(STEW-MAP) Summer 2018 CRL Fellowship Holly Berman, PhD Student, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

stew map
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

(STEW-MAP) Summer 2018 CRL Fellowship Holly Berman, PhD Student, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Stewardship Mapping & Assessment Project (STEW-MAP) Summer 2018 CRL Fellowship Holly Berman, PhD Student, Bloustein School of Planning & Public Policy Advising: Michelle Johnson, Erika Svendsen, & Lindsay Campbell (USFS Urban Field


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Stewardship Mapping & Assessment Project (STEW-MAP) Summer 2018 CRL Fellowship

Holly Berman, PhD Student, Bloustein School of Planning & Public Policy Advising: Michelle Johnson, Erika Svendsen, & Lindsay Campbell (USFS Urban Field Station)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Overview

  • STEW-MAP background
  • Analyzing group organizational characteristics
  • Group professionalization index
  • Understanding groups that transform
  • Next steps
slide-3
SLIDE 3

STEW-MAP Background

  • Mapping tool and database of civic environmental stewardship

groups

  • Originated in 2007: Who takes care of NYC? Understand and

strengthen civic capacity

  • Implemented in other cities: Chicago, Baltimore, Seattle, & more
  • 2017 NYC survey: measures of capacity, turf, networks

Civic environmental stewardship: civic actors as stewards who engage in acts of caretaking and claims-making on the environment (Andersson et al., 2014)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Group Organizational Characteristics

  • Understanding the structure and function of stewardship groups
  • Information including: stewardship function, site type, focus, staff, year

founded, legal designation, communication methods, services provided, budget, impacts & influences

  • Qualitative coding: metrics, goals, mission statements
  • White paper with full results currently in draft
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Creation of Professionalization Index

  • Based on index created by Fisher et al., 2012
  • Takes into account budget amount and size of staff
  • Each group assigned professionalization score from 1-5
  • 1-2 = low; 2.5-3.5=medium, 4-5=high

Professionalization scores for NYC groups (n=294)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Professionalization by Year Founded (n=294)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Primary Stewardship Function NYC (n=680)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Primary Stewardship Function NYC (n=680)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Groups that Transform

  • Analyzing organizational characteristic specific to groups that identified

their primary stewardship function as “transform” (n=45)

  • Newly added function to the 2017 survey
  • Focus on how stewardship groups seek to transform systems social-

ecological systems (energy, water, waste, communication networks)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Groups that Transform: Theory & Literature

  • Transformational adaptation, transformations to

sustainability, transforming behaviors, & social transformations (O’Brien & Sygna, 2013)

  • Spheres of transformation: practical, political,

personal (Sharma, 2007) → civic stewardship groups operate within and between these spheres

  • Resilience theory (Olsson et al., 2014)

(O’Brien & Sygna, 2013, after Sharma, 2007)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Groups that Transform: Preliminary Findings

Sites: community gardens, urban farms, stormwater management systems, food systems Focuses: environment, community improvement & capacity building, food Services provided: educational curricula/trainings, community organizing Drivers of change: extreme weather events, climate change, social movements Mission statements: Most blend environmental & social missions; neighborhood scale; improvement-focused actions

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Groups that Transform: Preliminary Findings

  • Transformation extends past management or improvement
  • Engage in neighborhood level actions and community outreach
  • Transform the environment through the social sphere
  • Small scale goals to contribute to the transformation of larger systems
  • Driven by community & ecosystem disturbance (extreme weather, climate)
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Groups that Transform: Next Steps

  • Explore individual groups in greater detail to understand how they

conceptualize their role in environmental transformation

  • Qualitative interviews as a possible next step to better

understanding this unique set of groups

  • Analyze network and spatial data

“Who decides to initiate transformations? How can power, politics, and interest present barriers, or pathways, to transformation?” (Olsson et al., 2014).

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Acknowledgements

Thank you!

  • Advising team at USFS Urban Field Station
  • Laura Landau (Project manager)
  • Justine Marchal-Appleton (Research fellow)
  • Rutgers Center for Resilient Landscapes

For more information and updates on STEW-MAP: https://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/STEW-MAP/

slide-15
SLIDE 15

References

Andersson, E., Barthel, S., Borgström, S., Colding, J., Elmqvist, T., Folke, C., & Gren, Å. (2014). Reconnecting cities to the biosphere: Stewardship of green infrastructure and urban ecosystem

  • services. Ambio, 43(4), 445–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0506-y

Fisher, D. R., Campbell, L. K., & Svendsen, E. S. (2012). The organisational structure of urban environmental stewardship. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2011.643367 O’Brien, K., & Sygna, L. (2013). Responding to Climate Change: The Three Spheres of Transformation. Proceedings of Transformation in a Changing Climate, (June), 16–23. Retrieved from www.cchange.no Olsson, P., Galaz, V., & Boonstra, W. J. (2014). Sustainability transformations: A resilience perspective. Ecology and Society, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06799-190401 Sharma, M. (2007). Personal to Planetary Transformation. Kosmos Journal, 1–7. Retrieved from https://www.kosmosjournal.org/article/personal-to-planetary-transformation/ Svendsen, E. S., Campbell, L. K., Fisher, D. R., Connolly, J. J. T., Johnson, M. L., Sonti, N. F., … Wolf, K. L. (2016). Stewardship mapping and assessment project: a framework for understanding community-based environmental stewardship. Gen. Tech. Rep. 156. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. 134 P., 156, 1–134. Retrieved from https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/all/50447