Summary p SNR - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

summary
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Summary p SNR - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

H H Cf.) Shimoda & Laming 2019a, MNRAS, 485 Shimoda & Laming 2019b, MNRAS, 489 1,2 Collaborators: J. M. Laming 3 ; S. Katsuda 4 1. Nagoya Univ.; 2. Tohoku


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Hα Hα

  • 1,2

, 2019, 12/26

Collaborators:

  • J. M. Laming3; S. Katsuda4
  • 1. Nagoya Univ.; 2. Tohoku Univ.; 3. Naval Research Lab.; 4. Saitama Univ.

Cf.) Shimoda & Laming 2019a, MNRAS, 485 Shimoda & Laming 2019b, MNRAS, 489

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Summary

pSNR

  • pSNR
  • pHα判別可能
slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • ,,, 2012

E<1017eVSNR?!E>1017eV?!

100

  • , e-, p, He, …
  • < 1015.5 eV

> 1015.5 eV

Ohira, Yamazaki & Terasawa (2012)

The energy spectrum of CRs

dF/dE∝E-2.7

Cosmic Rays

SNR Origin

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Supernova Remnant (SNR)

SNR 0509-67.5 (Chandra & HST)

Blue: 1.5 – 7.0 keV Green: 0.2 – 1.5 keV Red: Ha

X-ray:

~TeV

  • (e.g. Warren & Hughes 04).

Ha:

  • (e.g. Hovey+15).

From Chandra archival image

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • ,,, 2012

E<1017eVSNR?!E>1017eV?!

100

  • , e-, p, He, …
  • < 1015.5 eV

> 1015.5 eV

Ohira, Yamazaki & Terasawa (2012)

The energy spectrum of CRs

dF/dE∝E-2.7

Cosmic Rays

SNR Origin

CR CRSNR →

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Cosmic-Ray Modified Shock (CRMS)

Velocity

p: protons in background plasma

no CR shock (z=0)

z

down up

  • CR
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Cosmic-Ray Modified Shock (CRMS)

shock (z=0)

z

precursor CR CR

  • CR
  • heated/turbulent

Velocity down up no CR

p

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Cosmic-Ray Modified Shock (CRMS)

no CR shock (z=0)

z

CR CR

  • shock

with CR precursor Velocity down up

p

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Cosmic-Ray Modified Shock (CRMS)

no CR shock (z=0)

z

CR CR

  • shock

with CR precursor Velocity down up

p

p photoionization (e.g. Ghavamian+00, Medina+14). p CRMS

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Cosmic-Ray Modified Shock (CRMS)

, 1 p = +

  • v

u = = w w ´ = ´ w w D = D = D = ´ W

  • =

= b b = = = =

  • b

b pr = r r r = W

  • w

= » = =

  • p r

r = + » r = =

  • =

=

  • B

B dr r »

= W- r ∣ w <

p = +

  • =

= w w ´ = ´ w w D = D = D = ´ W

  • =

= b b = = = =

  • b

b pr = r r r = W

  • w

= » = =

  • p r

r = + » r = =

  • =

=

  • B

B dr r »

= W- r ∣ w <

w = w 3 d » = =

  • =

W- r r =

  • =
  • =
  • =

W

  • >
  • w

=

  • w

w = W

  • =

W- r r = W-

s =

  • w

w = W

  • =

= » =

  • »

=

  • »
  • »

> = =

  • =

=

  • =

=

  • =

=

  • =

=

  • =

=

  • =

=

  • =

=

  • w

w = W-

  • SNR

hybrid simulation (Ohira 16)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Cosmic-Ray Modified Shock (CRMS)

, 1 p = +

  • v

u = = w w ´ = ´ w w D = D = D = ´ W

  • =

= b b = = = =

  • b

b pr = r r r = W

  • w

= » = =

  • p r

r = + » r = =

  • =

=

  • B

B dr r »

= W- r ∣ w <

p = +

  • =

= w w ´ = ´ w w D = D = D = ´ W

  • =

= b b = = = =

  • b

b pr = r r r = W

  • w

= » = =

  • p r

r = + » r = =

  • =

=

  • B

B dr r »

= W- r ∣ w <

w = w 3 d » = =

  • =

W- r r =

  • =
  • =
  • =

W

  • >
  • w

=

  • w

w = W

  • =

W- r r = W-

s =

  • w

w = W

  • =

= » =

  • »

=

  • »
  • »

> = =

  • =

=

  • =

=

  • =

=

  • =

=

  • =

=

  • =

=

  • =

=

  • w

w = W-

  • SNR

hybrid simulation (Ohira 16)

p

  • SNRkpc
  • Challenging!
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Supernova Remnant (SNR)

SNR 0509-67.5 (Chandra & HST)

Blue: 1.5 – 7.0 keV Green: 0.2 – 1.5 keV Red: Ha

X-ray:

~TeV

  • (e.g. Warren & Hughes 04).

Ha:

  • (e.g. Hovey+15).

From Chandra archival image

Ha (e.g. Raymond 91 for review).

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Hα emission from upstream

Hα Surface Brightness −8 −6 −4 −2 2 4 6 Distance from the peak [′′] precursor postshock Shock Direction

Tycho’s SNR (Lee+2010)

Photoionization?

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Hα emission from upstream

Hα Surface Brightness −8 −6 −4 −2 2 4 6 Distance from the peak [′′] precursor postshock Shock Direction

Tycho’s SNR (Lee+2010)

Photoionization?

RESOLVED SHOCK STRUCTURE OF THE BALMER-DOMINATED FILAMENTS IN TYCHO’S SUPERNOVA REMNANT: COSMIC-RAY PRECURSOR?

Jae-Joon Lee1, John C. Raymond2, Sangwook Park1, William P. Blair3, Parviz Ghavamian4, P. F. Winkler5, and Kelly Korreck2

1 Astronomy and Astrophysics Department, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA; lee@astro.psu.edu

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • +

< < <

Hα emission from upstream

SNR Cygnus Loop (Katsuda+2016) Shock Direction

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • +

< < <

Hα emission from upstream

SNR Cygnus Loop (Katsuda+2016) Shock Direction

SPATIALLY RESOLVED SPECTROSCOPY OF A BALMER-DOMINATED SHOCK IN THE CYGNUS LOOP: AN EXTREMELY THIN COSMIC-RAY PRECURSOR?

Satoru Katsuda1, Keiichi Maeda2,3, Yutaka Ohira4, Yoichi Yatsu5, Koji Mori6, Wako Aoki7, Kumiko Morihana8, John C. Raymond9, Parviz Ghavamian10, Jae-Joon Lee11, Jiro Shimoda4, and Ryo Yamazaki4

1 Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), 3-1-1 Yoshinodai,

slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • +

< < <

Hα emission from upstream

SNR Cygnus Loop (Katsuda+2016) Shock Direction

SPATIALLY RESOLVED SPECTROSCOPY OF A BALMER-DOMINATED SHOCK IN THE CYGNUS LOOP: AN EXTREMELY THIN COSMIC-RAY PRECURSOR?

Satoru Katsuda1, Keiichi Maeda2,3, Yutaka Ohira4, Yoichi Yatsu5, Koji Mori6, Wako Aoki7, Kumiko Morihana8, John C. Raymond9, Parviz Ghavamian10, Jae-Joon Lee11, Jiro Shimoda4, and Ryo Yamazaki4

1 Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), 3-1-1 Yoshinodai,

p Ha

  • p CR

CR p Hα

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Hα emission from upstream

shock (z=0)

z H p

fully ionized H shock

  • no CR

p/e shock

  • H + p/e → H* + p/e

emits Lyβ precursor Velocity down up

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Hα emission from upstream

shock (z=0)

z H p

fully ionized H shock

  • no CR

p/e shock

  • H + p/e → H* + p/e

emits Lyβ precursor Velocity down up Lyβ

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Hα emission from upstream

shock (z=0)

z H p

fully ionized H shock

  • p/e shock
  • H + p/e → H* + p/e

emits Lyβ precursor Velocity down up Lyβ τLyβ ~ 1 1s → 3p Lyβ no CR

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Hα emission from upstream

shock (z=0)

z H p

fully ionized precursor Velocity down up Lyβ τLyβ ~ 1

  • Pol. Hα

1s → 3p → 2s Lyβ Hα Hα

  • 1. Raman

Lyβ to Hα no CR

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Hα emission from upstream

shock (z=0)

z H p

fully ionized precursor Velocity down up Lyβ τLyβ ~ 1

  • Pol. Hα

1s → 3p → 2s Lyβ Hα Hα

  • 1. Raman

Lyβ to Hα y

  • no CR
slide-23
SLIDE 23

downstream Lyβ→Hα

Polarization angle for Lyβ→Hα

Shock

  • Scattered Ha
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Hα emission from upstream

shock (z=0)

z H p

fully ionized precursor Velocity down up Lyβ τLyβ ~ 1

  • Pol. Hα

1s → 3p → 2s Lyβ Hα Hα

  • 1. Raman

Lyβ to Hα no CR

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Hα emission from upstream

shock (z=0)

z H p

fully ionized precursor Velocity down up Lyβ τLyβ ~ 1

  • Pol. Hα

  • 1. Raman

Lyβ to Hα 2.

  • H + e → H* + e
  • unPol. Hα

no CR

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Hα emission from upstream

H p

no CR shock (z=0)

z

with CR CR modified shock

  • fully ionized

precursor Velocity down up

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Hα emission from upstream

H p

no CR shock (z=0)

z

with CR

  • H

p

  • fully ionized

precursor Velocity down up H + p → p + H

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Hα emission from upstream

H p

no CR shock (z=0)

z

with CR fully ionized precursor Velocity down up Lyβ H shock

  • p/e shock
  • H + p/e → H* + p/e

emits Lyβ

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Hα emission from upstream

H p

no CR shock (z=0)

z

with CR

  • Lyβ

fully ionized precursor Velocity down up

  • Pol. Hα

Lyβ

slide-30
SLIDE 30

downstream Lyβ→Hα

Polarization angle for Lyβ→Hα

Shock

  • Scattered Ha

No scattering in this direction.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Hα emission from upstream

H p

no CR shock (z=0)

z

with CR

This Lyβ photon is not scattered because of the Doppler shift.

fully ionized precursor Velocity down up

  • Pol. Hα

Lyβ

:

→shock→ →shock→

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Hα emission from upstream

H p

no CR shock (z=0)

z

with CR

This Lyβ photon is not scattered because of the Doppler shift.

fully ionized precursor Velocity down up

  • Pol. Hα

Lyβ

:

→shock→ →shock→ p Lineatomic population (rate-eq.) → p :

  • 1. atomic population (SJ &

Laming 19a). Stokes I

  • 2. Lyβ
  • 3. Stokes Q3pLyβ to

Hα (i.e. radiative excitation) . See, SJ & Laming 19b for details

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Model set up for the shock

Shock Te0.1 Tp .

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Model set up for the shock

Shock Te0.1 Tp . We solve 3 cases:

  • 1. No precursor
  • 2. , (electron heating precursor)
  • 3. , (Cosmic-Ray Modified Shock)
slide-35
SLIDE 35

Line Transfer Model

Parameters: Vsh ntot,0 proton fraction χ0 Tdown Te=βTdown Pure hydrogen plasma. 4f

(SJ & Laming 19a)

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Results: Ionization Structure of H

Decelerated H

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Results: Radiative vs. Collisional

3pLyβ to Hα (i.e. radiative excitation) . →ok

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Results: Polarization of Ha

The sign of degree indicates the polarization angle (Stokes Q).

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Results: Polarization of Ha

Polarization degree Surface brightness

p p p (Sparks+ 15).

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Discovery of polarized Hα emission @ bright filament of SN 1006 (Sparks+ 15)

Ø Linear Polarization Ø Polarization angle perpendicular to the shock Ø Degree 2.0 ± 0.4 %

  • Stokes I

Stokes Q Stokes U

Observed Area

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Discovery of polarized Hα emission @ bright filament of SN 1006 (Sparks+ 15)

Ø Linear Polarization Ø Polarization angle perpendicular to the shock Ø Degree 2.0 ± 0.4 %

  • Stokes I

Stokes Q Stokes U

Observed Area

ü →

  • ü Sparks+15
  • ü
slide-42
SLIDE 42

Polarization of Ha vs others

Polarization degree Surface brightness Hβ/Hα

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Summary

pSNR

  • pSNR
  • pHα判別可能

Ø CRMS identifywith