Summary Appointments and Elections Awards The Medium Term Plan - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
summary
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Summary Appointments and Elections Awards The Medium Term Plan - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sep 19, 2023 344 likes •897 views

Summary Appointments and Elections Awards The Medium Term Plan (2002-2005) in brief LEP dismantling Where are we with the LHC LHC computing Putting in place the new Career Structure 19/6/01 L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

slide-1
SLIDE 1

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

1

Summary

  • Appointments and Elections
  • Awards
  • The Medium Term Plan (2002-2005) in brief
  • LEP dismantling
  • Where are we with the LHC
  • LHC computing
  • Putting in place the new Career Structure
slide-2
SLIDE 2

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

2

SENIOR STAFF APPOINTMENTS

  • Board of Directors
  • from Jan. 1, 2002 to Dec. 31, 2003:
  • R. Cashmore, Director of Collider Programmes;
  • C. Detraz, Director for Fixed Target and Future Programmes
  • .H. Hoffmann, Director for Technology Transfer and Scientific

Computing

  • J. May, Technical Director;
  • L. Evans, Director of the LHC Project;
  • Division Leaders
  • M. Delfino, IT Division, from Jan. 1, 2002 to Dec. 31, 200;
  • J. Fergusson, AS Division, from Jan. 1, 2002 to Dec. 31, 2004;
  • Ph. Lebrun, LHC Division, from Jan. 1, 2002 to Dec. 31, 2004.
slide-3
SLIDE 3

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

3

Elections

❧ Dr. H. Schunck (DE) was elected Vice-President of Council for a period of one year as of 1 July 2001. ❧ Prof. M. Calvetti (IT) was re-elected as a member of the Scientific Policy Committee for three years from 1 July 2001. ❧ Dr. J. Bezemer (NL) was re-elected as Chairman of TREF for a period of one year as of 1 July 2001. ❧ Mr. F Gruber (CH) was elected as Vice-Chairman of TREF for a period of one year as of 1 July 2001.

❧ Dr. J. Bezemer (NL) and Dr. F. Bello (PT) as Council

representatives (member and alternate), for three years, to the Governing Board of the Pension Fund. ❧ Dr. J. Bezemer (NL) as Chairman of the Investment Board of the Pension Fund, for three years.

❧

slide-4
SLIDE 4

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

4

Awards

❧ Degree “Honoris causa” from Universite de Geneve to S. Meyers and A. Hofmann for their works on accelerators; ❧ Computer World Honours Programme. Science Award for 2001 for the project SHIFT (see later) ❧ Scientific American Web Awards 2001 to “The antimatter mirror of the Universe”

slide-5
SLIDE 5

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

5

MTP 2002-2005 in brief...

❧ industrial production and installation of the LHC accelerator and detectors, which will continue to absorb the largest share of CERN resources; ❧ restricted but very high quality scientific programme(fixed target, theory); ❧ limited but significant accelerator and detector R&D, to identify future options for high energy physics with particle accelerators and prepare the long-term future of the Organisation; ❧ Outreach and Technology Transfer, building, in particular, on LHC related developments.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

6

Important milestones have been passed

❧ The conclusion of the 5-yearly remuneration review; ❧ Conclusion of the LEP programme; ❧ LHC commissioning schedule ❧ The fixed target programme at PS/SPS has been defined and budgetary appropriations identified; ❧ International Panel review of the LHC computing infrastructure (time-scale/cost estimate of prototype and final infrastr.)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

7

Expenditure from Material Budget in 2001

LHC 64% Out&TT 0.3% Consolid 8% Support 19% Research 9%

slide-8
SLIDE 8

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

8

LHC commissioning schedule

Jan-04 Apr-04 Jul-04 Oct-04 Jan-05 Apr-05 Jul-05 Oct-05 Jan-06 Apr-06 Jul-06 Oct-06 Jan-07 Apr-07 Jul-07 Oct-07

Octant test 01/04 to 3 1 / 0 8 Last dipole delivered 3 1 / 0 3 Ring closed and cold 3 1 / 1 2 First beam 0 1 / 0 2 Physics run 7 months L>2x1033 0 1 / 0 8 2 8 / 0 2 Pilot run 01/04 to 30/04 Shutdown 3 months

2004 2005 2006 2007

Pb-Pb run 6 weeks

1754 days till April 1 2006

slide-9
SLIDE 9

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

9

  • 2. The CERN Scientific Programme

MTP 2002-2005

slide-10
SLIDE 10

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

10

NA48 Direct CP violation

  • New (≈final) result presented in May:

ε’/ε =(18±2) 10-4

  • new result from kTeV is now consistent with CERN result !!!
  • extension in 2002 (NA48/1) to search for rare Ks decays

and neutral hyperon decays (3 1010 neutral kaon decays)

  • further extension in 2003 (NA48/2) for a high statistics

study of (to O(10-4)).

slide-11
SLIDE 11

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

11

CLIC Test Facility 3

slide-12
SLIDE 12

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

12

The SC cavities for β < 1

The β=0.7 4-cell prototype CERN technique of Nb/Cu sputtering for β=0.7, β=0.8 cavities (352 MHz):

  • excellent thermal and mechanical stability

(very important for pulsed systems)

  • lower material cost, large apertures, released

tolerances, 4.5 °K operation with Q = 109 Bulk Nb or mixed technique for β=0.52 (one 100 kW tetrode per cavity)

0.1 1 10 2 4 6 8 10 12

Eacc [MV/m] Q/10

9

0.8 single cell LEP 0.7 4-cells 0.8 5-cells

slide-13
SLIDE 13

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

13

Table 13 – Draft Budget for 2002 (MCHF)

Contributions: 1% MS, 2% Host States expenditures: 2% indexation ASSUMED:

2001 prices 2002 prices INCOME 971.5 982.8

Regular Contribution 944.9 956.2 CNGS Voluntary Contribution 17.8 17.8 Host States in-cash to LHC 2.0 2.0 Transfer from Reserve 5.0 5.0 Other Income 1.8 1.8

RUNNING EXPENDITURE 733.5 747.8 Personnel 455.2 464.3

Staff 423.6 432.1

  • f which the Centralised Budget represents

25.0 25.5

Fellows & Associates 31.5 32.2

Materials Costs 255.9 260.6

LHC Operation 33.6 34.3 Other Operation 128.2 130.8 R&D 7.5 7.7 Non Recurrent 53.0 53.7

  • f which the CNGS accounts for

18.8 18.8

Energy 33.5 34.2

Debts 22.5 22.9 LHC CONSTRUCTION 324.6 331.1 Detectors 40.0 40.8 Machine & Areas 365.0 370.6

  • f which extra in-kind contributions account for
  • 80.3
  • 80.3

BALANCE

  • 86.6
  • 96.1
slide-14
SLIDE 14

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

14

  • 5. Conclusions & Recommendations to Council

❧ Within the present severe budgetary constraints, the MTP will allow CERN to:

  • build the LHC (“barely sufficient”, going into difficult years)
  • keep a very restricted but high quality scientific programme in

the intervening period

  • undertake R&D and Technology Transfer and Outreach

activities at a basic level. ❧ The level of support, maintenance and consolidation continues to be alarmingly low ❧ Resources for LHC computing infrastructure could not be identified in this plan and will require extra support from the Council. ❧ The long-term plan for human resources requires a revision, to allow CERN to develop fully the global role acquired with the LHC programme.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

15

Conclusions (cont ’d)

  • Council is invited to :
  • approve the overall figures proposed for 2002 in order

that the detailed preliminary 2002 Draft Budget can be prepared for presentation in September 2001;

  • take note of the proposed budget estimates for 2003,

2004 and 2005. ❧ Member States are urged to consider making advance contributions which would serve to reduce the deficit anticipated as from 2002.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

16

LEP dismantling

slide-17
SLIDE 17

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

17

LEP dismantling

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

The Large Hadron Collider Lyndon Evans

Committee of Council meeting CERN, Geneva, 14 June 2001

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

19

Civil engineering - TI2

Breakthrough of tunnel TI2 into the LEP near Point 2

slide-20
SLIDE 20

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

20

LHC in brief

❧ adjudications done so far are within cost estimates; about 70% committed, 30% paid; ❧ cost overruns related to the operations on site and to the execution of contracts have been detected, e.g. in civil engineering; ❧ Concerns 1: Civil engineering - Cost overruns particularly on package 3a and 3b

  • Claims
  • Unforeseen difficulties
  • Extra work
  • Rescheduling

We are working with the contractors to minimize the cost. ❧ Concerns 2 - Superconducting cable delivery

  • An additional supplier (Outokumpo) and two additional winindg
  • machines. The results will only be seen at the beginning of next year.
  • Supply of superconducting cable is the most critical item in

maintaining the schedule. The situation will be reviewed before placing contracts for final dipole assembly.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

21

CERN commitments and payments

  • A. Brissonnaud AC/DI

0.00 500.00 1'000.00 1'500.00 2'000.00 2'500.00 D1995 D1996 D1997 D1998 D1999 D2000 D2001 D2002 D2003 D2004 D2005 D2006 Engagements BHT au 30-05/2001

1503 MCHF

Profil "Paiements" (CERN Budget)

2198 MCHF

Profil "Engagements Prévisionnels"

slide-22
SLIDE 22

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

22

LHC, still missing...

  • call for tender for Cryo-dipoles assembly and for cryo-

lines are out, adjudication in September.

  • review of cost-to-completion going on, in view of the

Status Report in December 2001;

  • this will integrate the most important elements of the

project:

  • most important adjudications
  • LHC computing
  • Discussion of Maintenance &Operation costs.
slide-23
SLIDE 23

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

23

Civil engineering status - underground

slide-24
SLIDE 24

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

24

Civil engineering at Point 1

slide-25
SLIDE 25

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

25

Civil engineering - TI8

slide-26
SLIDE 26

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

26

String 2

slide-27
SLIDE 27

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

27

Magnets

Name Quantity Purpose MB 1232 Main dipoles MQ 400 Main lattice quadrupoles MSCB 376 Combined chromaticity/ closed orbit correctors MCS 2464 Dipole spool sextupole for persistent currents at injection MCDO 1232 Dipole spool octupole/decapole for persistent currents MO 336 Landau octupole for instability control MQT 256 Trim quad for lattice correction MCB 266 Orbit correction dipoles MQM 100 Dispersion suppressor quadrupoles MQY 20 Enlarged aperture quadrupoles

In production

slide-28
SLIDE 28

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

29

In general good progress

  • ATLAS and CMS starting construction, learning how

to go into (mass) production

  • ALICE, starting construction, finalizing R&D,
  • ne more TDR to go: the TRD
  • LHCb, starting construction, finalizing R&D,

producing TDR’s as foreseen

  • TOTEM in constructive interaction with CMS,

proceed to TDR (total cross section, etc.)

  • MOEDAL to proceed to TDR

(magnetic monopoles, ‘passive’ detector at LHCb) No major concerns, but: schedule, funding

  • electronics (rad hard; front end) more difficult than anticipated
  • these (in particular ATLAS and CMS) are enormous enterprises

and the resources are very tight…

  • still a long way to go

Status of LHC experiments summarised by Jos Engelen @ SPC

June 11, 2001

slide-30
SLIDE 30

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

30

Summary of Expenditure 1995 - 2000

RRB-12 14

Total Commitments for CMS Construction 55 3 4 52 66 75 90 9 46 57 59 124 180 255 345

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06

Annual [MCHF]

100 200 300 400 500

Actual Annual Budget 2001 Draft Budget 2002 Future Annual Planned Profile Actual Cumulative Revised Profile

slide-31
SLIDE 31

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

31

Summary of Expenditure 1995 - 2000

RRB-12 15

Total Payments for CMS Construction 59 3 2 20 43 75 90 12 7 65 80 69 127 202 292

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06

Annual [MCHF]

100 200 300 400 500

Actual Annual Budget 2001 Draft Budget 2002 Future Annual Planned Profile Actual Cumulative Revised Profile

slide-32
SLIDE 32

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

32

Magnet Yoke

YE-1 & nose trial assembly Nov ‘00 In Kawasaki (Japan)

YB-2, YB-1, YB0 ready, YB1 started. Central wheel YB0, supporting the vacuum tank. Web camera: http://cmsdoc.cern.ch/outreach/

slide-33
SLIDE 33

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

33

ATLAS Progress (1)

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 YEAR MCHF

Commitments as made

  • r presently planned in

current prices Commitments as planned in MoU in '95 prices

slide-34
SLIDE 34

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

34

ATLAS Progress (2)

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 YEAR MCHF

Payments as made or presently planned in current prices Payments as planned in MoU in '95 prices

slide-35
SLIDE 35

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

35

B0 coil connected to the barrel toroid test stand in Hall 180 at CERN

slide-36
SLIDE 36

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

36

VELO mechanics ⇒ closely linked to the machine

Cooled Si sensors in secondary vacuum Openings for feedthrough flanges (25’000 pins)

25 cm 120 cm

Exit window 1.5-2 mm thick Al RF/Vacuum thin shield Vertex detector half

Regular reviews by the LHC machine group: 1st review: 3-4 April 2001 (very positive and constructive) 2nd review foreseen in February 2002

slide-37
SLIDE 37

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

37

TOF Multigap RPC

Strip length 1.20m 2 x 48 pads Standard unit detector for ALICE In TOF will be ~ 1600 such strips

  • 0.5

0.5 1.0

  • 1.0

Sigma 70 ps 0.5% later than 250 ps 0.06 % later than 500 ps 0.65% earlier than 250 ps Counts per 50 ps 103 102 10 1 MAXIM 3760 Time [ns]

slide-38
SLIDE 38

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

38

The LHC experimental programme as of 11/06/01: In general good progress

  • ATLAS and CMS are learning how to go into

(mass) production

  • ALICE completing RD, starting construction;
  • ne more TDR to go: the TRD
  • LHCb completing RD, starting construction;

producing TDR’s as foreseen No major concerns, but:

  • electronics (rad hard; front end) more difficult than anticipated
  • these (in particular ATLAS and CMS) are enormous enterprises

and the resources are very tight…

  • still a long way to go, only

1754 days till April 1 2006 Schedule, funding Joos Engelen, SPC, June 11, 2001

slide-39
SLIDE 39

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

39

LHC progress report: in conclusion…

❧A crucial year ❧No show stopper ❧Time to make a in-depth review of all aspects ❧Will come back at the end of the year

slide-40
SLIDE 40

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

40

Building the LHC Computing Grid Environment

❧ The LHC computing review (end 1999 - 22 Feb 2001) has identified the requirements for a full exploitation of LHC data by all participating institutes and physicists. ❧ world-wide Grid-computing system. CERN capacity ~1/3 of the total. ❧ The developments, installations and resources required at CERN cannot be satisfied within the present budget. The Management therefore proposes a two-phased approach, covering the years 2001 to 2007

  • Phase 1 (2001-2004): R&D with tests of increasing size aimed at a production

prototype, to be discussed now;

  • Phase 2 (2005-2007): Construction of the first production facility to be

discussed later on the basis of the findings of phase 1.

slide-41
SLIDE 41

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

41

http://www.datagrid.cnr.it/

Project start 01-01-01, duration 3 years, 6 principal partners, 3 industries, 12 further partners Deliverables: Middleware tried out with Particle Physics-, Earth Observation-, Biomedical Applications Applications - Distributed Fabrics - "Transparent" Grid Middleware Grids will have prominent role in the IST part of FP 6 of EU EU-interest to extend to other regions: US, Japan, Russia, . . ., GGF 1 Early start into LHC Computing Grid developments !!

DataGRID Project

slide-42
SLIDE 42

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

42

Complex Data = More CPU Per Byte

les.robertson@cern.ch

Estimated CPU Capacity required at CERN

1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Jan 2000: 3.5K SI95

Other experiments

LHC LHC

K SI95 Moore’s law –

some measure of the capacity technology advances provide for a constant number of processors or investment

slide-43
SLIDE 43

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

43

CERN Centre Physics Computing Capacity 1 2 3 4 5 6 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994

year Thousands of CERN Units IBM 9000 mainframe decomissioned

Moore's law (based on 1988)

SHIFT Project at CERN

CERN Past Performance (1) : 1988-1994 innovation Computer World Honours Programme: Science Award for 2001

slide-44
SLIDE 44

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

44

Mainframe

Mini- Computer

vector Supercomputer

Processor farms : the 90's supercomputer

slide-45
SLIDE 45

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

45

CERN Centre Physics Computing Capacity

20 40 60 80 100 120

1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000

year Thousands of CERN Units Mainframes decomissioned First PC services

Moore's law (based on 1988)

CERN RD47 project RISC decomissioning agreed

CERN Past Performance (2) : 1988-2000 Continued innovation

slide-46
SLIDE 46

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

46

Estimated resources for Computing Services at CERN

  • Eng. & accel. services

Infrastructure (non-physics)

non-LHC share of base physics svcs & infrastr.

LHC share of base physics services & infrastructure Physics WAN

Computer centre refurbishment

Prototype Outsourced administration &

  • peration

Tier 0 investment Tier 1 investment

10 20 30 40 50 60 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 year MCHF

Funding available (MTP)

Engineering & accelerator services (see note) Infrastructure services (non-physics) Physics support - non-LHC LHC share of infrastructure services Baseline LHC phys svcs LHC services & software -

  • peration

Fabric & Grid mgmt s/w R&D

Software & applications R&D

50 100 150 200 250 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 year FTEs

DataGRID funding Complement

note: The numbers in this category correspond to the situation at the end of January 2001. They are higher than the figures used in the LHC Computing Review due to a shift in responsibilities to IT from the Technical and Accelerator sectors

Prototype: ≈ 50 MCHF

slide-47
SLIDE 47

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

47

LHCGrid Organisation

Project Leader

The LHC Computing Grid Project

LHCC Project Overview Board Project Execution Board Software and Computing Committee (SC2) Work Plan Definition WP RTAG WP WP WP WP Common Computing RRB Resource Matters Multi- Science Industry Other Computing Grid Projects DataGRID Project Reviews Reports

slide-48
SLIDE 48

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

48

Conclusions of CC meeting, June 14

❧ Computing is part of the LHC programme ❧ Considerable interest in technological aspects ❧ Results of phase 1 developments to be “open” to every participant of the LHC experimental programme and MS ❧ Phase 2 to be considered in more detail later ❧ DG will invite delegations of all MS in July 2001 to CERN to discuss funding and manpower of phase 1 ❧ Propose funding solution for Phase 1 to September SPC, FC, CC ❧ If possible decide in September on phase 1

slide-49
SLIDE 49

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

49

5-yearly Review: outcome

❧ Salaries: +4.32% gross, 2.8% net (+0.6% for 2001) ❧ New method for (overall) annual salary adjustments ❧ New career structure ❧ Long-term care included in the CHIS ❧ Saved Leave Scheme (with 1% subsidy for 1st slice) replaces RSL ❧ Pension fund contribution redistributed: 1/3 staff, 2/3 organization 0.3% correction has been approved by Council as from Jan. 1st, 2001

slide-50
SLIDE 50

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

50

Aims of the New Career Structure

  • Achieve a more dynamic career structure
  • Give more flexible possibilities to modulate

advancement and reward

  • Retain positive elements of the present scheme

(annual interview, level of advancement budget)

slide-51
SLIDE 51

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

51

New Career Structure

  • Band

s

  • EAZ
  • FE

A B C D E F G

Aa Ab Ac Ba Bb Bc Ca C b Cc Da D b Dc Ea Eb Ec Fa Fb Fc Ga G b Gc increment = increment = increment = increment = increment = increment = 86 89 98 89 98 111 98 111 130 111 130 151 130 151 181 181 210 239 239 296 376 F0 3650 F0 4457 F0 4778 F0 5445 F0 6326 F1 3736 F1 4546 F1 4876 F1 5556 F1 6456 F2 3822 F2 4635 F2 4974 F2 5667 F2 6586 3908 4724 5072 5778 6716 9338 12644 13448 15081 1 3994 1 4813 1 5170 1 5889 1 6846 1 9519 1 12883 1 13744 1 15457 2 4080 2 4902 2 5268 2 6000 2 6976 2 9700 2 13122 2 14040 2 15833 3 4166 3 4991 3 5366 3 6111 3 7106 3 9881 3 13361 3 14336 3 16209 4 4252 4 5080 4 5464 4 6222 4 7236 4 10062 4 13600 4 14632 4 16585 5 4338 5 5169 5 5562 5 6333 5 7366 5 10243 5 13839 5 14928 5 16961 6 4424 6 5258 6 5660 6 6444 6 7496 6 10424 6 14078 6 15224 6 17337 7 4510 4546 7 5347 5366 7 5758 5778 7 6555 6586 7 7626 7683 7 10605 10755 7 14317 7 15520 7 17713 8 4596 1 4635 8 5436 1 5464 8 5856 1 5889 8 6666 1 6716 8 7756 1 7834 8 10786 1 10965 8 14556 8 15816 9 4682 2 4724 9 5525 2 5562 9 5954 2 6000 9 6777 2 6846 9 7886 2 7985 9 10967 2 11175 9 14795 9 16112 10 4768 3 4813 10 5614 3 5660 10 6052 3 6111 10 6888 3 6976 10 8016 3 8136 10 11148 3 11385 10 15034 10 16408 11 4854 4 4902 11 5703 4 5758 11 6150 4 6222 11 6999 4 7106 11 8146 4 8287 11 11329 4 11595 11 15273 12 4940 5 4991 12 5792 5 5856 12 6248 5 6333 12 7110 5 7236 12 8276 5 8438 12 11510 5 11805 13 5026 6 5080 13 5881 6 5954 13 6346 6 6444 13 7221 6 7366 13 8406 6 8589 13 11691 6 12015 7 5169 5170 7 6052 6111 7 6555 6586 14 7332 7 7496 14 8536 7 8740 7 12225 12225 8 5258 1 5268 8 6150 1 6222 8 6666 1 6716 8 7626 7683 8 8891 8976 8 12435 1 12464 9 5347 2 5366 9 6248 2 6333 9 6777 2 6846 9 7756 1 7834 9 9042 1 9157 9 12645 2 12703 10 5436 3 5464 10 6346 3 6444 10 6888 3 6976 10 7886 2 7985 10 9193 2 9338 10 12855 3 12942 11 5525 4 5562 11 6444 4 6555 11 6999 4 7106 11 8016 3 8136 11 9344 3 9519 11 13065 4 13181 12 5614 5 5660 12 6542 5 6666 12 7110 5 7236 12 8146 4 8287 12 9495 4 9700 12 13275 5 13420 13 5703 6 5758 6 6777 13 7221 6 7366 13 8276 5 8438 13 9646 5 9881 6 13659 7 5856 7 6888 14 7332 7 7496 14 8406 6 8589

14 9797

6 10062 7 13898 8 5954 8 6999 8 7626 15 8536 7 8740 15 9948 7 10243 8 14137 9 6052 9 7110 9 7756 8 8891 8 10424 9 14376 10 6150 10 7221 10 7886 9 9042 9 10605 10 14615 11 6248 11 8016 10 9193 10 10786 12 6346 12 8146 11 9344 11 10967 13 8276 12 9495 12 11148 14 8406 13 9646 13 11329 14 9797 14 11510

(

6444 ) 7332 ) 8589 )

(

10062 )

(

11805 )

(

7110 ) 8146 ) 9495 )

(

11148 )

(

13065 ) = FEP

=1 step/2 years

=EAZ

slide-52
SLIDE 52

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

52

New features

❧ Career reviews at several stages within career paths; ❧ Re-design of the exceptional advancement zone; ❧ Suppression of one grade lower entrance grade; ❧ More emphasis on modulated speeds of advancement; ❧ Introduction of allowances linked to performance, responsibility and specific labour market situations.

slide-53
SLIDE 53

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

53

Three principles governing assimilation

1. Same salary as before 2. Same Career Path 3. No one in "orange zone" of bands a or b

  • f Career Paths B-E
slide-54
SLIDE 54

19/6/01

  • L. Maiani. Talk to the Staff

54

Further steps

❧ 20 June to 4 July : visits of HR/Dir.Admin to all divisions, ❧ more details will be given in the Weekly Bulletin and also on the Web. ❧ During August everybody will receive a letter which will indicate his or her position in the new Salary Bands. ❧ The new Career Structure will be implemented on the 1 September

The new Career Structure will be implemented on 1 September The 2002 advancement exercise will follow the new rules !