Seneca Lake Watershed Management Plan March 5, 2012 Watershed - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Seneca Lake Watershed Management Plan March 5, 2012 Watershed - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Seneca Lake Watershed Management Plan March 5, 2012 Watershed Characterization Public Hearing Sponsors This project is being prepared for the New York State Department of State with funds provided under Title 11 of the Environmental
Sponsors…
“This project is being prepared for the New York State Department of State with funds provided under Title 11 of the Environmental Protection Fund.”
Sponsors…
City of Geneva, NY – EPF Project Sponsor
Drawing from a Broad Coalition
Seneca Lake Area Partners In Five Counties SLAP-5 Soil and Water Conservation Districts in Five Counties
Various other federal, state and local agencies…
LOCAL CITIZENS & Other Stakeholders
Schuyler County Watershed Protection Agency
Cities, Towns, and Villages,,,
Watershed…
All the land that drains into a common point (water body: stream or lake)
Marshak, 2012, Earth
Seneca Lake Watershed
Watershed Management Planning
Stages
- Existing State
- Desired State
- Strategies and Actions
Balancing Act
- Conflicting Uses
- Restoration and Protection
- Land use and Land Value
- Tools in the Toolbox
- Prioritize Issues and Target Funding
- Coordination and Cooperation
Watershed Management Planning
Four Legs of the Stool
- Oversight and Involvement
- Education and Outreach
- Public Participation
- Fact Finding
Selection of Planning Activities to Date
- Seneca Lake Area Partners in Five Counties
(SLAP-5)
- Seneca Lake Watershed Study
- 1999 Publication:
– Setting a Course for Seneca Lake: The State of the Seneca Lake Watershed
Since then:
- Wide variety of additional local planning,
DEC work, water quality sampling & monitoring, and other activities by local governments, SWCDs and academia
Watershed Management Plan
Components
- Characterization and Sub-watershed
Prioritization – 2012
- Public Comments – March 23
- Assessment of Local Laws, Programs and
Practices Affecting Water Quality
- Identification of Management Strategies
- Implementation Strategy
- Intermunicipal Coordinating Organization
- Watershed Management Plan
Seneca Watershed Characterization: The Setting
Seneca Lake
- Largest of 11 Finger Lakes
– 57 km long (36 miles) – 3 km wide (2 miles) – 175 km2 SA (67 miles2) – 198 m deep – 15.54 km3 Volume (4.1 x 1012 gal) – 18 years Residence Time
- Feeds into the Oswego River Basin.
- Ultimately drains northward into
Lake Ontario.
USGS Fact Sheet FS 180-99 http://www.dec.ny.gov/lands/ 53758.html
Lake Level Control
- Two Dams on Outlet
– Competing Interests
- Water Supply
– 100,000 people
- Upstream Levels
– Shore wells – Boating access – Winter protection – Flooding
- Downstream Flows
– Min Flow Dilute Effluents – Max Flow Prevent Flooding – Hydroelectricity
USGS Fact Sheet FS 180-99 http://www.canals.ny.gov/faq/oswego/netdata/seneca-levels.pdf
Municipal Involvement
- Five Counties
– Chemung – Ontario – Schuyler – Seneca – Yates
- Forty-One
Municipalities
Climate
Mean Monthly Max & Min Temperatures by Decade 1970-2009
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
January February March April May June July August September October November December Tempertaure (*F)
Max 1970-79 Max 1980-89 Max 1990-99 Max 2000-09 Min 1970-79 Min 1980-89 Min 1990-99 Min 2000-09 Cornell Agricultural Research Station Data, Geneva, NY
Mean Monthly Precipitation by Decade 1970-2009
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5
January February March April May June July August September October November December Precipitation (inches)
1970-79 1980-89 1990-99 2000-09 Cornell Agricultural Research Station Data, Geneva,
- Devonian
– Limestones
- Tully & Onondaga
– Shales (Marcellus) – Siltstones – Sandstones
- Underlying Silurian
– Evaporites
- Gypsum (CaSO4)
- Halite (NaCl)
- Glacial Tills
- Soils
Surface Bedrock
Soils Groups
- A. Soils with low
runoff potential.
- B. Soils having
moderate infiltration rates
- C. Soils having slow
infiltration rates
- D. Soils with high
runoff potential.
Aquifers
Topography and Steep Slopes
http://fli.hws.edu/maps.asp
Population
(87,000)
Population Growth
(1970 to 2010, 1.4%)
& Population Density
- C. Geneva ~13,300, -21%
- T. Geneva ~3,300, 18%
Hector ~4,900, 35% Dix ~3,800, -8% Fayette ~3,900, 31% Ovid ~2,300, -25% Romulus ~4,300, 1% Benton ~2,800, 31% Milo ~7,900, 15% V Penn Yan ~5,200, 0% Starkey ~3,600, 28% Veteran ~3,300, -6%
Parcel Classification
- Agriculture - 42%
- Residential - 27%
- Vacant Land - 14%
- Commercial - 1%
- Recreational - 1%
- Community Service - 5%
- Industrial - 1%
- Public Services - 1%
- Wild, Forested,
Conservation - 6%
- Unclassified - 1%
Land Cover Classification
- Water – 13%
- Developed, Open – 4.9%
- Developed, Low Impact – 1.3%
- Developed, Med. Impact – 1%
- Developed, High Impact – 0.1%
- Barren Land – <0.1%
- Forests – 26.5%
- Scrub/Grasslands – 7.1%
- Hay, Crops – 42.5%
- Wetlands – 4.3%
Gas Wells & Mines
Local Pollution Sources
1999 State of the Lake Report
- Agriculture
- Chemical Bulk Storage
- Forestry & Forestry
Practices
- Landfills, Dumps &
Hazardous Waste Sites
- Mined Lands
- Petroleum Bulk Storage
- Roadbank Erosion
- Salt Storage & Deicing
Materials
- Shore Residences
Environmental Health
- SPDES Permits
- Spills
- Streambank Erosion
Not duplicated in the 2012 Characterization
- Survey 4 Lake Sites & Buoy
– Weekly – CTD Profiles – Secchi Depths – Water Samples
- Chlorophyll
- Nutrients (NO3, TP, SRP)
- Turbidity, Major Ions
– Occasionally 9 Sites
- 5-6 Stream Sites
– Weekly – Discharge – Water Samples
- Nutrients (NO3, TP, SRP)
- Turbidity, Major Ions
– Occasionally 20 Sites
Limnology & Stream Hydrogeochemistry
Lake CTD Data
John Halfman, HWS
Temperature Specific Conductance, Salinity Dissolved Oxygen PAR, Available Light Photosynthesis Fluorescence, Algal Concentrations Turbidity
Seasonal & Shorter Changes: Seneca Lake Buoy Data
John Halfman, HWS http://fli-data.hws.edu/clarkpt/
2007 2008 2009 2010
Buoy Data – Lakes Change Response to Weather
2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006
Seneca Lake Salinity
John Halfman, HWS
Cathy Caiazza (WS’05)
Sodium Finger Lakes 20 40 60 80 100 Finger Lakes Sodium (ppm)
Canandaigua Cayuga Conesus Hemlock Honeoye Keuka Otisco Owasco Skeneateles Seneca
Seneca Lake
Extra Source: Sodium Ions:
Mass balance data
Mike Wing & John Halfman, HWS
Seneca Lake
80 ppm (~1.2 million tons) Streams 20 ppm 15,000 mt/yr Road Salt Outlet 80 ppm 60,000 mt/yr Evaporation ~0 ppm Concentrates Ions Rain ~0 ppm Dilutes Ions in Lake
Industry? Groundwater / Rock Salt Bedrock?
40 to 45,000 mt/yr Sodium (~450 railroad cars) plus 60 to 70,000 mt/yr Chloride (~680 railroad cars)
Century Scale Changes
Seneca Lake
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Year
Chloride, ppm
Jolly Halfman Others
Cayuga, Skaneateles & Hemlock
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Year Chloride (ppm)
Cayuga Skaneateles Hemlock
Glen Jolly, USGS Glen Jolly, USGS
Algae & Water Clarity
John Halfman, HWS
Secchi Depths Annual Average
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Secchi Depth (m)
Chlorophyll-a Annual Average
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Chlorophyll-a (ug/L)
Surface Bottom
Zebra / Quagga Mussels Nutrient Loading
Declining Zebra & Quagga Mussels?
Zebra & Quagga Mussels
14222 12057 16088 6421 878 1354 22870 17030 12937 8228.3 100 90 41 27 6
5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 2000 2001 2002 2003 2007 2011 Mussel Density (Ind/m
2)
20 40 60 80 100 Zebra Mussel Percentage (%)
Zebras Quaggas % Zerbas
Zebra Quagga Density
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 Density (Individuals/m2) Water Depth (m)
2011 Zebras 2011 Quaggas 2007 Zebras 2007 Quaggas 2002 Zebras 2002 Quagga 2001 Zebras 2001 Quaggas
Zebra & Quaggas 30 - 130 m
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 2001 2011 Mussel density (#/m^2) Quagga Zebras
Unpublished data from Halfman (‘00, ‘01, ‘03), Dittman (‘01, ’11), Shelley (‘02), Zhu (‘07)
Dissolved Phosphate Average Annual Concentration
20 40 60 80 100
Seneca Lake Castle Wilson Kashong Keuka Outlet Plum Pt. Big Stream Catharine Reeder Kendig
SRP (ug/L, P)
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
118, 197, 145, 102, 120, 116, 298
Seneca Streams: Nutrient Loading
John Halfman, HWS
Agriculture Agriculture Wastewater Treatment CAFO/Depot Urban/Agriculture
Phosphorus Budget
John Halfman, HWS Seneca Surplus 45 mt/yr
Sources Streams – 40 mtons/yr Atmosphere – 1 mtons/yr Municipal WWTF – 2.5 mtons/yr Septic Systems – 5 mtons/yr Lawn Care? Sinks Outlet – 8 mtons/yr Sediment – 1.5 mtons/yr
Nutrient Delivery Owasco
John Halfman, HWS
Total Suspended Solids Autosampler (8 hr samples)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 6/6 6/16 6/26 7/6 7/16 7/26 8/5 8/15 8/25 9/4 9/14 9/24 10/4 10/14 10/24 Date (2011) TSS (mg/L) 10 20 30 40 50 Stage (cm)
TSS (mg/L) Stage (cm) Precipitation (mm)
Total Phosphates Autosampler (8 hr samples)
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 6/6 6/26 7/16 8/5 8/25 9/14 10/4 10/24 Date (2011)
TP (ug/L, P)
10 20 30 40 50 Stage (cm)
Total Phosphate (µg/L, TP) Stage (cm) Precipitation (mm)
Dutch Hollow Hourly Readings
Stage, Cond., Temperature
Dutch Hollow Autosampler 3 Water Samples/Day
Finger Lakes Water Quality
John Halfman, HWS
Mean Rank vs. Agricultural Land Use
R2 = 0.90 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 20 30 40 50 60 Agricultural Land Use (%) Mean Water Quality Rank
Honeoye Excluded Skaneateles Canandiagua Keuka Seneca Owasco Cayuga
2005-2011 Average Ranking
5 10 15 20 25 30 Honoeye Canandiagua Keuka Seneca Cayuga Owasco Skaneateles Otisco Water Quality Rank
Oligotrophic Mesotrophic Eutrophic
Top Down Ecological Stress
Meghan Brown, HWS
Fishhook Water Flea Cercopagis pengoi Carnivorous Zooplankton Herbaceous Zooplankton Hemimysis anomala bloody red shrimp
Other Benthic Organisms
Dawn Dittman, USGS
Benthic Organisms
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 30 55 65 75 95 130
Water Depth (m) Densities (Ind/m2)
2001 Diporeia 2011 Diporeia 2001 Clams 2011 Clams 2001 Midges 2011 Midges 2001 Worms 2011 Worms
- D. Dittman, unpublished Data
“Bottom Up”, Zebra/Quagga Mussel and “Top Down” Stressors
Stream Macroinvertebrates
Susan Cushman, HWS Percent Modal Affinity Water Quality Index
Values > 65 No Impact Values 35 to 65 Slight Impact Values < 35 Severe Impact
Biotic Index
Values < 4.5 No Impact Values > 5.5 Moderate Impact Increased Impairment Increased Impairment
Preliminary Fish in Streams
Susan Cushman, HWS
Fish Abundance Fish Species Richness
Preliminary Mercury in Fish
Lisa Cleckner, HWS
Analyses on Blacknose dace (Lisa Cleckner). Action Level by FDA 1,000 ng/g, EPA screening value 300 ng/g (methyl Hg) No more than one meal of fish from Finger Lakes per week Historical Data Older (6yr) L Trout Avg: 400 ng/g Max: 578 ng/g
Historical Data & Box Cores
Meghan Brown & Tara Curtin, HWS
Box Core Record Historical Secchi & Chlorophyll Data
Historical Limnological Data
2 4 6 8 10 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Year Secchi Depth (m) Chlorophyll-a (ug/L)
Secchi Depth Chlorophyll-a
Total Mercury in Box Cores
Tara Curtin, HWS
Seneca Lake
Total Mercury in Box Cores
Tara Curtin, HWS
Questions, Comments, Input
www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery
Contact Information
- Project Website
– www.senecalakeplan.info
- David Zorn
– Genesee/Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council
- Chelsea Robertson
– Southern Tier Central Regional Planning and Development Board
- John Halfman & Sarah Meyer
– Finger Lakes Institute, Hobart & William Smith Colleges
- Project Advisory Committee