T Evidence of intergenerational educational persistence and the F - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

t
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

T Evidence of intergenerational educational persistence and the F - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The geography of mobility T Evidence of intergenerational educational persistence and the F Great Gatsby Curve in Brazil A R Tharcisio Leone D Free University of Berlin School of Business and Economics Institute for Latin American


slide-1
SLIDE 1

D R A F T

The geography of mobility

Evidence of intergenerational educational persistence and the ”Great Gatsby Curve” in Brazil Tharcisio Leone

Free University of Berlin School of Business and Economics Institute for Latin American Studies

June 11, 2018

Tharcisio Leone (FU-Berlin) The geography of mobility June 11, 2018 1 / 35

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

1 Introduction 2 Data 3 Estimating intergenerational mobility 4 The Great Gatsby Curve 5 Linking Inequality and school dropouts 6 Conclusion

Tharcisio Leone (FU-Berlin) The geography of mobility June 11, 2018 2 / 35

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Outline

1 Introduction 2 Data 3 Estimating intergenerational mobility 4 The Great Gatsby Curve 5 Linking Inequality and school dropouts 6 Conclusion

Tharcisio Leone (FU-Berlin) The geography of mobility June 11, 2018 3 / 35

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Motivation

“Great Gatsby Curve”

Source: Corak (2012) Tharcisio Leone (FU-Berlin) The geography of mobility June 11, 2018 4 / 35

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Motivation

.577 .543 .529 .527 .526 .523 .512 .510 .505 .503 .501 .501 .497 .495 .489 .488 .487 .483 .482 .480 .475 .470 .469 .457 .449 .444 .416 .515

Gini

Distrito Federal Acre Amazonas Maranhão Bahia Rio de Janeiro Tocantins Paraíba Pernambuco Ceará Roraima Piauí Alagoas Rio Grande do Norte São Paulo Espírito Santo Pará Sergipe Minas Gerais Mato Grosso do Sul Rio Grande do Sul Amapá Rondônia Mato Grosso Paraná Goiás Santa Catarina Brazil

.1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 1 Outcome share (Proportion)

Bottom 50% Middle 40% Top 10% Note: Estimations based on per capita household income. Source: PNAD-2014, own estimates.

(a) Income distribution

States

Tharcisio Leone (FU-Berlin) The geography of mobility June 11, 2018 5 / 35

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Research questions

1 There is a variation in intergenerational educational mobility

across Brazilian states?

2 What socioeconomic indicators are correlated with the mobility at

state level?

3 Does the “Great Gatsby Curve” also hold true within a single

country?

4 How higher income inequality leads to lower rate of mobility?

Investigation of one specific mechanism behind the correlation between inequality and mobility: School dropout rate.

Tharcisio Leone (FU-Berlin) The geography of mobility June 11, 2018 6 / 35

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Outline

1 Introduction 2 Data 3 Estimating intergenerational mobility 4 The Great Gatsby Curve 5 Linking Inequality and school dropouts 6 Conclusion

Tharcisio Leone (FU-Berlin) The geography of mobility June 11, 2018 7 / 35

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Data

1 Brazilian National Household Sample Survey (PNAD)

Mobility supplement 2014 (46, 051 individuals)

2 Main variables for the investigation

Number of years of schooling Level of education School Dropout rate Income inequality

3 Variable construction

Only individuals born between 1940 and 1989 The most educated parent 25/10 Ratio for income inequality Economic Marginalization

4 Further variables

Individual characteristics (gender, birth cohort, race, locality of residence and living with both parents at age 15)

Tharcisio Leone (FU-Berlin) The geography of mobility June 11, 2018 8 / 35

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Data

2 4 6 8 10 12 2 4 6 8 10 12 2 4 6 8 10 12 2 4 6 8 10 12 1940-1944 1945-1949 1950-1954 1955-1959 1960-1964 1965-1969 1970-1974 1975-1979 1980-1984 1985-1989 1940-1944 1945-1949 1950-1954 1955-1959 1960-1964 1965-1969 1970-1974 1975-1979 1980-1984 1985-1989 1940-1944 1945-1949 1950-1954 1955-1959 1960-1964 1965-1969 1970-1974 1975-1979 1980-1984 1985-1989 1940-1944 1945-1949 1950-1954 1955-1959 1960-1964 1965-1969 1970-1974 1975-1979 1980-1984 1985-1989 1940-1944 1945-1949 1950-1954 1955-1959 1960-1964 1965-1969 1970-1974 1975-1979 1980-1984 1985-1989 1940-1944 1945-1949 1950-1954 1955-1959 1960-1964 1965-1969 1970-1974 1975-1979 1980-1984 1985-1989 1940-1944 1945-1949 1950-1954 1955-1959 1960-1964 1965-1969 1970-1974 1975-1979 1980-1984 1985-1989 North, Acre North, Amapá North, Amazonas North, Pará North, Rondônia North, Roraima North, Tocantins Northeast, Alagoas Northeast, Bahia Northeast, Ceará Northeast, Maranhão Northeast, Paraíba Northeast, Pernambuco Northeast, Piauí Northeast, Rio Grande do Norte Northeast, Sergipe South, Paraná South, Rio Grande do Sul South, Santa Catarina Southeast, Espírito Santo Southeast, Minas Gerais Southeast, Rio de Janeiro Southeast, São Paulo West, Distrito Federal West, Goiás West, Mato Grosso West, Mato Grosso do Sul Brazil

Children Parents Years of Schooling Birth cohorts

(a) Average years of schooling

Tharcisio Leone (FU-Berlin) The geography of mobility June 11, 2018 9 / 35

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Data

Mean 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Years of schooling

M i d w e s t S

  • u

t h S

  • u

t h e a s t N

  • r

t h e a s t N

  • r

t h Mato Grosso do Sul Mato Grosso Goiás Distrito Federal Santa Catarina Rio Grande do Sul Paraná São Paulo Rio de Janeiro Minas Gerais Espírito Santo Sergipe Rio Grande do Norte Piauí Pernambuco Paraíba Maranhão Ceará Bahia Alagoas Tocantins Roraima Rondônia Pará Amazonas Amapá Acre Source: PNAD-2014, own estimates.

by region and states in Brazil

Average Education

Tharcisio Leone (FU-Berlin) The geography of mobility June 11, 2018 10 / 35

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Outline

1 Introduction 2 Data 3 Estimating intergenerational mobility 4 The Great Gatsby Curve 5 Linking Inequality and school dropouts 6 Conclusion

Tharcisio Leone (FU-Berlin) The geography of mobility June 11, 2018 11 / 35

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Estimating intergenerational mobility

  • 1. Transition matrix

Probability of children from parents with the educational attainment j to achieve the education level i. Provide a overview about the direction of the mobility.

  • 2. Linear regression model

Summarize the grade of persistence between parents’ and children’s educational attainment. Take into account the changes over time in the education inequality.

Tharcisio Leone (FU-Berlin) The geography of mobility June 11, 2018 12 / 35

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Transition matrices

1 Classification of educational outcomes Education of children

(generation t) and parents (generation t + 1) into four categories: no school certificate, primary, secondary and tertiary education.

2 Estimation of matrices

A trasition matrix is a process {X0, X1, X2, ...} with number of states S, where S has size R (possibly infinite) such that:

pij = P(Xt+1 = j | Xt = i) for i, j ∈ S, t = 0, 1, 2, ... (1)

with two important properties:

∀ i, j ∈ R, P(i, j) ≥ 0, and

N

  • j=1

pij =

N

  • j=1

P(Xt+1 = j | Xt = i) =

N

  • j=1

P{Xt=i}(Xt+1 = j) = 1

Tharcisio Leone (FU-Berlin) The geography of mobility June 11, 2018 13 / 35

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Transition matrices

3 Measure of intergenerational mobility

Immobility Ratio: ImR = Tr(P) S = N

i=1 ρij

S Upward and Downward Mobility: UpM = Pr (Xt > l | Xt+1 = l) and DoM = Pr (Xt < l | Xt+1 = l) Prais–Shorrocks-Indicator: MP S(P) = S − Tr(P) S − 1 with MP S ∈ [0, 1]

Tharcisio Leone (FU-Berlin) The geography of mobility June 11, 2018 14 / 35

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Transition matrices

0 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 1 1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990

Year of Birth Parents with no school certificate

0 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 1 1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990

Year of Birth Parents with primary education

0 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 1 1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990

Year of Birth Parents with secondary education

0 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 1 1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990

Year of Birth

Tertiary Secondary Primary No school

Parents with tertiary education Source: PNAD-2014, own estimates.

Descendants predicted propabilities of education attainment

Tharcisio Leone (FU-Berlin) The geography of mobility June 11, 2018 15 / 35

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Transition matrices

.1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 1

Probability

M i d w e s t S

  • u

t h e a s t S

  • u

t h N

  • r

t h e a s t N

  • r

t h B r a z i l Mato Grosso do Sul Goiás Distrito Federal Mato Grosso São Paulo Rio de Janeiro Minas Gerais Espírito Santo Santa Catarina Rio Grande do Sul Paraná Sergipe Rio Grande do Norte Pernambuco Paraíba Maranhão Ceará Bahia Alagoas Piauí Tocantins Roraima Rondônia Pará Amazonas Amapá Acre Brazil Source: PNAD-2014, own estimates.

by regions and states in Brazil

Intergenerational Education Mobility

Downward Immobility Upward Tharcisio Leone (FU-Berlin) The geography of mobility June 11, 2018 16 / 35

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Transition matrices

.1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9

Probability

Paraíba

  • M. G. do Sul

Alagoas Maranhão Sergipe Rio de Janeiro Pernambuco Mato Grosso

  • R. G. do Sul

Pará Brazil Minas Gerais Ceará Bahia São Paulo Paraná Santa Catarina Acre Distrito Federal Espírito Santo Roraima Goiás Amazonas Rondônia Amapá Piauí Tocantins

  • R. G. do Norte

Prais-Shorrocks Index Botton to Top Bottom Persistence Top Persistence

Source: PNAD-2014, own estimates.

Intergenerational Mobility Indexes

Tharcisio Leone (FU-Berlin) The geography of mobility June 11, 2018 17 / 35

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Linear regression model

The association between the education of children and parents is given by:

educc

is = α + β educp is + ǫi

for i = 1, 2, ...N (2)

Normalisation of coefficient β by the corresponding standard deviation:

ˆ β = ρcp

s

σp

s

σc

s

, with σ =

  • 1

N

N

  • i=1

(x1 − µ)2 (3)

Tharcisio Leone (FU-Berlin) The geography of mobility June 11, 2018 18 / 35

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Linear regression model

From equations (2) and (3) the resulting model can be summarized as:

educc

is

σc

s

= δ + ρ educp

is

σp

s

  • + ǫi

with ρ ∈ [0, 1] (4)

Inclusion of a vector X with controls variables and some interaction terms:

educc

is

σc

s

= δ + ρ educp

is

σp

s

+ η educp

is

σp

s

× UFi

  • + λ UFi + γ (Xi × UFi) + ǫis (5)

with: Control variables: Gender, year of birth and race Dummy variables UF present the state of residence

Tharcisio Leone (FU-Berlin) The geography of mobility June 11, 2018 19 / 35

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Linear regression model

(0.500 - 0.525] (0.475 - 0.500] (0.450 - 0.475] (0.425 - 0.450] (0.400 - 0.425] (0.375 - 0.400] [0.350 - 0.375] [0.250 - 0.275] Source: PNAD-2014, own estimates.

Intergenerational persistence in education

Tharcisio Leone (FU-Berlin) The geography of mobility June 11, 2018 20 / 35

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Outline

1 Introduction 2 Data 3 Estimating intergenerational mobility 4 The Great Gatsby Curve 5 Linking Inequality and school dropouts 6 Conclusion

Tharcisio Leone (FU-Berlin) The geography of mobility June 11, 2018 21 / 35

slide-22
SLIDE 22

The Great Gatsby Curve

Interim result

The chances of attaining intergenerational educational mobility vary a very great deal from one state to another in Brazil.

Next steps

Investigation of why the mobility ranges so widely within a single country. Correlation of mobility with income inequality at state level.

Model of Solon (2004)

Family (parents and children) as an intergenerational decision maker. Higher-income parents have (1) a higher capacity to invest in the human capital of their children, and (2) a higher incentive for this investment.

Tharcisio Leone (FU-Berlin) The geography of mobility June 11, 2018 22 / 35

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Correlating intergenerational mobility

RO AC AM RR PA AP TO MA PI CE RN PB PE AL SE BA MGES RJ SP PR SC RS MS MT GO DF

r = 0.3612*

.25 .35 .45 .30 .40 .50

Intergenerational persistence

.42 .44 .46 .48 .52 .54 .56 .58 .50

GINI-Coefficient

Note: r = Pearson´s Correlation. Asterisk be printed for correlation coefficients with p-values of .1 or lower. Source: PNAD-2014, own estimates.

Great Gatsby Curve

Tharcisio Leone (FU-Berlin) The geography of mobility June 11, 2018 23 / 35

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Outline

1 Introduction 2 Data 3 Estimating intergenerational mobility 4 The Great Gatsby Curve 5 Linking Inequality and school dropouts 6 Conclusion

Tharcisio Leone (FU-Berlin) The geography of mobility June 11, 2018 24 / 35

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Linking Inequality and school dropouts

Interim results

The level of intergenerational mobility ranges across Brazilian states The ”Great Gatsby Curve” holds true within a single country (States with greater income disparity tend to have lower levels of education mobility between generations)

Next steps

Change from an analysis of intergenerational mobility via correlation hypothesis to an investigation of the determinats The link between inequality and school dropout rate Economic marginalization: Children with very low expected earnings premium Marginalization arises as a consequence of higher income inequality

Tharcisio Leone (FU-Berlin) The geography of mobility June 11, 2018 25 / 35

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Linking Inequality and school dropouts

Research question

Have children from low socioeconomic backgrounds who live in states with high income inequality levels a greater chance to drop out the school system? The empirical probit model can be write as: EduOutcomeisc = π0 + π1 (IllitePis × ratios) + π2 (NoEducPis × ratios) + π3 IllitePis + π4 NoEducPis + π5 ratios + γ1 maleis + γ2 ruralis + γ3 bothPis + γ4 raceis + γ5 birthcis + ǫis

where: EduOutcome: Primary school dropout, secondary school dropout and concluded (tertiary) education system. Ratio: Ranking in income inequality (measured by the 25 to 10 ratio). Proxy for Marginalization: IlliteP for illiterate parents and NoEducP for parents with no primary education.

Tharcisio Leone (FU-Berlin) The geography of mobility June 11, 2018 26 / 35

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Correlating intergenerational mobility

High [5.2 - 7.5] Middle [4.8 - 5.1] Low [3.8 - 4.7] Level of inequality Notes: (i) Estimations based on per capita household income. (ii) Ratio represents the relation between average income at the 75th and 10th percentiles. Source: PNAD-2014, own estimates.

(b) Ratio 25/10 of income distribution

Tharcisio Leone (FU-Berlin) The geography of mobility June 11, 2018 27 / 35

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Correlating intergenerational mobility

.1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7

School Dropout

Illiterate No education Primary Secondary Tertiary Level of parent's education

Low Middle High Low Middle High Low Middle High Low Middle High Low Middle High Source: PNAD-2014, own estimates.

by education of parents and ratio 25/10 of income distribution

Dropout rate in primary education

Tharcisio Leone (FU-Berlin) The geography of mobility June 11, 2018 28 / 35

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Table 1: The impact of Inequality on School Dropout.

(PSD) (SSD) (CTE) VARIABLES Primary school dropout Secondary school dropout Concluded tertiary education Illiterate Parents * Ratio 25/10 0.0321 0.0206 0.0809 Parents with no school certificate * Ratio 25/10 0.0609** 0.0676**

  • 0.0489

Illiterate Parents 0.319 0.367*

  • 0.908***

Parents with no school certificate 0.468*** 0.458***

  • 0.535***

Ratio 25/10 0.00416

  • 0.103***

0.122*** Male 0.176*** 0.197***

  • 0.220***

Rural 0.691*** 0.748***

  • 0.710***

Living with both parent

  • 0.183***
  • 0.135***

0.143*** White (reference)

  • Black

0.164*** 0.239***

  • 0.404***

Mixed (white/black) 0.320*** 0.316***

  • 0.452***

Asian

  • 0.438***
  • 0.433***

0.654*** Indigenous 0.297** 0.164

  • 0.0841

1980 - 1989 (reference)

  • 1970 - 1979

0.415*** 0.351***

  • 0.0547*

1960 - 1969 0.489*** 0.512***

  • 0.0763**

1950 - 1959 0.463*** 0.819***

  • 0.120***

1940 - 1949 0.724*** 1.121***

  • 0.266***

Constant

  • 1.590***
  • 0.569***
  • 0.926***

Observations 35,555 35,305 34,109 Note: ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. Source: PNAD-2014, own estimates. Tharcisio Leone (FU-Berlin) The geography of mobility June 11, 2018 29 / 35

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Focus on the marginal effects at a point ˜ x:

How change in primary school dropout is related to change in the ratio 25/10 ? ∂E(EduOutcome|x) ∂x

  • x=˜

x

= ∂F(xβ) ∂x

  • x=˜

x

= f(˜ xβ)β

.1 .2 .3 .4 .5

Dropout probability

4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5

Ratio 25/10 of income distribution Yes No

Parents with primary education?

Source: PNAD-2014, own estimates.

Primary education

Tharcisio Leone (FU-Berlin) The geography of mobility June 11, 2018 30 / 35

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Focus on the marginal effects at a point ˜ x:

How change in educational outcome is related to change in the proxy for economic marginalization ? ∂E(EduOutcome|x) ∂x

  • x=˜

x

= ∂F(xβ) ∂x

  • x=˜

x

= f(˜ xβ)β

Table 2: Contrasts on School Dropout, by education of parents.

(PSD) (SSD) (CTE) VARIABLES Primary school dropout Secondary school dropout Concluded tertiary education Illiterate Parents (1 vs 0) 0.172*** 0.180***

  • 0.0812***

(0.0104) (0.0114) (0.00650) Parents with no education (1 vs 0) 0.253*** 0.305***

  • 0.154***

(0.00651) (0.00719) (0.00523) Notes: (i) Robust standard errors in parentheses; (ii) All other predictors at their mean value; (iii) ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001 Source: PNAD-2014, own estimates. Tharcisio Leone (FU-Berlin) The geography of mobility June 11, 2018 31 / 35

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Contrasts in tertiary education

  • .25
  • .15
  • .05
  • .30
  • .20
  • .10

Contrasts of Linear Prediction

4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5

Ratio 25/10 of income distribution

Source: PNAD-2014, own estimates.

Contrasts of Adjusted Predictions of NoEducP with 95% CIs

Tharcisio Leone (FU-Berlin) The geography of mobility June 11, 2018 32 / 35

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Outline

1 Introduction 2 Data 3 Estimating intergenerational mobility 4 The Great Gatsby Curve 5 Linking Inequality and school dropouts 6 Conclusion

Tharcisio Leone (FU-Berlin) The geography of mobility June 11, 2018 33 / 35

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Conclusion

Intergenerational persistence in education varies substantially across Brazilian states. Statistically signifficant association between intergenerational mobility and income inequality and expected earnings return to human capital. Confirmation of the ”Great Gatsby curve” at a national level. Children born in families with no education are more likely to leave the school early if they are living in states where the gap between the bottom and middle of income distribution is wider.

Tharcisio Leone (FU-Berlin) The geography of mobility June 11, 2018 34 / 35

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Thank you for your attention !

More Information? Questions? Suggestions? Please contact me: Tharcisio Leone ttleone13@zedat.fu-berlin.de

Tharcisio Leone (FU-Berlin) The geography of mobility June 11, 2018 35 / 35