sensor post processing using mcmd technology
play

Sensor Post-processing using MCMD technology Lars Eklund Alex - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sensor Post-processing using MCMD technology Lars Eklund Alex Chilingarov (Lancaster) et al. University of Cambridge, University of Glasgow, Lancaster University, University of Liverpool, Queen Mary University of London, Rutherford


  1. Sensor Post-processing using MCMD technology • Lars Eklund • Alex Chilingarov (Lancaster) et al. • University of Cambridge, University of Glasgow, Lancaster University, University of Liverpool, Queen Mary University of London, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory +Backthinning • Andy Blue et al.

  2. Outline • Integrated Hybrids • The first post-processing run • Results: – I/V and C/V characteristics – Capacitive load on front-end – Inter-strip resistance – Flatness and yield • Summary and Outlook – Towards a fully functional hybrid 2

  3. Post-processing of Hybrids • Traditional silicon module build (electrical parts) – Sensors, flex circuit, substrate, pitch adaptor, wire bonds, FE-chips, passive components • A novel approach: – Multi-Chip Module – Deposited (MCMD) – Deposit dielectric and metal layers directly on the silicon sensor – Layout concepts similar to PCBs – All-in-one: Sensor, hybrid, pitch-adaptor and strip connections • Applicable to VESPA pixel or strip designs Current ATLAS/SCT module – Replace double metal on strip – Power & control timepix – Mount hybrid on sensor – four layer hybrid, with surface mounted components • Commercially available technology – Semi-industrial partner 3

  4. Benefits and concerns Potential benefits • Reduced material – Thinner layers, no hybrid substrate • Reduced build complexity – Single object from industry • Increased integration – Higher interconnect density – Bump bonding of FE chips possible Points to prove • Electrical performance – Sensor – Hybrid (e.g. power distribution) • Radiation hardness • Thermal performance • Production yields Connecting vias to sensor pads • Cost 4

  5. Technology description – MCM-D on Si wafers • Post-process existing micron Silicon strip sensors • Dielectric layers: Benzocyclobutene (BCB) – Deposited in layers of 3-15 µm thickness – Dielectric constant of 2.65 • Conducting layers: sputtered Cu/Ti – Standard thickness 1 µm • Connecting vias: opened through the BCB before curing – To the sensor – Between metal layers • Feature sizes – Lithographic resolution: 10 µm – Good yield at 30 µm track width/spacing – Minimal via size at 15 µm thickness: 65 µm 5

  6. First post-processing fabrication run • Purpose of the first run: feasibility study – Investigate influence of post-processing on the sensors – Implement the first layer of a full design • Properties to be investigated – I/V & C/V characteristics – Capacitive load on front-end – Inter-strip resistance – Punch-through voltage – Yield – Sensor flatness • 4“ wafer (500 µm) with 26 mini-sensors 6

  7. Cross-section of prototype run 4 � m Ni + Passivation Cu/Ti layer Via (3-4 � m BCB) (1 � m) 150 nm Au • etched opening in the BCB (45 º) • coated with Cu/Ti BCB (6 or 12 � m) (dielectric) Passivation (SiO 2 ) Al strip SiO 2 implant Si substrate Implement the first layer of a fully functional hybrid: GNP plane plus strip connections 7

  8. Photos from prototype run Sensor with meshed GND plane Connections to bias and guard rings Strip pad connections 8

  9. Yields / IV & CV • Yields – 10 wafers processors – 4/260 sensors with macroscopic defects – No electrical problems, 3000 vias probed • IV / CV – Similar to unprocessed – 50/52 sensors operate at 400 V with < 1 uA current – 30-40V depletion 9

  10. Punch through Voltage / Inter-strip resistance • Apply voltage between strip DC pad and bias rail – Behaviour as unprocessed sensors • Measured inter-strip resistance – limit of Ris > 250 MOhm Sensor flatness •Same as unprocessed wafer scan 10

  11. Capacitance Total capacitance of one strip • Normally dominated by coupling to nearest neighbours C IS – Small decrease as compensation for trapped surface charges • Ground back plane (C sBP ) small additional contribution • The MCMD GND plane add a new capacitive load MCMD GND plane C sG C sG C sG C Is C Is C GBP C sBP C sBP C sBP Back-plane 11

  12. Summary of capacitive load measurements • Estimate capacitive load by C tot = C sG + C IS + C sBP • Strip length: 10 mm (8.5 mm covered by the GND plane) – Unit is approximately pF/cm C IS [pF] C sG [pF] C tot [pF] GND plane type 6 µm 12 6 µm 12 6 µm 12 µm µm µm Solid 0.63 0.75 1.84 1.03 2.7 2.0 GND 50% fill, 30 µm line width 0.71 0.82 1.30 0.82 2.2 1.8 GND 50% fill, 80 µm line width 0.75 0.84 1.14 0.68 2.1 1.7 GND 25% fill, 30 µm line width 0.83 0.89 0.76 0.48 1.8 1.6 BCB only + 3 µm passivation 1.02 1.05 - - 1.2 1.3 Bare sensor < 0.9 - ~1.1 The two values in red are interpolated values, not direct measurements Adds ~ 1pF/cm in area covered by MCMD GND plane 12

  13. Backthinning Andy Blue et al. • Minimise mass by backthinning FE chip Backthinned APS sensor Improve APS sensitivity in UV • Common practice for CCDs • Applied to APS sensors, backthinned to 20µm – Lapping, reactive ion etching, laser annealing • Work with E2V 13

  14. Summary and outlook • Sensor characteristics largely unaffected – I/V, CV characteristics similar to non-processed sensors – No observed change in inter-strip resistance or punch- through – No change in curvature – Increase in capacitive load observed – thick first BCB layer required • Next steps in the R&D programme (underway) – Measure irradiated samples at full upgrade fluence (under – Produce fully working four layer hybrid. – Simulate thermal performance • Backthinning well proven • Extensive experience in TSVs through 3D work • MCMD, backthinning,TSV integrated in UK VESPA upgrade programme 14

  15. Backup 15

  16. Inter-strip capacitance (C IS ) – bare & BCB covered • Bare sensors show decrease in C IS over time due to surface charge-up – Compensates for trapped charges – Need high voltage and long time to reach final value – Environmentally dependen • BCB is a very good insulator: no charge compensation C IS vs. time for bare and BCB covered (9 µm) sensors at 100 kHz 16

  17. Inter-strip capacitance (C IS ) – adding the GND plane • Four different GND plane configurations covering the sensor – Solid and meshed with 25% or 50% fill, 30 or 80 µm line width Cf. value from no metal • C IS (bare) < 0.9 pF • C IS (BCB) = 1.02 pF plot shows results for wafer mesh 25%-30 µm with 6 µm BCB layer mesh 50%-80 µm mesh 50%-30 µm Solid GND plane 17

  18. Capacitance to GND plane - C sG • Capacitance from strip to GND plane measured separately – Measure between bias rail and GND plane in R S -C S mode – R S = R bias / N strips , C S = C sG * N strips C sG [pF] GND plane type 6 µm 12 µm Solid 1.84 1.03 50% fill, 30 1.30 0.82 um line 50% fill, 80 1.14 0.68 um line 25% fill, 30 0.76 0.48 um line Parallel plate capacitor estimate for 6 µm BCB 1.06 < C sG < 2.65 Total capacitance between bias rail and GND plane vs. frequency strip width = 32 µm strip pitch = 80 µm 18

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend