Selection of indicators; the U-Multirank project Frans Kaiser - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

selection of indicators the u multirank project
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Selection of indicators; the U-Multirank project Frans Kaiser - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Selection of indicators; the U-Multirank project Frans Kaiser Center for Higher Education Policy Studies ACUP Seminar International university rankings and selection of indicators 21 June 2011 Barcelona Content Some words on indicators


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Selection of indicators; the U-Multirank project

Frans Kaiser Center for Higher Education Policy Studies

ACUP Seminar ‘International university rankings and selection of indicators 21 June 2011 Barcelona

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Some words on indicators

  • What is U-Multirank?
  • How did we select indicators?
  • International orientation
  • Research

Indicators in U-Multirank Discussion Content

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Indicators What is an indicator?

  • Quantitative
  • Proxy of an empirical

phenomenon

  • Not a statistic
  • ‘norm’-referenced (performance

indicator)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Indicators

  • Valid
  • Reliable
  • Relevant
  • Feasible
  • Part of a ‘system’ of indicators

What is a good indicator?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Indicators

slide-6
SLIDE 6

U-Multirank

Pilot project

  • commissioned by the European Commission; 2-year

project, starting November 2009

  • to allow stakeholders to make informed choices;
  • to help institutions to position themselves and

improve their performance

  • two phases:
  • Design of new instrument
  • Testing the feasibility of new instrument
  • on the design and testing of a new,

multidimensional, global transparency instrument

slide-7
SLIDE 7

U-Multirank design principles

  • Basic epistemological argument: all observations of reality are

conceptually driven

  • Rankings should be based on interests and priorities of its users:

the principle of user-driveness

  • Higher education and research institutions are predominantly

multi-purpose: the principle of multi-dimensionality

  • Higher education and research institutions are generally

combinations of different faculties, departments, and programs and show internal diversity: the principle of multi-levelness

  • Rankings are only useful if institutions/ programs are compared

that are sufficiently similar: the principle of comparability

  • The instrument should refrain from methodological mistakes: the

principle of methodological soundness

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Design of U-Multirank

Literature review

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Design of U-Multirank

Stages Functions & Audiences Enabling Performance Input Process Output Impact Functions context Teaching & Learning Research Knowledge Transfer Audiences International Orientation Regional Engagement

Conceptual framework

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Design of U-Multirank

Literature review Review of existing rankings Review of existing databases First selection Stakeholder consultation Expert advice Second selection Pre-test Revision Selection for pilot test

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • Many initiatives: no concise, consistent list of indicators
  • Many rationales
  • The increasing emphasis on the need to prepare students

international labor markets and to increase their international cultural awareness,

  • The increasing internationalization of curricula
  • The wish to increase the international position and reputation
  • f higher education and research institutions
  • Three types of activities
  • Activities to develop and promote international mobility of students

and staff,

  • Activities to develop and enhance international cooperation,
  • Activities to develop and increase international competition
  • In databases mainly input and process oriented

International orientation

slide-12
SLIDE 12

International orientation

Focused Institutional Ranking Definition

Educational programs in foreign language The number of programs offered in a foreign language as a percentage of the total number of programs offered International academic staff Foreign academic staff members (headcount) as percentage of total number of academic staff members (headcount). Foreign academic staff is academic staff with a foreign nationality, employed by the institution or working on an exchange base International doctorate graduation rate The number of doctorate degrees awarded to students with a foreign nationality, as a percentage of the total number of doctorate degrees awarded International joint research publications Relative number of research publications that list one or more author affiliate addresses in another country relative to research staff Number of joint degree programs The number of students in joint degree programs with foreign university (including integrated period at foreign university) as a percentage of total enrolment

slide-13
SLIDE 13

International orientation

Field-based Ranking Definition

Incoming and outgoing students Incoming exchange students as a percentage of total number of students and the number of students going abroad as a percentage of total number of students enrolled International graduate employment rate The number of graduates employed abroad or in an international

  • rganization as a percentage of the total number of graduates employed

International academic staff Percentage of international academic staff in total number of (regular) academic staff International research grants Research grants attained from foreign and international funding bodies as a percentage of total income Student satisfaction: Internationalization of programs Index including the attractiveness of the university’s exchange programs, the attractiveness of the partner universities, the sufficiency of the number of exchange places; support and guidance in preparing the stay abroad; financial support; the transfer of credits from exchange university; the integration of the stay abroad into studies (no time loss caused by stay abroad). Joint international publications Relative number of research publications that list one or more author affiliate addresses in another country relative to academic staff Percentage of international students The number of degree-seeking students with a foreign diploma on entrance as percentage of total enrolment in degree programs. Student satisfaction: International orientation

  • f programs

Rating including several issues: existence of joint degree programs, inclusion of mandatory stays abroad, international students (degree and exchange), international background of staff and teaching in foreign languages.

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • ‘creative work undertaken on a systematic basis in order to

increase the stock of knowledge, including knowledge of man, culture and society, and the use of this stock of knowledge to devise new applications’ (Frascati manual)

  • Four main channels for communicating research

activities and performance

  • Text; journal publications, books,
  • People
  • Artefacts
  • Money
  • Three types of research indicators
  • Output (count of publications; PhD production)
  • Outcomes (citation scores, prizes)
  • Impact (effect on society)
  • Research versus knowledge transfer

Research

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Research

Focused Institutional Ranking Definition

Expenditure on research The amount of money spent on research activities in the reference year as a percentage of total expenditure Research income from competitive sources Income from European research programs + income from

  • ther international competitive research programs +

income from research councils + income from privately funded research contracts as a share of total income Research publication output Frequency count of research publications with at least

  • ne author address referring to selected institution

(within Web of Science) Post-doc positions (share) Number of post-doc positions /fte academic staff Interdisciplinary research activities Share of research publications authored by multiple units from the same institution (based on self-reported data) Field-normalized citation rate Field-normalized citation impact score, where the fields are equivalent to the Thomson Reuters Journal

  • Categories. ‘

Share of highly cited research publications Share of top 10% most highly cited publications; comparing ‘actual’ citation counts to ‘expected’ counts per field Number of art related outputs Count of all relevant research-based tangible outputs in creative arts /fte academic staff Number of international awards and prizes won for research work Prizes, medals, awards and scholarships won by employees for research work and in (inter-) national cultural competitions, including awards granted by academies of science.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Research

Field-based Ranking Definition

External research income Level of funding attracted by researchers from contracts with external sources, including competitive grants and research income from government, industry, business and community organizations, as a percentage of total income Research publication output Frequency count of (Web of Science) research publications with at least one author address referring to selected institutional unit (relative to fte academic staff) Doctorate productivity Number of completed PhDs per number of Professors (head count)*100 (three-year average) Field normalized citation rate See definition under Institutional Ranking Highly cited research publications See definition under Institutional Ranking

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Next phase of U-Multirank

  • Further development of indicators and

indicatorselection

  • Strong focus on user-driven character
  • stakeholders’ involvement
  • User friendliness of webtools
  • Creation of a larger sample of higher education

institutions

  • Institutionalisation of U-Multirank
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Thank you for your attention

f.kaiser@utwente.nl www.u-multirank.eu www.u-map.eu