t he z ero l ower b ound f requency d uration
play

T HE Z ERO L OWER B OUND : F REQUENCY , D URATION , AND N UMERICAL C - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

T HE Z ERO L OWER B OUND : F REQUENCY , D URATION , AND N UMERICAL C ONVERGENCE Alexander W. Richter Auburn University Nathaniel A. Throckmorton DePauw University I NTRODUCTION Popular monetary policy rule due to Taylor (1993) r t =


  1. T HE Z ERO L OWER B OUND : F REQUENCY , D URATION , AND N UMERICAL C ONVERGENCE Alexander W. Richter Auburn University Nathaniel A. Throckmorton DePauw University

  2. I NTRODUCTION • Popular monetary policy rule due to Taylor (1993) r t = φ ˆ ˆ π t + ε t , ε t bounded support • Taylor principle requires φ > 1 (active monetary policy) ◮ Necessary and sufficient for unique bounded equilibrium • Three key assumptions 1. Fiscal policy is passive 2. Policy parameters are fixed 3. Zero lower bound (ZLB) never binds • Leeper (1991) relaxes the first assumption and Davig and Leeper (2007) relaxes the second assumption • This paper relaxes the third assumption R ICHTER AND T HROCKMORTON : T HE ZLB: F REQUENCY , D URATION , AND N UMERICAL C ONVERGENCE

  3. M AIN F INDINGS • We adopt a textbook New Keynesian model with two alternative stochastic processes: 1. 2-state Markov process governing monetary policy 2. Persistent discount factor or technology shocks • Convergence is not guaranteed even if the Taylor principle is satisfied when the ZLB does not bind. • The boundary of the convergence region imposes a clear tradeoff between the expected frequency and average duration of ZLB events ◮ Household can expect frequent—but brief—ZLB events or infrequent—but prolonged—ZLB events ◮ Parameters of the stochastic process affect convergence R ICHTER AND T HROCKMORTON : T HE ZLB: F REQUENCY , D URATION , AND N UMERICAL C ONVERGENCE

  4. A L ITTLE B ACKGROUND • Davig and Leeper (2007): Fisherian Economy φ ( s t ) π t = E t π t +1 + ν t , ν ∼ AR (1) p ij = Pr[ s t = j | s t − 1 = i ] and φ ( s t = j ) = φ j , s t ∈ { 1 , 2 } • Integration over s t E [ π t +1 | s t = i, Ω − s t ] = p i 1 E [ π 1 t +1 | Ω − s t ] + p i 2 E [ π 2 t +1 | Ω − s t ] , where Ω − s = { ν t , ν t − 1 , . . . , s t − 1 , s t − 2 , . . . } t • Define π jt = π t ( s t = j, ν t ) . The system is � φ 1 � � π 1 t � � p 11 � � E t π 1 t +1 � � ν t � 0 p 12 = + 0 φ 2 π 2 t p 21 p 22 E t π 2 t +1 ν t R ICHTER AND T HROCKMORTON : T HE ZLB: F REQUENCY , D URATION , AND N UMERICAL C ONVERGENCE

  5. D ETERMINACY : F ISHERIAN E CONOMY • The existence of a unique bounded MSV solution requires p 11 (1 − φ 2 ) + p 22 (1 − φ 1 ) + φ 1 φ 2 > 1 ( LRTP ) • Example determinacy/convergence regions p 11 = 0 . 8; p 22 = 0 . 95 p 11 = 0 . 5; p 22 = 0 . 95 1.4 1.4 φ 2 1.2 φ 2 1.2 1 1 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 0.5 1 1.5 φ 1 φ 1 R ICHTER AND T HROCKMORTON : T HE ZLB: F REQUENCY , D URATION , AND N UMERICAL C ONVERGENCE

  6. D ETERMINACY : NK E CONOMY • Example determinacy regions p 11 = 0 . 8; p 22 = 0 . 95 p 11 = 0 . 5; p 22 = 0 . 95 1.4 1.4 φ 2 φ 2 1.2 1.2 1 1 0.5 1 1.5 −1 0 1 φ 1 φ 1 • ZLB is similar to DL with φ 1 = 0 and φ 2 > 1 , but with a truncated distribution on the nominal interest rate R ICHTER AND T HROCKMORTON : T HE ZLB: F REQUENCY , D URATION , AND N UMERICAL C ONVERGENCE

  7. N ONLINEAR F ISHERIAN E CONOMY A second-order approximation of the Euler equation around the deterministic steady state implies π t +1 ] + E t [ˆ β t +1 ]) 2 ˆ r t + (ˆ r t − E t [ˆ = � �� � =0 ( First Order ) π t +1 ] − E t [ˆ π t +1 − ˆ β t +1 ) 2 ] − ( E t [ˆ π t +1 − ˆ β t +1 ]) 2 ) E t [ˆ β t +1 ] − ( E t [(ˆ � �� � =0 ( First Order, Jensen’s Inequality ) R ICHTER AND T HROCKMORTON : T HE ZLB: F REQUENCY , D URATION , AND N UMERICAL C ONVERGENCE

  8. N ONLINEAR F ISHERIAN E CONOMY 1.5 Nonlinear 1.4 ( ρ = 0 . 95 ) 1.3 Nonlinear Fixed Regime φ 2 1.2 ( ρ = 0 . 85 ) Convergence Region 1.1 Linear 1 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 φ 1 R ICHTER AND T HROCKMORTON : T HE ZLB: F REQUENCY , D URATION , AND N UMERICAL C ONVERGENCE

  9. N UMERICAL P ROCEDURE • We compute global nonlinear solutions to each setup using policy function iteration on a dense grid ◮ Linear interpolation and Gauss-Hermite quadrature ◮ Duration of ZLB events is stochastic ◮ Expectational effects of hitting and leaving ZLB • Algorithm is non-convergent whenever ◮ a policy function continually drifts from steady state ◮ the iteration step (max distance between policy function values on successive iterations) diverges for 100+ iterations • Algorithm is convergent whenever ◮ the iteration step is less than 10 − 13 for 10+ iterations R ICHTER AND T HROCKMORTON : T HE ZLB: F REQUENCY , D URATION , AND N UMERICAL C ONVERGENCE

  10. N UMERICAL P ROCEDURE • Our algorithm yields the same determinacy regions Davig and Leeper analytically derive in their Fisherian economy and New Keynesian economy ◮ When the LRTP is satisfied (not satisfied), our algorithm converges (diverges) • Within the class of MSV solutions, there is a link between the convergent solution and determinate equilibrium ◮ Non-MSV solutions with fundamental or non-fundamental components may still exist ◮ Finding locally unique MSV solutions with a ZLB is helpful since most research is based on MSV solutions. • Not a proof, but it provides confidence that our algorithm accurately captures MSV solutions R ICHTER AND T HROCKMORTON : T HE ZLB: F REQUENCY , D URATION , AND N UMERICAL C ONVERGENCE

  11. L ITERATURE • Linearized models with a singular ZLB event ◮ Eggertsson and Woodford (2003), Christiano (2004), Braun and Waki (2006), Eggertsson (2010, 2011), Erceg and Linde (2010), Christiano et al. (2011), Gertler and Karadi (2011), and many others • Nonlinear models with recurring ZLB events ◮ Judd et al. (2011), Fern´ andez Villaverde et al. (2012), Gust et al. (2012), Basu and Bundick (2012), Mertens and Ravn (2013), Aruoba and Schorfheide (2013), Gavin et al. (2014) • Determinacy in Markov-switching models ◮ Davig and Leeper (2007), Farmer et al. (2009,2010), Cho (2013), Barth´ elemy and Marx (2013) • Determinacy in models with a ZLB constraint ◮ Benhabib et al (2001a), Alstadheim and Henderson (2006) R ICHTER AND T HROCKMORTON : T HE ZLB: F REQUENCY , D URATION , AND N UMERICAL C ONVERGENCE

  12. K EY M ODEL F EATURES • Representative Household ◮ Values consumption and leisure with preferences ∞ � β t { log( c t ) − χn 1+ η � E 0 / (1 + η ) } t t =0 ◮ Cashless economy and bonds are in zero net supply ◮ No capital accumulation • Intermediate and final goods firms ◮ Monopolistically competitive intermediate firms produce differentiated inputs ◮ Rotemberg (1982) quadratic costs to adjusting prices ◮ A competitive final goods firm combines the intermediate inputs to produce the consumption good R ICHTER AND T HROCKMORTON : T HE ZLB: F REQUENCY , D URATION , AND N UMERICAL C ONVERGENCE

  13. E XOGENOUS ZLB E VENTS • The monetary authority follows � r ( π t /π ∗ ) φ ¯ s t = 1 for r t = 1 s t = 2 for r = 1 . 015 , π ∗ = 1 . 005 , and φ ∈ { 1 . 3 , 1 . 5 , 1 . 7 } Baseline: ¯ • s t follows a 2 -state Markov chain with transition matrix � Pr[ s t = 1 | s t − 1 = 1] � � p 11 � Pr[ s t = 2 | s t − 1 = 1] p 12 = Pr[ s t = 1 | s t − 1 = 2] Pr[ s t = 2 | s t − 1 = 2] p 21 p 22 R ICHTER AND T HROCKMORTON : T HE ZLB: F REQUENCY , D URATION , AND N UMERICAL C ONVERGENCE

  14. C ONVERGENCE (S HADED ) R EGIONS 0.5 Non-Convergence 0.4 0.3 p 22 0.2 0.1 φ = 1 . 7 φ = 1 . 5 φ = 1 . 3 0 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95 1 p 11 R ICHTER AND T HROCKMORTON : T HE ZLB: F REQUENCY , D URATION , AND N UMERICAL C ONVERGENCE

  15. C ONVERGENCE (S HADED ) R EGIONS 0.4 Non-Convergence 0.35 Prob. of Going to ZLB ( p 12 ) 0.3 φ = 1 . 7 0.25 0.2 φ = 1 . 5 0.15 0.1 0.05 φ = 1 . 3 0 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 Avg. Duration of ZLB Event (1 /p 21 ) R ICHTER AND T HROCKMORTON : T HE ZLB: F REQUENCY , D URATION , AND N UMERICAL C ONVERGENCE

  16. E NDOGENOUS ZLB E VENTS • The monetary authority follows r ( π t /π ∗ ) φ } r t = max { 1 , ¯ • Discount Factor ( β ) or Technology ( a ) follows z ) ρ z exp( ε t ) , ε t ∼ N (0 , σ 2 z t = ¯ z ( z t − 1 / ¯ ε ) • Let z t − 1 ∈ { z 1 , . . . , z N } . Probability of going to or staying at the ZLB given z t − 1 is � Pr { s t = 2 | z t − 1 = z i } = π − 1 / 2 φ ( ε j | 0 , σ ε ) j ∈J 2 ,t ( i ) J 2 ,t ( i ) is the set of indices where the ZLB binds given the state z t − 1 = z i . φ are the Gauss-Hermite weights. R ICHTER AND T HROCKMORTON : T HE ZLB: F REQUENCY , D URATION , AND N UMERICAL C ONVERGENCE

  17. Z ERO L OWER B OUND P ROBABILITIES 1 Prob. of Going to/Staying at ZLB ( ρ a , σ ε ) = (0 . 70 , 0 . 0180) ( ρ a , σ ε ) = (0 . 75 , 0 . 0155) ( ρ a , σ ε ) = (0 . 80 , 0 . 0133) 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 −2 0 2 4 6 8 Technology R ICHTER AND T HROCKMORTON : T HE ZLB: F REQUENCY , D URATION , AND N UMERICAL C ONVERGENCE

  18. C ONVERGENCE (S HADED ) R EGIONS 0.03 Non-convergence 0.025 φ = 1 . 7 0.02 φ = 1 . 5 σ ε 0.015 0.01 φ = 1 . 3 0.005 0 0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 0.85 0.9 ρ a R ICHTER AND T HROCKMORTON : T HE ZLB: F REQUENCY , D URATION , AND N UMERICAL C ONVERGENCE

  19. E XPECTATIONAL E FFECT π = 0 . 5 ¯ 1 Inflation Rate 0 −1 ( ρ a , σ ε , σ z ) = (0 . 70 , 0 . 0187 , 0 . 0262) ( ρ a , σ ε , σ z ) = (0 . 90 , 0 . 0091 , 0 . 0209) −2 −4 −2 0 2 4 6 8 Technology R ICHTER AND T HROCKMORTON : T HE ZLB: F REQUENCY , D URATION , AND N UMERICAL C ONVERGENCE

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend