Staff Budget Reduction Recommendation Board of Education Meeting - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

staff budget reduction recommendation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Staff Budget Reduction Recommendation Board of Education Meeting - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Staff Budget Reduction Recommendation Board of Education Meeting January 11, 2011 1 Recommendation Staffs budget reduction recommendation is based on the most current data available. Factors such as the states revenue


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Board of Education Meeting January 11, 2011

Staff Budget Reduction Recommendation

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Recommendation

  • Staff’s budget reduction recommendation is based
  • n the most current data available.
  • Factors such as the state’s revenue projections,

receiving less than flat funding from the county and Board decisions could affect this recommendation.

  • As the situation changes, adjustments to this

recommendation may be required. So while this may not be the final recommendation, it is our best thinking as of today, January 11, 2011.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Budget Outlook

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

National Perspective

  • American Recovery and Reinvestment

Act (ARRA) funding cliff finally arrived – $37.9 billion in federal stimulus funds is almost gone

  • 35 states project budget gaps for fiscal

year 2011-12

  • 21 states project gaps of more than

10%, including North Carolina

This data is from a Dec. 15, 2010, report from the Fiscal Research Division, a staff agency of the NC General Assembly.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

State Budget Outlook

  • The cumulative affect of the national economic

downturn, expiration of federal stimulus dollars and revenue challenges has left the state with a projected $3.7 billion shortfall.*

  • As a result, the NC Office of State Budget and

Management requested that all state agencies submit plans to reduce their budgets by 5, 10 and 15 percent.

*This data is from a Dec. 15, 2010, report from the Fiscal Research Division, a staff agency of the NC General Assembly.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

State Budget Gap Estimate

Preliminary FY 2011-12 Budget Gap Estimate

  • Revenue Availability Estimate

$18.2 billion

  • Budget Estimate

$21.9 billion

  • Preliminary Budget Gap Estimate
  • $ 3.7 billion

This data is from a Dec. 15, 2010, report from the Fiscal Research Division, a staff agency of the NC General Assembly.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

State Budget Gap Estimate

Preliminary FY 2011-12 Budget Gap Estimate

FY 2010-11 Revenue Availability $19.0 billion Expiration of 1% Sales Tax

  • 1.1 billion

Expiration of Corporate and Personal Income Surtaxes

  • 0.2 billion

Other One-Time Revenue Adjustments

  • 0.2 billion

Preliminary Estimate of Revenue Growth + 0.7 billion Preliminary Availability Estimate for FY 2011-12 $18.2 billion FY 2010-11 Certified Budget $19.0 billion State Funds Needed to Replace Federal ARRA Funds + 1.6 billion Other One-time Budget Adjustments + 0.4 billion Retirement System Contribution + 0.3 billion State Health Plan + 0.2 billion K-12 and Higher Education Enrollment + 0.2 billion Medicaid + 0.2 billion Preliminary Estimate of FY 2011-12 Budget $21.9 billion Preliminary Estimate of Budget Gap

  • $ 3.7 billion

This data is from a Dec. 15, 2010, report from the Fiscal Research Division, a staff agency of the NC General Assembly.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

State Budget Categories

NC is experiencing financial pressure in each of the major budget categories for FY 2010-11

Net Gen. Fund % Major Budget Categories Appropriations

  • f total

Public Schools 7,085,588,912 37% Higher Education* 3,722,071,167 20% Medicaid 2,368,365,829 12% Correction 1,285,252,983 7% Mental Health 705,476,614 4% Natural & Econ. Resources 467,727,028 2% Courts** 566,019,508 3% Capital and Debt 718,695,003 4% Other 2,039,797,168 11% TOTAL $18,958,994,212 100%

*Includes universities and community colleges **Includes courts and indigent defense

This data is from a Dec. 15, 2010, report from the Fiscal Research Division, a staff agency of the NC General Assembly.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

What This Means for CMS

Reduction % State Reduction Federal Funding Cliff County Growth/ Sustaining Estimate* Subtotal** Reduction % County Reduction Total Reduction @5% $32M $15M $15M $62M @5% $15M $77M @10% $63M $15M $15M $93M @10% $30M $123M @15% $95M $15M $15M $125M @15% $45M $170M

**Assumes flat funding from county ***Adopted budget divided by projected enrollment

The 2010-11 budgeted per-pupil amount is $8,523***. The per-pupil amount drops to $7,263 under the worst- case scenario presented above. The $7,263 per-pupil amount is between the 2001-02 and 2002- 03 budgeted per-pupil amounts.

*Estimate based on historical trend average which includes estimated increases for items such as benefits (health insurance and retirement) and costs due to enrollment growth (staffing and instructional materials)

The estimates above do not include any additional amounts required to cover discretionary reductions from the prior year nor do they assume the non-recurring cuts will be reinstated.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Budget Development Process & Timeline

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

  • Make reductions that have the least impact on the classroom first and

then other areas that impact the classroom

  • Align resources to support Strategic Plan 2014
  • Keep strong academic focus coupled with data-driven decision making
  • Recognize and plan for the impact of the economic environment and

employ sound fiscal management – respond to signals from state and local sources that funding may be limited

  • Acknowledge uncertainty regarding expected funding levels from all

sources, but be prepared for the worst

  • Request funding from county for growth and sustaining operations
  • Pay for Strategic Plan 2014 initiatives through budget reductions or

redirections

  • Establish flexibility in the budget to allow for various reduction levels

Framework for Budget Development

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Alignment to Strategic Plan 2014

  • The Framework for Budget Development requires alignment
  • f district resources to support Strategic Plan 2014.
  • This budget reduction recommendation aligns with Strategic

Plan 2014.

Areas of Focus

  • Effective Teaching and Leadership
  • Performance Management
  • Increasing the Graduation Rate
  • Teaching and Learning Through Technology
  • Environmental Stewardship
  • Parent and Community Connections
slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Process and Timeline

JUNE- NOVEMBER 2010

  • Case for Continuous Improvement
  • Board of Education budget work session
  • Establish BOE/superintendent’s goals and priorities
  • Budget Department convenes the budget development kickoff

meeting

  • Share BOE/superintendent’s goals and priorities
  • Outline the current year process
  • Set the budget-reduction target (10%) by department
slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Process and Timeline

DECEMBER 2010

  • Principal budget input via survey
  • Department heads compile budget recommendations to submit to

their Executive Staff member

  • Identify reductions and new requests, if any
  • Align total resources with Strategic Plan 2014 goals
  • Justify total budget recommendation based on

effectiveness and impact

  • Executive Staff members review departments’ budget

recommendations

  • Confirm reductions and new requests, if any
  • Confirm alignment with strategic plan and total budget

recommendation

  • Submit approved recommendations to budget staff
  • Employee professional organizations submit Budget considerations

(i.e. classroom teachers, teacher assistants and office professionals)

  • Budget staff compiles district budget data
slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Process and Timeline

JANUARY 2011

  • Executive Staff reviews budget-reduction recommendations

as a team to verify interdependencies

  • Executive Staff members review budget reduction

recommendations with COO/CFO/Budget staff

  • Validate reductions are sustainable
  • Validate reduction target is met or justify why not
  • Validate reductions are least detrimental to achieving

Strategic Plan 2014 goals

  • COO/CFO/Budget staff review budget reduction

recommendations with superintendent to discuss why cuts are proposed, plan of action and impact of the cuts. Result: Cuts are not equal across all areas, but best proposal is created with least detriment to achieving strategic plan goals

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Process and Timeline

JANUARY 2011 (con’t.)

  • Superintendent presents Executive Staff’s approved

budget reduction recommendations to Board of Education – much earlier this year due to critical decisions needed for staff and families

  • Budget staff computes estimated cost for salary/benefit

increases, sustaining operations, growth and new initiatives

  • Board of Education makes early budget decisions
slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Process and Timeline

FEBRUARY– APRIL 2011

  • Operationalize early budget decisions
  • Budget staff verifies state budget estimates with Planning

Department

  • Budget staff confirms sustaining operations, growth and

new initiatives cost estimates based on state planning allotment

  • Superintendent and Executive Staff finalize budget

recommendation, making adjustments as needed based

  • n updated information from state, etc.
  • Superintendent presents final budget recommendation to

Board of Education Note: Budget work sessions are held with the Board throughout the process as needed

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Key Dates

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

  • Week of Jan. 3 – All students received pre-lottery assignment

information in the mail

  • Jan. 7 – Magnet lottery application opens
  • Jan. 8 – Magnet Fair at Phillip O. Berry
  • Jan. 11 – Staff budget reduction recommendation presented to

Board of Education

  • Jan. 25 – Board of Education budget work session*
  • Mini-magnet fairs throughout the county

– Jan. 25 at Cornelius Town Hall – Jan. 27 at First Ward Elementary – Feb. 1 at South Mecklenburg

*Board meeting date

Key Dates for Families

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

  • Feb. 7 – Magnet lottery application closes at 10 p.m.
  • End of February – All families notified of 2011-12 school

assignments

  • Feb. 21 - March 21 – Reassignment/transfer period for assignments

for the 2011-12 school year

  • Feb. 15 – Board of Education budget work session
  • March 15 – Board of Education budget work session
  • March 22 – Board of Education budget work session*

*Board meeting date

Key Dates for Families (cont)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

  • Jan. 24 – Employee Transfer Fair begins
  • Jan. 31 – Enrollment projections given to schools
  • Feb. 14 – Enrollment projections to HR
  • Feb. 23 – Staff allocations to schools
  • March 8 – Request Board approval for Reduction in Force criteria
  • April/May – Begin notifying at-will employees affected by RIF
  • April 12 – Superintendent’s budget recommendation
  • April 26 – Public hearing on superintendent’s budget
  • April 27 – Board work session
  • May 1 – Deadline for notifying administrators of superintendent’s

intent to non-renew contracts

Key Dates for Staff

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Key Dates for Staff (cont)

  • May 10 – Board of Education's 2011-12 proposed budget approved
  • May 15 – Deadline for notifying teachers of superintendent’s intent to

non-renew/dismiss

  • June 1 – Deadline for notifying administrators of non-renewal
  • June 15 – Deadline for notifying teachers of non-renewal/dismissal
slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Employee Budget Information & Meetings

Four general information meetings have been scheduled to keep employees informed about the budget process. They are:

  • Jan. 13 at North Mecklenburg High, 6 p.m.
  • Jan. 20 at South Mecklenburg High, 6 p.m.
  • Jan. 24 at Independence High, 6 p.m.
  • Jan. 27 at Northwest School of the Arts, 6 p.m.
  • Additional employee meetings by zone
  • Employees may submit budget suggestions and ideas to

budgetquestions@cms.k12.nc.us

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Public Engagement

  • Board member constituent engagement
  • All budget meetings and work sessions will be

televised live on CMS TV

  • Video of the meetings will also be posted on the

2011-12 Budget Information section on the CMS Web site

  • Citizens are encouraged to send budget suggestions

to budgetquestions@cms.k12.nc.us

  • For more information, visit www.cms.k12.nc.us
  • Budget information sharing
  • Community meetings
slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Summary of Reductions since 2007-08

Note: Reductions are reflected by area in which the expenditure is budgeted; many expenditures are budgeted centrally and then expended at the school level. 2007-08 Budget Reductions Operations Division (25,342,503) 12.9% (23,163,051) 10.1% (7,347,516) 3.3% (4,202,863) 2.1% Academic Services Division (8,953,377) 5.3% (27,889,959) 14.0% (4,846,412) 2.6% (7,829,831) 4.6% Schools Division (44,764,334) 7.6% (55,626,298) 8.7% (7,054,883) 1.1% (8,318,787) 1.5% Total (79,060,214) 8.3% (106,679,308) 10.0% (19,248,811) 1.8% (20,351,481) 2.2% Less: Funding added back 20,313,480 19,776,737

  • Net Budget Impact

(58,746,734) 6.2% (86,902,571) 8.1% (19,248,811) 1.8% (20,351,481) 2.2% % of Division Budget (State & Local) 2010-11 Budget Reductions 2009-10 Budget Reductions 2008-09 Budget Reductions % of Division Budget (State & Local) % of Division Budget (State & Local) % of Division Budget (State & Local)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

2011-12 Recommended Budget Reductions

As of Jan. 11, 2011

Central Support & Operations Division

D epartment R eduction A mount C

  • m

m unications/Strategic Partnerships $ 157,830 H um an R esources 1,615,083 T echnology Serv ices 1,860,958 Finance 632,321 Legal 258,000 Athletic D epartm ent 399,500 Alternativ e Ed. & Safe Schools 1,146,108 School Law Enforcem ent 1,157,850 O ffice of Accountability 626,712 Auxiliary Serv ices 115,649 Building Serv ices 8,092,950 Storage and D istribution 286,357 T ransportation 4,000,000 Inv entory M anagem ent/T extbooks 390,420 All O ther C entral Support & O perations 355,949 Subtotal – C entral Support & O perations $ 21,095,687 2010-11 D ivis ion B udget (State & Local) $ 184,834,895 R eductions as a %

  • f D

ivis ion B udget 11.4% Total pos itions reduced 206

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

2011-12 Recommended Budget Reductions

As of Jan. 11, 2011

Academic Services Division

D epartment R eduction A mount

  • Prof. D

ev elopment & Leadership Academy $ 117,287 C areer and T echnical Education 3,233,917 ESL Student Education 113,589 Extended Year Programs 1,052,532 Arts Education 149,580 Bright Beginnings PreK Program 2,113,105 T alent D ev elopment 749,989 Literacy & Writing (PreK-12) 109,539 Media Serv ices 165,142 Support Serv ices 148,255 All O ther Academic Serv ices D iv ision 270,160 Academic Serv ices R eorganization 518,391 Subtotal – A cademic Services $ 8,741,486 2010-11 D ivis ion B udget (State & Local) $ 165,355,679 R eductions as a %

  • f D

ivis ion B udget 5.3% Total pos itions reduced 102

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

2011-12 Recommended Budget Reductions

As of Jan. 11, 2011

Schools Division

D es cription R eduction A mount School closures (School div ision reductions only)* $ 2,573,067 M idw

  • od relocation (School div

ision reductions only)** 238,500 Elim inate D SSF H igh School plans; no longer required 1,229,914 Elim inate one support position at each school 11,152,000 Elim inate T A's in 1st & 2nd grade; maintain a 1:22 ratio in k 9,295,201 C hange w eight from 1.3 to 1.25 7,937,758 Increase class size by 2 students for grades 4-12 15,105,435 Elim inate 107 teacher-lev el positions intended to be one tim e 6,338,359 Elim inate 10 positions allocated from the Achiev em ent Z

  • ne

689,290 Elim inate 2 m edia specialists 138,038 Elim inate Incentiv e, C ritical N eeds & Local Signing bonuses 4,293,933 Av erage Salary Adjustment 2,176,485 Elim inate prior year extended em ployment 79,713 R educe funds for equitable supplies and materials 125,000 Subtotal – Schools D ivis ion $61,372,693 2010-11 D ivis ion B udget (State & Local) $ 586,790,478 %

  • f D

ivis ion B udget 10.5% Total pos itions reduced 1,045

  • School closure reduction total is $5,237,746; the remaining $2,664,679 is embedded in departmental reductions on previous

slides.

**Midwood relocation reduction total is $969,617; the remaining balance is $731,117 of which $267,066 is embedded in

departmental reductions in previous slides and $464,051 in ARRA funding is reflected on the next slide.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

D epartment R eduction A mount %

  • f

D ivis ion B udget (State & Local) Pos itions R educed C entral Support & O perations D iv ision $ 21,095,687 11.4% 206 Academ ic Serv ices D iv ision 8,741,486 5.3% 102 Schools D iv ision 61,372,693 10.5% 1,045 Total R ecommended R eductions to State and Local B udget $ 91,209,866 9.7% 1,353 A R R A Funding C liff R educed Bright Beginnings R eduction* 8,448,581 $ 154 M idw

  • od R

elocation** 464,051 9 Total R ecommended R eductions 100,122,498 $ 1,516

2011-12 Recommended Budget Reductions

As of Jan. 11, 2011 *Bright Beginnings reduction total is $10,417,921; the remaining $1,969,340, a local reduction, is embedded in departmental reductions on previous slides. **Midwood relocation reduction total is $969,617; the remaining $505,566 is embedded in departmental and school reductions on previous slides.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Early Decisions

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

Decision Needed by January 25

Weighted Student Staffing

What?

  • Change Weighted Student Staffing formula from 1.3 to 1.25 in all

grade levels

Who’s impacted?

  • Teachers and students

Why an early decision?

  • Transfer Fair for teachers is scheduled for the end of January
  • Principals need time to build schedules and make school-staffing
  • decisions. This provides principals with accurate projections for

positions so they know how many vacancies they have.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

Decision Needed by January 25

Bell Schedules

What?

  • Change bell schedules to provide the most efficient bus

transportation and/or extending length of instructional day for elementary schools only

Who’s impacted?

  • Families and staff

Why an early decision?

  • Need to notify families early of changes so they can make time-

sensitive decisions

  • Transportation needs time to design routing schedules
slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

Decision Needed by January 25

Bright Beginnings

What?

  • Reducing number of Bright Beginnings classes from 175 to 70
  • Closing pre-k centers and non-Title I pre-k sites
  • Offering pre-k classes at select Title I schools

Who’s impacted?

  • Families, staff and community providers

Why an early decision?

  • Addresses a significant amount of the pending ARRA funding cliff
  • Families need to know our plan so they can prepare
  • Encourage partners to offer programs
  • Allow opportunities for private pre-k providers to expand
  • Staffing timeline
slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

Potential Future Recommendation

Magnet Transportation

What?

  • Eliminate transportation for all students in partial and full magnet

programs

Who’s impacted?

  • Families of more than 12,000 full and partial magnet students

currently assigned; staff – bus drivers and teachers

Why an early decision?

  • So families know and give them as many possible options about

where kids go to school

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

Closing Comments & Discussion