SU(5) GUT with Additional Generations of Higgs Bosons J. Evans 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

su 5 gut with additional generations of higgs bosons
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

SU(5) GUT with Additional Generations of Higgs Bosons J. Evans 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SU(5) GUT with Additional Generations of Higgs Bosons J. Evans 1 The University of Tokyo, IPMU Evans Z 2 Higgs Bosons The Standard Model Higgs Boson The interactions of the SM are chiral Left and right handed leptons carry different charges


slide-1
SLIDE 1

SU(5) GUT with Additional Generations of Higgs Bosons

  • J. Evans

1The University of Tokyo, IPMU Evans Z2 Higgs Bosons

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The Standard Model Higgs Boson

The interactions of the SM are chiral

Left and right handed leptons carry different charges

Chiral theories like the SM cannot have fermion masses

Massless fermions contradict experiment

Gauge invariant operators necessitate additional fields L = yfij¯ fLifRjh h → h A priori it appears SM violates flavor L = U†

ilyulmVmjh¯

qLiuRj + U†

ilydlmWmjh∗¯

qLidRj + yLijh¯ LLieRj

Evans Z2 Higgs Bosons

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Flavor Mixing: CKM Matrix

Flavor violating couplings arise from additional interactions

Even minimal Higgs Boson sector gives flavor violation

yN = 0 leads to no CKM like matrix for leptons CKM matrix from rotating uLi and dLi separately W bosons mix uLi and dLi giving LW = g2¯ uLiγµdLi → g2¯ u′

LiγµA† ikBkjd′ Lj

(MCKM)ij = A†

ikBkj

Evans Z2 Higgs Bosons

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Difficulties of Additional Higgs Bosons in the SM

Generic addition of a Higgs Boson to the SM

Doubles number of Yukawa couplings Gives no additional reparameterizations

Runge basis for two Higgs doublets (Only one vev) Φvev = v1 v Φ1 + v2 v Φ2 Φ⊥ = v2 v Φ2 − v1 v Φ1 v2 = v2

1 + v2 2

Lagrangian in this basis L = yuiΦvev ¯ qLiuRi + ydiΦ∗

vev ¯

qLidRi + yLiΦvev¯ LLieRi + yNiΦ∗

vev¯

LLiN + ξuijΦ⊥¯ qLiuRj + ξdijΦ∗

⊥¯

qLidRj + ξLijΦ⊥¯ LLieRj + ξNijΦ∗

⊥¯

LLiNRj

Evans Z2 Higgs Bosons

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Constraints on Additional Yukawa Couplings

Each ξ will give a diagram contributing to FV Meson mass mixing will constrain the ξ couplings Meson (quarks) BF fF (GeV) ∆Mexpt

F

(GeV) K 0 (¯ sd) 0.79 0.159 (3.476 ± 0.006) × 10−15 B0

d (¯

bd) 1.28 0.216 (3.337 ± 0.033) × 10−13 D0 (¯ cu) 0.82 0.165 (0.95 ± 0.37) × 10−14

Table: Data associated with the neutral mesons K 0, B0

d and D0.

(borrowed from Gupta, Wells).

Constraints on ξ form meson mass mixing ξds ≤ 1 × 10−5 ξuc ≤ 3 × 10−5 ξdb ≤ 4 × 10−5 ξsb ≤ 2 × 10−

Evans Z2 Higgs Bosons

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Z2 odd Higgs Bosons in the SM

Two ways to evaded constraints and avoid tuning

1

Identical couplings for additional Higgs bosons ∆Lf = yd

ij ¯

Qi Fu({Φk}) djR + yu

ij ¯

Qi Fd({Φk}) ujR + ye

ij ¯

Li Fe({Φk}) ejR +

Reparametrization of fermions identical to SM

2

Symmetries forbid coupling of additional Higgs boson to SM fermions L = LSM + LHid(Φ′

k, Φk, f ′ i )

Additional Higgs bosons interact with SM through Higgs

3

Or both of the above combined

Additional Z2 symmetry

SM fermions even or odd SM Higgs even Additional Higgs odd

Evans Z2 Higgs Bosons

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Higgs bosons of Supersymmetry

Higgs physics suggests SUSY (Stabilize Hierarchy) SUSY Higgs interactions falls under the 3rd Higgs interactions with SM constrained by Holomorphy Exact SUSY has acceptable small flavor violation (FV) SUSY breaking CAN introduce flavor violation MSSM plus Z2 odd Higgs boson gives no new FV Wodd = WMSSM + µ22Hu2Hd2

Evans Z2 Higgs Bosons

slide-8
SLIDE 8

SUSY and Grand Unification

Gauge coupling unification in SUSY

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Log10(Q/1 GeV) 10 20 30 40 50 60

α

−1

α1

−1

α2

−1

α3

−1

Figure: From Martins Supersymmetry Primer

Evans Z2 Higgs Bosons

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Grand Unification in Supersymmetry

If SUSY, Grand Unification likely Superpotential of SU(5) Grand Unification WMSSM = 1 3Tr Σ3 + 1 2fVTr Σ2 + λ ¯ Hβ(Σβ

α + 3Vδβ α)Hα

+1 4hijǫαβγδǫψαβ

i

ψγδ

j Hǫ +

√ 2f ijψαβ

i

φjα ¯ Hβ. vev breaking SU(5) give doublet triplet splitting Σ =       2 2 2 −3 −3       Doublet Triplet splitting important for proton stability Triplet Higgs must be very heavy (m2

H3 ∼ 1016 GeV)

Evans Z2 Higgs Bosons

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The Higgs bosons of a SUSY SU(5) × Z2 GUT

Low scale Higgs superpotential of SUSY SU(5) × Z2 WZ2 = −µH3 ¯ H3 − µ′H′ ¯ H′ Two problems with this

Z2 symmetry gives domain wall problem Additional Higgs will be very hard to detect (aka boring)

Fixed by adding explicit breaking of Z2 WZ2

/ = ǫ(H ¯

H′ + H′ ¯ H)

Evans Z2 Higgs Bosons

slide-11
SLIDE 11

EWSB and the Higgs Triplet

Masses of additional triplet and doublet identical

Doublet Higgs constrained by EWSB Triplet Higgs constrained by absence of CCB

EWSB requires at least one Higgs mass be negative ǫ2 − m2

3 − m3µ′ < 0

for ǫ2 > m2

3

m2

3 − ǫ2 − m3µ′ < 0

for ǫ2 < m2

3

No CCB requires all Triplet Higgs mass be positive µ′2 − m2

3 > 0

Evans Z2 Higgs Bosons

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Z2 Odd Triplet Higgs

Z2 odd triplet Higgs bosons mix with SM triplet Higgs For µGUT ≫ µ′, ǫ mixing small H = √ 2 2 H1 + √ 2 2 ¯ H∗

1 −

√ 2ǫ 2µGUT H2 − √ 2ǫ 2µGUT ¯ H∗

2

¯ H = − √ 2 2 H∗

1 +

√ 2 2 ¯ H1 − √ 2ǫ 2µGUT H∗

2 +

√ 2ǫ 2µGUT ¯ H2. But,µGUT ≫ µ′, ǫ lead to light triplet Higgs m2

H1

= µ2

GUT + m2 3 + 2ǫ2

m2

¯ H1

= µ2

GUT − m2 3 + 2ǫ2

m2

H2

= µ′2 + m2

3

m2

¯ H2

= µ′2 − m2

3

Evans Z2 Higgs Bosons

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Proton Decay From Z2 Odd Higgs Bosons

S-channel decay through odd Higgs bosons A′

i

ASM = ǫ2 2m2

Hi

Enhanced if 2m2

Hi < ǫ2

Dimension 5 operators are always suppressed A′

i

ASM = ǫ µGUT ǫ mHi

This contribution will be suppressed unless we fine tune

Evans Z2 Higgs Bosons

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Parameter Space Constraints From Proton Decay

The parameter space is only minimally constrained

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 mH

2

Proton Lifetime (log10(Years)) p−−> µ K0 mH

2

=1015 GeV mH

2

=1014 GeV mH

2

=1013 GeV mH

2

=1012 GeV

Evans Z2 Higgs Bosons

slide-15
SLIDE 15

BBN Constraints on Triplet Higgs Boson

Once Z2 is broken the odd Higgs bosons will decay Decay only through mixing and will be quite suppressed Strongly interacting and can mess up BBN Must decay before BBN Γ(H → ¯ fifj) ∝ |yi|2mH ǫ2 µ2

GUT

1 Γ ≤ 1s

Evans Z2 Higgs Bosons

slide-16
SLIDE 16

BBN Constraints on Parameter Space

Very small values of mH and ǫ forbidden by BBN constraints

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

B GeV mH

2

GeV

τH> 1 s τH <1 s for mH

C

<1016 τH <1 s for mH

C

< 2 X 1016 GeV τH <1 s for mH

C

< 4X1016 GeV τH <1 s for mH

C

< 8X1016 GeV

Evans Z2 Higgs Bosons

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Conclusions

Additional Higgs bosons require symmetries to forbid FV Z2 odd Higgs bosons will not introduce FV EWSB for SU(2) Higgs bosons and no CCB for SU(3) constrain the Z2 breaking to be of EW scale EW scale Z2 breaking can evade BBN/proton decay constraints Supersymmetric GUT with additional Z2 odd Higgs boson will have an EW scale triplet Further analysis

Collider phenomenology of light Triplet Higgs boson Possible motivations for this type of Higgs sector

Evans Z2 Higgs Bosons