Synthesis of graphene-based nanomaterials: their applications in electrochemical detection of organic molecules
Stela Pruneanu
INCDTIM Cluj-Napoca
NANOGENTOOLS Autumn School October 2017
Synthesis of graphene-based nanomaterials: their applications in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Synthesis of graphene-based nanomaterials: their applications in electrochemical detection of organic molecules Stela Pruneanu INCDTIM Cluj-Napoca NANOGENTOOLS Autumn School October 2017 TOPICS 1. Graphene synthesis TEM/HRTEM
NANOGENTOOLS Autumn School October 2017
NANOGENTOOLS Autumn School October 2017
Single layer of sp2 hybridized carbon atoms High mobility of charge carriers: 200.000 cm2V−1s−1 Surface area of a single graphene sheet is 2630 m2/g Graphene is resistant to attack by powerful acids and alkalis (hydrofluoric acid, ammonia)
NANOGENTOOLS Autumn School October 2017
Au(x)/MgO- catalyst, where x = 1, 2 or 3 wt% Ag(x)/MgO-catalyst, where x = 1,2 or 3 wt% Pt(x)/MgO-catalyst, where x = 1,2 or 3 wt% AuAg(x)/ MgO-catalyst, where x = 1:1 or 1.5:1.5 wt% AuPd (x)/ MgO-catalyst, where x = 1:1 or 1.5:1.5 wt% AuCu (x)/ MgO-catalyst, where x = 1:1 or 1.5:1.5 wt% AuPt (x)/ MgO-catalyst, where x = 1:1 or 1.5:1.5 wt% Methane; (carbon source) 1000 oC- synthesis temperature (60 minutes) Purification in HCl (30 minutes) Drying - 120 oC (overnight)
NANOGENTOOLS Autumn School October 2017
2 6
TEM/HRTEM images (3 wt.% metal)
Graphene-gold nanoparticles (5-35 nm; 22 nm) Graphene-silver nanoparticles (5-200 nm; 35 nm) Graphene-platinum nanoparticles (2-10 nm; 8 nm) NANOGENTOOLS Autumn School October 2017
XRD patterns of Gr-Au-x nanocomposites
d-spacing: Graphite = 0.335 nm Gr-Au-3 = 0.349 nm Gr-Au-2 = 0.358 nm
Gr-Au-3 τ (graphene): 2.2 nm (6 graphitic layers) Gr-Au-2 τ (graphene): 1.6 nm (4 graphitic layers)
S Pruneanu et al, International Journal of Nanomedicine 2013(8) 1429–1438
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 200 400 600 800
Gr(100)
2 (degrees)
Gr-Au-1 Gr-Au-2 Gr-Au-3
Intensity (a.u.)
(111) (200) (220) (311) (222) Gr(002)
Bragg’s law: nλ = 2d sinϴ
where K is the shape factor, λ is the x-ray wavelength, β is the line broadening at half the maximum intensity (FWHM) in radians, and θ is the Bragg angle τ = the mean size of the crystalline domains
Scherrer equation: τ = Kλ/βcosθ
NANOGENTOOLS Autumn School October 2017
Thermal reduction 300o Ar
Chemical reduction
1. 2. NANOGENTOOLS Autumn School October 2017
d-spacing: GO = 0.75 nm RGO = 0.36 nm N-Gr = 0.35 nm
NANOGENTOOLS Autumn School October 2017
NANOGENTOOLS Autumn School October 2017
NANOGENTOOLS Autumn School October 2017
TEM images of graphene
NANOGENTOOLS Autumn School October 2017
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 10 20 30 40 50
Intensity (a.u.) 2 (degrees)
Measured spectra FLG MLG 21.28 25.99 21.28 25.99
3 15 % 77 23
Gr 22a 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 10 20 30 40
Measured spectra FLG MLG
Intensity (a.u.) 2 (degrees)
21.23 26.26
3 27 % 93 7 26.26 21.23
Gr 35
0.5 M electrolyte 1 M electrolyte
XRD pattern of graphene XRD pattern of graphene
immediately after preparation: mixture of few-layer and multi-layer graphene
NANOGENTOOLS Autumn School October 2017
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Measured GO FLG MLG
Intensity (a.u.) 2degrees)
11.95 22.89 26.04 11.95 22.89 26.04
3 4 14 % 55 23 22
21L
GO GO GR
XRD pattern of the mixt material TEM image of the mixt material d-spacing: GO = 0.75 nm (insulating; good biocompatibility with living systems) GR = 0.36 nm (highly conductive; poor biocompatibility with living systems)
NANOGENTOOLS Autumn School October 2017
XRD pattern of EGr-TPyP composite TEM/AFM images of EGr-TPyP composite
NANOGENTOOLS Autumn School October 2017
6 x 10-6 M TPyP in 0.2 M KCl Bias: 9 V
200 300 400 500 600 700 800 0.32 0.40 0.48 0.56 0.64 0.72 0.80
200 300 400 500 600 700 800
0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04
740
10-6 M TPyP Absorbance (a.u.) (nm)
413 511 657 Q-bands Soret band
413
(nm)
Absorbance (a.u.)
268 EGr-TPyP graphene-acidic solution
UV-Vis spectrum of EGr-TPyP composite UV-Vis spectrum of porphyrin Soret band Q bands
range with molar extinction coefficients of 105 M -1 cm -1
Q bands with molar extinction coefficients of 104 M -1 cm -1
NANOGENTOOLS Autumn School October 2017
Increases the active surface area (50 - 100 %) Improves the transfer of electrons EGr-TPyP/GC Screen-printed electrode
CE WE RE NANOGENTOOLS Autumn School October 2017
attached to an aromatic ring
drugs, and endogenous substances.
that lead to leukemia.
NANOGENTOOLS Autumn School October 2017
antioxidant, dyes and pharmaceutics
considered as environmental pollutants by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the European Union (EU)
and HQ.
metabolites.
NANOGENTOOLS Autumn School October 2017
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
0.0 1.0x10
2.0x10
3.0x10
10-4 M CAT pH 3.6 pH 4.4 pH 5.0 pH 6.0 pH 7.0 pH 8.0
I (A) E (V) vs Ag/AgCl
CVs recorded with EGr-TPyP/GC electrode in pH varying solutions (from 3.6 to 8); Optimum pH was selected to be pH 6 SWVs recorded with GC electrodes modified with various volumes of EGr-TPyP solution in pH 6 PBS solution containing 10-4 M catechol; scan rate 10 mVs-1. NANOGENTOOLS Autumn School October 2017
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.0 1.0x10
2.0x10
3.0x10
4.0x10
5.0x10
6.0x10
7.0x10
E (V) vs Ag/AgCl
8 L 10 L 15 L
I (A)
graphene dispersion in DMF 1 mg/mL
Icap = C x dV/dt- 3 x 10-5 - 6 x 10-5 A
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
0.0 3.0x10
6.0x10
9.0x10
1.2x10
10-4 M CAT pH 6 PBS
i (A/cm
2)
E (V) vs Ag/AgCl
0.21 V 0.15 V EGr-TPyP/GC electrode
b.
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
0.0 1.0x10
2.0x10
3.0x10
4.0x10
5.0x10
6.0x10
TPyP/GC
i (A/cm
2)
E (V) vs Ag/AgCl
pH 6 PBS 10-4 M CAT 10-4 M CAT
GC 0.46 V 0.1 V
a.
NANOGENTOOLS Autumn School October 2017
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 8.0x10
1.6x10
2.4x10
3.2x10
4.0x10
4.8x10
pH6 PBS 10-6 M 3x10-6 M 6x10-6 M 10-5 M 3x10-5 M 6x10-5 M 10-4 M
I (A) E(V) vs Ag/AgCl
EGr-TPyP/GC electrode
0.26 V b.
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.0 1.5x10
3.0x10
4.5x10
6.0x10
7.5x10
pH 6 PBS 3x10-6M 6x10-6 M 10-5 M 3x10-5 M 6x10-5 M 10-4 M
I (A) E (V) vs Ag/AgCl
a. GC electrode
SWV recorded in the presence of CAT SWV recorded in the presence of CAT
0.0 3.0x10
6.0x10
9.0x10
1.2x10
0.0 5.0x10
1.0x10
1.5x10
2.0x10
2.5x10
3.0x10
0.0 2.0x10
0.0 1.0x10
2.0x10
3.0x10
4.0x10
5.0x10
6.0x10
GC electrode Ipeak (A) CCAT (M) y = - 3.71 x 10-8 + 0.006 x CCAT LOD = 1.42 x 10-5 M
EGr-TPyP/GC y = - 5.22 x 10-7 + 0.242 x CCAT LOD = 2.09 x 10-6 M
Ipeak (A) CCAT (M)
c.
NANOGENTOOLS Autumn School October 2017
SWV recorded in the presence of HQ and CAT SWV recorded in the presence of REZ and CAT
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0x10
2.0x10
3.0x10
4.0x10
5.0x10
HQ
0.26 V
CAT
pH 6 PBS 10-6 M 3x10-6 M 6x10-6 M 10-5 M 3x10-5 M 6x10-5 M 10-4 M
I (A) E (V) vs Ag/AgCl
a. 0.16 V
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0x10
2.0x10
3.0x10
4.0x10
5.0x10
0.65 V
pH 6 PBS 10-6M 3x10-6M 6x10-6M 10-5M 3x10-5M 6x10-5M 10-4 M
I (A) E (V) vs Ag/AgCl
CAT
0.27 V
REZ
c.
NANOGENTOOLS Autumn School October 2017
0.0 3.0x10
6.0x10
9.0x10
1.2x10
0.0 5.0x10
1.0x10
1.5x10
2.0x10
2.5x10
3.0x10
LOD = 1.22 x 10
LOD = 9.4 x 10
LOD = 2.09 x 10
y = 9.29 x 10-8 + 0.29 x CCAT y = - 5.52 x 10-7 + 0.11 x CCAT y = - 5.22 x 10-7 + 0.242 x CCAT
EGr-TPyP/GC
b.
5 x 10-5 M HQ interferent 5 x 10-5 M REZ interferent No interfering species
CCAT (M) Ipeak (A)
NANOGENTOOLS Autumn School October 2017
Analysis of CAT in a relevant environment two drinking water sources:
23.59 Na+; 4.75 K+; 60.14 Mg2+; 191.2 Ca2+; 11.12 Cl-; 13.57 SO4
2-.
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 5.0x10
1.0x10
1.5x10
2.0x10
2.5x10
mineral water
0.2 M KCl 3x10-7M 6x10-7M 10-6M 3x10-6M 6x10-6M 10-5M 3x10-5M 6x10-5M 10-4M
I (A) E(V) vs Ag/AgCl
0.0 2.0x10
0.0 3.0x10
6.0x10
9.0x10
1.2x10
1.5x10
1.8x10
2.1x10
2.4x10
2.7x10
y = -3.51 x 10-7 + 0.09 x CCAT LOD = 4.19 x 10
M
in tap water
y = - 5.22 x 10-7 + 0.242 x CCAT LOD = 2.09 x 10-6 M
Ipeak (A) CCAT (M)
y = -1.437 x 10-7 + 0.115 x CCAT LOD = 1.82 x 10
M
in mineral water
in PBS pH 6
EGr-TPyP/GC Added (M) Found (M) Recovery % RSD (%)
Mineral water 10-5 0.95 x 10-5 95 7.21 3 x 10-5 3.3 x 10-5 110 7.22 10-4 1.04 x 10-4 104 3.15 Tap water 10-5 0.97 x 10-5 97 4.49 3 x 10-5 2.96 x 10-5 98 5.07 10-4 1.03 x 10-4 103 6.48 Table 2. Determination of catechol in mineral and tap water
NANOGENTOOLS Autumn School October 2017
200 300 400 500 600 700 800 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
Eg Absorbance (a.u.) Wavelength (nm) TiO2 TA TA-GO TA-GR TA-GT Eg
3.26 eV – wide band-gap semiconductor 3.09 eV 3.06 eV 3.04 eV 3.05 eV TiO2 TA- TiO2/Ag TA- GO TA- GR TA - GT
Shift of the absorption edge towards visible range UV-Vis spectra of graphene-TiO2 based materials
NANOGENTOOLS Autumn School October 2017
TEM/EDS mapping of TiO2/Ag TEM images of graphene-TiO2/Ag c d e
NANOGENTOOLS Autumn School October 2017
NANOGENTOOLS Autumn School October 2017
200 300 400 500 600 700 800 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
sun light
Absorbance (a.u.) Wavelenght (nm) AM 2 x 10
AM TA TA-GO TA-GR TA-GT
200 300 400 500 600 700 800 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
day light
AM 2 x 10
AM TA TA-GO TA-GR TA-GT Absorbance (a.u.) Wavelenght (nm)
4 mg of photo-catalysts (TA, TA-GO, TA-GR and TA-GT) - in 20 ml of amaranth solution (2 x 10-5 M)
200 300 400 500 600 700 800 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
UV light
AM 2 x 10
AM TA TA-GO TA-GR TA-GT Absorbance (a.u.) Wavelenght (nm)
60 W
NANOGENTOOLS Autumn School October 2017
50 100 150 200 250
AM TA TA-GO TA-GR TA-GT ln Ct/C0 UV irradiation time (min)
50 100 150 200 250
AM TA TA-GO TA-GR TA-GT ln Ct/C0 Sun light irradiation time (min)
50 100 150 200 250
AM TA TA-GO TA-GR TA-GT ln Ct/C0 Daylight irradiation time (min)
First order reaction- the rate depends linearly on the concentration of only one reactant (a unimolecular reaction)
the reaction rate; k is the first order rate constant
NANOGENTOOLS Autumn School October 2017
Sun light 30 min 2 h 4 h TA 77% 12.8% 0.04% TA-GO 69 7.3 TA-GR 55 2 TA-GT 59.2 3.2
Samples k (min-1) k (min-1) k (min-1) AM 0.0010 0.0052 0.0006 TA 0.0168 0.0347 0.0050 TA-GO 0.0191 0.0552 0.0063 TA-GR 0.0204 0.0583 0.0122 TA-GT 0.0173 0.0505 0.0070
NANOGENTOOLS Autumn School October 2017
NANOGENTOOLS Autumn School October 2017