Recommendation FY 2012 through FY 2014 1 FY 2013 Executive - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

recommendation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Recommendation FY 2012 through FY 2014 1 FY 2013 Executive - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Executive Budget Recommendation FY 2012 through FY 2014 1 FY 2013 Executive Recommendation Economy/Revenues Budget Principles Budget Summary The Plan Good Government Public Safety Education Health &


slide-1
SLIDE 1

FY 2012 through FY 2014

1

The Executive Budget Recommendation

slide-2
SLIDE 2

FY 2013 Executive Recommendation

  • Economy/Revenues
  • Budget Principles
  • Budget Summary
  • The Plan

– Good Government – Public Safety – Education – Health & Welfare – Medicaid – Other

  • Where We End Up
  • Risks

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The Economy/Revenues

Projecting slow steady improvement over the next two years.

Personal Income: 3.5% to 4.5% average growth Employment: 1.8% to 3.0% average growth S&P Growth: 1.0% to 4.0% average growth

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The Economy/Revenues

Base Revenue Forecast

  • Develop optimistic, baseline, and pessimistic.
  • Assume below baseline for both FY 2011 and FY 2012.

FY 2012 – 4.3% above FY 2011 actual FY 2013 – 5.9% above FY 2012 projected FY 2014 – 6.1% above the FY 2013 projected All numbers exclude the impact from revenue sharing and the temporary sales tax.

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Total Revenues

5 $8,909.8 $9,159.2 $8,664.1 $0.0 $1,000.0 $2,000.0 $3,000.0 $4,000.0 $5,000.0 $6,000.0 $7,000.0 $8,000.0 $9,000.0 $10,000.0 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014

Total State Revenues

Note:

  • Revenues are between FY 2006 & FY 2007 levels
  • Total revenue amounts include impacts from expiration of

Proposition 100 and phase in of existing tax reforms

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Baseline Budget Picture

6

$0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 $8,000 $9,000 $10,000 $11,000 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 $ in Millions

General Fund Ongoing Expenditures and Revenues

On-going Revenues Total Expenditures

slide-7
SLIDE 7

The Budget: Principles

  • Short-term decisions must be evaluated in light of

their impact on the State’s long-term fiscal health.

  • Funding for a program will not be restored simply

because funding has been provided in the past.

  • Spending decisions must respect the wishes of

citizens who, in voting for Proposition 100, recognized the importance of funding for education, health care and public safety.

  • Temporary resources will be used to improve the

State’s long-term position.

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The Budget: Summary

FY 2012

Debt Reduction $ 106.0 SFB Building Renewal $ 100.0 Midnight Reversion $ 41.0 IT Phase I $ 10.0 State Hospital $ 2.5 AG Tobacco $ 1.4 Total $260.9

8

Debt Reduction 41% SFB Building Renewal 38% Midnight Reversion Retirement 16% AFIS Replacement Down Payment 4% State Hospital 1% AG 0%

slide-9
SLIDE 9

The Budget: Summary

FY 2013

One-Time $ 253.3 Good Government $ 38.9 Rollover Reduction $ 100.0 Public Safety $ 17.5 Education $ 170.6 Health and Welfare $ 77.2 Natural Resources $ 14.4 Total $671.9

9

One-Time 38% Good Government 6% Public Safety 3% Education 25% Rollover Reduction 15% Health and Welfare 11% Natural Resources 2%

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Total Spending

FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 On-going Spending $8,185,547.6 $8,710,238.6 $8,917,418.2 One-time Spending $335,439.0 $253,063.1 $5,115.5 Total Spending $8,520,986.6 $8,963,301.7 $8,922,533.7 Percentage Change 2.6% 5.2%

  • 0.5%

10

  • Spending levels for FY 2012- FY 2014 are between FY 2006 and FY 2007

expenditure levels

  • FY 2014 expenditures assume the implementation of federal healthcare

reform

slide-11
SLIDE 11

The Plan

  • Good Government
  • Public Safety
  • Education
  • Health and Welfare
  • Medicaid
  • Other

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Personnel Reform

The State’s current personnel system is inefficient and makes it difficult to discipline employees or reward top performers. Also a large percentage

  • f the State’s workforce is nearing retirement.

Recommendation:

  • Consolidate the nine Personnel Systems
  • Transition to at-will workforce
  • Improve workforce management
  • Restructure grievance and appeal system
  • Update human resource practices

12

GOVERNOR’S CORNERSTONES

3

#

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Employee Pay Increase

In conjunction with personnel reform, the Executive recommends a 5% pay increase for eligible employees:

– Uncovered non-university employees – Employees uncovered by personnel reform – Employees who voluntarily elect to become uncovered under personnel reform – Employees required to remain covered by personnel reform (e.g. full authority peace

  • fficers)

13

GOVERNOR’S CORNERSTONES

3

#

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Employee Pay Increase

General Fund Cost $53.7 million

HITF Rate Reduction and Fund Transfer ($48.6 million) Vehicle License Tax Transfer Reduction $8.9 million Other Fund Transfer Reductions $14.2 million

Net General Fund Cost $28.2 million

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

AFIS Replacement

AFIS is obsolete and must be replaced to avoid potential failure. – The entire state is dependent on AFIS. – If AFIS stops, vendor and employee payments stop. Replacing AFIS is also critical to modernizing state government. – If AFIS is replaced, the serious risk of failure is eliminated and the entire state can benefit from increased efficiency and transparency.

15

GOVERNOR’S CORNERSTONES

3

#

slide-16
SLIDE 16

IT Modernization

In addition to AFIS replacement, the State has a number of additional IT infrastructure needs including: – Modernizing the State Data Center – Enhancing Security and Privacy – Expanding e-Government Recommendation: Create a new Information Technology Modernization Fund: – FY 2012: $10 million GF for AFIS – FY 2013: $95 million GF for AFIS and IT

16

GOVERNOR’S CORNERSTONES

3

#

slide-17
SLIDE 17

IT Modernization

Recommendation: Update and Provide Maintenance on BRITS

– BRITS (Business Re-engineering/Integrated Tax System) processes tax returns for the State – Original cost was $152 million – Executive recommends $7.1 million for a tune-up

  • Replace vulnerable hardware
  • Increase system capacity
  • Reduce delays in implementing changes
  • Extend life of system by at least 5 years

17

GOVERNOR’S CORNERSTONES

3

#

slide-18
SLIDE 18

IT Modernization

The State has or will be launching additional IT projects including:

1. DES – Joining a multi-state consortium to replace the State’s Unemployment Insurance system 2. DOC – Developing plans to replace the prisoner management system

18

GOVERNOR’S CORNERSTONES

3

#

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Debt Retirement

The Executive recommends buying back the Capitol Complex. Accomplished through a defeasance.

– The State cannot directly retire the debt until 2019. – Instead, the State places sufficient funds in an escrow account to fund the interest and principal payments until the call date. – Once the funds are in the account, the lien on the Capitol is released.

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Debt Retirement

Early retirement of debt will save money.

Principal associated with the Capitol Complex: $ 80,900,000 Funds to cover interest costs: $ 25,000,000 Total Cost of Defeasance: $ 105,900,000 Original Debt Service Cost: $153,510,000 Savings over the original debt schedule: $ 47,610,000

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Rollover Retirement/Soft Capital

  • Soft capital funding for schools is currently

10% of the formula.

  • The State is currently deferring (rolling over)

$952 million of K-12 payment. The Executive Recommendation addresses both

  • f these problems.

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Rollover Retirement/Soft Capital

  • The Executive recommends reducing the FY 2013

rollover by $100 million.

  • The Executive proposes a $200 million payment to the

school districts outside of the current formula to use for either soft capital or to cover the $100 million rollover reduction.

  • For FY 2014 and beyond, the Executive proposes

providing $100 million per year outside of the formula in conjunction with a $100 million reduction in the

  • rollover. Districts will continue to use the funds for

either rollover reduction backfill or soft capital.

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Rollover Retirement/Soft Capital

Example: District A FY 13 Budget Capacity $1,000 FY 13 Revenue $ 700 FY 14 Rollover Revenue $ 270 Shortfall $ 30 FY 13 Soft Capital/Rollover $ 60 District A can use ending balance or a portion of the soft capital/rollover funds to cover the shortfall. Remaining soft capital rollover funds can be used for soft capital.

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Midnight Reversion

The Executive Budget recommends the retirement of the midnight reversion. Implemented in FY 2009, this accounting measure provided a one-time benefit of $54

  • million. The estimated cost to retire the

mechanism is $41 million.

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

The Plan

  • Good Government
  • Public Safety
  • Education
  • Health and Welfare
  • Medicaid
  • Other

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Prison Population Growth FY 1982-FY 2016

26

5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 Inmates Fiscal Year

Prison Population Growth: FY 1982 - FY 2015

Projected Monthly Growth Rates FY 2012: 0 FY 2013: 0 FY 2014: 25

*For FY 2012: through 12/31/11, population has declined by 286.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Male Population, Vacancy and Growth

27

Minimum (L-2) Medium (L-3) Close (L-4) Maximum (L-5) Total Male Population 13,561 15,480 4,173 3,280 36,494 Male Bed Vacancy Rate 4.0% 0.8% 14.2% 6.3% 4.0% Projected Growth Rate 1.0/Mo.

  • 4.5/Mo.
  • 8.5/Mo.

12.0/Mo. 25.0/Mo.

Total Prison System Bed Vacancy Rate: 5.6%

Vacancy Rates include 5,212 temporary beds

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Male Minimum & Medium Custody Bed Plan

28

20,000 22,000 24,000 26,000 28,000 30,000 32,000 34,000 Design Capacity Total Capacity Population

Pressures on Population

  • Growing special populations: sex offenders, protective segregation
  • Growing uncooperative population: refusal to house, disciplinary

Open 2,000 Private Beds Close 504 Temporary Beds

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Male Maximum Custody Bed Plan

29

2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 Design Capacity Total Capacity Population

Open 500 Beds at Lewis Prison (Buckeye)

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Department of Corrections

30

FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 2,000 Private Medium Beds $0 $17,969,900 $43,873,000 500 Max Custody Beds $50,000,000 $0 $12,700,000 Total $50,000,000 $17,969,900 $56,573,000

Executive Recommendation for new DOC beds

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Assaults

31

1,504 1,755 2,076 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 2009 2010 2011

Total Inmate Assaults and Fights: 2009-2011

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Department of Corrections

The Executive recommends 306 FTE Positions ($18.5 million)

  • Security Posts Inside Prisons - 193 FTE
  • Security for Medical Transportation - 113 FTE

Funding for the new positions will be over two years.

32

FY 2013 $9.3 million FY 2014 $18.5 million

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Department of Public Safety

33

The Department’s vehicle replacement budget was eliminated in FY 2010.

63,300 78,700 96,700 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012

Average Mileage of the Highway Patrol Fleet

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Department of Public Safety

Highway Patrol Vehicles

  • Historical standard for replacement of Highway Patrol

Vehicles- 100,000 miles

  • The Executive recommends shifting the standard of vehicle

replacement from individual vehicle mileage to average

  • dometer reading of the fleet.
  • Recommendation recognizes the different uses and life of

vehicles in the fleet. The Executive Recommends $6.3 million for vehicles ($3.5 Public Safety Fund, $2.8 General Fund)

34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Highway Patrol Vehicle Replacement

The average odometer reading will fall below 70,000 in FY 2021.

35

60,000 65,000 70,000 75,000 80,000 85,000 90,000 95,000 100,000

FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022

Average Odometer Reading-Recommendation

Average Odometer Reading Target

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Department of Public Safety

36

The Executive Recommendation also addresses:

  • High increases in ERE costs at DPS
  • Backlog in DNA casework at the Crime Lab
slide-37
SLIDE 37

Department of Juvenile Corrections

  • Catalina Mountain School Closure: $3.8 million

GF savings

  • CMS was the costliest facility to operate and

provided limited services

  • Gives all youth access to the same treatment

and educational services

37

slide-38
SLIDE 38

The Plan

  • Good Government
  • Public Safety
  • Education
  • Health and Welfare
  • Medicaid
  • Other

38

slide-39
SLIDE 39

K-12 Education

Move on When Reading

  • Requires “that a pupil not be promoted from the third

grade if the pupil obtains a score on the reading portion of the AIMS test that demonstrates the pupil’s reading ‘falls far below’ the third grade level” beginning school year 2013-2014.

  • Requires LEAs and schools to implement a comprehensive

K‐3 assessment system, a research based reading curriculum, explicit instruction and intensive intervention to students reading below grade level.

  • 4,100 (5%) 3rd grade students scored “falls far below” on

the reading portion of AIMS in 2011.

39

GOVERNOR’S CORNERSTONES

2

#

slide-40
SLIDE 40

K-12 Education

The Executive recommends $50 million in support of intervention and remediation programs to begin in Kindergarten. To provide the funding, the Executive recommends adjusting the K-8 Group A weight to provide the $50 million in state funding for Move On When Reading. The Executive also recommends a review of the current exemptions from Move On When Reading.

40

GOVERNOR’S CORNERSTONES

2

#

slide-41
SLIDE 41

K-12 Education

School Safety

  • $686,000

– Educator Database

  • A mechanism to search educator information such as certification and

disciplinary information

  • State Board of Education will lead the development of the database

– Additional Investigators

Education Jobs Backfill

  • $35 million in CORL funds

Adult Education

  • $4.6 million to draw down $11.8 in federal funds

The Executive also recommends requiring school districts to sponsor schools through the State Board for Charter Schools

41

GOVERNOR’S CORNERSTONES

2

#

slide-42
SLIDE 42

School Facilities Board

Building Renewal

Existing Formula

– No ability to link appropriations with outcomes – Does not take into account different climates and building materials – Insufficient help for very small districts – Local prioritization issues

The Executive recommends eliminating the existing formula

42

slide-43
SLIDE 43

School Facilities Board

The Executive recommends a new Building Renewal program

  • Develop a statewide system inventory
  • Funding based on system life cycle
  • Require districts to develop a five-year building plan
  • Require districts to participate in SFB online

preventative maintenance program to be eligible

  • Make districts responsible for component failures
  • Districts will apply to the SFB for funding based on

their five-year building plan and their system inventory

43

slide-44
SLIDE 44

School Facilities Board

Three-Year Transitional Building Renewal Grant Program

Recommendation

  • The Executive Recommendation provides $100

million to the SFB Building Renewal Grant fund to provide funding for the three-year transition period.

  • The Executive Recommendation provides $40

million to school districts for their role in the new building renewal program.

44

slide-45
SLIDE 45

School Facilities Board

New Construction

The Executive recommends changing the new construction formula to include available space just outside the school district.

The SFB will:

  • project enrollment
  • determine which districts have insufficient space within their boundaries
  • divide each of those districts into four quadrants
  • select the highest growth quadrant
  • draw a 10-mile radius from the center point of the highest growth quadrant

All available space within the radius will count toward meeting the minimum space guidelines for the district.

Since the State’s share of new construction costs will decrease, the Executive recommends increasing local district bonding capacity, returning half of the bonding capacity that was cut as part of Students’ FIRST.

45

slide-46
SLIDE 46

School Facilities Board

46

slide-47
SLIDE 47

School Facilities Board

47

slide-48
SLIDE 48

School Facilities Board

48

slide-49
SLIDE 49

School Facilities Board

49

School District Scheduled to Open Awarded Funding Awarded Funding Using 10-Mile Radius Available Bonding Capacity (5% ESD & HS/10% USD) Proposed Bonding Capacity (10% ESD & HS/20% USD)

Thatcher USD FY 2012 $ 1,330,152 $4,309,444 $ 8,618,887 Vail USD FY 2013 $ 6,530,981 ($ 900,522) $ 46,203,956 Benson USD FY 2014 $ 1,229,940 $ 1,099,041 $ 9,773,082 Liberty ESD FY 2014 $ 10,234,963 $ 537,335 $ 10,404,671 Laveen ESD FY 2015 $ 12,793,704 ($ 4,860,439) $ 5,929,122 Litchfield ESD FY 2015 $ 9,441,360 ($ 6,030,819) $26,188,362 Pima USD FY 2015 $ 1,937,115 $ 1,937,115 n/a n/a Queen Creek USD FY 2015 $8,609,580 ($11,652,683) $ 12,269,634 Sahuarita USD FY 2015 $7,676,222 $7,676,222 n/a n/a Total: $59,784,017 $9,613,337

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Community Colleges

50

Arizona SMART Scholarships

  • $10 million to the Commission for Postsecondary Education for

scholarships for Community College students

  • Maximum award amount: Cost of tuition up to $2,000 per year
  • Program will produce at least 5,000 scholarships per year
  • Students can receive scholarship for up to two years
  • Qualifying Criteria

– Students must be enrolled in one of the top 20 programs at the Community College the Local Workforce Investment Board has determined best meets local workforce needs – Students must show they have at least two years full-time work experience – Students must qualify for needs-based assistance – For veterans, needs-based assistance requirements are waived

GOVERNOR’S CORNERSTONES

1

#

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Universities

Performance Funding The Executive Recommends capitalizing on the efforts to move Universities toward performance funding by:

– Working with the Legislature and the Universities to refine the proposed formula – Redistributing $15 million of the existing funding base according to this formula – Providing a new $15 million to be distributed according to the formula

51

GOVERNOR’S CORNERSTONES

2

#

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Course Redesign

To prepare Arizona’s workforce for the future, the Governor has asked the University system to double the number of Arizona students receiving degrees by 2020. The Executive Recommendation includes $15.3 million to increase retention rates and degree

  • utput without sacrificing degree quality.

52

GOVERNOR’S CORNERSTONES

2

#

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Universities- Parity

53

Average Disparity from the U of A FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 $827 $566 $405

$0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 FY 2011 GF per FTE FY 2012 GF per FTE (Estimated FTE) FY 2013 GF and Course Redesign Funding per FTE (Using estimated FY 2012 FTE) State GF per FTE

Per Student State Funding Comparisons

ASU NAU UA

slide-54
SLIDE 54

The Plan

  • Good Government
  • Public Safety
  • Education
  • Health and Welfare
  • Medicaid
  • Other

54

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Economic Security

Federal Funding Cliff The Executive recommends $25 million to replace expiring federal funds in the TANF

  • program. Not replacing these funds would

require significant cuts in TANF programs. Adoption Services The Executive recommends $17 million for federal funding cliffs and caseload growth in adoption services.

55

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Child Protective Services

The Executive and the DES Director identified three internal

  • perational areas that require additional funding to enhance child

safety and promote quality management within the division.

  • Accountability/Quality Management/Transparency – Add four new quality

control managers. The new quality control managers will coordinate to a) implement quality management initiatives throughout the division; b)

  • versee and improve accountability; and, c) increase transparency to the

public.

  • Investigator Retention –create a new step in the CPS investigator class. This

step will be used to promote excelling investigators to positions that are still in the field, but will also provide mentoring and training services.

  • Criminal Investigations –28 new investigator specialist positions. These

positions will provide a law enforcement presence inside of CPS to assist in high priority cases that involve allegations of criminal conduct. These positions will report directly to the DES Director.

56

GOVERNOR’S CORNERSTONES

3

#

slide-57
SLIDE 57

DHS – Arnold v. Sarn

In 2010, due to the historic budget crisis, the Arnold

  • v. Sarn court orders were suspended for two
  • years. That suspension expires on June 30, 2012.

For the last several months, the Executive has been negotiating with the plaintiffs to agree on new

  • rders.

That process is still underway.

57

GOVERNOR’S CORNERSTONES

3

#

slide-58
SLIDE 58

DHS – Arnold v. Sarn

In the meantime, the Executive Recommendation provides an additional $39 million to implement the following services for the SMI population.

  • medication and medication services
  • crisis services
  • supported employment
  • case management
  • family and peer support
  • supported housing
  • living skills training
  • health promotion
  • personal assistance
  • respite care

58

GOVERNOR’S CORNERSTONES

3

#

slide-59
SLIDE 59

The Plan

  • Good Government
  • Public Safety
  • Education
  • Health and Welfare
  • Medicaid
  • Other

59

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Medicaid Reform Plan

Reform Plan Status

In FY 2012, the Executive implemented the Medicaid Reform Plan.

  • Froze childless adults enrollment
  • Eliminated spend down program
  • Implemented benefit limits
  • Provider rate reductions

The Executive is still working with the Federal Government to implement components of the reform

  • plan. However, the Executive is not recommending

supplemental Medicaid funding for FY 2012.

60

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Provider Rates

61

As part of Medicaid Reform, the State has adopted a series of rate cuts for Medicaid providers

Provider Groups Prior to 4/1/2011 4/1/2011 10/1/2011 Hospitals rate freeze 5% rate cut 5% rate cut Physicians 5% rate cut 5% rate cut 5% rate cut Ambulance (Emergency Transport) 5% rate cut 5% rate cut 5% rate cut Behavioral Health Services 5% rate cut 5% rate cut 5% rate cut Nursing Facilities rate freeze rate freeze 5% rate cut Home Based Services 5% rate cut (+2.5% rate cut due to rebase) 2.5% rate cut 5% rate cut Dental 5% rate cut 5% rate cut 5% rate cut Ambulatory Surgery Centers 5% rate cut rate freeze 5% rate cut Community Alternative Residential Settings 5% rate cut 2.5% rate cut 5% rate cut

The Executive recommends no further rate cuts

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Provider Rates

The Executive recommends a 3 percent rate ($27 million GF) increase for:

– Physicians – Behavioral Health Service Providers – Nursing Facilities – Home Service Providers – Ambulatory Surgery Centers

Before implementing the increase, AHCCCS must complete a study to ensure the increases are consistent with federal law.

62

slide-63
SLIDE 63

AHCCCS- AG Tobacco Litigation

Beginning this year the AG’s Office will be defending the State in arbitration to determine if we have diligently enforced the Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement Recommendation:

  • FY 2012 Supplemental $1.4 million GF
  • FY 2013 $1.2 million GF

63

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Federal Health Care Reform

64

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Impact of PPACA

65

General Fund Impacts of PPACA

FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Caseload AHCCCS

  • 77,516,600

297,792,700 DHS

  • 41,490,200

108,235,900

Total Caseload Costs

119,006,800 406,028,600 Primary Care Physicians 6,316,500 13,896,300 14,610,500 AHCCCS/DES IT Modifications 2,500,000 1,500,000

  • Total:

8,816,500 134,403,100 420,639,100

PPACA Federal Match

Caseload AHCCCS

  • 587,980,700

1,856,909,400 DHS

  • 335,923,000

830,137,600

Total Caseload Match

923,903,700 2,687,047,000 Primary Care Physicians 61,225,200 134,695,400 148,164,900 AHCCCS/DES IT Modifications 12,500,000 8,500,000

  • Total:

73,841,100 1,067,099,100 2,835,211,900

slide-66
SLIDE 66

The Plan

  • Good Government
  • Public Safety
  • Education
  • Health and Welfare
  • Medicaid
  • Other

66

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Other Budget Issues

  • Natural Resources

– Forester: $1 million – Apache Water Settlement: $2 million – Land Department to General Fund: $11.4 million

  • Local Government

– Suspension of County Payment: $38.6 million – Repeal one year or less prisoner shift

  • Tourism

– $7 million for tourism activities – Repeal tourism formula

67

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Where We End Up

68

FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 Beginning Balance $3,243.0 $392,017.5 $587,960.3 Revenue $8,909,761.0 $9,159,244.5 $8,664,139.3 Total Available $8,913,004.0 $9,551,262.0 $9,252,099.6 Expenditures $8,520,986.5 $8,963,301.7 $8,922,533.7 Balance $392,017.5 $587,960.3 $329,565.9

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Where We End Up

69

  • 1,000.0

2,000.0 3,000.0 4,000.0 5,000.0 6,000.0 7,000.0 8,000.0 9,000.0 10,000.0 11,000.0 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Est. FY 2013 Est. FY 2014 Est. $ in millions

Arizona General Fund Ongoing Expenditures and Revenues FY 2002- FY 2013

Spending w/ ARRA and rollover Rev w/Solutions

slide-70
SLIDE 70

Risks

The Executive budget recommendation leaves a large balance at the end of FY 2014. These funds are there to address potential budget risks including:

  • Economic Disruptions
  • Federal Action
  • Lawsuits
  • Medicaid Expansion

70