System Dynamics based on multi-omics data II
- A biologist-centric perspective -
System Dynamics based on multi-omics data II - A biologist-centric - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
System Dynamics based on multi-omics data II - A biologist-centric perspective - Outline What a biologist hopes to get What a biologist typically gets Where a biologist gets stuck How a biologist is trying to overcome
Biological insights (components, interactions, kinetic laws, parameters,…) OMICS Genes, RNAs, Proteins & PTMs, Metabolites Lipids PHENOTYPE Morphology Physiology Fitness Pathology “classical reductionistic techniques” Top-down: „Find components & interactions from data!“ Bottom-up: „Find the simplest model(s) to predict system’s behavior!“ in vivo in vitro in vivo
red = higher in mutant, green = lower in mutant, size = p-value
red = higher in mutant, green = lower in mutant, size = p-value
Q: Which enzyme(s) cause the observed metabolic patterns?
after 5 min 20 min 60 min
It’s simple to find differences
It’s difficult to unravel the causes
Biological insights (components, interactions) Data mining Prediction
Sauer, Heinemann & Zamboni, Science 2007
1. Include network information in data mining Different levels of sophistication:
2. Use time-resolved experiments
Systematic ‘omics analysis upon known perturbations
Non-targeted reannotation of ORFs
Q: Which enzyme(s) likely caused the observed metabolic patterns?
GAPDH G6PDH
seconds minutes hours days Characterize temporal organization during metabolic transients
Resolve translational responses from direct effects, e.g.
Time scale
DNA mRNA Proteins Metabolites
Seconds
Discover small molecule – enzyme interactions Determine reaction mechanisms and kinetic parameters Investigate in vivo drug metabolism (on-target and off-target)
50 100 150 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5
glucose hexose-6-P PEP pyruvate
Hours Differentiation Adaptation Transcriptional responses Cell cycle …
0.27 0.33 0.4 0.47 0.53 0.6 0.67 0.73 0.8 0.87 0.93 1 1.07 1.13 1.2 1.27 1.33 1.4 1.47 1.53 1.6 1.67 1.73 1.8 1.87 1.93 2 2.07 2.13 2.2 2.27 2.33 2.4 2.47 2.53 2.6 2.67 2.73 2.8 2.87 2.93 3 3.07 3.13 3.2 3.27 3.33 3.4 3.47 3.53 3.6 3.67 3.73 3.8 3.87 3.93 4 4.07 4.13 4.2 4.27 4.33 4.4 4.47 4.53 4.6 4.67 4.73 4.8 4.87 4.93 5 5.07 5.13 5.2 5.27 5.33 5.4 5.47 5.53 5.6 5.67 5.73 5.8 5.87 5.93 6 6.07 6.13 6.2 6.27 6.33 6.4 6.47 6.53 6.6 6.67 6.73 6.8 6.87 6.93 7 7.07 7.13 7.2 7.27 7.33 7.4 7.47M G1 S M G1 S M
Link et al, Curr Opin Biotechnol, 2014
Metabolite Fold-changes
Küpfer et al, Nature Biotech 2007 > SIGNALING Link et al, Nature Biotech 2013 > ENZYME – METABOLITE INTERACTIONS Link et al, Nature Methods 2015 > ALLOSTERIC REGULATION
Küpfer et al, Nature Biotech 2007
Several key enzymes in glycolysis are known to be potentially activate/inhibited by metabolites.
Q: In condition XYZ, which allosteric links are actively regulating glycolysis?
Link et al, Nature Biotech 2013, 31(4):357
putative allosteric links
experiment
Test which models can reproduce the data. In this case, 3’600 variants with 0-2 allosteric interactions exist.
leads to a good fit
Link et al, Nature Biotech 2013, 31(4):357
Challenges:
(OMICS > targeted, ad-hoc assays)
phenotype?
conditions/perturbations? It’s a combined computational/analytical effort.