Sma marter Balanced Summa mmative Assessme ments 2018 Prelimi - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
sma marter balanced summa mmative assessme ments 2018
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Sma marter Balanced Summa mmative Assessme ments 2018 Prelimi - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Nov 20, 2023 237 likes •439 views

Sma marter Balanced Summa mmative Assessme ments 2018 Prelimi minary Report Jammie Behrendt, Assistant Superintendent Katherine Strach, Coordinator of Data, Assessment & EL Services October 2018 1 Ag Agen enda Sc Scho hool-

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Sma marter Balanced Summa mmative Assessme ments 2018 Prelimi minary Report

Jammie Behrendt, Assistant Superintendent Katherine Strach, Coordinator of Data, Assessment & EL Services October 2018

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Ag Agen enda

Dis District trict Ov Over ervi view Sc Scho hool- l-by-Sc Scho hool l Br Brea eakdown

  • ELA
  • Mathematics
  • Student Group Two-

Year Comparisons

  • Student Group Three-

Year Comparisons

  • Encinal School
  • Laurel School
  • Oak Knoll School
  • Hillview Middle School
  • School Highlights

Ne Next S Step eps

  • Content Area of Focus
  • Improvement Process
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Dis District Ov trict Over ervie view w

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

ELA ELA O Over ervie view w

54% 30% 10% 6%

Standard Exceeded Standard Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Not Met

84%

Met or Exceeded Standard N = 1,921

27% 24% 26% 32% 33% 39% 53% 60% 58% 52% 51% 47% 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade

80% 84% 84% 84% 84% 85% 58% 56% 41% 58% 34% 36% 54% 36% 7% 8% 5% 6%

Reading Writing Listening Research/Inquiry

Claim Level

Above Standard Near Standard Below Standard

82% 82% 84% 2016 2017 2018

% Met or Exceeded Standard

slide-5
SLIDE 5

26% 27% 17% 16% 24% 17% 55% 52% 61% 66% 57% 64% 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade

5

Mathema matics Overview

59% 21% 13% 7%

Standard Exceeded Standard Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Not Met

81%

Met or Exceeded Standard N = 1,921 82% 79% 79% 82% 82% 81% 69% 60% 59% 21% 31% 32% 10% 9% 8%

Claim Level

Above Standard Near Standard Below Standard Concepts & Procedures Problem Solving and Modeling & Data Analysis Communicating Reasoning

81% 81% 81% 2016 2017 2018

% Met or Exceeded Standard

slide-6
SLIDE 6

+ 2% 0% +11% + 2% +10% + 2% + 2% + 3% +17% + 8% + 7% 0% + 7% + 1% +10% + 2% 6

Student Group Two-Year Comp mparisons

84% 60% 58% 40% 45% 24% 84% 63% College Bound 81% 54% 50% 36% 33% 31% 76% 60% HI, PI, and AA Students with Disabilities Socioeconomically Disadvantaged English Learners RFEP students

Mathematics ELA

ALL

Compared to 2017 Compared to 2017

ELs + RFEP students

% Met or Exceeded Standard

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Student Group Three-Year Comp mparisons

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

2016 2017 2018

All CB HI,PI,AA SWD SED 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

2016 2017 2018

All RFEP EL and RFEP EL 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

2016 2017 2018

All CB HI,PI,AA SWD SED 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

2016 2017 2018

All RFEP EL and RFEP EL

Mathematics ELA

% Met or Exceeded Standard

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Sc Scho hool- l-by-Sc Scho hool l Break akdo down wn

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Enc Encinal inal S Sch chool

  • ol

Mathematics ELA

55% 25% 11% 9%

Standard Exceeded Standard Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Not Met

80%

Met or Exceeded Standard N = 274 54% 24% 16% 6%

Standard Exceeded Standard Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Not Met

78%

Met or Exceeded Standard N = 275 57% 51% 44% 53% 35% 38% 51% 37% 7% 11% 5% 11%

Reading Writing Listening Research/Inquiry

Claim Level

Above Standard Near Standard Below Standard

65% 57% 57% 23% 35% 33% 12% 8% 9%

Claim Level

Above Standard Near Standard Below Standard Concepts & Procedures Problem Solving and Modeling & Data Analysis Communicating Reasoning

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Enc Encinal inal S Sch chool

  • ol
  • 2%
  • 3%
  • 1%
  • 13%
  • 1%
  • 16%
  • 28%*
  • 9%*

+1%*

  • 8%

+11%* +4%*

  • 4%*
  • 14%*

+9% 0%

80% 50% 48% 27% 42% 32% 89% 58% College Bound 78% 43% 38% 42% 30% 38% 72% 52% HI, PI, and AA Students with Disabilities Socioeconomically Disadvantaged English Learners RFEP students

Mathematics ELA

ALL

Compared to 2017 Compared to 2017

ELs + RFEP students

% Met or Exceeded Standard

* Small Population (N < 30) Please use extra caution when interpreting the results as large swings can be triggered by just a few students.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Laur Laurel Scho el School

11

Mathematics ELA

57% 26% 13% 4%

Standard Exceeded Standard Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Not Met

83%

Met or Exceeded Standard N = 344 57% 22% 16% 5%

Standard Exceeded Standard Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Not Met

79%

Met or Exceeded Standard N = 343 59% 47% 44% 54% 36% 43% 53% 42% 6% 10% 3% 3%

Reading Writing Listening Research/Inquiry

Claim Level

Above Standard Near Standard Below Standard

66% 56% 60% 24% 35% 32% 10% 9% 8%

Claim Level

Above Standard Near Standard Below Standard Concepts & Procedures Problem Solving and Modeling & Data Analysis Communicating Reasoning

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Laur Laurel Scho el School

12 +3% +1% +17% +5% +18% +7% +26% +10% +21% +9% +25%* +2%*

  • 6%
  • 7%

+5%

  • 3%

83% 67% 67% 58% 54% 31% 84% 66% College Bound 79% 53% 49% 43% 35% 35% 73% 60% HI, PI, and AA Students with Disabilities Socioeconomically Disadvantaged English Learners RFEP students

Mathematics ELA

ALL

Compared to 2017 Compared to 2017

ELs + RFEP students

% Met or Exceeded Standard

* Small Population (N < 30) Please use extra caution when interpreting the results as large swings can be triggered by just a few students.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Oa Oak K k Knol

  • ll S

Sch chool

  • ol

Mathematics ELA

58% 27% 10% 5%

Standard Exceeded Standard Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Not Met

85%

Met or Exceeded Standard N = 368 57% 25% 14% 4%

Standard Exceeded Standard Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Not Met

82%

Met or Exceeded Standard N = 371 58% 52% 45% 56% 36% 41% 52% 39% 5% 7% 2% 5%

Reading Writing Listening Research/Inquiry

Claim Level

Above Standard Near Standard Below Standard

70% 63% 59% 22% 30% 33% 9% 8% 8%

Claim Level

Above Standard Near Standard Below Standard Concepts & Procedures Problem Solving and Modeling & Data Analysis Communicating Reasoning

slide-14
SLIDE 14

0%

  • 3%

+13% +7% +14% +11% +33%* +6%* +35%* +22%*

  • 4%*
  • 1%*

+12%*

  • 9%*

+9%

  • 4%

14

Oa Oak K k Knol

  • ll S

Sch chool

  • ol

College Bound 82% 64% 64% 46% 52% 43% 78% 61% HI, PI, and AA Students with Disabilities Socioeconomically Disadvantaged English Learners RFEP students

Mathematics ELA

ALL

Compared to 2017 Compared to 2017

ELs + RFEP students

% Met or Exceeded Standard

85% 66% 65% 77% 55% 29% 96% 68%

* Small Population (N < 30) Please use extra caution when interpreting the results as large swings can be triggered by just a few students. +12%

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Hillvie Hillview Mid w Middle S le Sch chool

  • ol

Mathematics ELA

50% 35% 9% 6%

Standard Exceeded Standard Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Not Met

85%

Met or Exceeded Standard N = 933 62% 19% 10% 8%

Standard Exceeded Standard Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Not Met

82%

Met or Exceeded Standard N = 930 59% 62% 37% 61% 33% 32% 57% 33% 9% 7% 6% 6%

Reading Writing Listening Research/Inquiry

Claim Level

Above Standard Near Standard Below Standard

70% 62% 60% 19% 28% 32% 11% 11% 8%

Claim Level

Above Standard Near Standard Below Standard Concepts & Procedures Problem Solving and Modeling & Data Analysis Communicating Reasoning

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Hillvie Hillview Mid w Middle S le Sch chool

  • ol

+3% +2% +11% +5% +8% +4%

  • 5%

+4% +16% +12% +6%

  • 1%

+14% +9% +13% +8%

85% 58% 56% 27% 39% 12% 80% 61% College Bound 82% 54% 50% 28% 29% 18% 77% 61% HI, PI, and AA Students with Disabilities Socioeconomically Disadvantaged English Learners RFEP students

Mathematics ELA

ALL

Compared to 2017 Compared to 2017

ELs + RFEP students

% Met or Exceeded Standard

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Sc Scho hool l Highligh ighlights ts

Encinal Laurel Oak Knoll Hillview

Among all schools:

  • Highest % met or exceeded for

English Learners on ELA (32%) Compared to 2017:

  • English Learners increased 11%
  • n ELA standard met or

exceeded Among all schools:

  • Highest % met or exceeded for

CB students (67%), and HI, PI and AA combined on ELA (67%) Compared to 2017:

  • CB students, HI, PI, and AA

combined, SWD, SED, and English Learners increased 17-26% on ELA standard met or exceeded

  • CB students, HI, PI, and AA

combined, SWD, and SED students increased 5-10% on Math standard met or exceeded Among all schools:

  • Highest % met or exceeded for

all students, SWD, and SED students on ELA (55%-85%)

  • Highest % met or exceeded for

all students, CB students, HI, PI, and AA combined, SWD, SED and English Learners on Math (43%-82%) Compared to 2017:

  • CB students, HI, PI, and AA

combined, SWD, SED students increased 13-35% on ELA standard met or exceeded

  • CB students, HI, PI, and AA

combined, SWD, and SED students increased 6-22% on Math standard met or exceeded Compared to 2017:

  • CB students, HI, PI, and AA

combined, SED, and English Leaners increased 6-16% on ELA standard met or exceeded

  • CB students and SED students

increased 5% and 12% respectively on Math standard met or exceeded

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Ne Next S Step eps

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Ne Next S Step eps

  • Math focus
  • Alignment of structures with continuous improvement science practices