals Policy Focus: EU 2011 Social Business Initiative

Social Enterprises moving into the mainstream?

GEM 2016: 3.5% of population doing SE - 1/3 of those market-driven

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Many Corporations increasingly adopt an Impact focus (and ~2400 got certified)

5

And Sustainability Strategies are increasingly integrated at the core business of multinationals

slide-6
SLIDE 6

SDGs Increasingly Used As Metric For Impact, proposing specific and comparable indicators

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Social Enterprises

The Great Convergence ?

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Three Key Segments of Social Enterprises

1- Inclusion of Disadvantaged Populations 2- Base of the Pyramid Markets (BoP) 3- Well-Being of People & Planet

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Many Small ll Ventur ures es - The Chall llenge enge of Scali ling ng

The he de developm lopment nt cycle le of

  • f so

social ial innov nnovati ation

  • n init

nitia iative tives consist consists of

  • f a pathwa

athway that hat st star arts ts wi with an an in innov novati ative ide dea with ith pot potential ntial so soci cieta tal im impact ct an and ad advanc nces towa

  • wards

ds mainstr mainstream adopti ption

  • n of
  • f the

the pr propose

  • posed solut

solution ion – diss issemina ination, ion, in in or

  • rder to

to maxim imize ize impact.

Financing Gap (Death Valley)

9

EU Policy 2016: Start-up and Scale Up Initiative

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The Big Picture: A Change in Financial Capitalism

Ther ere e are e now close e to to $100 0 trilion n in assets ts under er managem emen ent t

How w are these se funds nds appli plied ed and d mana nage ged? d? – Risk-Adj djust usted ed Return urn

Impac act t Fi Financ ncin ing brings gs a new w criter erion

  • n to

to the inve vest stment ment proce

  • cess

ss: Impact

act ( = = valu lue cr creati tion to soci ciety) ty)

Financial ial Return Risk

IMPACT = Valu lue Creat ation

  • n

for r Society ety

Financial ial Return Risk

slide-11
SLIDE 11

The trend of incorporating Impact started with Social Responsible Investment (SRI) (since the 2000s called Sustainable Investing)

Th There e are now $22.89 2.89 trillion lion of AUM M under der respons ponsib ible e inve vestmen stment strat rateg egies es = 26% % of AUM UM globally ally (53% 3% Eu Europe,

  • pe, 22%

% US) ) including: uding:

  • 1. Negati

tive/exclusion lusionar ary y screening ing – 15.02 02 trillion ion (11.06 trillion in Europe)

  • 2. Posit

itiv ive/Best st-in in-cla lass ss screeni eening ng

  • 3. Norms

ms-bas ased screenin ing 4. . Integration tegration of ESG factor

  • rs

s – 10.37 37 trillion ion (North America, Australia, Asia)

  • 5. Sustai

tainab nability ility themed d inve vest sting ing

  • 6. Impact/commu

ct/communi nity ty inve vest stin ing

  • 7. Corp

rpora

  • rate engageme

ment t and sharehol holder der action

  • n – 8.37

7 trilli lion

  • n (Japan)

Source: GSIA 2016 report based in 2015 data http://www.gsi-alliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/GSIR_Review2016.F.pdf

Fund Managers are increasingly considering ESG as part of their fiduciary duties

small ll but fast stest st growing wing cate tegor gory y (250

0 Billio ion, , +100% % ye year)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Since 2008 that Doing Good seems to lead to Doing Better

Swiss Re, one of Europe’s biggest insurers, is to move its entire $130bn investment portfolio to new, ethically-based benchmark indices. Swiss Re’s research shows that the total returns offered by the ESG indices are very slightly lower than for more conventional benchmarks, but that they are less volatile. That, says Mr Fürer, creates better risk-adjusted returns. FT - 6 September 2017: Investors are finding that if they are good to the planet and to people, they also end up, on average, benefiting themselves. There is mounting evidence that funds which observe environmental, social and governance (ESG) standards in their strategies tend to outperform those that don’t by a significant margin.“... The outperformance of ESG strategies is beyond doubt. It is time for ESG investing to become mainstream,” says Isabelle Mateos y Lago, global macro investment strategist at BlackRock, which manages $5.7tn worldwide. “It is no longer just something for a few tree-hugging individuals to get involved with. In the research process of every team at BlackRock, we are increasingly ensuring that they take ESG into account.”

slide-13
SLIDE 13

What are the current challenges in Scaling-Up Impact Investing to $000s Billions? Implementing negative screening of existing investments or using ESG is relatively easy... Investing through positive screening by profitably funding innovative social enterprises- that is the current challenge... and opportunity... Similar to the rise and role of the asset class of “Private Equity” but focused on Impact

slide-14
SLIDE 14

From Venture Philanthropy to Impact Investing

In the mid 2000s 0s, , a few ve vent ntur ure e capital alist sts s in Europe

  • pe applied

d their r inves vestmen ment approach ach to to social ial enter terpri prises ses crea eatin ing g small pioneer eer countr ntry y funds s of 5-10M 0M euros

  • s (ex:

: Bonn Ventur ures es, Oltre e Ventur ures es, , Ph PhiTrus ust, t, CREAS). ). Some have ve since e raised ed 2nd fund of 20M+ + euros Active e Pu Public c Policy: y: EIF launch ches es Social Impact act Accelera elerator

  • r (2013)

13)

Other larger funds created and now with $1B AUM:

Leapfrog Investments http://www.leapfroginvest.com (BoP) Bridges Fund Mgmt http://www.bridgesfundmanagement.com/ (UK)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Specific Challenges for the different segments of social enterprise 1- Inclusion of Disadvantaged Populations

  • Main Focus of European social enterprises and funds. But lower

profit potential and less scalable (tough niches) - Hybrid business models and impact selling (through govern. cost savings)

2- Base of the Pyramid Markets

  • Main focus of global investment funds, development
  • rganizations and multinational corporations - but works mostly

in developing countries and becomes VC/PE in frontier markets

3- Well-Being of People & Planet

  • Less developed segment as it is difficult to scale (benefits are

long-term) unless there is strong profit potential – in that case commercial markets work – e.g. Drug development / Pharma

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

General Challenges for Impact Investing compared to VCs in Commercial Entrepreneurship

  • Longer development cycles (10-20 years)
  • Weaker secondary market for acquisitions or IPOs (no exits…)
  • Founder replacement more challenging (work of passion)
  • Regulation / Government funding often relevant (and uncertain)
  • Organization-centric growth (instead of innovation-centric)
  • Less likely to have profitable Unicorn (we do have non-profit ones)

Impact Investing will not scale profitably using the traditional venture capital model! (no exits, no unicorns)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Unless we bring in new investment mind-set and deploy

TECH FOR IMPACT

Impact Investing will not scale profitably…:

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

The Investment Mind-Set Needs to Change:

1- It is not about building sustainable organizations. it is about validating novel solutions to societal problems and making them widely adopted (through the public or commercial or social sector) 2- It is not about managing a portfolio of high risk venture to create winners and exit, but about nurturing each venture as a carrier of social innovation and realizing value for society with it 3- Funds may need longer time-horizon and new mechanism for investor liquidity. Management remuneration different from “20% Carry”?

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Technology deployed with the right investment mind-set can enable impact investing to scale and fulfill its critical role in funding social innovations for society Let me focus on 3 key applications/trends

My Key Argument Today

slide-20
SLIDE 20

1-Digital Tech for Efficiency of the Social Economy

Adaptation and deployment of established digital technologies to lower the cost and increase the effectiveness of social economy services and products

  • Case management software
  • Online registration and automation systems
  • Digital delivery of products and services to niches

Outcome is Increased Productivity in the Social Inclusion and Base of the Pyramid Segments

slide-21
SLIDE 21

2-Tech-Enabled Collaborative Global Platforms

Digital and Collaborative Technology enable a powerful mechanism for scaling social innovations through global and high-engagement platforms & movements

  • Knowledge: Wikipedia
  • Inspiration: TED
  • Microfinance: KIVA
  • Medical Innovation: Patient Innovation
  • Online Education: EdX
  • etc…

These models are the current and future Impact Unicorns

  • Allowing for global scale and empowerment at minimal cost (could

be a realm for impact philanthropy and/or impact investors)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

3- Deep Tech Solutions to Wicked Problems

Artificial intelligence cleverly deployed can address previously unsolvable problems

  • Reduce food wastage
  • Skin Cancer Detection
  • Disease Prevention and Prediction
  • Addresses for each family in the world
  • Etc..

This makes the “Well-Being of People & Planet” a scalable and investable segment with Lock-Step Business and Impact Models

slide-23
SLIDE 23

http://mustardseed.vc/

Allowing some Impact Investors to aim for higher than average returns

23

By Investing in Ventures with Lock-Step Business and Impact Models

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Final Thoughts

Impact Investing needs to develop its own business model different from traditional venture capital As with VCs in tech entrepreneurship, the clever deployment of technology in impact entrepreneurship will enable scalable and investable social innovation models: The rise of the Impact Venture (for-profit, mission-oriented, technology-enabled) Thank you for your attention! Q&A

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Social Enterprises

Rise of a New Venture Category

Impact Ventures