(Supersymmetric) Godel Space from Wrapped M2 Branes Bert Vercnocke, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

supersymmetric godel space from wrapped m2 branes
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

(Supersymmetric) Godel Space from Wrapped M2 Branes Bert Vercnocke, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

(Supersymmetric) Godel Space from Wrapped M2 Branes Bert Vercnocke, ITF, K.U.Leuven in collaboration with: Tommy Levi (NYU) Joris Raeymaekers (FZU Prague) Dieter Van den Bleeken (Rutgers U.) Walter Van Herck (K.U.Leuven)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

(Supersymmetric) Godel Space from Wrapped M2 Branes

in collaboration with:

  • Tommy Levi (NYU)
  • Joris Raeymaekers (FZU Prague)
  • Dieter Van den Bleeken (Rutgers U.)
  • Walter Van Herck (K.U.Leuven)
  • Thomas Wyder (K.U.Leuven)

Zurich, 7 September 2009 Bert Vercnocke, ITF, K.U.Leuven

slide-2
SLIDE 2

7 Sep 2009 Bert Vercnocke – “Godel Space from Wrapped M2 Branes”

Overview

  • Introduction
  • Our system

– Reduction of 11d sugra to 3d effective action

  • Solutions:

– Anti-de Sitter space – Godel space – (Super)symmetries

  • Superglue

– Gluing Godel space to anti de Sitter space

  • Conclusions and outlook
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction

slide-4
SLIDE 4

7 Sep 2009 Bert Vercnocke – “Godel Space from Wrapped M2 Branes”

Introduction/Motivation

  • Problem:

– background + probe M2 wrapping

Backreaction?

  • Original motivation: Black Hole entropy/microstates

– Constituent counting: D-branes/CFT states – Supergravity regime?

  • Fuzzball proposal
  • Gaiotto-Strominger-Yin (2005), GSY + Denef-Van den Bleeken (2007):

Type IIA on CY gives N=2 supergravity in 4d D0-D4 black hole split as D0-D4 background and probe D0, counting agrees with entropy

(1) (2)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

7 Sep 2009 Bert Vercnocke – “Godel Space from Wrapped M2 Branes”

1) Gaiotto-Strominger-Yin:

– D0-D4 BH: background + probe core D0-D4 D0s – Background near-horizon: – AdS superconformal quantum mechanics Counting ground states – Large # (non-abelian) D0s: puff up to D2s (conjecture) agrees with entropy

Introduction/Motivation

slide-6
SLIDE 6

7 Sep 2009 Bert Vercnocke – “Godel Space from Wrapped M2 Branes”

Introduction/Motivation

  • GSY+Denef-Van den Bleeken:

– D0-D4 BH:

background + probe core D0-D4 + D0s purely fluxed

– Two interesting regions in scaling limit

Consider 5d/11d interpretation:

  • FAR region: quotient of

(not surprising, D0-D4 BH near horizon)

  • NEAR region: global

(surprising)

– Entropy?

  • Start in near region (take D0 charge to infinity)
  • Bring in D0 charge as D2/M2 branes (non-abelian degrees of freedom)
  • M2’s wrap near horizon : spinning particles in
  • Counting ok in leading order à la GSY
  • ISSUES:

– Myers effect? – Backreaction of probe branes on

Either solves black hole problems or is interesting new solution

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Our System

slide-8
SLIDE 8

7 Sep 2009 Bert Vercnocke – “Godel Space from Wrapped M2 Branes”

  • Backreaction of M2 branes on

? 11 dimensional picture

D6-anti D6 near horizon:

Our System

From M2 probes to an ansatz for the backreaction

slide-9
SLIDE 9

7 Sep 2009 Bert Vercnocke – “Godel Space from Wrapped M2 Branes”

  • Backreaction of M2 branes on

? 11 dimensional picture

From M2 probes to an ansatz for the backreaction

M2 brane probes

(Susy when rotating with constant angular velocity in global , see later)

Our System

slide-10
SLIDE 10

7 Sep 2009 Bert Vercnocke – “Godel Space from Wrapped M2 Branes”

  • Backreaction of M2 branes on

? 11 dimensional picture

Backreacted system: (ASSUME...) Red and blue cycles (on )

From M2 probes to an ansatz for the backreaction

M2 brane probes

(Susy when rotating with constant angular velocity in global , see later)

Our System

slide-11
SLIDE 11

7 Sep 2009 Bert Vercnocke – “Godel Space from Wrapped M2 Branes”

  • Backreaction of M2 branes on ?

– Details:

Specifying our ansatz in 11 dimensions

Our System

slide-12
SLIDE 12

7 Sep 2009 Bert Vercnocke – “Godel Space from Wrapped M2 Branes”

Redux

  • Backreaction of M2 branes on ?

– Details:

Our System

Specifying our ansatz in 11 dimensions

Redux

slide-13
SLIDE 13

7 Sep 2009 Bert Vercnocke – “Godel Space from Wrapped M2 Branes”

  • Reduced to 5 dimensions over

– Gives five dimensional N=1 supergravity with vector multiplets and one

hypermultiplet:

  • Reduced to 3 dimensions over

– : no backreaction, AdS

: backreaction = ???

– Constant sphere radius? None of the other fields couple to this modulus!

General for codimension 2 branes CY volume

Our System

complex scalar in universal hypermultiplet

From 11d to 5d to 3d

slide-14
SLIDE 14

7 Sep 2009 Bert Vercnocke – “Godel Space from Wrapped M2 Branes”

  • Inspiration: codimension 2 branes are special!
  • Greene, Shapere, Vafa, Yau (1990) (Stringy cosmic strings)
  • Gibbons, Green, Perry (1995)

(D7 branes)

  • 3D part of metric:

FLAT SPACE!

Remains valid when spatial part

  • f is “flat”
  • Action and equations of motion in 3d:

: no backreaction, AdS : backreaction = ???

– Einstein eqns. – Scalar field eqn. – We search for stationary solutions

Flat space: Our case:

Equations of motion in the 3d system

Our System

slide-15
SLIDE 15

7 Sep 2009 Bert Vercnocke – “Godel Space from Wrapped M2 Branes”

  • Let's put everything together:

– Wrapped branes on the sphere in – Leads to three-dimensional action: – Ansatz:

Gauge freedom:

– Einstein eqns.: – We will focus on eqn. for : sourced Liouville equation

Our case, we will show this is timelike stretched

What does our ansatz give us?

Our System

slide-16
SLIDE 16

7 Sep 2009 Bert Vercnocke – “Godel Space from Wrapped M2 Branes”

  • Let's put everything together:

– Wrapped branes on the sphere in – Leads to three-dimensional action: – Ansatz:

Gauge freedom:

– Einstein eqns.: – We will focus on eqn. for : sourced Liouville equation

Our case, we will show this is timelike stretched

T a k e a r b i t r a r y

Our System

What does our ansatz give us?

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Solutions

slide-18
SLIDE 18

7 Sep 2009 Bert Vercnocke – “Godel Space from Wrapped M2 Branes”

  • Solving for general value of

– Ansatz and Einstein equations: – Specifics:

  • Spatial base has topology of a disk (UHP) (cf. AdS)
  • Imaginary part of positive: lives on UHP
  • Possible poles of only on the boundary of space

meromorphic function from disk/UHP to UHP

Solutions

Solving for our ansatz

slide-19
SLIDE 19

7 Sep 2009 Bert Vercnocke – “Godel Space from Wrapped M2 Branes”

  • Solving for general value of

– Ansatz and Einstein equations: – Specifics:

  • Spatial base has topology of a disk (UHP) (cf. AdS)
  • Imaginary part of positive: lives on UHP
  • Possible poles of only on the boundary of space

meromorphic function from disk/UHP to UHP

– Build solutions: – We can take:

  • Literature (sourced Liouville eqn.)
  • Uniqueness? Locally: 3D gravity

Solutions

Solving for our ansatz

Notice earlier gauge freedom!

slide-20
SLIDE 20

7 Sep 2009 Bert Vercnocke – “Godel Space from Wrapped M2 Branes”

Godel Space in Disk and UHP coordinates

  • Poincare Disk
  • Timelike Squashed AdS (TMG): unphysical!
  • AdS
  • Timelike Stretched AdS

circle timelike, CTCs

  • Upper Half Plane (UHP)
  • We express the Godel metric in coordinates where the spatial base is

either the Poincare disk or UHP.

.

Solutions: Godel Space

slide-21
SLIDE 21

7 Sep 2009 Bert Vercnocke – “Godel Space from Wrapped M2 Branes”

  • Original Godel space

– Metric in four dimensions:

3d solution above ( ) plus 1 extra dimension

– Solution to Einstein eqns. with a pressureless fluid source:

constant energy density

– Closed Timelike Curves (CTCs) – Godel rotates around every point:

  • Our Godel space

– 3d solution – Non-trivial complex scalar with

EM tensor of the “Godel” form

– CTCs – Pole of on the boundary ( )

Infinite U(1)- charge of gauge field:

Properties of original and our Godel space

.

Solutions: Godel Space

slide-22
SLIDE 22

7 Sep 2009 Bert Vercnocke – “Godel Space from Wrapped M2 Branes”

(Super)Symmetries

Comparison of supsersymmetries: probe/backreaction

  • Background geometry

– Bosonic symmetry group: – Supergroup (8 supersymmetries):

  • Probe (wrapped) M2 Branes

– Static w.r.t. generator of (i.e. t in UHP coords, physically

rotating M2!)

– Minimal energy: ,

mass of brane

– ½ BPS state: (4 supersymmetries)

  • Is 3d Godel Space = Backreacted (wrapped) M2 branes ?

– Bosonic symmetry group – Same (4 supersymmetries) of probe – Check: M2 branes in Godel background do not break any susy

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Superglue

slide-24
SLIDE 24

7 Sep 2009 Bert Vercnocke – “Godel Space from Wrapped M2 Branes”

Superglue

  • Motivation: why glue to Anti de Sitter space?

– Black hole motivation – AdS/CFT

  • Embedding of Godel in AdS:

SIMPLEST REALIZATION: domain wall canceling the M2 charge

  • Outside wall: locally AdS (3d gravity)

– Analogy with enhancon etc.

  • Resolving CTCs of Godel-type spacetime
  • Setting up the domain wall

– Cancel energy-momentum sourcing Godel space – Need M2 brane charge

Domain wall built up out of M2 branes wrapping internal , smeared in AdS on a dimension 1 domain “wall”

  • Action

– Which wall? M2 branes couple to CY volume try constant

How to glue Godel space to Anti de Sitter?

slide-25
SLIDE 25

7 Sep 2009 Bert Vercnocke – “Godel Space from Wrapped M2 Branes”

Superglue

  • Action

with Solution supersymmetric (remember static probe branes in UHP are susy!)

  • Domain Wall
  • Ansatz:

Complex Scalar Metric

Strategy

.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

7 Sep 2009 Bert Vercnocke – “Godel Space from Wrapped M2 Branes”

Superglue

  • Junction conditions

– For metric, complex scalar

(= CY volume and gauge field)

Strategy

Normal Coordinate Fields Fields Domain Wall

  • Need to match:

– Continuity across domain wall – EOM scalar/metric across wall: – Einstein eqn. AdS part: no source

= the sign of the M2 brane tension! Godel in/out determined by brane tension neg/pos Metric: Global AdS!

slide-27
SLIDE 27

7 Sep 2009 Bert Vercnocke – “Godel Space from Wrapped M2 Branes”

Superglue

  • Problems:

– CTCs:

  • Remember poincare disk:

Domain walls are circles tangent to the boundary in

  • Even worse:

– Out(in)side AdS space can be brought to global coordinates – Identification of AdS-angle requires extra timelike identification in

Godel

– Black hole charges? Hoped for, but not realized!

Remaining issues

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Conclusions & Outlook

slide-29
SLIDE 29

7 Sep 2009 Bert Vercnocke – “Godel Space from Wrapped M2 Branes”

Conclusions & Discussion

  • Summary?

– Backreaction of M2 branes wrapped on in background? – Godel space + complex scalar in 3 dimensions:

  • Infinte M2 charge on one boundary point
  • Supersymmetric (½ BPS)

– Connect to to asymptotically AdS spacetime: domain wall of M2 branes

  • PROBLEMS: CTCs, no BH equivalent
  • Questions?

– What corresponds to backreacted setup of Gaiotto-Denef-Strominger-Van

den Bleeken-Yin? We would expect asymptotics = quotient of

– Other alternatives

  • For Godel solutions? Complex scalar solution?
  • of making Domain Wall?

– 11d picture, need codimension 1 object – other brane sources:

  • M2?
  • M5?

– Use this technology to resolve problematic solutions (3d conical defect of

AdS…)

slide-30
SLIDE 30

End

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Extra Slides

slide-32
SLIDE 32

7 Sep 2009 Bert Vercnocke – “Godel Space from Wrapped M2 Branes”

Solutions

  • As an appetizer, let's solve the case

– We know this should be AdS – Equations of motion become

in terms of an arbitrary holomorphic function

– We can show this is AdS with the coordinate transformation:

  • For later use, two main coordinate systems:
  • The Poincare Disk
  • The Upper Half Plane (UHP)

Parameter gives

slide-33
SLIDE 33

7 Sep 2009 Bert Vercnocke – “Godel Space from Wrapped M2 Branes”

Solutions: Godel Space

Godel Space in Disk and UHP coordinates

  • Poincare Disk
  • Timelike Squashed AdS (TMG)
  • AdS
  • Timelike Stretched AdS

circle timelike, CTCs

  • Upper Half Plane (UHP)
  • We express the AdS metric in coordinates where the spatial base is

either the Poincare disk or UHP.

.

  • Poincare Disk