sma marter balanced summa mmative assessme ments 2018
play

Sma marter Balanced Summa mmative Assessme ments 2018 Prelimi - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sma marter Balanced Summa mmative Assessme ments 2018 Prelimi minary Report Jammie Behrendt, Assistant Superintendent Katherine Strach, Coordinator of Data, Assessment & EL Services October 2018 1 Ag Agen enda Sc Scho hool-


  1. Sma marter Balanced Summa mmative Assessme ments 2018 Prelimi minary Report Jammie Behrendt, Assistant Superintendent Katherine Strach, Coordinator of Data, Assessment & EL Services October 2018 1

  2. Ag Agen enda Sc Scho hool- l-by-Sc Scho hool l Dis District trict Next S Ne Step eps Brea Br eakdown Over Ov ervi view • Encinal School • ELA • Content Area of Focus • Laurel School • Mathematics • Improvement Process • Oak Knoll School • Student Group Two- • Hillview Middle School Year Comparisons • School Highlights • Student Group Three- Year Comparisons 2

  3. Dis District Ov trict Over ervie view w 3

  4. ELA O ELA Over ervie view w % Met or Exceeded Standard 6% 84% 10% 82% 2016 30% 54% Met or Exceeded 2017 82% Standard N = 1,921 2018 84% Standard Exceeded Standard Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Not Met Claim Level 84% 84% 84% 84% 85% 80% 58% 34% 7% Reading 47% 51% 52% 58% 53% 56% 36% 8% Writing 60% 41% 54% 5% Listening 39% 58% 36% 6% Research/Inquiry 33% 32% 26% 27% 24% 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade Above Standard Near Standard Below Standard 4

  5. Mathema matics Overview % Met or Exceeded Standard 7% 81% 13% 81% 2016 21% 59% Met or Exceeded 81% 2017 Standard N = 1,921 2018 81% Standard Exceeded Standard Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Not Met Claim Level 82% 82% 82% 81% 79% 79% Concepts & Procedures 69% 21% 10% 55% 57% 52% 64% 66% Problem Solving and 61% 60% 31% 9% Modeling & Data Analysis 59% 32% 8% Communicating Reasoning 27% 26% 24% 17% 17% 16% Above Standard Near Standard Below Standard 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 5

  6. Student Group Two-Year Comp mparisons ELA Mathematics % Met or Exceeded Standard Compared to 2017 Compared to 2017 + 2% 0% 84% 81% ALL +11% + 2% 60% 54% College Bound +10% + 2% 58% 50% HI, PI, and AA + 2% + 3% 40% Students with Disabilities 36% +17% + 8% 45% Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 33% + 7% 0% 24% English Learners 31% + 7% + 1% 84% RFEP students 76% +10% ELs + RFEP students + 2% 63% 60% 6

  7. Student Group Three-Year Comp mparisons % Met or Exceeded Standard ELA Mathematics 90% 90% 80% 80% 70% 70% All All 60% 60% CB CB 50% 50% HI,PI,AA HI,PI,AA 40% 40% SWD SWD 30% 30% SED SED 20% 20% 10% 10% 2016 2017 2018 2016 2017 2018 90% 90% 80% 80% 70% 70% All All 60% 60% RFEP RFEP 50% 50% 40% 40% EL and RFEP EL and RFEP 30% 30% EL EL 20% 20% 10% 10% 2016 2017 2018 2016 2017 2018 7

  8. Sc Scho hool- l-by-Sc Scho hool l Break akdo down wn 8

  9. Encinal Enc inal S Sch chool ool Claim Level 9% 80% 11% 57% 35% 7% Reading 25% 55% 51% 38% 11% Writing Met or Exceeded ELA Standard 44% 51% 5% Listening N = 274 53% 37% 11% Research/Inquiry Standard Exceeded Standard Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Not Met Above Standard Near Standard Below Standard Claim Level 6% 78% 16% Concepts & Procedures 65% 23% 12% Problem Solving and 54% 24% 57% 35% 8% Met or Exceeded Modeling & Data Analysis Standard 57% 33% 9% Communicating Reasoning Mathematics N = 275 Standard Exceeded Standard Met Above Standard Near Standard Below Standard Standard Nearly Met Standard Not Met 9

  10. Enc Encinal inal S Sch chool ool ELA Mathematics % Met or Exceeded Standard Compared to 2017 Compared to 2017 -2% -3% 80% 78% ALL -1% -13% 50% 43% College Bound -1% -16% 48% 38% HI, PI, and AA -28%* -9%* 27% Students with Disabilities 42% +1%* - 8% 42% Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 30% +11%* +4%* 32% English Learners 38% -4%* -14%* 89% RFEP students 72% +9% ELs + RFEP students 0% 58% 52% * Small Population (N < 30) Please use extra caution when interpreting the results as large swings can be triggered by just a few students. 10

  11. Laur Laurel Scho el School Claim Level 4% 83% 13% 59% 36% 6% Reading 26% 57% 47% 43% 10% Writing Met or Exceeded ELA Standard 44% 53% 3% Listening N = 344 54% 42% Research/Inquiry 3% Standard Exceeded Standard Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Not Met Above Standard Near Standard Below Standard Claim Level 5% 79% 16% Concepts & Procedures 66% 24% 10% Problem Solving and 22% 57% 56% 35% 9% Met or Exceeded Modeling & Data Analysis Standard 60% 32% 8% Communicating Reasoning Mathematics N = 343 Standard Exceeded Standard Met Above Standard Near Standard Below Standard Standard Nearly Met Standard Not Met 11

  12. Laur Laurel Scho el School ELA Mathematics % Met or Exceeded Standard Compared to 2017 Compared to 2017 +3% +1% 83% 79% ALL +17% +5% 67% 53% College Bound +18% +7% 67% 49% HI, PI, and AA +26% +10% 58% Students with Disabilities 43% +21% +9% 54% Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 35% +25%* +2%* 31% English Learners 35% -6% -7% 84% RFEP students 73% +5% ELs + RFEP students -3% 66% 60% * Small Population (N < 30) Please use extra caution when interpreting the results as large swings can be triggered by just a few students. 12

  13. Oa Oak K k Knol oll S Sch chool ool Claim Level 5% 10% 85% 58% 36% 5% Reading 27% 58% 52% 41% 7% Writing Met or Exceeded ELA Standard 45% 52% 2% Listening N = 368 56% 39% 5% Research/Inquiry Standard Exceeded Standard Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Not Met Above Standard Near Standard Below Standard Claim Level 4% 82% 14% Concepts & Procedures 70% 22% 9% 25% Problem Solving and 57% 63% 30% 8% Met or Exceeded Modeling & Data Analysis Standard 59% 33% 8% Communicating Reasoning Mathematics N = 371 Standard Exceeded Standard Met Above Standard Near Standard Below Standard Standard Nearly Met Standard Not Met 13

  14. Oak K Oa k Knol oll S Sch chool ool ELA Mathematics % Met or Exceeded Standard Compared to 2017 Compared to 2017 0% -3% 85% 82% ALL +13% +7% 66% 64% College Bound +14% +11% 65% 64% HI, PI, and AA +33%* +6%* 77% Students with Disabilities 46% +35%* +22%* 55% Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 52% -4%* -1%* 29% English Learners 43% +12 % +12%* -9%* 96% RFEP students 78% +9% ELs + RFEP students -4% 68% 61% * Small Population (N < 30) Please use extra caution when interpreting the results as large swings can be triggered by just a few students. 14

  15. Hillview Mid Hillvie w Middle S le Sch chool ool Claim Level 6% 85% 9% 59% 33% 9% Reading 50% 62% 32% 7% 35% Writing Met or Exceeded ELA Standard 37% 57% 6% Listening N = 933 61% 33% 6% Research/Inquiry Standard Exceeded Standard Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Not Met Above Standard Near Standard Below Standard Claim Level 8% 82% 10% Concepts & Procedures 70% 19% 11% 19% Problem Solving and 62% 62% 28% 11% Met or Exceeded Modeling & Data Analysis Standard 60% 32% 8% Communicating Reasoning Mathematics N = 930 Standard Exceeded Standard Met Above Standard Near Standard Below Standard Standard Nearly Met Standard Not Met 15

  16. Hillview Mid Hillvie w Middle S le Sch chool ool ELA Mathematics % Met or Exceeded Standard Compared to 2017 Compared to 2017 +3% +2% 85% 82% ALL +11% +5% 58% 54% College Bound +8% +4% 56% 50% HI, PI, and AA -5% +4% 27% Students with Disabilities 28% +16% +12% 39% Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 29% +6% -1% 12% English Learners 18% +14% +9% 80% RFEP students 77% +13% ELs + RFEP students +8% 61% 61% 16

  17. Sc Scho hool l Highligh ighlights ts Encinal Laurel Oak Knoll Hillview Among all schools: Among all schools: Among all schools: Compared to 2017: • Highest % met or exceeded for • Highest % met or exceeded for • Highest % met or exceeded for • CB students, HI, PI, and AA English Learners on ELA (32%) CB students (67%), and HI, PI all students, SWD, and SED combined, SED, and English and AA combined on ELA (67%) students on ELA (55%-85%) Leaners increased 6-16% on ELA Compared to 2017: • Highest % met or exceeded for standard met or exceeded • English Learners increased 11% Compared to 2017: all students, CB students, HI, PI, • CB students and SED students on ELA standard met or • CB students, HI, PI, and AA and AA combined, SWD, SED increased 5% and 12% exceeded combined, SWD, SED, and and English Learners on Math respectively on Math standard English Learners increased (43%-82%) met or exceeded 17-26% on ELA standard met or exceeded Compared to 2017: • CB students, HI, PI, and AA • CB students, HI, PI, and AA combined, SWD, and SED combined, SWD, SED students students increased 5-10% on increased 13-35% on ELA Math standard met or exceeded standard met or exceeded • CB students, HI, PI, and AA combined, SWD, and SED students increased 6-22% on Math standard met or exceeded 17

  18. Next S Ne Step eps 18

  19. Ne Next S Step eps • Math focus • Alignment of structures with continuous improvement science practices 19

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend