Spatial and modular organisation of brain networks prevents - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

spatial and modular organisation of brain networks
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Spatial and modular organisation of brain networks prevents - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Spatial and modular organisation of brain networks prevents large-scale activation Marcus Kaiser School of Computing Science / Institute of Neuroscience Newcastle University United Kingdom http://www.biological-networks.org Network Science


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Spatial and modular organisation of brain networks prevents large-scale activation

http://www.biological-networks.org

Marcus Kaiser School of Computing Science / Institute of Neuroscience Newcastle University United Kingdom

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Network Science

Rapidly expanding field: Watts & Strogatz, Nature (June 1998) cited 2,255 times Barabasi & Albert, Science (October 1999) cited 2,122 times Modelling of SARS spreading over the airline network (Hufnagel, PNAS, 2004) Identity and Search in Social Networks (Watts et al., Science, 2002) The Large-Scale Organization of Metabolic Networks. (Jeong et al., Nature, 2000)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Types of neural/cortical connectivity

Structural / Anatomical (connection): two

regions are connected by a fibre tract

Functional (correlation): two regions are

active at the some time

Effective (causation): region A causes

activity in region B

Sporns, Chialvo, Kaiser, Hilgetag.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2004

A B

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Cortical networks

Human cortical areas (after Brodmann, 1909)

Nodes: cortical areas Edges: fiber tracts between areas

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Cortical networks

Visual pathways Visual system

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Structure and Function in Neural Systems

Multiple clusters Small-world architecture Scale-free organisation Spatial arrangement Development of spatial networks Hierarchy and critical activation

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Cat cortical network

Hilgetag & Kaiser (2004) Neuroinformatics 2: 353

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

AREAS 5Al 5m 5Am SII SSAi SIV SSAo 4g 6l 5Bl 6m 5Bm 1 2 4 3a 3b 7 AES PFCL pSb 35 36 Amyg 2b Sb Enr RS IA PFCMd CGA IG CGP PFCMil EPp P AAF AI VP(ctx) AII Tem Hipp ALLS DLS PLLS 17 18 19 AMLS 2a 21a 21b VLS PMLS PS 5Al 5m 5Am SII SSAi SIV SSAo 4g 6l 5Bl 6m 5Bm 1 2 4 3a 3b 7 AES PFCL pSb 35 36 Amyg 2b Sb Enr RS IA PFCMd CGA IG CGP PFCMil EPp P AAF AI VP(ctx) AII Tem Hipp ALLS DLS PLLS 17 18 19 AMLS 2a 21a 21b VLS PMLS PS

Multiple clusters/communities

VISUAL AUDITORY FRONTO- LIMBIC SENSORY- MOTOR

Hilgetag et al. (2000) Phil Trans R Soc 355: 91

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Reconstructing connectivity

Costa LdF, Kaiser M, Hilgetag CC (2007) BMC Systems Biology 1:16

untested

Macaque visual cortex (31 nodes)

Green: correct prediction Red: wrong prediction Yellow: prediction of untested connectivity

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Small-world architecture

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

  • Average clustering coefficient

Small-world features

path length ~2 → One degree of separation

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Scale-free organization

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Scale-free networks

(Barabasi & Albert, Science, 1999) (Liljeros, Nature, 2001) Log-log plot

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Is the brain similar to scale-free networks?

FEF 46 LIP 7B

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 degree cumulated occurences Macaque Random

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Sequential node removal

randomly = irrespective of degree targeted = highly-connected nodes first

Kaiser et al. (2007) European Journal of Neuroscience 25:3185-3192

0.5 1 1 2 3 4 fraction of deleted nodes ASP Small-world Network, Node elimination n=73 0.5 1 1 2 3 4 fraction of deleted nodes ASP Random Network, Node elimination n=73 3

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Spatial arrangement

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Reducing neural wiring costs

Minimizing total wire length reduces metabolic costs

for connection establishment and signal propagation

Every alternative arrangement of network nodes will

lead to a higher total wiring length (Component Placement Optimization, CPO)

(Cherniak, J. Neurosci., 1994)

A B C D A B C D rearranging nodes A and D

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Previous results supporting CPO

Macaque: layout of cortical prefrontal areas

(Klyachko & Stevens, PNAS, 2003)

  • C. elegans:

layout of ganglia

(Cherniak, J. Neurosci., 1994)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Rhesus monkey cortical network

V1 V2 V3 VP V3A V4 VOT V1 N 1 1 1 1 V2 1 N 1 1 1 1 1 V3 1 1 N 1 1 1 VP 1 N 1 1 1 V3A 1 1 1 1 N 1 V4 1 1 1 1 1 N 1 VOT 1 1 N

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

  • C. elegans neural network

Global level (277 neurons with 2105 connections) Local level (rostral ganglia, 131 neurons, 764 connections)

(White et al., 1986; Choe et al., 2004)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Wiring length distribution

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Reduced wiring length for alternative placements

  • 32%
  • 49%
  • 48%

Kaiser & Hilgetag (2006) PLoS Computational Biology, 7:e95

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Fewer long-distance projections for optimized placement

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Networks without long-distance connections

Original network Minimal wiring same number of connections preference for short-distance

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Why are there long-distance connections?

  • riginal

minimal

ASP

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Benefits of fewer processing steps

  • Synchrony of near and distant regions
  • Reduced transmission delays
  • Less (cross-modal) interference
  • Higher reliability of transmission
slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Altered Connectivity in Alzheimer patients

Stam et al. (2007) Cerebral Cortex, 17:92

EEG synchronization Network

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Path length and task performance

Mini Mental State Examination (attention, memory, language)

Diamonds: Alzheimer patients Empty squares: Control

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Development

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

Real-world networks extend in space!

References Kaiser & Hilgetag (2004). Physical Review E 69:036103 Kaiser & Hilgetag (2007). Neurocomputing, 70:1829-1832 Nisbach & Kaiser (2007). European Physical Journal B, 58:185–191

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

Topological and spatial organization

(1) Preference for short-distance connections (2) Existence of long-distance connections (3) Small-world properties (4) Spatial and topological clusters Spatial growth Time windows

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

Global connectivity (between areas)

Kaiser & Hilgetag, 2004

Local connectivity

Braitenberg & Schuez, 1998 Hellwig, 2000

Distance dependence

Rat visual cortex (layers 2, 3) Macaque (one hemisphere)

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

Spatial growth

Edge formation probability depends on spatial distance d between nodes u and v

Kaiser & Hilgetag, Physical Review E, 2004

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

Resulting network topology

density distance dependence

Cortical Networks

  • German highway system
  • Yeast Protein-Protein

Interaction Network

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

Spatial component: Time-window dependance: Pdist(u,v) = c * e-a d(u,v) P(u,v) = Ptemp(u) * Ptemp(v) * Pdist(u,v)

Spatial growth and time windows

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

Development of Clusters

Kaiser & Hilgetag (2007). Neurocomputing, 70:1829-1832

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

Robustness of small-world properties

Nisbach & Kaiser (2007). European Physical Journal B, 58:185–191

slide-39
SLIDE 39

39

Is this model implemented in the brain?

Experimentally testable predictions: (1) A small overlap of the time windows of two regions should result in fewer fibre tracts between those regions. (2) Regions with wider time windows should (a) have a larger number of connections and (b) be part of a larger cluster. (3) Older regions should get more connections than newer regions.

slide-40
SLIDE 40

40

Hierarchy and critical activation One degree of separation

slide-41
SLIDE 41

41

Critical range of cortical function

Low activation High level of activation Epileptic seizure

slide-42
SLIDE 42

42

Standard model: Balance between inhibition and excitation

  • +

Excitatory population Inhibitory population

Soltesz & Staley. Computational Neuroscience of Epilepsy. Academic Press, to appear in Nov.

slide-43
SLIDE 43

43

Topological model: Hierarchical modular network

  • clusters of sub-clusters of nodes
AREAS 5Al 5m 5Am SII SSAi SIV SSAo 4g 6l 5Bl 6m 5Bm 1 2 4 3a 3b 7 AES PFCL pSb 35 36 Amyg 2b Sb Enr RS IA PFCMd CGA IG CGP PFCMil EPp P AAF AI VP(ctx) AII Tem Hipp ALLS DLS PLLS 17 18 19 AMLS 2a 21a 21b VLS PMLS PS 5Al 5m 5Am SII SSAi SIV SSAo 4g 6l 5Bl 6m 5Bm 1 2 4 3a 3b 7 AES PFCL pSb 35 36 Amyg 2b Sb Enr RS IA PFCMd CGA IG CGP PFCMil EPp P AAF AI VP(ctx) AII Tem Hipp ALLS DLS PLLS 17 18 19 AMLS 2a 21a 21b VLS PMLS PS
slide-44
SLIDE 44

44

Spatial self-similarity

Neuron Box counting dimension: 1.5-1.7

Binzegger et al. (2005), Cerebral Cortex

10

1

10

2

10

3

10

2

10

3

10

4

Box size (µm) Intersected boxes

Box counting dimension: 1.39-1.42

(Kaiser, unpublished)

Cortical network

slide-45
SLIDE 45

45

Hierarchical cluster network model

  • 1,000 nodes; 12,000 bidirectional connections

cluster1 100 nodes cluster10 100 nodes

4000 connections 4000 connections 4000 connections

sub-cluster1 10 nodes sub-cluster10 10 nodes

sub-cluster100 10 nodes

… network 1000 nodes

nodes: 1 … … … … … i … … … … … 1000

  • activation threshold: >6 presynaptic neurons, stochastic

deactivation, p=0.3

slide-46
SLIDE 46

46

Comparison networks

random small-world hierarchical cluster

slide-47
SLIDE 47

47

Example activation behaviour

  • 30 runs
  • 100 (10%) randomly activated initial nodes

random small-world hierarchical cluster

slide-48
SLIDE 48

48

Robustness for starting parameters

small-world hierarchical cluster

Kaiser, Goerner, Hilgetag (2007) New Journal of Physics, 9:110

slide-49
SLIDE 49

49

Robustness for spreading parameters

k: activation threshold v: deactivation probability

slide-50
SLIDE 50

50

Robustness for node exhaustion

slide-51
SLIDE 51

51

Dependence on inter-cluster connectivity

Sustained activity in three clusters for reduced inter- cluster connectivity Sustained activity in one cluster Do epilepsy patients have larger inter-cluster connections?

slide-52
SLIDE 52

52

Outlook: Hierarchies and activity spreading

subsubcluster activation → spatially near nodes → rapid feedback → rapid oscillation cluster activation → spatially near and distant nodes → slower feedback → slower oscillation

slide-53
SLIDE 53

53

Partial seizure

Xiang and Kaiser, unpublished

dB Magnitude

slide-54
SLIDE 54

54

www.carmen.org.uk

Newcastle :

  • Prof. Colin Ingram,
  • Prof. Paul Watson,

Dr Stuart Baker, Dr Marcus Kaiser, Dr Phil Lord, Dr Evelyne Sernagor, Dr Tom Smulders,

  • Prof. Miles Whittington

York :

  • Prof. Jim Austin

Stirling :

  • Prof. Leslie Smith

St Andrews : Dr Anne Smith Cambridge : Dr Stephen Eglen Leicester : Dr Rodrigo Quian Quiroga Manchester : Dr Stefano Panzeri Sheffield : Dr Kevin Gurney, Dr Paul Overton Plymouth :

  • Prof. Roman Borisyuk

Warwick :

  • Prof. Jianfeng Feng

Imperial College : Dr Simon Schultz

£4.5M e-science project started in Oct 2006 4-year PhD Programme: ‘Systems Neuroscience: From Networks to Behaviour’ starting October 2008

slide-55
SLIDE 55

55

Summary

Cortical networks show

properties of small-world and scale-free networks and have a modular organization (clusters)

Neural systems are optimized

for fast processing rather than for saving energy

Spatial growth with time

windows generates modular small-world networks

Hierarchical modules enable

robust sustained activity without inhibition or external inputs

slide-56
SLIDE 56

56

Collaborators

Supported by e-Therapeutics, EPSRC, and Royal Society.

Jacobs University Bremen Claus Hilgetag Newcastle University Alex Thiele Miles Whittington Mark Cunningham Evelyne Sernagor Indiana University Olaf Sporns São Paulo University Luciano da Fontoura Costa Cambridge University Stephen Eglen More information at http://www.biological-networks.org/ Team Jennifer Simonotto Jose Marcelino PostDoc PhD student