small and large systems
play

small and large systems Maciej Lewicki maciej.lewicki@uwr.edu.pl - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Excited QCD Krynica-Zdrj, Feb 5, 2020 News from NA61/SHINE: small and large systems Maciej Lewicki maciej.lewicki@uwr.edu.pl University of Wrocaw Institute of Theoretical Physics Section 1 Studies of the Onset of Deconfinement Phase


  1. Excited QCD Krynica-Zdrój, Feb 5, 2020 News from NA61/SHINE: small and large systems Maciej Lewicki maciej.lewicki@uwr.edu.pl University of Wrocław Institute of Theoretical Physics

  2. Section 1 Studies of the Onset of Deconfinement

  3. Phase Transitions in QCD T (temperature) LHC RHIC QGP SPS 1 s t o r d e r p h a s e t r a n s i t i o n HG µ B (bary on chemical potential) Maciej Lewicki (UWr) Small and large systems @NA61/SHINE Feb 5, 2020 1 / 29

  4. Phase Transitions in QCD T (temperature) c o l l i s i o n Becattini, Manninen, Gaździcki e n e r g Phys. Rev. C 73, 044905 (2006) y system size QGP SPS 1 s t o r d e r p h a s e t r a n s i t i o n HG µ B (bary on chemical potential) Maciej Lewicki (UWr) Small and large systems @NA61/SHINE Feb 5, 2020 1 / 29

  5. Strangeness as a probe of deconfinement No strangeness content in colliding nuclei. Sensitive to the state of matter created in the fireball. confined matter quark-gluon plasma T C ≈ 150 MeV K mesons − → (anti-)strange quarks 2: q , ¯ q g K = 4 g s = 12 Phase transition 2 × spin 3 × color 2 M ≈ 2 · 500 MeV 2 m ≈ 2 · 100 MeV Lightest strangeness carriers: relatively heavy kaons ( M > T C ) in the confined phase, relatively light strange quarks ( m � T C ) in QGP. Maciej Lewicki (UWr) Small and large systems @NA61/SHINE Feb 5, 2020 2 / 29

  6. Main strangeness carriers in A+A collisions at high µ B strangeness conservation ¯ s s = isospin isospin symmetry symmetry ≈ ≈ ¯ K + K 0 K − K 0 ≪ high baryon ≈ density high baryon density ≪ ¯ Λ Λ – sensitive to strangeness content only – sensitive to strangeness content and baryon density p + p → p + Λ + K + + π 0 ≈ [GeV] 0.94 + 0.94 → 0.94 + 1.12 + 0.49 + 0.14 p + p → p + p + K + + K − ≈ [GeV] 0.94 + 0.94 → 0.94 + 0.94 + 0.49 + 0.49 The first option is almost 200MeV "cheaper". Maciej Lewicki (UWr) Small and large systems @NA61/SHINE Feb 5, 2020 3 / 29

  7. Strange definitions Strangeness production � N s ¯ s � – number of s - ¯ s pairs produced in a collision. s � = � Λ + ¯ Λ � + � K + ¯ 2 · � N s ¯ K � + � φ � + . . . multistrange hyperons Maciej Lewicki (UWr) Small and large systems @NA61/SHINE Feb 5, 2020 4 / 29

  8. Strange definitions Strangeness production � N s ¯ s � – number of s - ¯ s pairs produced in a collision. s � = � Λ + ¯ Λ � + � K + ¯ 2 · � N s ¯ K � + � φ � + . . . multistrange hyperons s � ≈ � Λ � + � K + + K − + K 0 + ¯ K 0 � 2 · � N s ¯ ∝ � π � Entropy production The experimental ratio of strangeness to entropy can be defined as: E S = � Λ � + � K + ¯ K � 2 · � N s ¯ s � ≈ � π � � π � � π � ≈ 3 s � ≈ � K + � + � K 0 � 2 · � K + � , � π + � + � π − � � � � N s ¯ ≈ 2 � K + � � K + � � N s ¯ s � ≈ 2 E S ≈ 4 � π + � , � π + � � π � 3 3 Maciej Lewicki (UWr) Small and large systems @NA61/SHINE Feb 5, 2020 4 / 29

  9. Section 2 Theoretical Models

  10. Models of strangeness production There are multiple approaches to describe the strangeness production in HIC. I want to briefly introduce some of them: Statistical Models: ◮ Hadron Resonance Gas ◮ Statistical Hadronization Model ◮ Statistical Model of Early Stage include deconfinement Dynamical Models: explicitly ◮ Rafelski-Müller toy model ◮ Parton-Hadron String Dynamics Maciej Lewicki (UWr) Small and large systems @NA61/SHINE Feb 5, 2020 5 / 29

  11. Hadron Resonance Gas → Assumption of chemical equilibrium. Density of particle species i : p 2 dp ∂ lnZ i n i ( µ, T ) = N i V = − T = g i � , µ i = µ B B i + µ S S i + µ I 3 I 3 , i Ei − µ i V ∂µ 2 π 2 e ± 1 T Chemical potentials µ i constrained by conservation laws: � V n i B i = Z + N → µ B baryon number: i 3 equations, 5 unknowns � n i S i = 0 → µ s strangeness: V ↓ i 2 free parameters n i I 3 , i = Z − N charge: � V → µ I 3 , i 2 i Two free parameters ( T , µ B ) are fitted to experimental data on particle yields. Maciej Lewicki (UWr) Small and large systems @NA61/SHINE Feb 5, 2020 6 / 29

  12. Particle yields – input to HRG model dN/dy N part =350 10 2 10 π + π - 1 – p p K + K - – Λ Λ -1 10 AGS SPS RHIC 2 10 10 √ s NN (GeV) The energy dependence of experimental hadron yields at mid-rapidity for various species produced in central nucleus-nucleus collisions. (Andronic, Braun-Munzinger, Stachel; Nucl.Phys.A772:167-199,2006) Maciej Lewicki (UWr) Small and large systems @NA61/SHINE Feb 5, 2020 7 / 29

  13. Hadron Resonance Gas (Andronic, Braun-Munzinger, Stachel; Nucl.Phys. A834 (2010) 237C-240C) Maciej Lewicki (UWr) Small and large systems @NA61/SHINE Feb 5, 2020 8 / 29

  14. Statistical Hadronization – γ s , γ q Results on strangess in HRG were not satisfactory. Parameter of "phase-space occupancy" γ s introduced to improve the fits: Due to larger mass of s quark it requires more time to saturate and so it doesn’t reach equilibrium value. → γ s < 1 at lower collision energies (AGS, SPS). → γ s = 1 at higher energies (from RHIC). Maciej Lewicki (UWr) Small and large systems @NA61/SHINE Feb 5, 2020 9 / 29

  15. Statistical Hadronization – γ s , γ q Results on strangess in HRG were not satisfactory. Parameter of "phase-space occupancy" γ s introduced to improve the fits: Due to larger mass of s quark it requires more time to saturate and so it doesn’t reach equilibrium value. → γ s < 1 at lower collision energies (AGS, SPS). → γ s = 1 at higher energies (from RHIC). Later on γ q was introduced to tune the fits for u , d quarks. Maciej Lewicki (UWr) Small and large systems @NA61/SHINE Feb 5, 2020 9 / 29

  16. Statistical Hadronization – γ s , γ q dotted: γ q , γ s = 1 dashed: γ q = 1 , γ s < 1 but is it still a statistical model? solid: γ q , γ s < 1 (J. Rafelski; Eur.Phys.J.ST 155 (2008) 139-166) Maciej Lewicki (UWr) Small and large systems @NA61/SHINE Feb 5, 2020 10 / 29

  17. Strangeness in Statistical Model of Early Stage � MT � 3 / 2 e − M / T ≈ gV � gV 1 for heavy particles 2 π d 3 p � n � = e E / T ± 1 ( 2 π ) 3 gV 2 π 2 4 · 45 T 3 ≈ for light particles > non-strange < < N ss > / - T MT 3 / 2 � u + d + g � ∝ T 3 � K � � s � · e − M / T ∝ T 3 = const ( T ) � π � T 3 Gaździcki, Gorenstein, Acta Phys.Polon. B30 (1999) 2705 Maciej Lewicki (UWr) Small and large systems @NA61/SHINE Feb 5, 2020 11 / 29

  18. Strangeness in Statistical Model of Early Stage Strange/non-strange Temperature dependence on collision energy in SMES : particle ratio: > T[MeV] 300 non-strange 250 QGP 200 < 150 < N ss > / - 100 0 5 10 15 20 25 s NN [GeV] s NN Crossing the phase transition leads to a decrease of the strange/non-strange particle ratio – the horn-like structure – Mareks’ horn. Maciej Lewicki (UWr) Small and large systems @NA61/SHINE Feb 5, 2020 12 / 29

  19. Dynamical Approach by Rafelski-Müller strangeness production in confined matter strangeness production in QGP N + N → N + Y + K q 1 k 1 π + N → K + Y k π + N → K + Y 2 -q 2 π + Y → Ξ + K π + Y → Ξ + K k 1 q 1 k π + Ξ → Ω + K -q π + Ξ → Ω + K 2 2 1 fm/ c 100 fm/ c (Rafelski, Müller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 1066) Maciej Lewicki (UWr) Small and large systems @NA61/SHINE Feb 5, 2020 13 / 29

  20. Rafelski-Müller Dynamical Approach > non-strange QGP < < N ss > / - s NN Equilibrium value reached in QGP ← fast strangeness production. No enhancement in the confined phase ← slow strangeness production in whole hadronic region. Deconfinement happens in the collisions of heavy ions, but not in p+p interactions. → explanation for system size dependence ( A+A vs p+p ). Maciej Lewicki (UWr) Small and large systems @NA61/SHINE Feb 5, 2020 14 / 29

  21. PHSD model with & without C hiral S ymmetry R estoration in the confined phase Implements the onset of deconfinement. Without CSR – prediction of PHSD qualitatively resembles predictions of the Rafelski-Müller model. With CSR – enhanced strangeness production in the confined phase. The strange quark mass used in the string decay Schwinger-formula in assumed to decrease with energy density, while still in the confined phase. (Palmese et al. , PRC94 (2016) 044912) Maciej Lewicki (UWr) Small and large systems @NA61/SHINE Feb 5, 2020 15 / 29

  22. Collision energy dependence of strangeness production "horn" plot SMES 0) Pb+Pb Au+Au > ≈ (y LHC non-strange AGS + SPS NA49 π / RHIC + K 0.2 QGP < < N ss > / 0.1 - 0 2 4 10 10 s NN 1 s [GeV] NN Qualitatively, heavy-ion data follows dependence predicted by SMES . Maciej Lewicki (UWr) Small and large systems @NA61/SHINE Feb 5, 2020 16 / 29

  23. Before NA61/SHINE No precise baseline of p+p collisions. No data on system size dependence of particle production at SPS energies – vicinity of the onset of deconfinement. Maciej Lewicki (UWr) Small and large systems @NA61/SHINE Feb 5, 2020 17 / 29

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend