surviving the viva
play

Surviving the Viva ! ! The role of your supervisor and examiners ! - PDF document

Outline of session ! The viva in context of a PhD Surviving the Viva ! ! The role of your supervisor and examiners ! What to expect on the day Dr Keith Morgan - Typical questions / topics Dr Sara Shinton - Possible outcomes - Common


  1. Outline of session ! The viva in context of a PhD Surviving the Viva ! ! The role of your supervisor and examiners ! What to expect on the day Dr Keith Morgan - Typical questions / topics Dr Sara Shinton - Possible outcomes - Common concerns answered Shinton Consulting Ltd ! Summary of good preparation context: nature of research, big picture ideas, defence But first: What is a PhD ? ! original work ! a contribution to knowledge ! displays understanding of the field ! displays the skills of critical thinking ! a period of training to be a professional researcher … problem giving instructing solving opinions others managing networking projects… collaborating Examiners are asked to assess: So why do we have a viva..? Is the thesis an original work that makes a significant contribution to knowledge in or understanding of the field ? ! Establish that you have actually done the Does the thesis contain material worthy of publication ? work and written the thesis Does the thesis demonstrate adequate knowledge of the field of study and relevant literature ? Does the thesis show the exercise of critical judgement with ! Test your ability to defend your thesis regard to both the student’s work and that of other scholars in the same general field ? ! Establish that you have a satisfactory Is the presentation and style of the thesis satisfactory: knowledge of the wider field surrounding full and adequate references your research topic coherent structure clear intentions, background, method, conclusions understandable to a scholar in the same field ? http://www.ed.ac.uk/files/atoms/files/copsupervisorsresearchstudents.pdf

  2. Where do we start? Think big… Context – your work ! Context ! You need to know WHY your project was important / relevant at the outset… ! Contribution to field ! Originality ! …so you should be able to EXPLAIN the key ! Critical judgement and testing of ideas work that has already been done by others in ! Defending results your area… ! You need to be clear about these… ! …and how this relates to your research aim Mini Viva - Part 1 Context – your work ! With a partner – someone you do NOT know ! Then you should be able to explain what you have actually done during your research… ! Discuss for a few minutes how your research project was devised, focusing on ! …how and what this contributes to your field - problem - motivation key work of others - approach contribution the aim of ! Both of your projects must be discussed to your field your research your methods and results Mini Viva - Part 2 Originality ! With the same partner ! New work ! New interpretation ! Discuss for a few minutes what your research ! New application contributes to your field, and where it might ! New way of testing knowledge go in the future ! New connections - What would you do with 10 more years? ! Both of your projects must be discussed

  3. Critical judgement Mini Viva - Part 3 In the thesis... ! Discuss with your partner ! Refer to the key papers ! The ways in which your work is original ! Demonstrate critical engagement ! Comparing approaches and conclusions of others ! Then ! Understanding academic lineage ! The ways in which your work is NOT original ! Recognising quality – identify value in work ! Noting potential conflicts of interest Critical judgment in viva Defending Your Results ! Why did you use this method / approach Experiences so far...? ! Be clear on its advantages and limitations ! Published papers ! Is your interpretation the only possible ! Conference contributions explanation ? ! Group meetings ! Support from literature ! Informal discussions ! Confirmation from further work ! What are the implications of your work ? ! Into groups of around 4 or 5 people... Potential mini viva part 4... What do you think... or What could be better... Final thought on ‘Big Ideas’ In your groups Where will you demonstrate … ! Reflect on your experience ! Originality ! Significance of your contribution ! Understanding of context ! What preparation did you do ? ! Knowledge of the field and critical thinking ! What questions were you asked ? ! Innovative ideas ! How was your work received ? ! Publishable outcomes ! What was the audiences’ perspective ? ! What new leads were suggested ? ... and is it obvious ?

  4. Frequently Asked Questions What to Expect... ! What format will the viva take ? ! What should I take in with me ? ! When do I find out the outcome ? Do you have any specific concerns about the day itself ? ! Who will be there ? ! What are they there to do ? ! What if they disagree with each other ? Who and what More on the examiner’s role ! Chairperson ! Check that you wrote the thesis by tackling you ! administrative and advisory on the detail ! External Examiner ! so may check understanding of anything you wrote ! test knowledge and understanding ! ask questions designed to see if you really ! ensure thesis and candidate deserves PhD understand your own argument ! may advise on deficiencies ! see if you can justify a position which they have ! Internal Examiner a problem with ! arranges viva and contributes to decision on award ! point out problems with the thesis and give you ! also tests knowledge and understanding in the viva ! Supervisor the opportunity to think through ways to rectify ! Should not play any part them When and where... One examiner’s checklist Typical questions / topics ! Evidence collected ! Research aims clear? ! what are your main findings ? ethically? ! Literature adequately ! what is original about your research ? ! Sufficient evidence? reviewed/critiqued? ! describe your methodology and why you decided to use it ! Convinced of reliability ! Key papers included? and validity? ! can you highlight the contribution that you have made ? ! Theoretical basis sound? ! Findings assessed against ! how do your findings relate to this particular literature ? ! Conjectures consistent literature? ! why was this problem worth investigating ? with theory? ! Findings make significant ! what do you think of your thesis ? ! Appropriate methodology? contribution to the field? ! Any inconsistencies? ! Conclusions? IS THIS PERSON AN EXPERT? ! but also – anything !

  5. Possible outcomes Typical examiners’ reports The thesis: ! PhD awarded ! contains evidence of sufficient experience in methods of ! PhD awarded, subject to corrections research; ! these could be minor editorial or more significant corrections ! demonstrates the purpose of the investigation and a critical ! checked by the internal examiner discussion of the results; ! PhD not awarded, as candidates oral defence deficient in ! represents a significant contribution to the relevant field of specified aspects learning ! further examination required ! Additional research work required in thesis Recommendations including comments on: either up to 6 months work with no further oral examination ! ! the scope, character and quality of the work submitted or work could be more substantial, up to 12 months, with second oral ! ! the performance of the candidate at the oral examination ! MPhil awarded ! for which corrections may still be required ! Degree not awarded and candidate judged to have failed Overall, whether the thesis and viva performance merits PhD During the thesis writing… ! Always remember the viva is coming ! Good preparation ! Keep a file or folder of notes and references Planning… that did not make it into your thesis ! Think of possible questions, and make a note (especially if you don’t know the answer) After thesis submission After thesis submission ! Take a short break if possible ! Read some of your external examiners output, in order to be familiar with their ! Read your thesis afresh, know it’s structure and current interests think about the BIG picture ! Remember the wider field, and also basic ! Look for any weak areas in your knowledge fundamental material ! Then look back to your folders of related notes, references and possible questions ! Continue to read the relevant key literature!

  6. Some practical revision tips The night before ! Take breaks ! Try to relax ! Discuss problems with others ! Avoid caffeine and alcohol ! Make a list of any outstanding questions to ! Don’t start any new topics discuss with supervisor ! Skim those condensed notes ! Prepare condensed notes for night before ! Try to get a good nights sleep ! Keep ‘in touch’ with the group / department On the day When answering questions… ! Speak clearly, make eye contact ! Be smart, but comfortable ! Give straight but full answers ! Sober (!) and pleasant – first impressions ! Request clarification if a question is not count understood ! React to atmosphere and style of panel ! Perhaps challenge a question if you know it is ! Be confident, you know more than think ! based on a poor premise ! Be positive and motivated – it will come ! the debate will probably come naturally… across ! …so you can be assertive but not aggressive ! Remember the purpose of the viva… ! Don’t exaggerate or be falsely modest Afterwards Summary of preparation ! Wait for recommendation ! Practice speaking and dealing with questions ! Implement corrections (often surprisingly ! Ask people to read sections and ask questions quick to do) ! Summarise your thesis and know its structure ! Make sure the paperwork is all in place for ! Ask survivors for advice... the final submission of hardbound copies ! Understand the BIG picture of your own work – context, aims, main findings and contribution ! Celebrate ! ! Read new material as it is published

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend