Selection Dynamics in Transient Compartmentalization A. Blokhuis 1 , - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

selection dynamics in transient compartmentalization
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Selection Dynamics in Transient Compartmentalization A. Blokhuis 1 , - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Selection Dynamics in Transient Compartmentalization A. Blokhuis 1 , D. Lacoste 1 , P. Nghe 1 and L. Peliti 1 , 2 February 9, 2018 / OIST 1 ESPCI (Paris) and 2 SMRI (Italy) Table of contents 1. Introduction 2. The Model 3. Results 4.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Selection Dynamics in Transient Compartmentalization

  • A. Blokhuis1, D. Lacoste1, P. Nghe1 and L. Peliti1,2

February 9, 2018 / OIST

1 ESPCI (Paris) and 2 SMRI (Italy)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Table of contents

  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. The Model
  • 3. Results
  • 4. Conclusion

1

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Motivation

The RNA World hypothesis

Random Chemistry

RNA PROTEINS Time DNA LUCA RNP World RNA World

  • How could self-replicating molecules maintain their activity, in

spite of inevitable replication errors?

  • How could functional molecules overcome their disadvantages

wrt non-functional (but faster-replicating) mutants? COMPARTMENTALIZATION

2

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Motivation

The RNA World hypothesis

Random Chemistry

RNA PROTEINS Time DNA LUCA RNP World RNA World

  • How could self-replicating molecules maintain their activity, in

spite of inevitable replication errors?

  • How could functional molecules overcome their disadvantages

wrt non-functional (but faster-replicating) mutants? COMPARTMENTALIZATION

2

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The Questions

  • Can transient compartmentalization be sufficient to maintain

active ribozymes in the presence of fast-replicating parasites?

  • Which quantities determine success or failure of the process?

3

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Experiment Scheme

RNA replication and catalysis Compartmentalization of RNA in drops Drop selection (fluorescence-activated sorting) Ale Drop breaking and RNA pooling

Matsumura et al., 2016

4

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Experiment Results

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1 2 3 4 5 6

µ = 3.10-9 µ = 2.10-9

Bulk

Round

Fraction of ribozyme Fraction of ribozyme 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

µ = 8.10-5 µ = 1.10-5

Selected, Compartmentalized

Round

Matsumura et al., 2016

5

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The process

i) Inoculation ii) Maturation iii) Selection iv) Pooling

6

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Inoculation

  • Droplets are initialized with a large number (Ne) of Qβ enzymes,

and activated nucleotides

  • Droplets are seeded with n RNA templates: n is

Poisson-distributed with average λ

  • RNA templates come in two kinds: ribozymes and parasites
  • In a given droplet there are initially m ribozymes and

y = (n − m) parasites (m is random, of average λx)

  • x: fraction #ribozymes/#RNAs in the solution (at the end of the

previous round)

  • We neglect mutations producing new parasites (mutation rate is

very small)

7

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Maturation

  • RNAs initially replicate autocatalytically: n(t) ∼ exp(t)

(exponential phase)

  • Parasites replicate faster than ribozymes: m(t) ≃ m eαt,

y(t) ≃ y eγt, γ > α

  • When n(t) ≃ Ne, Qβ is the growth-limiting factor: further growth

is linear with time (linear phase)

  • In the linear phase, the ratio y(t)/m(t) = #parasites/#ribozymes

remains constant

  • At the end of the maturation phase, we have m(t) = ¯

m, y(t) = ¯ y, with ¯ y y = Λ ¯ m m Λ > 1

  • Thus given (x, m, n), one has

¯ m = N · m nΛ − (Λ − 1)m = N ¯ x ¯ y = N − ¯ m

8

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Selection

  • Droplets are selected according to the number ¯

m of ribozymes contained

  • N: number of RNAs at the end of the maturation phase
  • ¯

x = ¯ m/N: fraction of ribozymes

  • Selection function:

f(¯ x) = 1 2 ( 1 + tanh ( ¯ x − xth xw ))

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

¯ x

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

f(¯ x)

9

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Pooling

  • Each round k yields x −

→ x′: x′ = ∑

m,n ¯

x(m, n) f(¯ x(m, n)) P(x|m, n; λ, Λ) ∑

m,n f(¯

x(m, n)) P(x|m, n; λ, Λ)

  • Does x reach a fixed point as k → ∞?
  • Evaluate ∆x = x′ − x vs. (λ, x) for fixed Λ

10

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Dynamics

∆x vs. (λ, x)

11

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Dynamics

∆x vs. (λ, x) Λ = 4 1 4 7 10

λ

0.0 0.5 1.0

x

−1 1

11

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Phase diagram

100 101 102

λ

100 102 104 106

Λ

R B C P

12

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Asymptotes

Λ ≫ 1: R-B line at λ0: λ0f(1) = ( eλ0 − 1 ) f(0) (λ0 ≃ 6.95) B-P line at λ1: λ1f(0) = ( eλ1 − 1 ) f(1) (λ1 ≃ 1.49 · 102) λ ≫ 1: R-C line at Λ = 1 + (f ′(1)/(f(1)λ)) + O(λ−2) C-P line at Λ = 1 + (f ′(0)/(f(0)λ)) + O(λ−2) The exact shape of f(x) is not important

13

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Population dynamics

λ = 5, Λ = 10 (C) (i) No compartments (ii) Compartments, no selection (iii) Compartments with selection

5 10 15 20 round number 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

x

(iii) (ii) (i) 14

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Population dynamics

λ = 10, Λ = 5 (P)

15

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Linear Selection Function

100 101 102

λ

100 102 104 106

Λ

R B C P

16

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Summary

  • Transient compartmentalization with selection may succeed in

purging parasites, provided λ is small enough (and selection is strong enough)

  • Here selection is extrinsic but the same scenario applies to

intrinsic selection (due, e.g., to cooperativity)

  • Transient compartments may bridge the gap between

metabolism-based (Oparin, Dyson) and information-based (Eigen, Schuster) scenarios for the origin of life

17

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Acknowledgments

ArXiv 1802.00208 Alex David Philippe

18

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Thank you!

18

slide-23
SLIDE 23

References i

  • 1. Biebricher C K, Replikation und Evolution von RNA in vitro,

Habilitationsschrift, TU Karl-Wilhelm (Braunschweig) (1987)

  • 2. Dyson F, Origins of Life (2nd ed.) (Cambridge: Cambridge U. P.,

1999 )

  • 3. Eigen M, Selforganization of matter and the evolution of

biological macromolecules, Naturwissenschaften 58 465–523 (1971)

  • 4. Eigen M, and Schuster P, The Hypercycle: A principle of natural

self-organization (Berlin: Springer, 1979)

  • 5. Matsumura S, Kun Á, Ryckelnyck M, Coldren F, Szilágyi A, Jossinet

F, Rick C, Nghe P, Száthmary E, and Griffiths A D, Transient compartmentalization of RNA replicators prevents extinction due to parasites, Science 354 1293-1296 (2016)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

References ii

  • 6. Maynard Smith J, and Száthmary E, The Major Transitions in

Evolution (Oxford: Freeman, 1995)

  • 7. Oparin A I, Origin of Life (New York: Dover, 1953)
  • 8. Spiegelman S, Haruna I, Holland I B, Beaudreau G, and Mills D,

The synthesis of a self-propagating and infectious nucleic acid with a purified enzyme, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 54 919-927 (1965)

  • 9. Spiegelman S, An in vitro analysis of a replicating molecule,

American Scientist 55 221-264 (1967). Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/27836918

  • 10. Száthmary E, and Demeter L, Group selection of early replicators

and the origin of life, J. Theor. Biol. 128 463-486 (1987)

  • 11. Wilson D S, A theory of group selection, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA

72 143-146 (1975)