steering control and looming detection in young adults
play

Steering Control and Looming Detection in Young Adults with DCD Y - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Steering Control and Looming Detection in Young Adults with DCD Y Ad lt ith DCD Rita F. de Oliveira 3 , Catherine Purcell 1 , John Wann 1 , Ri F d Oli i C h i P ll J h W Damian Poulter 1 , Kate Wilmut 2 1 Royal Holloway University of


  1. Steering Control and Looming Detection in Young Adults with DCD Y Ad lt ith DCD Rita F. de Oliveira 3 , Catherine Purcell 1 , John Wann 1 , Ri F d Oli i C h i P ll J h W Damian Poulter 1 , Kate Wilmut 2 1 Royal Holloway University of London, UK 2 Oxford Brookes University, UK 3 Royal Holloway University of London, UK, German Sport University Cologne Research supported by the UK ESRC ES/F017650/1 & The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research

  2. Looming Detection in Young Adults with DCD • Looming usually indicates an approaching object • What is the perceptual ability of DCD to detect looming? p p y g • Ability to detect an approaching car is a critical roadside skill • At what speeds are young adults with DCD no longer able to detect an h d d l i h l bl d approaching car? • Measured sensitivity to looming detection in central and peripheral vision, under monocular viewing conditions

  3. Looming Detection Thresholds for a Central Car R V = . 0.34 Looming Thresholds Θ T * TTC 2 0.32 0.30 81 0.28 0.26 0.24 deg/s) 0 22 0.22 ing Thesholds (d 0.20 mph 0.18 200ms 0.16 0.14 Loomi 196 0.12 0.10 235 0.08 N = 5 Did it get bigger? 0.06 (Null trials for FP rate) 392 0.04 0 04 0.02 0.00 <5th 5th - 15th DCD <5 th now <5 th DCD <5 th now <5 th DCD <5 th now 5 th 15 th DCD <5 th now 5 th -15 th 5 th 15 th TD mean & 95% CI TD mean & 95% CI 5 th -15 th and >15 th d >15 th • When centrally fixating, all individuals were able to detect an approaching car travelling at speeds well above those likely to be encountered in the real world (>196mph)

  4. Looming Detection Thresholds for a Peripheral Car R V = . Θ T * TTC 2 0.50 Looming Thresholds 0.48 0.46 0.44 0.42 56 0.40 (deg/s) 0.38 62 0.36 ming Thesholds ( 69 0.34 0.32 mph 200ms 0.30 0.28 84 0.26 N = 4 Loom 0 24 0.24 0.22 0.20 Did it get bigger? Did it get bigger? 0.18 Did the car grow bigger? (Null trials for FP rate) 0.16 0 14 0.14 196 0.12 0.10 <5th 5th - 15th DCD <5 th now <5 th DCD <5 th now 5 th -15 th TD mean & 95% CI 5 th -15 th and >15 th • When not fixating directly, the speeds at which all individuals were able to detect an approaching car decreased (>56mph) compared to when individuals were directly fixating on the car (>196mph)

  5. Looming Detection Thresholds for a Central Car with Simulated Observer Motion R V = . Θ T * TTC 2 0.52 Looming Thresholds 0.49 49 0.46 0 46 55 0.43 0.40 62 0.37 deg/s) 0.34 ing Thesholds (d 0.31 mph 0.28 200ms 0.25 0.22 107 0.19 0.19 Loomi 138 0.16 0.13 196 Did it get bigger? 0.10 235 (Null trials for FP rate) 0.07 0 04 0.04 N = 5 0.01 -0.02 <5th 5th - 15th DCD <5 th now <5 th DCD <5 th now 5 th -15 th 5 th 15 th and >15 th TD mean & 95% CI TD mean & 95% CI DCD <5 now <5 DCD <5 now 5 -15 5 th -15 th and >15 th • When in motion and detecting an approaching car centrally, overall the speeds at which individuals were able to detect an approaching car (>49mph) were much lower than when individuals were stationary and directly fixating on the car (>196mph)

  6. Looming Detection Thresholds for a Peripheral Car with Simulated Observer Motion R V = . Θ T * TTC 2 1.90 Looming Thresholds 1.80 14 1 70 1.70 1.60 1.50 1.40 deg/s) 1.30 19 1.20 1 20 ming Thesholds ( 1.10 1.00 mph 0.90 200ms 0.80 30 0.70 0 70 Loom 38 0.60 0.50 0.40 Did it get bigger? 0.30 (Null trials for FP rate) (Null trials for FP rate) 98 98 0 20 0.20 N 3 N = 3 196 0.10 0.00 <5th 5th - 15th DCD <5 th now <5 th DCD <5 th now 5 th -15 th TD mean & 95% CI 5 th -15 th and >15 th • The ability to detect an approaching car decreased considerably for all individuals when in motion and not fixating directly on a car (~38mph) compared to when stationary and directly fixating (>196mph) • Two participants may fail to detect an approaching car travelling any faster than ~20mph T i i f il d hi lli f h 20 h

  7. How long does it take to cross the road? • TTC fixed at 3sec – estimated length of time it takes to walk the width of a single lane – good estimate for some – good estimate for some… 7.00 Walking Speeds (normal) • … Not so good for others 6.50 6.00 5.50 5.00 Time (sec) 4.50 4.00 3.50 3.00 TTC = N=5 2.50 <5th h 5th-15th h h DCD <5 th now <5 th DCD <5 th now 5 th -15 th TD mean & 95% CI 5 th -15 th and >15 th

  8. Conclusions • It seems that in a simple looming detection task, young adults with DCD do not have general perceptual difficulties in judging whether cars are not have general perceptual difficulties in judging whether cars are approaching • The differences found in walking speeds have implications for the execution of a safe road crossing – For example: A looming threshold that equates to being able to detect a car travelling at 60mph with 3 seconds to cross, would equate to not being able to detect a car travelling any f faster than 22mph if it takes 5 seconds to cross t th 22 h if it t k 5 d t

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend