some thoughts on lfcs at 30
play

Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 Samson Abramsky Department of Computer - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sep 18, 2023 •273 likes •1.31k views

Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 Samson Abramsky Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 1 / 20 Sense And/Or Sensibility? Samson

  1. My first Close Encounter Working at GEC Computers, 1977, on operating system development. Came across two orange booklets: George Milne and Robin Milner, Concurrent Processes and their Syntax Robin Milner, Flowgraphs and Flow Algebras . This was the opening quotation from Flowgraphs and Flow Algebras: ”You could get an infinite number of wires in this . . . junction box, but we don’t usually go that far in practice” – Man from London Electricity Board, 1959. It presents an algebra of nets, and proves its completeness under a simple equational theory, using the methods of initial algebra semantics (ADJ). There are many pictures of nets: precursor of many subsequent diagrammatic calculi. Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 4 / 20

  2. Concurrent Processes and their Syntax Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 5 / 20

  3. Concurrent Processes and their Syntax Concurrency among computations which communicate with each other presents some of the most exciting challenges in the study of computation. Not only is it of great practical relevance, but it also appears to demand a theory of its own, which at present exists only tentatively. One aspect of this theory must be quantitative . . . . Another (perhaps the other) aspect is qualitative; what conceptual framework is needed to understand and discuss the behavior of concurrent computations? Although these two aspects should presumably interact, it appears to be sound methodology to separate them initially. This paper deals with the qualitative aspect. We attempt to provide a part of the necessary conceptual framework by attacking the question: What sort of mathematical object is a process? Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 5 / 20

  4. The Cunning of Reason I Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 6 / 20

  5. The Cunning of Reason I What is a fruitful guiding principle at a certain stage in the development of a scientific field does not always stay that way! Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 6 / 20

  6. The Cunning of Reason I What is a fruitful guiding principle at a certain stage in the development of a scientific field does not always stay that way! This separation of concerns, precursor of Track A vs. Track B Eurotheory vs. US theory was an important and necessary step in its time. Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 6 / 20

  7. The Cunning of Reason I What is a fruitful guiding principle at a certain stage in the development of a scientific field does not always stay that way! This separation of concerns, precursor of Track A vs. Track B Eurotheory vs. US theory was an important and necessary step in its time. As was foreseen in the quotation, these two strands, quantitive and qualitative, must eventually interact, and are increasingly doing so: Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 6 / 20

  8. The Cunning of Reason I What is a fruitful guiding principle at a certain stage in the development of a scientific field does not always stay that way! This separation of concerns, precursor of Track A vs. Track B Eurotheory vs. US theory was an important and necessary step in its time. As was foreseen in the quotation, these two strands, quantitive and qualitative, must eventually interact, and are increasingly doing so: Probability Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 6 / 20

  9. The Cunning of Reason I What is a fruitful guiding principle at a certain stage in the development of a scientific field does not always stay that way! This separation of concerns, precursor of Track A vs. Track B Eurotheory vs. US theory was an important and necessary step in its time. As was foreseen in the quotation, these two strands, quantitive and qualitative, must eventually interact, and are increasingly doing so: Probability Weighted systems of various kinds Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 6 / 20

  10. The Cunning of Reason I What is a fruitful guiding principle at a certain stage in the development of a scientific field does not always stay that way! This separation of concerns, precursor of Track A vs. Track B Eurotheory vs. US theory was an important and necessary step in its time. As was foreseen in the quotation, these two strands, quantitive and qualitative, must eventually interact, and are increasingly doing so: Probability Weighted systems of various kinds Real-time Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 6 / 20

  11. The Cunning of Reason I What is a fruitful guiding principle at a certain stage in the development of a scientific field does not always stay that way! This separation of concerns, precursor of Track A vs. Track B Eurotheory vs. US theory was an important and necessary step in its time. As was foreseen in the quotation, these two strands, quantitive and qualitative, must eventually interact, and are increasingly doing so: Probability Weighted systems of various kinds Real-time Quantum Information Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 6 / 20

  12. The Cunning of Reason I What is a fruitful guiding principle at a certain stage in the development of a scientific field does not always stay that way! This separation of concerns, precursor of Track A vs. Track B Eurotheory vs. US theory was an important and necessary step in its time. As was foreseen in the quotation, these two strands, quantitive and qualitative, must eventually interact, and are increasingly doing so: Probability Weighted systems of various kinds Real-time Quantum Information Computational Systems Biology Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 6 / 20

  13. The Cunning of Reason I What is a fruitful guiding principle at a certain stage in the development of a scientific field does not always stay that way! This separation of concerns, precursor of Track A vs. Track B Eurotheory vs. US theory was an important and necessary step in its time. As was foreseen in the quotation, these two strands, quantitive and qualitative, must eventually interact, and are increasingly doing so: Probability Weighted systems of various kinds Real-time Quantum Information Computational Systems Biology Computational Game Theory and Economics Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 6 / 20

  14. The Cunning of Reason I What is a fruitful guiding principle at a certain stage in the development of a scientific field does not always stay that way! This separation of concerns, precursor of Track A vs. Track B Eurotheory vs. US theory was an important and necessary step in its time. As was foreseen in the quotation, these two strands, quantitive and qualitative, must eventually interact, and are increasingly doing so: Probability Weighted systems of various kinds Real-time Quantum Information Computational Systems Biology Computational Game Theory and Economics and more . . . Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 6 / 20

  15. The Cunning of Reason II Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 7 / 20

  16. The Cunning of Reason II Another important feature, part of the spirit of LFCS: Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 7 / 20

  17. The Cunning of Reason II Another important feature, part of the spirit of LFCS: Explicitly marking Computer Science as a serious scientific discipline in its own right; not just a service subject, an auxiliary, a branch of engineering . . . Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 7 / 20

  18. The Cunning of Reason II Another important feature, part of the spirit of LFCS: Explicitly marking Computer Science as a serious scientific discipline in its own right; not just a service subject, an auxiliary, a branch of engineering . . . Crucial for me, when I picked up those orange booklets: ”Science is nothing more that doing your damnedest with your mind, no holds barred” Percy W Bridgman Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 7 / 20

  19. The Cunning of Reason II Another important feature, part of the spirit of LFCS: Explicitly marking Computer Science as a serious scientific discipline in its own right; not just a service subject, an auxiliary, a branch of engineering . . . Crucial for me, when I picked up those orange booklets: ”Science is nothing more that doing your damnedest with your mind, no holds barred” Percy W Bridgman Again, the picture looks different now. CS has arrived on the scene; now we must avoid remaining in splendid isolation! Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 7 / 20

  20. The Cunning of Reason II Another important feature, part of the spirit of LFCS: Explicitly marking Computer Science as a serious scientific discipline in its own right; not just a service subject, an auxiliary, a branch of engineering . . . Crucial for me, when I picked up those orange booklets: ”Science is nothing more that doing your damnedest with your mind, no holds barred” Percy W Bridgman Again, the picture looks different now. CS has arrived on the scene; now we must avoid remaining in splendid isolation! More positively: exciting things are happening on the boundaries with other disciplines. The methods and modes of thought of CS can – and should – be applied much more widely. Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 7 / 20

  21. The Cunning of Reason II Another important feature, part of the spirit of LFCS: Explicitly marking Computer Science as a serious scientific discipline in its own right; not just a service subject, an auxiliary, a branch of engineering . . . Crucial for me, when I picked up those orange booklets: ”Science is nothing more that doing your damnedest with your mind, no holds barred” Percy W Bridgman Again, the picture looks different now. CS has arrived on the scene; now we must avoid remaining in splendid isolation! More positively: exciting things are happening on the boundaries with other disciplines. The methods and modes of thought of CS can – and should – be applied much more widely. Cautionary tales: LiCS and other battlegrounds . . . Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 7 / 20

  22. The Cunning of Reason III Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 8 / 20

  23. The Cunning of Reason III What do we need to know? Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 8 / 20

  24. The Cunning of Reason III What do we need to know? Those papers by Robin defined an initial syllabus for me. Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 8 / 20

  25. The Cunning of Reason III What do we need to know? Those papers by Robin defined an initial syllabus for me. Later, I learned domain theory by reading Gordon’s papers (!!) Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 8 / 20

  26. The Cunning of Reason III What do we need to know? Those papers by Robin defined an initial syllabus for me. Later, I learned domain theory by reading Gordon’s papers (!!) How it looked back then: logic, order theory, universal algebra, some (general/point-set) topology, increasingly category theory . . . Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 8 / 20

  27. The Cunning of Reason III What do we need to know? Those papers by Robin defined an initial syllabus for me. Later, I learned domain theory by reading Gordon’s papers (!!) How it looked back then: logic, order theory, universal algebra, some (general/point-set) topology, increasingly category theory . . . A clear remove from ”mainstream mathematics” Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 8 / 20

  28. The Cunning of Reason III What do we need to know? Those papers by Robin defined an initial syllabus for me. Later, I learned domain theory by reading Gordon’s papers (!!) How it looked back then: logic, order theory, universal algebra, some (general/point-set) topology, increasingly category theory . . . A clear remove from ”mainstream mathematics” Another aspect of the separation of qualitative from quantitative. Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 8 / 20

  29. The Cunning of Reason III What do we need to know? Those papers by Robin defined an initial syllabus for me. Later, I learned domain theory by reading Gordon’s papers (!!) How it looked back then: logic, order theory, universal algebra, some (general/point-set) topology, increasingly category theory . . . A clear remove from ”mainstream mathematics” Another aspect of the separation of qualitative from quantitative. It looks very different now! Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 8 / 20

  30. The Cunning of Reason III What do we need to know? Those papers by Robin defined an initial syllabus for me. Later, I learned domain theory by reading Gordon’s papers (!!) How it looked back then: logic, order theory, universal algebra, some (general/point-set) topology, increasingly category theory . . . A clear remove from ”mainstream mathematics” Another aspect of the separation of qualitative from quantitative. It looks very different now! My own (modest, call-by-need) experience from quantum information and foundations. Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 8 / 20

  31. The Cunning of Reason III What do we need to know? Those papers by Robin defined an initial syllabus for me. Later, I learned domain theory by reading Gordon’s papers (!!) How it looked back then: logic, order theory, universal algebra, some (general/point-set) topology, increasingly category theory . . . A clear remove from ”mainstream mathematics” Another aspect of the separation of qualitative from quantitative. It looks very different now! My own (modest, call-by-need) experience from quantum information and foundations. Mathematics which has been unavoidable : probability, linear algebra, functional analysis, linear programming, convex geometry, projective geometry, logic, algorithms and complexity, sheaves and cohomology, . . . Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 8 / 20

  32. The Cunning of Reason III What do we need to know? Those papers by Robin defined an initial syllabus for me. Later, I learned domain theory by reading Gordon’s papers (!!) How it looked back then: logic, order theory, universal algebra, some (general/point-set) topology, increasingly category theory . . . A clear remove from ”mainstream mathematics” Another aspect of the separation of qualitative from quantitative. It looks very different now! My own (modest, call-by-need) experience from quantum information and foundations. Mathematics which has been unavoidable : probability, linear algebra, functional analysis, linear programming, convex geometry, projective geometry, logic, algorithms and complexity, sheaves and cohomology, . . . Potentially, there is much more. Look at the students! Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 8 / 20

  33. Show, don’t tell Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 9 / 20

  34. Show, don’t tell I will illustrate these themes: Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 9 / 20

  35. Show, don’t tell I will illustrate these themes: Reconnecting the qualitative and structural with the quantitative Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 9 / 20

  36. Show, don’t tell I will illustrate these themes: Reconnecting the qualitative and structural with the quantitative CS interconnecting with other fields of science, being influenced by – and daring to (try to) influence! Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 9 / 20

  37. Show, don’t tell I will illustrate these themes: Reconnecting the qualitative and structural with the quantitative CS interconnecting with other fields of science, being influenced by – and daring to (try to) influence! Broadening the mathematical tools, connecting with the ”mainstream” Illustrate literally, with some pictures to give an impression of some current work on contextuality Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 9 / 20

  38. Show, don’t tell I will illustrate these themes: Reconnecting the qualitative and structural with the quantitative CS interconnecting with other fields of science, being influenced by – and daring to (try to) influence! Broadening the mathematical tools, connecting with the ”mainstream” Illustrate literally, with some pictures to give an impression of some current work on contextuality Rui Soares Barbosa, Kohei Kishida, Ray Lal and Shane Mansfield Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 9 / 20

  39. Show, don’t tell I will illustrate these themes: Reconnecting the qualitative and structural with the quantitative CS interconnecting with other fields of science, being influenced by – and daring to (try to) influence! Broadening the mathematical tools, connecting with the ”mainstream” Illustrate literally, with some pictures to give an impression of some current work on contextuality Rui Soares Barbosa, Kohei Kishida, Ray Lal and Shane Mansfield The slogan: contextuality arises where we have a family of data which is locally consistent , but globally inconsistent . Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 9 / 20

  40. Contextuality Analogy: Local Consistency b ′ a a ′ b Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 10 / 20

  41. Contextuality Analogy: Local Consistency b ′ a a ′ b Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 10 / 20

  42. Contextuality Analogy: Global Inconsistency Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 11 / 20

  43. Bundle Pictures Logical Contextuality Ignore precise probabilities Events are possible or not E.g. the Hardy model: 00 01 10 11 ab � � � � ab ′ × � � � × a ′ b � � � a ′ b ′ � � � × Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 12 / 20

  44. Bundle Pictures Logical Contextuality Ignore precise probabilities Events are possible or not E.g. the Hardy model: 00 01 10 11 ab � � � � • b ′ ab ′ × � � � • a ′ × a ′ b � � � a • • b a ′ b ′ � � � × Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 12 / 20

  45. Bundle Pictures Logical Contextuality Ignore precise probabilities Events are possible or not E.g. the Hardy model: 00 01 10 11 ab � � � � • b ′ ab ′ × � � � • a ′ × a ′ b � � � a • • b a ′ b ′ � � � × Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 12 / 20

  46. Bundle Pictures Logical Contextuality • 0 • 0 Ignore precise probabilities • • Events are possible or not 0 • 1 • E.g. the Hardy model: • 1 • 1 00 01 10 11 ab � � � � • b ′ ab ′ × � � � • a ′ × a ′ b � � � a • • b a ′ b ′ � � � × Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 12 / 20

  47. Bundle Pictures Logical Contextuality • 0 • 0 Ignore precise probabilities • • Events are possible or not 0 • 1 • E.g. the Hardy model: • 1 • 1 00 01 10 11 ab � � � � • b ′ ab ′ × � � � • a ′ × a ′ b � � � a • • b a ′ b ′ � � � × Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 12 / 20

  48. Bundle Pictures Logical Contextuality • 0 • 0 Ignore precise probabilities • • Events are possible or not 0 • 1 • E.g. the Hardy model: • 1 • 1 00 01 10 11 ab � � � � • b ′ ab ′ × � � � • a ′ × a ′ b � � � a • • b a ′ b ′ � � � × Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 12 / 20

  49. Bundle Pictures Logical Contextuality • 0 • 0 Ignore precise probabilities • • Events are possible or not 0 • 1 • E.g. the Hardy model: • 1 • 1 00 01 10 11 ab � � � � • b ′ ab ′ × � � � • a ′ × a ′ b � � � a • • b a ′ b ′ � � � × Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 12 / 20

  50. Bundle Pictures Logical Contextuality • 0 • 0 Ignore precise probabilities • • Events are possible or not 0 • 1 • E.g. the Hardy model: • 1 • 1 00 01 10 11 ab � � � � • b ′ ab ′ × � � � • a ′ × a ′ b � � � a • • b a ′ b ′ � � � × Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 12 / 20

  51. Bundle Pictures Logical Contextuality • 0 • 0 Ignore precise probabilities • • Events are possible or not 0 • 1 • E.g. the Hardy model: • 1 • 1 00 01 10 11 ab � � � � • b ′ ab ′ × � � � • a ′ × a ′ b � � � a • • b a ′ b ′ � � � × Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 12 / 20

  52. Bundle Pictures Logical Contextuality • 0 • 0 Ignore precise probabilities • • Events are possible or not 0 • 1 • E.g. the Hardy model: • 1 • 1 00 01 10 11 ab � � � � • b ′ ab ′ × � � � • a ′ × a ′ b � � � a • • b a ′ b ′ � � � × Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 12 / 20

  53. Bundle Pictures Logical Contextuality • 0 • 0 Ignore precise probabilities • • Events are possible or not 0 • 1 • E.g. the Hardy model: • 1 • 1 00 01 10 11 ab � � � � • b ′ ab ′ × � � � • a ′ × a ′ b � � � a • • b a ′ b ′ � � � × Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 12 / 20

  54. Bundle Pictures Logical Contextuality • 0 • 0 Ignore precise probabilities • • Events are possible or not 0 • 1 • E.g. the Hardy model: • 1 • 1 00 01 10 11 ab � � � � • b ′ ab ′ × � � � • a ′ × a ′ b � � � a • • b a ′ b ′ � � � × Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 12 / 20

  55. Bundle Pictures Logical Contextuality • 0 • 0 Ignore precise probabilities • • Events are possible or not 0 • 1 • E.g. the Hardy model: • 1 • 1 00 01 10 11 ab � � � � • b ′ ab ′ × � � � • a ′ × a ′ b � � � a • • b a ′ b ′ � � � × Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 12 / 20

  56. Bundle Pictures Logical Contextuality • 0 • 0 Ignore precise probabilities • • Events are possible or not 0 • 1 • E.g. the Hardy model: • 1 • 1 00 01 10 11 ab � � � � • b ′ ab ′ × � � � • a ′ × a ′ b � � � a • • b a ′ b ′ � � � × Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 12 / 20

  57. Bundle Pictures Logical Contextuality • 0 • 0 Ignore precise probabilities • • Events are possible or not 0 • 1 • E.g. the Hardy model: • 1 • 1 00 01 10 11 ab � � � � • b ′ ab ′ × � � � • a ′ × a ′ b � � � a • • b a ′ b ′ � � � × Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 12 / 20

  58. Bundle Pictures Logical Contextuality • 0 • 0 Ignore precise probabilities • • Events are possible or not 0 • 1 • E.g. the Hardy model: • 1 • 1 00 01 10 11 ab � � � � • b ′ ab ′ × � � � • a ′ × a ′ b � � � a • • b a ′ b ′ � � � × Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 12 / 20

  59. Bundle Pictures Logical Contextuality • 0 • 0 Ignore precise probabilities • • Events are possible or not 0 • 1 • E.g. the Hardy model: • 1 • 1 00 01 10 11 ab � � � � • b ′ ab ′ × � � � • a ′ × a ′ b � � � a • • b a ′ b ′ � � � × Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 12 / 20

  60. Bundle Pictures Logical Contextuality • 0 • 0 Ignore precise probabilities • • Events are possible or not 0 • 1 • E.g. the Hardy model: • 1 • 1 00 01 10 11 ab � � � � • b ′ ab ′ × � � � • a ′ × a ′ b � � � a • • b a ′ b ′ � � � × Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 12 / 20

  61. Bundle Pictures • 0 Strong Contextuality • 0 • • E.g. the PR box: 0 • 1 • • 00 01 10 11 1 • 1 ab × × � � × × ab ′ � � • b ′ a ′ b × × � � • a ′ a • a ′ b ′ × × � � • b Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 13 / 20

  62. Contextuality, Logic and Paradoxes Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 14 / 20

  63. Contextuality, Logic and Paradoxes Liar cycles . A Liar cycle of length N is a sequence of statements S 1 : S 2 is true, S 2 : S 3 is true, . . . S N − 1 : S N is true, S N : S 1 is false. For N = 1, this is the classic Liar sentence S : S is false. Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 14 / 20

  64. Contextuality, Logic and Paradoxes Liar cycles . A Liar cycle of length N is a sequence of statements S 1 : S 2 is true, S 2 : S 3 is true, . . . S N − 1 : S N is true, S N : S 1 is false. For N = 1, this is the classic Liar sentence S : S is false. Following Cook, Walicki et al. we can model the situation by boolean equations: x 1 = x 2 , . . . , x n − 1 = x n , x n = ¬ x 1 Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 14 / 20

  65. Contextuality, Logic and Paradoxes Liar cycles . A Liar cycle of length N is a sequence of statements S 1 : S 2 is true, S 2 : S 3 is true, . . . S N − 1 : S N is true, S N : S 1 is false. For N = 1, this is the classic Liar sentence S : S is false. Following Cook, Walicki et al. we can model the situation by boolean equations: x 1 = x 2 , . . . , x n − 1 = x n , x n = ¬ x 1 The “paradoxical” nature of the original statements is now captured by the inconsistency of these equations. Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 14 / 20

  66. Contextuality in the Liar; Liar cycles in the PR Box Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 15 / 20

  67. Contextuality in the Liar; Liar cycles in the PR Box We can regard each of these equations as fibered over the set of variables which occur in it: { x 1 , x 2 } : x 1 = x 2 { x 2 , x 3 } : x 2 = x 3 . . . { x n − 1 , x n } : x n − 1 = x n { x n , x 1 } : x n = ¬ x 1 Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 15 / 20

  68. Contextuality in the Liar; Liar cycles in the PR Box We can regard each of these equations as fibered over the set of variables which occur in it: { x 1 , x 2 } : x 1 = x 2 { x 2 , x 3 } : x 2 = x 3 . . . { x n − 1 , x n } : x n − 1 = x n { x n , x 1 } : x n = ¬ x 1 Any subset of up to n − 1 of these equations is consistent; while the whole set is inconsistent. Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 15 / 20

  69. Contextuality in the Liar; Liar cycles in the PR Box We can regard each of these equations as fibered over the set of variables which occur in it: { x 1 , x 2 } : x 1 = x 2 { x 2 , x 3 } : x 2 = x 3 . . . { x n − 1 , x n } : x n − 1 = x n { x n , x 1 } : x n = ¬ x 1 Any subset of up to n − 1 of these equations is consistent; while the whole set is inconsistent. Up to rearrangement, the Liar cycle of length 4 corresponds exactly to the PR box . Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 15 / 20

  70. Contextuality in the Liar; Liar cycles in the PR Box We can regard each of these equations as fibered over the set of variables which occur in it: { x 1 , x 2 } : x 1 = x 2 { x 2 , x 3 } : x 2 = x 3 . . . { x n − 1 , x n } : x n − 1 = x n { x n , x 1 } : x n = ¬ x 1 Any subset of up to n − 1 of these equations is consistent; while the whole set is inconsistent. Up to rearrangement, the Liar cycle of length 4 corresponds exactly to the PR box . The usual reasoning to derive a contradiction from the Liar cycle corresponds precisely to the attempt to find a univocal path in the bundle diagram. Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 15 / 20

  71. Paths to contradiction 0 • • 0 • • 0 • 1 • • 1 • 1 b 2 • • a 2 a 1 • • b 1 Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 16 / 20

  72. Paths to contradiction 0 • • 0 • • 0 • 1 • • 1 • 1 b 2 • • a 2 a 1 • • b 1 Suppose that we try to set a 2 to 1. Following the path on the right leads to the following local propagation of values: a 2 = 1 � b 1 = 1 � a 1 = 1 � b 2 = 1 � a 2 = 0 a 2 = 0 � b 1 = 0 � a 1 = 0 � b 2 = 0 � a 2 = 1 Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 16 / 20

  73. Paths to contradiction 0 • • 0 • • 0 • 1 • • 1 • 1 b 2 • • a 2 a 1 • • b 1 Suppose that we try to set a 2 to 1. Following the path on the right leads to the following local propagation of values: a 2 = 1 � b 1 = 1 � a 1 = 1 � b 2 = 1 � a 2 = 0 a 2 = 0 � b 1 = 0 � a 1 = 0 � b 2 = 0 � a 2 = 1 We have discussed a specific case here, but the analysis can be generalised to a large class of examples. Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 16 / 20

  74. Topological Characterisation • 0 • 0 ˘ Cech cohomology • • (on a presheaf derived from the 0 • 1 model) • • 1 Topological invariant γ ( s ) for every • 1 possible event s γ ( s ) � = ∅ implies contextuality • Cohomological witnesses for PR b ′ box, GHZ, Peres-Mermin, Specker’s • a ′ triangle, Kochen-Specker, All AvN a • models, . . . • b Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 17 / 20

  75. Edinburgh Memories Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 18 / 20

  76. Edinburgh Memories The Edinburgh interaction group Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 18 / 20

  77. Edinburgh Memories The Edinburgh interaction group Kohei Honda, Nobuko Yoshida, Paul-And´ e Melli` es, Juliusz Chroboczek, Jim Laird Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 18 / 20

  78. A Parting Shot Some good advice: ”Avoid the temptation to work so hard that there is no time left for serious thinking”. Francis Crick Samson Abramsky (Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Some Thoughts on LFCS at 30 19 / 20

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend

LFCS Now and Then Gordon Plotkin LFCS@30 Edinburgh, April, 2016 Gordon Plotkin LFCS Now and

LFCS Now and Then Gordon Plotkin LFCS@30 Edinburgh, April, 2016 Gordon Plotkin LFCS Now and

LFCS Now and Then Gordon Plotkin LFCS@30 Edinburgh, April, 2016 Gordon Plotkin LFCS Now and Then Origins of LFCS Logic programming Gordon Plotkin LFCS Now and Then Hope Park Square Gordon Plotkin LFCS Now and Then Hope Park Square

502 views • 39 slides
Visiting LFCS over the past 25 years Philip Scott University of Ottawa Happy 30th Birthday LFCS

Visiting LFCS over the past 25 years Philip Scott University of Ottawa Happy 30th Birthday LFCS

Visiting LFCS over the past 25 years Philip Scott University of Ottawa Happy 30th Birthday LFCS ! Philip Scott University of Ottawa LFCSVisiting over 25 Years Visiting LFCS over 25 years It has been a great honour and privilege to

293 views • 18 slides
Functional In-place Update with Layered Datatype Sharing Michal Kone cn y LFCS, University

Functional In-place Update with Layered Datatype Sharing Michal Kone cn y LFCS, University

Functional In-place Update with Layered Datatype Sharing Michal Kone cn y LFCS, University of Edinburgh part of a wider collaboration with David Aspinall, Martin Hofmann, Robert Atkey M. Kone cn y, LFCS Edinburgh Theory seminar,

479 views • 47 slides
ALL THINGS Lindy Strong THOUGHTS ARE ENERGY Thoughts are Energy Thought energy has no

ALL THINGS Lindy Strong THOUGHTS ARE ENERGY Thoughts are Energy Thought energy has no

RESTORATION OF ALL THINGS Lindy Strong THOUGHTS ARE ENERGY Thoughts are Energy Thought energy has no boundary. Your thoughts are not confined to a certain location. We would like to think that our private thoughts are in fact

1.33k views • 92 slides
Isaiah 55:8-9 8. For My thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways My ways, declares

Isaiah 55:8-9 8. For My thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways My ways, declares

Isaiah 55:8-9 8. For My thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways My ways, declares the LORD. 9. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are My ways higher than your ways and My thoughts than your thoughts. Trusting God

444 views • 18 slides
5 Thoughts on Staying Sharp and Relevant Some thoughts and ideas on learning and thinking for

5 Thoughts on Staying Sharp and Relevant Some thoughts and ideas on learning and thinking for

5 Thoughts on Staying Sharp and Relevant Some thoughts and ideas on learning and thinking for todays IT pros Scott Lowe, VCDX 39 vExpert, Author, Blogger, Geek http://blog.scottlowe.org / Twitter: @scott_lowe Before we start Get

279 views • 15 slides
Random thoughts Some random thoughts and Encourage use of formal methods: Guarantees

Random thoughts Some random thoughts and Encourage use of formal methods: Guarantees

Random thoughts Some random thoughts and Encourage use of formal methods: Guarantees -> liability -> insurance -> proof some potentially relevant Develop software ecosystem with few, composable, secure elements wrapping

578 views • 3 slides
MINDSPEAK FEBRUARY 22, 2014 Agenda My background Thoughts on what makes BUSINESS

MINDSPEAK FEBRUARY 22, 2014 Agenda My background Thoughts on what makes BUSINESS

MINDSPEAK FEBRUARY 22, 2014 Agenda My background Thoughts on what makes BUSINESS successful Thoughts on what makes PEOPLE successful Thoughts on EAST AFRICA Thoughts on EABL Q & A 2 My Background British, 48

245 views • 21 slides
Towards refined notions of computation: the global state example Danel Ahman LFCS, University of

Towards refined notions of computation: the global state example Danel Ahman LFCS, University of

Towards refined notions of computation: the global state example Danel Ahman LFCS, University of Edinburgh 20 December 2012 joint work with Gordon Plotkin and Alex Simpson Overview Moggis monadic approach to computational effects

595 views • 48 slides
A comparison of the ODE semantics of PEPA with timed continuous Petri nets Vashti Galpin LFCS

A comparison of the ODE semantics of PEPA with timed continuous Petri nets Vashti Galpin LFCS

Introduction ODE semantics of PEPA Timed continuous Petri nets Comparison Conclusions A comparison of the ODE semantics of PEPA with timed continuous Petri nets Vashti Galpin LFCS University of Edinburgh 25 July 2007 Vashti Galpin, LFCS,

981 views • 76 slides
The Calculus of Communicating Systems Dr. Liam OConnor University of Edinburgh LFCS (and UNSW)

The Calculus of Communicating Systems Dr. Liam OConnor University of Edinburgh LFCS (and UNSW)

CCS The Calculus of Communicating Systems Dr. Liam OConnor University of Edinburgh LFCS (and UNSW) Term 2 2020 1 CCS Where we are at Last lecture we concluded our examination of proof methods for concurrency by examining compositional

538 views • 27 slides
The Calculus of Communicating Systems Dr. Liam OConnor University of Edinburgh LFCS (and UNSW)

The Calculus of Communicating Systems Dr. Liam OConnor University of Edinburgh LFCS (and UNSW)

CCS The Calculus of Communicating Systems Dr. Liam OConnor University of Edinburgh LFCS (and UNSW) Term 2 2020 1 CCS Where we are at Last lecture we concluded our examination of proof methods for concurrency by examining compositional

849 views • 71 slides
megan's final project proposal/ presentation/ thoughts/ etc megan's thoughts clothing and

megan's final project proposal/ presentation/ thoughts/ etc megan's thoughts clothing and

megan's final project proposal/ presentation/ thoughts/ etc megan's thoughts clothing and light: what visually constructs the human figure? clothing and fashion are a means of maintaining control over the human body. they do this by

423 views • 7 slides
Curriculum on Communications L2/B: Organizing Your Thoughts Organizing Your Thoughts Agenda

Curriculum on Communications L2/B: Organizing Your Thoughts Organizing Your Thoughts Agenda

California Cadet Corps Curriculum on Communications L2/B: Organizing Your Thoughts Organizing Your Thoughts Agenda B1. Public Speaking B2. Oral Presentation B3. Effective Writing B4. Creative Writing PUBLIC SPEAKING B1.

607 views • 39 slides
charin.fntolist,erase.applist and how not to do research Peter Buneman LFCS 30 th anniversary

charin.fntolist,erase.applist and how not to do research Peter Buneman LFCS 30 th anniversary

charin.fntolist,erase.applist and how not to do research Peter Buneman LFCS 30 th anniversary Once upon a time ... I spent a lot of time writing programs But I left the stimulating but tumultuous environment at Edinburgh to work in the US ...

566 views • 20 slides
The Connected Health Kit Thoughts Research User Experience Research patients Now Thoughts

The Connected Health Kit Thoughts Research User Experience Research patients Now Thoughts

The Connected Health Kit Thoughts Research User Experience Research patients Now Thoughts The Personalize Connected Health Kit Design Routines trends 2017 Interactive Heart failure Research learning Learning ... new things

212 views • 8 slides
Local convergence for random permutations The case of uniform pattern-avoiding permutations

Local convergence for random permutations The case of uniform pattern-avoiding permutations

Local convergence for random permutations The case of uniform pattern-avoiding permutations Jacopo Borga, Institut fr Mathematik, Universitt Zrich July 9, 2018 Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire Our goal 1. Scaling limits: Our

2.18k views • 175 slides
[12] The Eigenvector Two interest-bearing accounts Suppose Account 1 yields 5% interest and

[12] The Eigenvector Two interest-bearing accounts Suppose Account 1 yields 5% interest and

The Eigenvector [12] The Eigenvector Two interest-bearing accounts Suppose Account 1 yields 5% interest and Account 2 yields 3% interest. amount in Account 1 Represent balances in the two accounts by a 2-vector x ( t ) = . amount in

629 views • 41 slides
MSc in Computer Engineering, Cybersecurity and Artificial Intelligence Course FDE , a.a.

MSc in Computer Engineering, Cybersecurity and Artificial Intelligence Course FDE , a.a.

MSc in Computer Engineering, Cybersecurity and Artificial Intelligence Course FDE , a.a. 2019/2020, Lecture 4 Review of matrix algebra and state-space transformations Prof. Mauro Franceschelli Dept. of Electrical and Electronic Engineering

883 views • 50 slides
Location: Clough 144 DISCLAIMER: Everything I say about the final today is advice, it does not

Location: Clough 144 DISCLAIMER: Everything I say about the final today is advice, it does not

Announcements Monday, April 22 Please fill out your CIOS survey! If 85% of the class completes the survey by April 25th , then we will drop two quizzes instead of one. My office hours are this week Monday - Wednesday 10 am and next week

1.12k views • 55 slides
1 AN EMPIRICAL COMPARISON OF CONVERTIBLE BOND VALUATION MODELS Robert Jones, Chris Veld, and Yuriy

1 AN EMPIRICAL COMPARISON OF CONVERTIBLE BOND VALUATION MODELS Robert Jones, Chris Veld, and Yuriy

1 AN EMPIRICAL COMPARISON OF CONVERTIBLE BOND VALUATION MODELS Robert Jones, Chris Veld, and Yuriy Zabolotnyuk * November, 21 2006 JEL-codes: C12, C63, G13. Keywords: convertible bonds, credit risk, Ayache-Forsyth-Vetzal model, Tsviveriotis-

287 views • 27 slides
Flexible and Multishift Induced Dimension Reduction Algorithms Martin van Gijzen Joint work with

Flexible and Multishift Induced Dimension Reduction Algorithms Martin van Gijzen Joint work with

Flexible and Multishift Induced Dimension Reduction Algorithms Martin van Gijzen Joint work with Gerard Sleijpen and Jens Zemke NWO-JSPS Seminar, Delft, April 10-13, 2012 1 Delft University of Technology Outline Introduction IDR

577 views • 30 slides
Revelation Series Lesson #006 June 13, 2004 Dean Bible Ministries www.deanbibleministries.org

Revelation Series Lesson #006 June 13, 2004 Dean Bible Ministries www.deanbibleministries.org

Revelation Series Lesson #006 June 13, 2004 Dean Bible Ministries www.deanbibleministries.org Dr. Robert L. Dean, Jr. Revelation 1:1, The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave Him to show to His bond-servants, the things which must

856 views • 15 slides
SLDG schemes for 1st and 2nd order PDEs Olivier Bokanowski Laboratory Jacques Louis Lions (Paris

SLDG schemes for 1st and 2nd order PDEs Olivier Bokanowski Laboratory Jacques Louis Lions (Paris

SLDG schemes for 1st and 2nd order PDEs Olivier Bokanowski Laboratory Jacques Louis Lions (Paris 6) University Paris-Diderot (Paris 7) Commands (INRIA Saclay / Ensta ParisTech) Joint work with G. Simarmata (Rabobank, Netherlands) HYP 2012,

1.04k views • 86 slides

More recommend