summary
play

Summary Introduction 1 Research program Gemmes research - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

27/06/2018 #WorldInCommon AGENCE FRANAISE DE DVELOPPEMENT | FRENCH DEVELOPMENT 27/06/2018 #WorldInCommon AGENCE FRANAISE DE DVELOPPEMENT | FRENCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 0/72 AGENCY GEMMES - ISEO 27, J UNE 2018 Gal Giraud Chief


  1. 27/06/2018 #WorldInCommon AGENCE FRANÇAISE DE DÉVELOPPEMENT | FRENCH DEVELOPMENT 27/06/2018 #WorldInCommon AGENCE FRANÇAISE DE DÉVELOPPEMENT | FRENCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 0/72 AGENCY

  2. GEMMES - ISEO 27, J UNE 2018 Gaël Giraud Chief Economist | AFD Senior researcher | CNRS Professor | ENPC Director | Energy et Prosperity Chair #WorldInCommon AGENCE FRANÇAISE DE DÉVELOPPEMENT | FRENCH DEVELOPMENT #WorldInCommon AGENCE FRANÇAISE DE DÉVELOPPEMENT | FRENCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 0/72 AGENCY

  3. � Summary Introduction 1 Research program Gemmes research programme 2 Gemmes: the model 3 Basics Introduction 4 Research program Related Literature 5 Modeling set-up 6 The macroeconomic core The climate module Target achievements 7 Modeling uncertainty 8 Climate prospective 9 Scope of analysis Scenario analysis 10 Concluding remarks #WorldInCommon AGENCE FRANÇAISE DE DÉVELOPPEMENT | FRENCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 1/72

  4. � Outlines 1 Introduction Research program 2 Gemmes research programme 3 Gemmes: the model 4 Introduction 5 Related Literature 6 Modeling set-up 7 Target achievements 8 Modeling uncertainty 9 Climate prospective 10 Concluding remarks #WorldInCommon AGENCE FRANÇAISE DE DÉVELOPPEMENT | FRENCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 2/72

  5. � Introduction The 2008 crisis: a revival of Minsky’s theory of financial instability Nonfinancial Business; Credit Market Instruments; Liability, Level/Gross Domestic Product (left) Civilian Unemployment Rate (right) 11.2 5 10.4 4 9.6 3 8.8 2 % Chg. of (Bil. of $/Bil. of $) 8.0 1 Percent 7.2 0 6.4 -1 5.6 -2 4.8 -3 4.0 -4 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 fred.stlouisfed.org myf.red/g/7Dv0 Figure: Time series of the private debt ratio and employment rate in the United States over the period 1990-2010. #WorldInCommon AGENCE FRANÇAISE DE DÉVELOPPEMENT | FRENCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 3/72

  6. � Introduction A “New normal"? (1) Figure: Quantitative Easing vs inflation, US. #WorldInCommon AGENCE FRANÇAISE DE DÉVELOPPEMENT | FRENCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 4/72

  7. � Introduction A “New normal"? (2) Figure: Public debt vs spread, US. #WorldInCommon AGENCE FRANÇAISE DE DÉVELOPPEMENT | FRENCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 5/72

  8. � Introduction Failure of standard models Figure: Troïka’s predictions on the Greek GDP ... #WorldInCommon AGENCE FRANÇAISE DE DÉVELOPPEMENT | FRENCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 6/72

  9. � Introduction Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) 1 . All the present and future variables are simultaneously at equilibrium 2 . People maximize their individual utility (or profit) perfectly anticipating the future. 3 . Returns to scale are decreasing by assumption. 4 . Equilibrium is only disrupted by exogenous shocks but is always locally asymptoti- cally stable 5 . Money is neutral and there is no banking sector. 6 . Private debts don’t matter. 7 . Inequalities don’t matter. 8 . Energy and matter don’t matter. 9 . Climate backloops are harmless. #WorldInCommon AGENCE FRANÇAISE DE DÉVELOPPEMENT | FRENCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 7/72

  10. � Introduction The trouble with macroeconomics � Blanchard (PIIE, 2016): I see the current DSGE models as seriously flawed... � Romer (2016): For more than three decades, macroeconomics has gone backwards... � Kocherlakota (2016): ...we simply do not have a settled successful theory of the macroeconomy. The choices made 25-40 years ago - made then for a number of excellent reasons - should not be treated as written in stone or even in pen. #WorldInCommon AGENCE FRANÇAISE DE DÉVELOPPEMENT | FRENCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 8/72

  11. � Introduction Micro-foundations? Figure: Sonnenschein-Mantel-Debreu (1975) #WorldInCommon AGENCE FRANÇAISE DE DÉVELOPPEMENT | FRENCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 9/72

  12. � Introduction Rational expectations? � Cass & Stiglitz (1969) : trajectories with rational expectations are not locally stable in the space of trajectories with expectations. � In the parlance of Guesnerie (2006) : REE are not eductively stable. #WorldInCommon AGENCE FRANÇAISE DE DÉVELOPPEMENT | FRENCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 10/72

  13. � Introduction The Price-taking paradigm 1 . Suppose you wanna travel from Iseo to Roma as quickly as possible... ∂ q i = 0 and dp ∂ p 2 . dQ < 0 are mutually incompatible (unless each firm is atomless): 0 = ∂ p dp ∂ Q = ∂ q i dQ ∂ q i dp dQ < 0 . = #WorldInCommon AGENCE FRANÇAISE DE DÉVELOPPEMENT | FRENCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 11/72

  14. � Introduction The Price-taking paradigm 1 . The conventional solution to Max q i π ( q i ) = p · q i − c i ( q i ) is not individually optimal (unless each firm is atomless): π ( q i + dq i ) − π ( q i ) = p ( Q + dq i )( q i + dq i ) − c i ( q i + dq i ) − p ( Q ) q i + c i ( q i ) dp dQ + d 2 q i − c ′ ≃ p ( Q ) dq i + q i dq i i ( q i ) dq i dp dQ < 0 ≃ q i dq i #WorldInCommon AGENCE FRANÇAISE DE DÉVELOPPEMENT | FRENCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 12/72

  15. � Introduction The Price-taking paradigm 1 . d π ∂π dq j � := ∂ q j dQ dQ j � dq j ∂ � = � p ( Q ) q i − c i ( q i ) ∂ q j dQ j � dq i dq j dp ( Q ) � � p − c ′ = i ( q i ) dQ + q i dQ , dQ j 2 . In the symmetric case: dQ − � j � = i dq j dq i = dQ dQ 1 − ( n − 1 ) dq i = dQ , 3 . dp ( Q ) = p ( Q ) + Q dp ( Q ) c ′ (1) i ( q i ) = p ( Q ) + nq i . dQ dQ #WorldInCommon AGENCE FRANÇAISE DE DÉVELOPPEMENT | FRENCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 13/72

  16. � Introduction The Price-taking paradigm 1 . The price-taking solution coincides with the monopolistic one. 2 . Hence, it is Pareto-suboptimal. 3 . Discontinuity of the price-taking solution when n → + ∞ . ( � = Mas-Collel ()). 4 . Perfect competition makes sense only with an atomless space of firms. In the “real” world ( n < + ∞ ), competition is always imperfect. 5 . Stigler (1954), Keen & Standish (2006), Giraud et al. (2018). #WorldInCommon AGENCE FRANÇAISE DE DÉVELOPPEMENT | FRENCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 14/72

  17. � Summary Introduction 1 Research program Gemmes research programme 2 Gemmes: the model 3 Basics Introduction 4 Research program Related Literature 5 Modeling set-up 6 The macroeconomic core The climate module Target achievements 7 Modeling uncertainty 8 Climate prospective 9 Scope of analysis Scenario analysis 10 Concluding remarks #WorldInCommon AGENCE FRANÇAISE DE DÉVELOPPEMENT | FRENCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 15/72

  18. � II. Debts and credit Figure: Keen (2017) #WorldInCommon AGENCE FRANÇAISE DE DÉVELOPPEMENT | FRENCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 16/72

  19. � Debts and credit 7 Figure: Keen (2017) #WorldInCommon AGENCE FRANÇAISE DE DÉVELOPPEMENT | FRENCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 17/72

  20. � Debts and credit Figure: UK (Keen (2017)) #WorldInCommon AGENCE FRANÇAISE DE DÉVELOPPEMENT | FRENCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 18/72

  21. � Debts and credit Figure: Keen (2017) #WorldInCommon AGENCE FRANÇAISE DE DÉVELOPPEMENT | FRENCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 19/72

  22. � Gemmes research programme Key research highlights 1 . Combine three potential sources of global instabilities (climate, finance and in- equalities) in a minimal and consistent framework to provide prospective analysis insights on the climate-economy interactions 2 . Identify the instability factors and their transmission channels (in particular the piv- otal role of private debt) through non-linear dynamics. 3 . Provide public policy guidance for the implementation of the Paris Agreement to contain global warming “well below” +2 ◦ C. 4 . Provide insight on the impact of natural resource scarcity: biodiversity, energy, min- erals... 5 . Help drive the social-ecological transition. #WorldInCommon AGENCE FRANÇAISE DE DÉVELOPPEMENT | FRENCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 20/72

  23. � Summary Introduction 1 Research program Gemmes research programme 2 Gemmes: the model 3 Basics Introduction 4 Research program Related Literature 5 Modeling set-up 6 The macroeconomic core The climate module Target achievements 7 Modeling uncertainty 8 Climate prospective 9 Scope of analysis Scenario analysis 10 Concluding remarks #WorldInCommon AGENCE FRANÇAISE DE DÉVELOPPEMENT | FRENCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 21/72

  24. � Gemmes: the model – Theoretical elements � Minimum (bounded) rationality in a stock-flow consistent set-up. � Mathematical formalization of Minsky’s moment ◮ Lotka-Volterra relationship linking the employment rate to the wage share ◮ Dynamics of the private debt of firms + endogenous creation of non-neutral money by banks. � Phenomenological empirical approach to ground aggregate behavior: investment, consumption, short-term Phillips curve (Mankiw (2010) [ ? ] , Gordon (2014), Krug- man (2014)). � Endogenous business cycles � Multiplicity of long-term equilibria: ◮ A desirable steady-state equilibrium ◮ A bad attractor leading to a breakdown #WorldInCommon AGENCE FRANÇAISE DE DÉVELOPPEMENT | FRENCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 22/72

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend