Some mathematical results on mixture flows. D. B RESCH Laboratoire - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

some mathematical results on mixture flows
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Some mathematical results on mixture flows. D. B RESCH Laboratoire - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Some mathematical results on mixture flows. D. B RESCH Laboratoire de Math ematiques, UMR5127 CNRS


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

  • D. BRESCH

Laboratoire de Math´ ematiques, UMR5127 CNRS Universit´ e de Savoie Mont-Blanc 73376 Le Bourget du lac France Email: didier.bresch@univ-smb.fr

ANR project DYFICOLTI managed by D. LANNES Basel, June 2017 Thanks for the invitation to A. Mazzucato, G. Alberti, G. Crippa

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system

Outline

1

Some multi-fluid systems (miscible fluids - Mixture);

2

An example of immiscible fluid system sharing the same framework :

3

Multi-fluid models as limit of mono-fluid models. Joint works with: B. DESJARDINS, E. GRENIER and J.–M. GHIDAGLIA ;

  • M. RENARDY (Virginia Tech, Blacksburg) ; M. HILLAIRET (Montpellier

University), X. HUANG (Academia Sinica, Pekin) ; P. MUCHA (Warsaw university) and E. ZATORSKA (Imperial college).

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system A model with algebraic closure A model with a PDE closure

A model with an algebraic closure (common pressure)

α+ + α− = 1, ∂t(α+ρ+) + div (α+ρ+u+) = 0, ∂t(α−ρ−) + div (α−ρ−u−) = 0, ∂t(α+ρ+u+) + div (α+ρ+u+ ⊗ u+) + α+∇P = 0, ∂t(α−ρ−u−) + div (α−ρ−u− ⊗ u−) + α−∇P = 0, P = P−(ρ−) = P+(ρ+), with 0 ≤ α± ≤ 1. See for instance M. ISHII (1975), D.A. DREW AND S.L. PASSMAN (1998).

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system A model with algebraic closure A model with a PDE closure

The model with algebraic closure

Non-conservative, non-hyperbolic system if 0 ≤ |u+ − u−| < cm with c2

m = c2 −c2 +((α+ρ+)1/3 + (α−ρ−)1/3)3/(α+ρ−c2 − + α−ρ+c2 +).

In general, cm is large compared to u+ and u− and thefore flow belongs to non-hyperbolic region. See: H.B. STEWART, B. WENDROFF, J. Comp. Physics, 363–409, (1984) (Appendix I). Remark: Here we consider velocity governed by Navier-Stokes type systems. It exists other PDEs governing the two velocity fields: Darcy, Brinkman etc....

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system A model with algebraic closure A model with a PDE closure

The model with algebraic closure with extra terms

α+ + α− = 1, ∂t(α+ρ+) + div (α+ρ+u+) = 0, ∂t(α−ρ−) + div (α−ρ−u−) = 0, ∂t(α+ρ+u+) + div (α+ρ+u+ ⊗ u+) + α+∇P + π∇α+ = 0, ∂t(α−ρ−u−) + div (α−ρ−u− ⊗ u−)) + α−∇P + π∇α− = 0, P = P−(ρ−) = P+(ρ+), with 0 ≤ α± ≤ 1. Remark: The terms α±∇P + π∇α± are usually replaced by terms such as ∇(α±P±) + F±

int + P± int∇α±

where F±

int are internal forces such as relative drag terms, P± int modelize macroscopic

terms encoding pressure at the microscopic interface between the different fluids.

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system A model with algebraic closure A model with a PDE closure

The model with algebraic closure

In litterature, use Bestion term π = δ α+α−ρ+ρ− α+ρ− + α−ρ+ (u+ − u−)2. with δ > 1 to get hyperbolicity for small relative velocity. – See paper by M. NDJINGA, A. KUMBARO, F. DE VUYST,

  • P. LAURENT-GENGOUX, ISMF (2005) for geometric discussions: number of

intersecting points of parabola and hyperbola in quarter plane. Extension of H.B. STEWART, B. WENDROFF’s approach. – Direct study: analytical calculations. D.B., B. DESJARDINS, J.–M. GHIDAGLIA, E. GRENIER, M. HILLAIRET. See chapter in Handbook edited by Giga and Novotny.

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system A model with algebraic closure A model with a PDE closure

A low mach number model

α− + α+ = 1, ∂t(α+) + div (α+u+) = 0, ∂t(α−) + div (α−u−) = 0, ρ+(∂t(α+u+) + div (α+u+ ⊗ u+)) + α+∇P + π∇α+ = 0, ρ−(∂t(α−u−) + div (α−u− ⊗ u−)) + α−∇P + π∇α− = 0, with ρ− and ρ+ constants and P the Lagrangian multiplier associated to the constraint α+ + α− = 1.

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system A model with algebraic closure A model with a PDE closure

A model with an algebraic closure

Hyperbolic with Bestion closure namely: π = δ α+α−ρ+ρ− α+ρ− + α−ρ+ (u+ − u−)2 with δ > 1. Rq: We will see a model which shares the same form: The two-layers shallow-water system between rigid lids: See slide 14. In this model, π = 0 and a term cst∇α+ appears in the + momentum component.

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system A model with algebraic closure A model with a PDE closure

A model with an algebraic closure

Local well-posedness on an associated low mach number limit system, see [1] Global weak solutions if degenerate viscosities and capillarity terms, see [2] Invariant regions, see [2] Global weak solutions in one space dimension if degenerate viscosities, see [3] [1] D. B., M. RENARDY. Well-Posedness of Two-Layer Shallow-Water Flow Between Two Horizontal Rigid Plates. Nonlinearity , 24, 1081–1088, (2011). [2] D. B., B. DESJARDINS, J.–M. GHIDAGLIA, E. GRENIER. On Global Weak Solutions to a Generic Two-Fluid Model. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. Volume 196, Number 2, 599-629, (2009). [3] D.B., X. HUANG, J. LI. A Global Weak Solution to a One-Dimensional Non-Conservative Viscous Compressible Two-Phase System. Comm. Math. Phys., Volume 309, Issue 3, 737–755, (2012).

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system A model with algebraic closure A model with a PDE closure

A model with a PDE closure (equation on fraction)

α+ + α− = 1, ∂tα+ + uint · ∇α+ = 1 λP (P+ − P−), ∂t(α+ρ+) + div (α+ρ+u+) = 0, ∂t(α−ρ−) + div (α−ρ−u−) = 0, ∂t(α+ρ+u+) + div (α+ρ+u+ ⊗ u+) + α+∇P+ + P+

int∇α+

= 1 λu (u+ − u−), ∂t(α−ρ−u−) + div (α−ρ−u− ⊗ u−) + α−∇P− + P−

int∇α−

= 1 λu (u− − u+), with uint and P±

int respectively interface velocity and interface pressures explicitely

given in terms of the unknowns.

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system A model with algebraic closure A model with a PDE closure

A model with a PDE closure (equation on fraction)

If λu → 0, One-velocity field. See works by F. DIAS, D. DUTYKH and J.–M. GHIDAGLIA (2010) on a two-fluid model for violent aerated flows. See for instance: R. ABGRALL, C. BERTHON, F. COQUEL, S. DELLACHERIE, D.A. DREW and S.L. PASSMAN, Th. GALLOU¨

ET, M. ISHII, Ph. LE FLOCH,

  • R. SAUREL and others for modeling and numerics.
  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system A model with algebraic closure A model with a PDE closure

Letting λu and λp go formmaly to zero, we get a mono-fluid system with two species. If we consider the viscous version, we have α+ + α− = 1, P+(ρ+) = P−(ρ−), ∂t(α+ρ+) + div (α+ρ+u) = 0, ∂tρ + div (ρu) = 0, ∂t(ρu) + div (ρu ⊗ u) + ∇P+(ρ+) − µ∆u + ∇divu = 0. – Global weak solution for such system? Yes using the framework recently developed by D.B., P.–E. Jabin. Quantitative regularity estimates on appropriate unknowns needed. Work in progress with P. Mucha and E. Zatorska Note that the pressure is not monotone in a conservative variable.

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system A model with algebraic closure A model with a PDE closure

A model with a PDE closure (equation on fraction)

Viscous multi-fluid model as limit of viscous mono-fluid model: (One-velocity field), see [4], [5], [6]. [4] D.B., X. HUANG. A Multi-Fluid Compressible System as the Limit of Weak-Solutions of the Isentropic Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations.

  • Arch. Rational Mech. Analysis 201 (2), 647–680, (2011).

[5] D.B., M. HILLAIRET. Note on the derivation of multicomponent flow systems.

  • Proc. AMS, 143, 3429–2443, (2015).

[6] D.B., M. HILLAIRET. A compressible Multi-Fluid system with new physical relaxation terms. Accepted in Annales ENS (2017).

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Two-layer shallow-water flow - Results and comments

Local well posedness

LOCAL WELL POSEDNESS WITH NO-IRROTATIONALITY CONDITION Collaboration with M. RENARDY: Paper [1]

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Two-layer shallow-water flow - Results and comments

Let us consider: – Two imiscible fluids separated by an interface and confined in a fixed strip. – Two different constant densities: Density of the bottom layer > Density of the top layer. – Gravity taken into account. Performing a formal long wave asymptotic = ⇒ Two-layer shallow-water equation with constraint. This averaged system shares the same structure than a two-fluid mixture system. Remark: Mixture of two-species with divergence constraint on mean velocity: Interesting to investigate (similar systems in other applications).

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Two-layer shallow-water flow - Results and comments

Model and Theorem

The model (SW) in Ω = T2 or R2 ht + div (hv1) = 0, −ht + div ((1 − h)v2) = 0, (v1)t + (v1 · ∇)v1 + ρ − 1 ρ ∇h + 1 ρ∇p = 0, (v2)t + (v2 · ∇)v2 + ∇p = 0.

  • Remark. Indices 1 and 2 refer to the bottom and top layer respectively. Density of

bottom layer ρ = ρ1/ρ2 > 1, the top one equals 1. The depth of the bottom layer is h1 = h and top h2 = 1 − h. Gravity g is taken equal to 1.

  • Theorem. Let ρ > 1 and s > 2. Assuming that (h0, v0

1, v0 2) ∈ (Hs)5 with 0 < h0 < 1

are such that |v0

1 − v0 2|2 < (ρ − 1)(h0 + ρ(1 − h0))/ρ.

(1) is satisfied and, moreover, div (h0v0

1 + (1 − h0)v0 2) = 0. Then, there exists Tmax > 0,

and a unique maximal solution (h, v1, v2) ∈ C([0, Tmax); (Hs)5) (and a corresponding pressure p) to the system (SW), which satisfies the initial condition (h, v1, v2)|t=0 = (h0, v0

1, v0 2).

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Two-layer shallow-water flow - Results and comments

Framework and idea

Non-irrotational case: First result to the authors’s knowledge. Main result: Local well-posedness under optimal restrictions on the data by rewriting the system in an appropriate form which fits into the abstract theory of T.J.R. HUGHES, T. KATO and J.E. MARSDEN related to second order quasi-linear hyperbolic systems. Idea: Isolate the “essential” part, using the total derivative ∂t + V · ∇ operator with V the weighted average velocity V = (ρ(1 − h)v1 + hv2)/(ρ(1 − h) + h): This is known as Favre velocity. Remark that we can write an equation on h where we see the constraint in it: ( ∂ ∂t + (V · ∇))2h = (1 − h)h h + ρ(1 − h)

  • (ρ − 1)∆h−

ρ h + ρ(1 − h)((v1 − v2) · ∇)2h

  • +f2(v1, v2, h, ∇v1, ∇v2, ∇h, ht).
  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Two-layer shallow-water flow - Results and comments

Some Mathematical comments

Assumption equivalent to the one obtained by P. GUYENNE, D. LANNES, J.–C. SAUT [GLS2010] in the one-dimensional case (see (24)3) and better than the

  • ne obtained in the irrotational case (see (44)3). With our notation, Condition (44)3

in [GLS2010] reads v0

1 − v0 22 ∞ < (ρ − 1)(1 + ρ − (ρ − 1)2h0 − 1∞)/2ρ.

We note we obtain if we replace the L∞ norms by point values. Methods in GLS2010: In one-dimension, explicit relation between v1 and v2: v2 = −hv1/(1 − h). In the bi-fluid framework, no gravity inside, see B.L. KEYFITZ’s works (reduction indicated due to C.M. DAFERMOS) related to singular shocks, Riemann problems and loss of hyperbolicity. In irrotational-two dimensional case, non-local relation between v1 = ∇Φ1 and v2 = ∇Φ2 through div(h∇Φ1) = −div((1 − h)∇Φ2). The interesting difficulty being to define an appropriate non-local symmetrizer.

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Two-layer shallow-water flow - Results and comments

Some physical comments

Physical point of view: Condition arises from the competition between the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability and the stabilizing effect of gravity. Same condition obtained in the study of long wave linear stability of density stratified two layer flow with a constant velocity in each layer (take the limit k → 0 with surface tension coefficient γ = 0 and g = 1 in (3.6) of Funada-Joseph): |v1 − v2|2 ≤ tanh(kh1) ρ1 + tanh(kh2) ρ2 1 k [(ρ1 − ρ2)g + γk2] See also the recent fundamental mathematical paper D. LANNES in the nonlinear

  • framework. Note that papers T. FUNADA – D.D. JOSEPH and D. LANNES concern

potential flows.

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Two-layer shallow-water flow - Results and comments

Applications to bifluid systems and simulations.

Remark: Same kind of result in 3 dimension for s > 5/2 with application for the two-fluid models of a suspension page 903 (with no viscosity µ = 0) in R. CAFLISH, G. PAPANICOLAOU (SIAM J. Appl. Math (1983)). Remark: If no gravity and nothing more, well posedness only for analytical data (See E. GRENIER, Comm. Partial Diff. Eqs (1996)). Remark: Important to deal with non-irrotational data in bifluid framework. For instance Bestion closure in the momentum equations. Pint∇αi = δ α1α2ρ1ρ1 α2ρ1 + α1ρ2 (u1 − u2)2∇αi with δ ≥ 1. Remark: Important from a numerical point of view: Iterative scheme!

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations - some recalls Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations and Kinetic equation on defect measures The weak limit and Young measures characterization

Global weak solutions for isentropic NS equations

GLOBAL WEAK SOLUTIONS FOR ISENTROPIC NS EQUATIONS: SOME RECALLS

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations - some recalls Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations and Kinetic equation on defect measures The weak limit and Young measures characterization

The model

Let us consider the following barotropic compressible Navier-Stokes equations:

  • ∂tρ + div(ρu) = 0,

∂t(ρu) + div(ρu ⊗ u) − µ△u − (µ + λ)∇(divu) + ∇P(ρ) = 0, where ρ, u, P denote the density, velocity and pressure respectively. The pressure law is given by P(ρ) = aργ (a > 0, γ > d/2), d the space dimension, µ and λ are the shear viscosity and the bulk viscosity coefficients respectively. They satisfy the following physical restrictions: µ > 0, λ + 2 3µ ≥ 0.

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations - some recalls Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations and Kinetic equation on defect measures The weak limit and Young measures characterization

Sketch of proof

Energy estimates give ρnL∞(0,T;Lγ(Ω)) + unL2(0,T;(H1

0(Ω))3) + √ρnunL∞(0,T;(L2(Ω))3) ≤ C

therefore ρn → ρ in L∞(0, T; Lγ(Ω)) ∗ weak , un → u in L2(0, T; (L2(Ω))3 weak Thus convergence OK in each terms except the pressure one pn = aργ

n .

To prove convergence to p(ρ) = aργ, ρn → ρ in L1

loc(Q)?

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations - some recalls Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations and Kinetic equation on defect measures The weak limit and Young measures characterization

More integrability on pressure

To get rid of measure, extra information on ρn. In fact we test against ϕ = B

  • ρθ

n − (

ρθ

n)

  • /|Ω|

where B is the Bogovskii operator on Ω and 0 < θ < γ. We show T

ργ+θ

n

≤ c(T, Ω, E0), θ = 2 d γ − 1.

  • Remark. Bogovski operator applied to momentum eqs formally as divergence of the

momentum equation ∆(−(2µ + λ)divu + aργ) = div(ρ˙ u) where ˙ u = ∂tu + u · ∇u and then ρθ∆−1 applied to the resulting equation.

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations - some recalls Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations and Kinetic equation on defect measures The weak limit and Young measures characterization

Convergence

We get, using similar tools than in the incompressible setting, ρn → ρ in C0([0, T]; Lγ

weak(Ω)),

ργ

n → ργ in L(γ+θ)/γ(QT) weak,

ρnun → ρu in C0([0, T]; (L2γ/(γ+1)

weak

(Ω))3) ρnui

nuj n → ρuiuj in D′(QT).

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations - some recalls Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations and Kinetic equation on defect measures The weak limit and Young measures characterization

Convergence

Passing to the limit, we get ∂tρ + div(ρu) = 0 in D′(QT), ∂t(ρu) + div(ρu ⊗ u) − µ∆u − (λ + µ)∇divu + a∇ργ = 0 in (D′(QT))3. Difficulty: ργ = ργ, a.e. = ⇒ Compactness on {ρn}n∈N∗? Key ingredients: Effective flux G property where G = aργ

n − (2µ + λ)divun,

renormalization techniques, monotonicity and strict convexity.

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations - some recalls Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations and Kinetic equation on defect measures The weak limit and Young measures characterization

Idea – Some weak compactness

The sequence {aργ

n − (2µ + λ)divun}n∈N∗ has some weak-compactness property.

P.–L. Lions: For all function b ∈ C1([0, ∞)) satisfying some conditions at infinity, we get lim

n→∞

T

(aργ

n − (2µ + λ)divun)b(ρn)ϕ =

T

(aργ − (2µ + λ)divu)b(ρ)ϕ for all ϕ ∈ D(QT).

  • E. Feireisl: For all function b ∈ C1([0, ∞)) and all k > 0. If we denote bk the

function such that bk(s) = b(s) if s ∈ [0, k) and bk(s) = b(k) is s ∈ [k, +∞), then we get lim

n→∞

T

(aργ

n − (2µ + λ)divun)bk(ρn)ϕ =

T

(aργ − (2µ + λ)divu)bk(ρ)ϕ for all ϕ ∈ D(QT).

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations - some recalls Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations and Kinetic equation on defect measures The weak limit and Young measures characterization

Defect measures equality

P.–L. Lions: b(s) = s,

  • E. Feireisl: bk denoted Tk.

P.–L. Lions: From estimates on ρn, we have ρn ∈ L2(QT) if γ ≥ 9/5 for d = 3. Thus renormalized theorem (DI-PERNA-LIONS) is OK ∂tb(ρ) + div(b(ρ)u) + (ρb′(ρ) − b(ρ))divu = 0. If b(s) = s ln s then the momentum equation with weak-compactness gives ∂t(ρ ln ρ − ρ ln ρ) + div((ρ ln ρ − ρ ln ρ)u) = a 2µ + λ(ργρ − ργ+1) in D′(QT).

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations - some recalls Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations and Kinetic equation on defect measures The weak limit and Young measures characterization

Use of monotonicity and strict-convexity

Integration + monotonicity of s → asγ and strict-convexity of s → s ln s with s ≥ 0 implies ρ ln ρ = ρ ln ρ a.e. in QT. = ⇒ weak convergence commutes with strictly convex function = ⇒ strong convergence in L1(QT) If strong convergence in L1 of ρε

0.

Use integrability in Lγ+θ with γ > d/2 to get strong convergence of {ρn}n∈N in Lγ(QT). Important remark: If no strong convergence in L1 of initial density sequence, the weak limit may not satisfied compressible Navier-Stokes Equations but another one. We show that if initial density defect measure characterized with dirac masses, we can derive the multi-fluid system with PDE closure (Baer Nunziato model).

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations - some recalls Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations and Kinetic equation on defect measures The weak limit and Young measures characterization

The case d/2 < γ < 3d/(d + 2)

  • E. Feireisl: ρ ∈ L2(QT) =

⇒ Di-Perna and Lions theory not direct. In fact sup

k>0

lim sup

n→+∞

Tk(ρn) − Tk(ρ)γ+1

γ+1,QT ≤ c(T, Ω, E0).

= ⇒ even if the density is not square integrable, the oscillations amplitude is better is better than square integrable. = ⇒ allows to prove that (ρ, u) is a renormalized solution. = ⇒ E. Feireisl adapts P.-L. Lions trick: b(s) = Lk(s) such that sL′

k(s) − Lk(s) = Tk(s) and Lk(s) → s ln s when k → ∞. Finally ρ ln ρ = ρ ln ρ a.e.

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations - some recalls Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations and Kinetic equation on defect measures The weak limit and Young measures characterization

Weak limit and multi-fluid system justification

YOUNG MEASURE, WEAK SOLUTIONS, MULTI-FLUID SYSTEM WITH PDE CLOSURE Collaboration with X. HUANG, M. HILLAIRET: paper [4], [5], [6]

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations - some recalls Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations and Kinetic equation on defect measures The weak limit and Young measures characterization

The model

Let us consider the following barotropic compressible Navier-Stokes equations:

  • ∂tρ + div(ρu) = 0,

∂t(ρu) + div(ρu ⊗ u) − µ△u − (µ + λ)∇(divu) + ∇P(ρ) = 0, where ρ, u, P denote the density, velocity and pressure respectively. The pressure law is given by P(ρ) = aργ (a > 0, γ > 1), µ and λ are the shear viscosity and the bulk viscosity coefficients respectively. They satisfy the following physical restrictions: µ > 0, λ + 2 3µ ≥ 0.

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations - some recalls Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations and Kinetic equation on defect measures The weak limit and Young measures characterization

Remarks and references

Question: Justification of multi-fluid system from mono-fluid one with low regularity. More precisely is there exist weak sequences corresponding to concentrating density which converge to the strong solution of a viscous multi-fluid system? No oscillations-concentrations in velocity – concentrations in density. As mentioned in LIONS’s book (Remarks 5.8 and 5.9), weak limits of a sequence of solutions of compressible Navier–Stokes system with highly-oscillating density are not in general solutions of the compressible Navier-Stokes system. References:

  • D. SERRE (Physica D, (1991)) (See also W.E. (1992) and A.A. AMOSOV, A.A.

ZLOTNIK 1996) focusing on the one-dimensional case and providing a formal calculus for the multi-dimensional problem. To capture the effect of oscillations, using the renormalization procedure related to the mass equation, M. HILLAIRET (J. Math Fluid Mech, 2007) and P. PLOTNIKOV and SOKOLOWSKI (Birkhauser 2012) (following the formal calculus in D. SERRE) introduced Young measure as in the work by R. DI PERNA, A. MAJDA to describe a ”homogenized system” satisfied in the limit: = ⇒ Kinetic Equation on the Young measures.

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations - some recalls Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations and Kinetic equation on defect measures The weak limit and Young measures characterization

Open and known results

In M. HILLAIRET’s paper, we still do not know whether the obtained solution of the multi-fluid system are weak limit to finite-energy weak solutions of compressible Navier-Stokes equations.

  • M. HILLAIRET (2007): Formal deduction of the multi-fluid system from the weak

limit system. Remark: Existence and uniqueness of local strong solution of the viscous multi-fluid system has been established by M. HILLAIRET far from vacuum.

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations - some recalls Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations and Kinetic equation on defect measures The weak limit and Young measures characterization

Weak-compactness of the effective flux

Important Lemma (due to P.–L. LIONS): Given b ∈ C1(R+) such that b′(z) = 0 for z sufficiently large with compact support, let b((ρn) converge to b in L∞(QT) endowed with its weak star topology. We have: lim

n→+∞

T

[(p(ρn) − (λ + 2µ)div(un))b(ρn))φ(t, x) dxdt = T

[(q − (λ + 2µ)div(u))b)φ(t, x) dxdt for all φ ∈ D(QT).

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations - some recalls Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations and Kinetic equation on defect measures The weak limit and Young measures characterization

The limit system

Assume (ρn, un) be finite-energy weak solutions to NS eqs and ρn ⇀ ρ in L∞(0, T; Lγ(T3)) ⋆ weak, un ⇀ u in L2(0, T; H1(T3)), ρ ∈ L∞(0, T; Lγ(T3)), u ∈ L2(0, T; H1(T3)). Then there exists a measurable family of probability measures, we denote (ν(t,x)) such that

1

We have < ν, Id >= ρ and < ν, p >= q, in a sense precised in next slide.

2

For all b ∈ C(R+), smooth, with compact support, (< ν, b >)t + div(< ν, b > u)+ < ν, (Id b

′ − b) > div(u)

= < ν, (Id b

′ − b) > q− < ν, (Id b ′ − b)p >

λ + 2µ .

3

Finally,

  • ∂tρ + div(ρu) = 0,

∂t(ρu) + div(ρu ⊗ u) − µ△u − (µ + λ)∇(divu) + ∇q = 0,

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations - some recalls Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations and Kinetic equation on defect measures The weak limit and Young measures characterization

Definition

Actually, as in E. FEIREISL, we define < ν, Id >= lim

k→∞ < ν, Tk ◦ Id >, < ν, p >= lim k→∞ < ν, Tk ◦ p >,

where Tk(z) = min{z, k} is a family of truncation functions. However, if ρn is uniformly bounded in both space and time, then 1) in previous slide holds in a classical sense. This will be the case since we will consider weak sequences with uniformly bounded density.

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations - some recalls Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations and Kinetic equation on defect measures The weak limit and Young measures characterization

The multi-fluid model – Strong solution

If Young measures are assumed to be convex combinations of Dirac measures, i.e: ν(t,x) =

m

  • i=1

αi1(t, x)δρi1(t,x), ∀(t, x) ∈ (0, T) × Ω. Using such hypothesis, the homogeneized compressible Navier-Stokes system reads:          (αi1)t + u1 · ∇αi1 = fαi1, i = 1, . . . , m αi1

  • (ρi1)t + div(ρi1u1)) = αi1fρi1,

i = 1, . . . , m ∂tρ + div(ρu1) = 0, ∂t(ρu1) + div(ρu1 ⊗ u1) + ∇q = µ△u1 + (µ + λ)∇(divu1), fαi1 = αi1(aργ

i1 − q)

λ + 2µ , fρi1 = ρi1(q − aργ

i1)

λ + 2µ 0 ≤ αi1,

m

  • i=1

αi1 = 1 ρ =

m

  • i=1

αi1ρi1, q = a

m

  • i=1

αi1ργ

i1,

where ρi1, u1 denotes the density, velocity respectively and αi1 is the coefficients.

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations - some recalls Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations and Kinetic equation on defect measures The weak limit and Young measures characterization

This gives the multi-fluid system with PDE closure !! It is interesting to note that the relaxation quantity λp given in the first part is linked to the viscosities λ and µ. A more general relaxation term will be obtained if we start from the density dependent viscosity case.

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations - some recalls Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations and Kinetic equation on defect measures The weak limit and Young measures characterization

Sketch of proof

First Result: Solution of the multi-fluid system obtained as weak limit to finite-energy weak solutions of compressible Navier-Stokes equations ? Explicit oscillating initial data and extension of HOFF’s paper (with M. HILLAIRET) = ⇒ Model is linked to the BAER-NUNZIATO model. To be able to characterize the propagation of Young measure, need of more regularity

  • n the velocity field with only L∞ bound on the density:

= ⇒ Hoff’s regularity framework. Weak sequence related to the existence result by B. DESJARDINS. Given initial data ρ0 ∈ L∞(T3), ρ0 ≥ 0, u0 ∈ H1(T3). There exists T0 ∈ (0, ∞) and a weak solution (ρ, u) to the compressible Naiver-Stokes equations with (ρ, ρu)|t=0 = (ρ0, ρ0u0). For all 0 < T < T0, ρ ∈ L∞((0, T) × T3) ∩ C([0, T]; Lq(T3)), for all q ∈ [1, ∞) ∇u ∈ L∞(0, T; (L2(T3))9). √ρ∂tu ∈ (L2((0, T) × T3))3, Pu ∈ L2(0, T; H2(T3)), G = (λ + 2µ)divu − p(ρ) ∈ L2((0, T); H1(T3)), where P denotes the projection on the space of divergence-free vector fields.

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations - some recalls Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations and Kinetic equation on defect measures The weak limit and Young measures characterization

Some remarks

The L∞ bound on ρn

0 is also assumed in D. SERRE (one-dimensional case). This is

also required in weak-strong uniqueness by B. DESJARDINS, P. GERMAIN. We will also consider ρn

0 ≥ C > 0 as in D. SERRE’s paper for the full mathematical

justification the multi-fluid system. Note that steps divu ∈ L1(0, T; L∞(T3)) and defect measure characterization do not assume to be far from vacuum. Initial density sequence (ρn

0)n∈N far from vacuum is necessary for justification of the

multi-fluid system.

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations - some recalls Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations and Kinetic equation on defect measures The weak limit and Young measures characterization

Sketch of proof

Prove that weak sequence based on B. DESJARDINS’s lemma has extra-regularity. Namely, divu ∈ L1(0, T; L∞(T3)).

  • B. Desjardins’s weak sequence satisfies:

sup

0<t≤T

∇u2 + T

  • T3 ρ|˙

u|2 ≤ C, (2) with ˙ u the total time derivative. Write now extra estimates following D. HOFF’s Ideas. First step : sup

0<t≤T

(G2 + ω2) ≤ C, ∇G6 + ∇ω6 ≤ C(ρ

1 2 ˙

u2 + ∇˙ u2), G = (2µ + λ)divu − P, ω = ∇ × u where G and ω denote the effective viscous flux and vorticity, respectively.

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations - some recalls Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations and Kinetic equation on defect measures The weak limit and Young measures characterization

Sketch of proof

This step uses the equation ∇G − µ∇ × ω = ρ˙ u and standard Lp elliptic estimates since ∆G = div(ρ˙ u), µ∆ω = ∇ × (ρ˙ u). We use also the following inequality v(L6(T3))3 ≤ C(

  • T3 ρv + ∇v(L2(T3))9)

such that v ∈ (H1(T3))3 and ρ a non negative function such that

  • T3 ρ ≥ C > 0.
  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations - some recalls Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations and Kinetic equation on defect measures The weak limit and Young measures characterization

Sketch of proof

Second step : Deduce the following estimate sup

0<t≤T

  • T3 σρ|˙

u|2 + T

  • T3 σ|∇˙

u|2 ≤ C where σ = min(1, t). This estimate is deduced operating σ(∂t + div(u·)) on the momentum equation and taking the scalar product with ˙ u and summing. We control high power norm using the link between ∇u and G, ω and p.

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations - some recalls Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations and Kinetic equation on defect measures The weak limit and Young measures characterization

Sketch of proof

Use this estimate, the ones in previous slide and the expression of G, to deduce the result that means: divu ∈ L1(0, T; L∞(T3)). The key part is that we can use interpolation on G and the bound T ∇˙ u3/4

L2 ≤ C

T σ∇˙ u2

L2

3/8 T σ−3/55/8. Remark: In Recent HOFF-SANTOS’s paper, ρ0 ∈ L∞ and u0 ∈ Hs + smallness assumption and relation betweeg λ and µ is considered. Propagation of singularity result when s > 1/2: such regularity implies also divu ∈ L1L∞. If local existence with same kind of estimates thus OK. No direct interpolation easily.

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations - some recalls Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations and Kinetic equation on defect measures The weak limit and Young measures characterization

Sketch of proof

Fourth step: Use a weak-strong procedure to prove that the strong solution built by

  • M. HILLAIRET corresponds to the weak limit. This use that divu ∈ L1L∞ and

ρ ∈ L∞.

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations - some recalls Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations and Kinetic equation on defect measures The weak limit and Young measures characterization

Sketch of proof

Important remarks: Assumptions on ρ0 same than D. SERRE (1991) in the one-dimensional case. Note that Young measures characterization is needed looking at three moments since (θ0, θ1) = (0, 1) to prove that ν(t,x) = δ(ρ(t,x),m(t,x)) in vanishing viscosity for compressible Euler flow, see G.Q. CHEN, M. PEREPELITSA, (2009) (Physical viscosity limit of solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations to a finite-energy entropy solution of the isentropic Euler equations with finite-energy initial data, 1D case linked to adequate energy estimates and reduction of measure-valued solutions with unbounded support).

  • Y. BRENIER, C. DE LELLIS, L. SZ´

EKELYHIDI JR. (2010): Weak strong

uniqueness for measure valued solutions. Argument based on admissible solution of Euler such that T

0 D(u)∞ < +∞. Linked to the Blow-up

criteria for Euler system (see G. PONCE (1985)). For compressible Navier-Stokes equations: Blow-up criteria linked to T

0 divu∞ < +∞ or

T

0 ρ∞ < +∞ (see recent papers by X.HUANG, J. LI and Z.P. XIN, B.

HASPOT, Z. ZHANG ....).

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations - some recalls Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations and Kinetic equation on defect measures The weak limit and Young measures characterization

It is possible to consider the density dependent viscosity compressible Navier-Stokes

  • equations. In the one-dimensional in space case we get the following system

∂tαi + ∂x(αiu) = αi µ(ρi)fi ∂tρi + u∂xρi = − ρi µ(ρi)fi ∂t(ρu) + ∂x(ρu2) = ∂x[µ∂xu − p] for 1 ≤ i ≤ k with fi = 1 k

j=1

αj µ(ρj)

∂xu −

k

  • j=1

αj p(ρj) µ(ρj)   + p(ρi) for 1 ≤ i ≤ k µ = 1 k

i=1

αi µ(ρi) , p =

k

  • i=1

αip(ρi) µ(ρi) k

i=1

αi µ(ρi) . Work with M. Hillairet: Annales ENS (2017).

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations - some recalls Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations and Kinetic equation on defect measures The weak limit and Young measures characterization

With constant viscosities, this reads:

  • αi = 1,

(3) ∂tαi + u · ∇αi = αi(aργ

i − π)

λ + 2µ , (4) ∂tρi + div(ρiu) = ρi(π − aργ

i )

λ + 2µ , (5) ∂t(ρu) + div(ρu ⊗ u) + ∇π = µ∆u + (λ + µ)∇divu (6) where (ρ, u) are given by ρ =

  • αiρi

and π =

  • αiq(ρi).
  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Some multi-fluid systems Local well-posedness - A physical example of bifluid system Multi-fluid model as limit of mono-fluid system Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations - some recalls Isentropic Navier-Stokes equations and Kinetic equation on defect measures The weak limit and Young measures characterization

Thanks for your attention !!!

  • D. Bresch

Some mathematical results on mixture flows.