soci 424 networks social structures
play

SOCI 424: Networks & Social Structures Sept. 28 1. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SOCI 424: Networks & Social Structures Sept. 28 1. Administrative 2. Structure and homophily 3. Dyads and triads 1 Administrative Lab 1 due today Turn in via Campuswire DM or email Lab 2 today or tomorrow Help sessions Help


  1. SOCI 424: Networks & Social Structures Sept. 28 1. Administrative 2. Structure and homophily 3. Dyads and triads 1

  2. Administrative Lab 1 due today ⦙ Turn in via Campuswire DM or email ⦙ Lab 2 today or tomorrow Help sessions ⦙ Help sessions scheduled will be Thursdays from 10:30-11:30am 2

  3. Citation Data & Structure 
 homophily 3

  4. Structure and homophily Homophily McPherson, Smith-Lovin, and Cook (2001) ⦙ (Canonical) review of research on types, rates, and causes of homophily ⦙ Almost 20 years old Baseline homophily ⦙ Homophily just based on who is available to connect with ⦙ E.g., baseline homophily on country of birth for Canadian residents would be about 78.55% for those born in Canada “Inbreeding” homophily ⦙ Choice : preference to form, e.g., trust relations with people with similar experiences ⦙ Structural : increased opportunities to form ties with similar alters due to, e.g., residential segregation, religious practices, homogenous professional networks, etc. 4

  5. Structure and homophily Homophily as cause or consequence of ties? Similarity can lead to relations ⦙ People with similar interests, experiences, tastes, beliefs may prefer to form and maintain ties with each other Relations can lead to similarity ⦙ People who are tied together in a social network may converge in characteristics ⦙ E.g. transmission of behavior (smoking) or shared experiences (attending the same school) 5

  6. Structure and homophily Homophily as structuring force Tendency toward homophily can influence the overall structure of a network ⦙ Dense ties within categories ⦙ Sparse ties between categories Simple example ⦙ 50 nodes, ties are 9 times more likely within categories than between ⦙ Quickly leads to bifurcated network ⦙ This structure has consequences for the flow of information, opportunities, epidemiology, etc. 6

  7. Citation Data & Dyads 
 triads 7

  8. Dyads Types of dyads Murray Cher Josh Josh mutual Dionne Christian Cher Tai Josh asymmetric T ai Tai Cher Travis null Elton Dyad census 4 Amber 4 28 8

  9. Triads Types of triads Murray + + + + + + . . . ?? + + + + /& A A . . .+A. 0-e + Josh 210 201 12oc Dionne + . . . + + + A //k . . Christian + + 8% . . . . ? ‘* ? + + + 120D 12ou 1llD 1llU Cher + + . . . + /A . . .+--t . + + + + - _ T ai A I+\ . .m. . + + 102 03oc 021c . . . + fk . . + - _ & (k .4--). .--_). Travis 021D 021u 012 003 Fig. 1. The 16 triad types. Elton Johnsen, Eugene C. 1985. “Network Macrostructure Models for the Davis- in V, which makes M and A but not N reflexive on V as well. Now, Leinhardt Set of Empirical Sociomatrices.” Social Networks 7 (3): 203–24. among a set of three distinct vertices from V there are 16 different of M, A and N connections between the pairs of vertices combinations in the set. Each combination is a triucl fvpe expressed as an ordered triple of nonnegative integers, nz : u: n, where u and 17 are the tn. of M, A and N relations, numbers respectively, and + ~7 = 3, n7 + CI together with a special letter C, D, T or U standing for “cyclic”, “down”, “transitive”, or “ up”. The set 0 of the 16 different triad types is given in Figure 1. Amber Now, various group structure models X can be defined in terms of the subset P, of 0, of all triads permitted to appear in the structure, P,; = 0 - P,y of all triads forbidden and its complementary subset to appear. Clearly, only P,y or P,:. need be specified in order to define the 9

  10. Triads Triad census Murray 38 Josh Dionne 15 Christian Cher 21 T ai 1 Travis Elton 2 3 Amber 4 10

  11. Triads Triads, so what? Triads can be explained in terms of behavior ⦙ E.g. transitivity of close ties ⦙ E.g. intransitivity of “opposite” gender relationships ⦙ (Always at most a tendency ) (Near) absence of certain types of triads limits overall social structures ⦙ Theories of ‘structural balance’ ⦙ Whole body of literature on “forbidden triad” sets and their analytically implied structures ⦙ E.g. “ranked clusters” (Davis and Leinhardt 1972) Meaningful, but incomplete ⦙ Does not describe specific relations, individual positions, etc. ⦙ Strictly limited triads almost never occur in empirical networks 11

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend