T HE R OLE OF BEKP S TRENGTH ON ITS M ARKET S HARE Paulo Csar Pavan - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

t he r ole of bekp s trength on its
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

T HE R OLE OF BEKP S TRENGTH ON ITS M ARKET S HARE Paulo Csar Pavan - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

T HE R OLE OF BEKP S TRENGTH ON ITS M ARKET S HARE Paulo Csar Pavan 1 CONCLUDING REMARKS Sharing with you our understanding: There is a slow but increasing demand for a higher BEKP strength, dependent on the paper grade. BEKP producers and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

THE ROLE OF BEKP STRENGTH ON ITS MARKET SHARE

Paulo César Pavan

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Sharing with you our understanding: There is a slow but increasing demand for a higher BEKP strength, dependent on the paper grade. BEKP producers and customers (papermakers) may obtain relative competitive advantage with this movement. There are several different ways to provide that. The trend of increasing BEKP use does not appear to be dependent on this strength increase CONCLUDING REMARKS

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • BEKP has built a successful history, and shall continue in the

foreseeable future Recap and update figures shown in the 5th ICEP

  • The dynamics involved in BEKP use

The Driving Forces for using or for not using BEKP The strength factor and trade-offs

  • (Paper) Books can still give us important insights

What professors teach us How to make it in real life

  • There are benefits to be ahead of competition on BEKP usage

Anticipating Trends

  • Final Remarks

OUTLINE

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

“The Role of BEKP Strength on its Market Share”

Does it really matter???

BEKP has built a successful history, and shall continue in the foreseeable future

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Recap and update figures shown in the 5th ICEP World Market Pulp Consumption

* Estimate ** Others BHKP include Birch, NMHW, SMWHW-US and Indonesian

Total 18.3 Mton Total 40.5 Mton

Sources: Hawkins Wright, PPPC

Total 53.6 Mton

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Source: PPPC

Tissue 37% Tissue 42% P&W 38% P&W 32% Specialty 20% Specialty 19% Other 5% Other 7% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2010 2013

BEKP

Tissue 24% Tissue 25% P&W 50% P&W 42% Specialty 19% Specialty 19% Other 7% Other 13% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2010 2013

OTHER BHKP

Recap and update figures shown in the 5th ICEP BEKP is strongly relied on a growing paper segment

Destination of the most common HWKP

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Source: RISI

4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10% 1993 1998 2003 2008 2013 2018 2023

Tissue share in total paper

Volume Growth

1993-2003 2003-2013 2013-2023 4,1% 3,4% 3,7%

Recap and update figures shown in the 5th ICEP BEKP is strongly relied on a growing paper segment

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Per Capita Consumption of Tissue by World Region 2014 (kg/person)

Source: RISI

2007 2014

North America Western Europe Japan Oceania Latin America China Africa

24 15.5 14.5 10.5 5 3 1 24.1 15.6 14.9 10.5 6.2 4.8 0.6

2007 2014

Recap and update figures shown in the 5th ICEP BEKP is strongly relied on a growing paper segment

8

+6.5 MM ton

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Per Capita Consumption of Tissue by World Region 2014 (kg/person)

Source: RISI

2007 2014

North America Western Europe Japan Oceania Latin America China Africa

24 15.5 14.5 10.5 5 3 1 24.1 15.6 14.9 10.5 6.2 4.8 0.6

2007 2014

Recap and update figures shown in the 5th ICEP BEKP is strongly relied on a growing paper segment

9

+2.5 +7.7 +10.5 +20,7 MM ton

slide-10
SLIDE 10

“The Role of BEKP Strength on its Market Share”

What are the driving forces?

It is worth using BEKP even though the way may seem hard

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

The Driving Forces for using BEKP or not

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12 113 234 443 111 145 237 434 94 167 209 401 141 45 213 737 85 231 661 129 297 575 60
  • Mfg. Cash Cost and Cumulative Production

Cumulative Production, FMT per Year (x1.000.000)

0,00 1,00 2,00 3,00 4,00 5,00 6,00 7,00 8,00 9,00

Cost, USD per FMT

200 400 600 800 1.000 1.200 1.400 1.600

  • 200

Overhead Materials Labor Energy Chemicals Pulps Raw Material Fiber

European Tissue Producers Furnish = 59 + 6%

The Driving Forces for using BEKP Furnish* Cost (% + 1 SD)

* Pulp + Raw Material: Fiber

C

50 134 167 53 197 54 146 134 52 153 169 45 136 150 156 211 47 69 46 180 152 557 66 114 128 714 115 175 653 78 204 809 60 184 870
  • Mfg. Cash Cost and Cumulative Production

Cumulative Production, FMT per Year (x1.000.000)

0,00 1,00 2,00 3,00 4,00 5,00 6,00 7,00 8,00

Cost, USD per FMT

200 400 600 800 1.000 1.200 1.400 1.600

  • 200

Overhead Materials Labor Energy Chemicals Pulps Raw Material Fiber

NA Tissue Producers Furnish = 58 + 12%

50 266 40 169 47 40 171 58 170 167 43 207 48 194 144 43 191 35 252 136 43 217 49 214 146 42 53 201 272 117 38 57 54 40 43 227 475 44
  • Mfg. Cash Cost and Cumulative Production

Cumulative Production, FMT per Year (x1.000)

500 1.000 1.500 2.000 2.500 3.000 3.500 4.000

Cost, USD per FMT

200 400 600 800 1.000 1.200

  • 200

Overhead Materials Labor Energy Chemicals Pulps Raw Material Fiber

LA Tissue Producers Furnish = 49 + 9%

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

15 Years

Price GAP (USD/adt) NBSK-BEKP

50 70 90 110 130 150 2000 2005 2010 2015 50 70 90 110 130 150 2015 2020

4 Years 10 Years 5 Years Track Record

Source FOEX.FI

Forecast

Source RISI

The Driving Forces for using BEKP Pulp Price – Competitiveness: NBSK vs BEKP

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

The Driving Forces for using BEKP Superior Paper Quality through BEKP

There is no single fiber which would provide the best solution for all the requirements: softness / smoothness / absorption / fluffiness / bulk / strength…

... BHKP in general - and BEKP in particular - fulfils well most of the (tissue) key quality demands.

Source: Happy and lasting marriage, Timo Teras -Leading Advisor, Pöyry Forest Industry Consulting, Tissue World Magazine April/May 2009 Source: The eucalytptus fibre: A very special fibre. Noe, P. and Demuner, B.J.. Aracruz News, 7(3): 6-7, 1997 Eucalyptus: Today’s Preferred Short-Fiber Pulp. WOMP. Demuner, B.J. and Claudio-da-Silva, Jr. Ed. by David Hillman. Aplleton, WI. p89-93., 2005

  • Uniform paper formation and high opacity: important for all grades
  • f fine papers. BEKP: high number of fibers/gram and short fiber length.
  • High Bulk and stiffness: critical for board or printing papers, and kept

when eucalyptus pulp is used.

  • Smoothness: one of the most sought property in coated papers,

especially art papers having a matt finish. BEKP: Low coarseness.

  • Softness: unquestionably the most desirable characteristic in tissue
  • papers. BEKP: high fibre count and low coarseness.

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

The Driving Forces for using BEKP Sustainability from the Forest to the Mills “... Brazil has 7.6 million hectares of

planted eucalyptus (72%), pinus (21%) and other

species … Planting for industrial purposes is carried out according to

sustainable forestry management principles that seek to reduce environmental impacts and promote

economic and social development of the communities surrounding the plantations and mills ... about 60% are certified by the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and by Brazilian Forestry Certification Program (Cerflor), endorsed by the Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification Systems (PEFC).”

Source: IBÁ - http://www.iba.org/web/en/arvores-plantadas/

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

The Driving Forces for using BEKP Sustainability from the Forest to the Mills Evolution of Pulp Production Technologies

Contracted Performance (actual numbers)

1990s 2000s 2010s 2015s Production Capacity

ADtB/day

1150 2400 3920 5600

Chemical Consumption kg act.Cl/ADtB

41 34

30 Effluent (Bleaching)

m³ /ADtB

18 15 10-15 Brightness Target

% ISO

91 92 92 92 Brightness Reversion

% ISO

< 2.0 1.6 1.6

Source: Paulo Aguiar - Fiber Business Line Metso Paper South America; and Fibria own data

16

Chemical Consumption kg act.Cl/ADtB

41 34

30 Effluent (Bleaching)

m³ /ADtB

18 15 10-15

slide-17
SLIDE 17

The Driving Forces for avoiding BEKP use Papermaker Mind-sets

Source: memoryofpaper.oeaw.ac.at/ 17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

The Driving Forces for avoiding BEKP use Papermaker Mind-sets

COMFORT ZONE Safe -Secure Stable Comfortable Easy Reliable

COMFORT ZONE Safety Volume Proc Stability Cost vs budget

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

The Driving Forces for avoiding BEKP use Paper Strength / Papermaking Runnability

Source: CTP, Eucaref project, 2013 Source: Fibria proprietary databank

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

It may not be a matter of the strength itself... Or at least not only it!

Paper strength Smoothness Runnability Absorbency Drain/Dryability Softness Bulk ...

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

“The Role of BEKP Strength on its Market Share”

What are the levers to make it easier?

(Paper) Books can still give us important insights

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

What’s on the game? Understanding the phenomena. Tensile ≠ Tear In Plane Tear ≠ Out of Plane Tear

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

What’s on the game? Understanding the phenomena.

Softwood Hardwood

Behavior of a softwood based paper under stress is different of that from a hardwood based paper

Source: Fibria internal report from Innventia, 2013

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

One of the most used theories is Van den Akker’s:

Tear strength related to fibre pull out as well as fiber fracture; initially mostly fiber pull out then more and more fiber fracture.

Source: Van den Akker, 1944; Fibria internal data.

500 x 500 x

What’s on the game? Understanding the phenomena.

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

What’s on the game? Understanding the phenomena.

Source: Fibria internal report from Innventia, 2013

25

Fiber strength and Fiber-Fiber bonding shall be taken into account as within a given and specific matrix

slide-26
SLIDE 26

What’s on the game? Understanding the phenomena.

Source: Demuner, B.; Fibria internal report, 2013

  • Seth and Page (1988) & Page (1994): for paper with low bonding between fibers:

TEAR = f (FIBER LENGTH)

  • Paltakari (2011):

TEAR = f (FIBER LENGTH)3/2

  • Giertz &Helle, 1960 and Page, 1994: for paper with low bonding between fibers:

TEAR = f (FIBER STRENGTH)2 (fiber strength measured by Zero-Span)

  • Kärenlampi for loosely bonded sheets (eg tissue):

𝑿𝒒𝒃𝒒𝒇𝒔 ~ 𝑺𝑪𝑩 ∗ 𝒈𝒋𝒄𝒇𝒔 𝒎𝒇𝒐𝒉𝒖𝒊 ∗ (𝒕𝒒𝒇𝒅𝒋𝒈𝒋𝒅 𝒕𝒊𝒇𝒃𝒔 𝒄𝒑𝒐𝒆 𝒕𝒖𝒔𝒇𝒐𝒉𝒖𝒊)𝟑(𝒈𝒋𝒄𝒇𝒔 𝒙𝒋𝒆𝒖𝒊)𝟑 (𝑭 ∗ 𝒅𝒑𝒃𝒔𝒕𝒇𝒐𝒇𝒕𝒕 𝟑)

26

Aha! It seems that there are ways to work on paper tear not only through the use of longer or coarser fibers also in literature!!

slide-27
SLIDE 27

What’s on the game? Understanding the phenomena – What matters?

Source: Demuner, B.; Fibria internal report, 2013

Summary: For SWKP: Fiber strength (and length) is the most relevant for TEAR mechanism. Bonding-ability also contributes; For HWKP: Bonding-ability (and bond strength!) is the most relevant attribute.

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28
  • 1. MORFOLOGY
  • Length / Coarseness
  • Diameter / Wall thickness
  • 2. STRENGTH
  • Damages
  • 3. FORM
  • Curl / Kinks
  • 4. BONDING ABILITY
  • Sheet density /WRV / Carboxyl groups
  • Specific Surface Area / Collapsability

FIBER LOAD BEARING ABILITY

  • Fiber Stiffness/Activation

 Fiber shrinkage/curl

  • Effective fiber length

 Length / coarseness / kink

  • Fiber strength

 Tensile/Shear strength

  • Sheet uniformity

FURTHER PAPER/PAPERMAKING RELATED FACTORS

FIBER BONDING/COHESION

  • Fiber contact area

 Fiber colapse / twist / flexibility  Fibrillation  Fines

  • Specific bond strength

 Surface chemistry  Polymer entanglement

FIBER (PRIMARY) FACTORS

What’s on the game? Understanding the phenomena – The knobs

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Technology allows higher BEKP participation in paper furnish balancing trade-offs

Source: Pavan, PC; 5th International Colloquium on Eucalyptus Pulp, 2001

.... among others 29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Technology allows higher BEKP participation in paper furnish On pulp side we can mention:

  • Pulping/bleaching set ups

 Cooking/Kappa ; Bleaching sequence; pH management;

Drying Technologies*...

  • Forestry differentiation

 Different hibrids; Spacing; Sorting; Ages*...

  • Pulp additivation / surface functionalization

 A brave new world

And one could expect many new or combined strategies to succeed...

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

DRAINAGE TENSILE/TEAR Fiber Wood

Usual Behavior

Eu EucaStr Strong

                                                     

Technology allows higher BEKP participation in paper furnish – A real example

Reference

Euca EucaSt Strong

  • ng

Better strength/drainage relationship  Refining Energy  Machine Througput  Additives – DSA Furnish Optimization  BEKP increase

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

“The Role of BEKP Strength on its Market Share”

Why being ahead of competition

  • n BEKP usage?

Recap…

32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

BEKP provides unique conditions

  • Open-minded teams to make BEKP work and keep

sheet winding on the reel will be rewarded with:

  • Unique and cheaper furnish;
  • Less demanding refining;
  • Paper opacity; smoothness; softness...
  • Drainage and balanced tear/tensile;
  • Secure and sustainable source of fibers;
  • Opportunity to get the lead in
  • Eco-labeling;
  • C footprint;
  • Customer preference on the shelf;
  • Reel cost

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

“The Role of BEKP Strength on its Market Share”

Final Remarks

34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

For sharing time, information and experience thank you:

Bibiana Rubini Braz Demuner Danilo Oyakawa Dimas Rodrigues Neto Ergilio Cláudio-da-Silva Jr. Fernando Bertolucci Fernando Pescatori Heloisa Barbosa Leonardo Melo Pablo Santos Renato Silva

Final Remarks

35

There is a slow but increasing demand for a higher BEKP strength, dependent on the paper grade.  The more you use the higher the challenge BEKP producers and customers (papermakers) may obtain relative competitive advantage with this movement.  Quality / Cost / Eco-friendly There are several different ways to provide that.  Forest pulp functionalization and Refinning as examples The trend of increasing BEKP use does not appear to be dependent on this strength increase  Strong rate of market share accumulation along the years

slide-36
SLIDE 36

For sharing time, information and experience thank you:

Bibiana Rubini Braz Demuner Danilo Oyakawa Dimas Rodrigues Neto Ergilio Cláudio-da-Silva Jr. Fernando Bertolucci Fernando Pescatori Heloisa Barbosa Leonardo Melo Pablo Santos Renato Silva

For the great opportunity we thank:

5th ICEP Organizing Committee

For the great opportunity we thank: 7th ICEP Organizing Committee For the special support: Patricia Lombardi P. de Abreu - Inteligência de Mercado And...

Acknowledgements

36

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37 www.facebook.com/f m/fibriabrasil www.twitter.com/f m/fibria_b _brasil ww www.youtube.com/ m/fibriacelulose www.linkedin.com/c m/comp mpany/f /fibria

pcpavan van@fibri ria.com.br m.br www.fibri ria.com. m.br

For your kind attention:

THANK YOU!