SESSION E DESIGN FRAMEWORK FOR FUTURE GUIDELINES ON B2C SUPPLIES - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

session e
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

SESSION E DESIGN FRAMEWORK FOR FUTURE GUIDELINES ON B2C SUPPLIES - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SESSION E DESIGN FRAMEWORK FOR FUTURE GUIDELINES ON B2C SUPPLIES 17-18 April 2014 Tokyo, Japan Prof. Walter Hellerstein, University of Georgia Law School Schedule for this session Overview of parallel sessions objective European


slide-1
SLIDE 1

SESSION E

DESIGN FRAMEWORK FOR FUTURE GUIDELINES ON B2C SUPPLIES

17-18 April 2014 Tokyo, Japan

  • Prof. Walter Hellerstein, University of Georgia

Law School

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • Schedule for this session

– Overview of parallel session’s objective – European tax policy perspective, Ms Pia Michelsen – Perspective from Japan, Mr Minoru Nakazato – Rapporteur, Mr Ilya Trunin – Discussion with the floor – Possible conclusions

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Overview of Parallel Sessions’ Objectives

  • Exploring approaches for allocating taxing rights over

supplies of services and intangibles to final consumers

  • Identifying “substantive” and “enforcement” jurisdiction

– “Substantive jurisdiction”: power of country to impose tax on subject matter of exaction

  • For consumption taxes, where consumption occurs or is

deemed to occur

– “Enforcement jurisdiction”: power of country to compel collection of tax over which it has substantive jurisdiction

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Overview of Parallel Sessions’ Objectives

  • Focus of Parallel Session E is “substantive jurisdiction”
  • Key questions to be addressed by our session:

– Which proxies are available for identifying the “place of consumption” – Is it necessary to use different proxies for different kinds of supplies? – Is it necessary to distinguish between B2B and B2C? – What are the possible and preferred solutions?

  • Focus of Parallel Session F is “enforcement jurisdiction”

– Practical means to enforce compliance with tax over which country has substantive jurisdiction, particularly in digital economy

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Ultimate goal for tax regime design (combining

Parallel Sessions E and F) is to align substantive and enforcement jurisdiction (upper left cell) and to avoid other three possibilities:

5

Substantive Jurisdiction Enforcement Jurisdiction No Substantive Jurisdiction Enforcement Jurisdiction Substantive Jurisdiction No Enforcement Jurisdiction No Substantive Jurisdiction No Enforcement Jurisdiction

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Introduction of Case Study