Simulations of Abelian lattice gauge theories with optical lattices Luca Tagliacozzo
Alessio Celi ICFO Maciej Lewenstein ICFO Maciej Lewenstein ICFO Alejandro Zamora ICFO
Simulations of Abelian lattice gauge theories with optical lattices - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Simulations of Abelian lattice gauge theories with optical lattices Luca Tagliacozzo Alessio Celi ICFO Maciej Lewenstein Maciej Lewenstein ICFO ICFO Alejandro Zamora ICFO Outlook Why simulations with optical lattices Why lattice
Alessio Celi ICFO Maciej Lewenstein ICFO Maciej Lewenstein ICFO Alejandro Zamora ICFO
produces macroscopic phases very different from constituents (confinement, fractionalization, topological order) .
COLD ATOMS
COLD ATOMS IONS TRAPS
COLD ATOMS IONS TRAPS MICROWAVE ION CHIPS
COLD ATOMS IONS TRAPS MICROWAVE ION CHIPS
description of both high and low energies physics (QCD... antiferromagnets...)
interactions
Difficult to engineer interactions different from
Difficult to engineer interactions different from
Difficult to engineer interactions different from
Difficult to engineer interactions different from How do we get four body interactions ?
Four body interactions via the Rydberg gate
Four body interactions via the Rydberg gate
Four body interactions via the Rydberg gate
Four body interactions via the Rydberg gate
Four body interactions via the Rydberg gate
Four body interactions via the Rydberg gate We need a two dimensional Hilbert space
x y t Lattice gauge theories
x y t Lattice gauge theories
x y t Lattice gauge theories
x y t Lattice gauge theories
x y t Lattice gauge theories
x y t Lattice gauge theories
Hamiltonian formulation of LGT, Hilbert space
Hamiltonian formulation of LGT, Hilbert space
Hamiltonian formulation of LGT, Hilbert space
Hamiltonian formulation of LGT, Hilbert space
Hamiltonian formulation of LGT, Hilbert space
Hamiltonian formulation of LGT, Hilbert space
Hamiltonian formulation of LGT, Hilbert space
Hamiltonian formulation of LGT, Hilbert space
Hamiltonian formulation of LGT, Hilbert space
Hamiltonian formulation of LGT, operators
Hamiltonian formulation of LGT, operators
Hamiltonian formulation of LGT, operators
Hamiltonian formulation of LGT, operators
Hamiltonian formulation of LGT, operators
Hamiltonian formulation of LGT, operators
Deconfined/ T
Confined Wegner 71, Kogut 79
U(1) LGT with local Hilbert space of dim 2
U(1) LGT with local Hilbert space of dim 2
U(1) LGT with local Hilbert space of dim 2
U(1) LGT with local Hilbert space of dim 2
U(1) LGT with local Hilbert space of dim 2
U(1) LGT with local Hilbert space of dim 2
U(1) LGT with local Hilbert space of dim 2
U(1) LGT with local Hilbert space of dim 2
U(1) LGT with local Hilbert space of dim 2
Link models and gauge magnets
Link models and gauge magnets
Link models and gauge magnets
Link models and gauge magnets
The U(1) gauge magnets
The U(1) gauge magnets
The U(1) gauge magnets
The U(1) gauge magnets
The U(1) gauge magnets Local Gaped Confined
The U(1) gauge magnets Local Gaped Confined
The U(1) gauge magnets T
Gapless Confined Local Gaped Confined
Can we really simulate it with Rydberg?
Can we really simulate it with Rydberg?
We can perform time evolution
two level system which dynamic can be implemented via Rydberg
Can we really simulate it with Rydberg?
Hamiltonian is not frustration free We do not know GS locally
We cannot make dissipative state preparation We can perform time evolution
two level system which dynamic can be implemented via Rydberg
Can we really simulate it with Rydberg?
Hamiltonian is not frustration free We do not know GS locally
We cannot make dissipative state preparation We can perform time evolution
two level system which dynamic can be implemented via Rydberg
We cannot make adiabatic preparation
Gapless interesting phase no easy state Level crossing with other phase where easy state
U(1) gauge magnet Rydberg state preparation
U(1) gauge magnet Rydberg state preparation Adiabatic
U(1) gauge magnet Rydberg state preparation Adiabatic We need an easy state
U(1) gauge magnet Rydberg state preparation Adiabatic We need an easy state Slowly change H
U(1) gauge magnet Rydberg state preparation Adiabatic We need an easy state Slowly change H but
U(1) gauge magnet Rydberg state preparation Adiabatic We need an easy state Slowly change H but Dissipative
U(1) gauge magnet Rydberg state preparation Adiabatic We need an easy state Slowly change H Engenier L(t) but Dissipative
U(1) gauge magnet Rydberg state preparation Adiabatic We need an easy state Slowly change H Engenier L(t) Need to locally know GS but but Dissipative
State preparation, mixed strategy
State preparation, mixed strategy
State preparation, mixed strategy
State preparation, mixed strategy
State preparation, mixed strategy
State preparation, mixed strategy
State preparation, mixed strategy
State preparation, mixed strategy
State preparation, mixed strategy
State preparation, mixed strategy
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 cwState preparation, mixed strategy
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 cw2 3 4 −8.5 −8 −7.5 −7 −6.5 −6 −5.5 t Energy CRAB Adiabatic linear ramp E0 E1
U(1) gauge magnet Rydberg time evolution
U(1) gauge magnet Rydberg time evolution
U(1) gauge magnet Rydberg time evolution Trotter
U(1) gauge magnet Rydberg time evolution Trotter
U(1) gauge magnet Rydberg time evolution Trotter
U(1) gauge magnet Rydberg time evolution Trotter
U(1) gauge magnet Rydberg time evolution Trotter
U(1) gauge magnet Rydberg time evolution Trotter
U(1) gauge magnet Rydberg time evolution Trotter
U(1) gauge magnet Rydberg time evolution Trotter
Conclusions Intersting historical phase for MBQP First quantum simulations (QS) We propose a possible candidate for U(1) LGT QS Now should be possible to perform
Further step towards complete QS LGT... (need matter).