some fra ss e classes of finite integral
play

Some Fra ss e Classes of Finite Integral Cherlin Metric Spaces - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Some Fra ss e Classes of Finite Integral Metric Spaces Gregory Some Fra ss e Classes of Finite Integral Cherlin Metric Spaces Metrically Ho- mogeneous Graphs Finite Distance Transitive Graphs Homogeneous Gregory Cherlin


  1. Some Fra¨ ıss´ e Classes of Finite Integral Metric Spaces Gregory Some Fra¨ ıss´ e Classes of Finite Integral Cherlin Metric Spaces Metrically Ho- mogeneous Graphs Finite Distance Transitive Graphs Homogeneous Gregory Cherlin Graphs Homogeneous Metric Spaces A Catalog Special Cases Generic Cases Proofs Conclusion Bertinoro, May 27

  2. Some Fra¨ ıss´ e Classes of Finite Integral Metric Spaces Metrically Homogeneous Graphs 1 Gregory Finite Distance Transitive Graphs Cherlin Homogeneous Graphs Metrically Ho- Homogeneous Metric Spaces mogeneous Graphs Finite Distance Transitive Graphs Homogeneous A Catalog 2 Graphs Homogeneous Special Cases Metric Spaces A Catalog Generic Cases Special Cases Proofs Generic Cases Proofs Conclusion Conclusion 3

  3. The Classification Problem Some Fra¨ ıss´ e Classes of Finite Integral Metric Spaces Gregory Cherlin Γ connected, with graph metric d . Metrically Ho- Γ is metrically homogeneous if the metric space (Γ , d ) is mogeneous Graphs (ultra)homogeneous. Finite Distance Transitive Graphs (Cameron 1998) Classify the countable metrically Homogeneous Graphs Homogeneous homogeneous graphs. Metric Spaces Contexts: infinite distance transitive graphs, homogeneous A Catalog Special Cases graphs, homogeneous metric spaces Generic Cases Proofs Conclusion

  4. Finite Distance Transitive Graphs Some Fra¨ ıss´ e Classes of Finite Integral Metric Spaces Gregory Cherlin distance transitivity = metric homogeneity for pairs Metrically Ho- mogeneous Graphs Smith’s Theorem: Finite Distance Transitive Graphs • Imprimitive case: Bipartite or Antipodal (or a cycle) Homogeneous Graphs Antipodal: maximal distance δ Homogeneous Metric Spaces • Reduction to the primitive case (halving, folding) A Catalog Special Cases Generic Cases Proofs Conclusion

  5. Classification of Homogeneous Graphs Metrically homogeneous diameter ≤ 2 = Homogeneous. Some Fra¨ ıss´ e Classes of (The metric is the graph) Finite Integral Metric Spaces e Constructions: Henson graphs H n , H c Fra¨ ıss´ Gregory n Cherlin Lachlan-Woodrow 1980 The homogeneous graphs are Metrically Ho- m · K n and its complement; mogeneous Graphs The pentagon and the line graph of K 3 , 3 (3 × 3 grid) Finite Distance Transitive Graphs The Henson graphs and their complements (including Homogeneous Graphs Homogeneous the Rado graph) Metric Spaces A Catalog Method: Induction on Amalgamation Classes Special Cases Generic Cases Claim: If A is an amalgamation class of finite graphs Proofs containing all graphs of order 3, I ∞ , and K n , then A contains Conclusion every K n + 1 -free graph. Proof by induction on the order | A | where A is K n + 1 -free This doesn’t work directly, but a stronger statement can be proved by induction.

  6. Induction via Amalgamation Some Fra¨ ıss´ e Classes of Finite Integral Metric Spaces A ′ is the set of finite graphs G such that any 1-point Gregory extension of G lies in A . Cherlin Inductive claim: Every finite graph belongs to A ′ . Metrically Ho- mogeneous Not making much progress yet, but . . . Graphs Finite Distance Transitive Graphs 1-complete: complete. 0-complete: co-complete. Homogeneous Graphs A p is the set of finite graphs G such that any finite Homogeneous Metric Spaces p -complete graph extension of G belongs to A . A Catalog A p ⊆ A ′ Special Cases Generic Cases A p is an amalgamation class Proofs Conclusion Target: The generators of A all lie in one A p , for some p .

  7. Lachlan’s Ramsey Argument Some Fra¨ ıss´ e Classes of Finite Integral Metric Spaces How to get into A p : Gregory Cherlin Metrically Ho- 1-point extensions of a large direct sum ⊕ A i mogeneous Graphs = ⇒ Finite Distance Transitive Graphs p -extensions of one of the A i . Homogeneous Graphs Homogeneous Metric Spaces If A i is itself a direct sum of generators, we get a fixed value A Catalog Special Cases of p . Generic Cases Proofs First used for tournaments: Lachlan 1984, cf. Cherlin 1988 Conclusion

  8. Homogeneous Metric Spaces Some Fra¨ ıss´ e Classes of Finite Integral Metric Spaces Gregory Cherlin Rational-valued Urysohn space. Z -valued Urysohn space is a metrically homogeneous Metrically Ho- mogeneous space. Graphs Finite Distance Or Z ∩ [ 0 , δ ] -valued. Transitive Graphs Homogeneous S -valued: Van Th´ e AMS Memoir 2010 Graphs Homogeneous Metric Spaces A metrically homogeneous graph of diameter δ is: A Catalog A Z -valued homogeneous metric space with bound δ , and Special Cases Generic Cases all triangles ( 1 , i , i + 1 ) allowed (connectivity). Proofs Conclusion

  9. Some Fra¨ ıss´ e Classes of Finite Integral Metric Spaces Metrically Homogeneous Graphs 1 Gregory Finite Distance Transitive Graphs Cherlin Homogeneous Graphs Metrically Ho- Homogeneous Metric Spaces mogeneous Graphs Finite Distance Transitive Graphs Homogeneous A Catalog 2 Graphs Homogeneous Special Cases Metric Spaces A Catalog Generic Cases Special Cases Proofs Generic Cases Proofs Conclusion Conclusion 3

  10. Special Cases Some Fra¨ ıss´ e Classes of Finite Integral Metric Spaces Gregory Cherlin Metrically Ho- Diameter ≤ 2 (Lachlan/Woodrow 1980) mogeneous Graphs Locally finite (Cameron, Macpherson) Finite Distance Transitive Graphs Homogeneous Γ 1 -exceptional Graphs Homogeneous Metric Spaces Imprimitive (Smith’s Theorem) A Catalog Special Cases Generic Cases Proofs Conclusion

  11. The Locally Finite Case Some Fra¨ ıss´ e Finite of diameter at least 3 and vertex degree at least 3: Classes of Antipodal double covers of certain finite homogeneous Finite Integral Metric Spaces graphs (Cameron 1980) Gregory Cherlin Metrically Ho- mogeneous Graphs Finite Distance Transitive Graphs Homogeneous Graphs Homogeneous Metric Spaces A Catalog Special Cases Generic Cases Proofs Conclusion Figure: Antipodal Double cover of C 5 Infinite, Locally Finite: Tree-like T r , s (Macpherson 1982) Construction:

  12. The graphs T r , s Some Fra¨ ıss´ e Classes of Finite Integral Metric Spaces The trees T ( r , s ) : Alternately r -branching and s -branching. Gregory Bipartite, metrically homogeneous if the two halves of the Cherlin partition are kept fixed. Metrically Ho- mogeneous The graph obtained by “halving” on the r -branching side is Graphs Finite Distance T r , s . Transitive Graphs Homogeneous Graphs Each vertex lies at the center of a bouquet of r s -cliques. Homogeneous Metric Spaces Another point of view: the graph on the neighbors of a fixed A Catalog Special Cases vertex: Generic Cases Proofs Γ 1 : r · K s − 1 . Conclusion From this point of view, we may also take r or s to be infinite!

  13. Γ 1 Some Fra¨ ıss´ e Classes of Γ i = Γ i ( v ) : Distance i , with the induced metric. Finite Integral Metric Spaces Remark Gregory Cherlin If distance 1 occurs, then the connected components of Γ i Metrically Ho- are metrically homogeneous. mogeneous Graphs Finite Distance In particular Γ 1 is a homogeneous graph. Transitive Graphs Homogeneous Graphs Exceptional Cases: finite, imprimitive, or H c n . Homogeneous Metric Spaces The finite case is Cameron+Macpherson, the imprimitive A Catalog case leads back to T r , s with r or s infinite, and H c n does not Special Cases Generic Cases occur for n > 2 (Cherlin 2011) Proofs Conclusion In other words, the nonexceptional cases are I ∞ Henson graphs H n including Rado’s graph.

  14. Imprimitive Graphs Some Fra¨ ıss´ e “Smith’s Theorem” (Amato/Macpherson, Cherlin): Classes of Finite Integral Part I: Bipartite or antipodal, and in the antipodal case with Metric Spaces classes of order 2 and the metric antipodal law for the Gregory Cherlin pairing: d ( x , y ′ ) = δ − d ( x , y ) Metrically Ho- mogeneous Graphs Hence no triangles of diameter greater than 2 δ : Finite Distance Transitive Graphs Homogeneous Graphs d ( x , z ) ≤ d ( x , y ′ ) + d ( y ′ , z ) = 2 δ − d ( x , y ) − d ( x , z ) Homogeneous Metric Spaces A Catalog Part II: The bipartite case reduces by halving to a case in Special Cases Generic Cases which Γ 1 is the Rado graph. Proofs Conclusion On the other hand, the antipodal case does not reduce: while distance transitivity is inherited after “folding,” metric homogeneity is not. There is also a bipartite antipodal case.

  15. Some Amalgamation Classes Some Fra¨ ıss´ e Within A δ : finite integral metric spaces with bound δ : Classes of Finite Integral Metric Spaces A δ K , even: No odd cycles below 2 K + 1. Gregory A δ Cherlin C , bounded: Perimeter at most C . Metrically Ho- ( 1 , δ ) -constraints. mogeneous Graphs The first two classes are given (implicitly) in Finite Distance Transitive Graphs Homogeneous Komjath/Mekler/Pach 1988 as examples of constraints Graphs Homogeneous admitting a universal graph, which is constructed by Metric Spaces A Catalog amalgamation. Special Cases The last is a generalization of Henson’s construction. A Generic Cases Proofs ( 1 , δ ) -space is a space in which only the distances 1 and δ Conclusion occur (a vacuous condition if δ = 2). Any set S of ( 1 , δ ) -constraints may be imposed. Mixing: A δ K , C ; S

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend