Seek onk Publ ic Sch chool s Preliminary Budget Present at ion - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Seek onk Publ ic Sch chool s Preliminary Budget Present at ion

January 9, 2017

5 O

VE R AR C HING G O ALS O F BUDG E T DE VE LO PME NT

1 . 1 . To optimize a e and s sustain studen ent a achiev evem emen ent 2.

• 2. To thoughtfully id

identif ify, u util iliz ize, prio iorit itiz ize and/or re- allocate, re re- organize and/ or re- structure a e available e res esources es 3.

• 3. To maintain r

regulatory compliance r re: initiatives & m man andates 4.

• 4. To demon
• nstrate fiscal responsibility in o
• ur d

decision- making 5.

• 5. To acknowledge an

and be grateful f for

• r t

the s support o

• f the G

G reat ater S eekonk C

• mmunity on b

behal alf of our s schoo

• ols

DATA- BA SED DECISION- MA KING PROCESS

Considerations

MCA S,PA RCC scores, Edwin A nalytics, District A nalysis & A ssistance Tool, DDMs, What Works Class Size Comparison to Similar districts A udit Recommendations Regulations and Initiatives Programs, Resources, Individual Student Needs School Improvement Plans Parent & Staff Input District’s Mission, V ision, G

• als

Current, A nticipated Funding Streams Social- Emotional Supports, Staffing, Programs

C O MPR E HE NS IVE MULTI- MODEL A PPROA CH

RENNIE CENTER FOR EDUCA TION RESEA RCH & POL ICY

Line I e Item em

Ongoing expenditure & revenue data

Pr Pros

Simple, easy, detailed info & trends and tracking

C

• C
• ns

Incomplete picture/explanation, no rationale, no performance expectations

% A Add O dd O n

Usually to previous year

Pr Pros

Simple

C

• C
• ns

May not match district’s real needs Funding may not be sufficient in L ittle information about what actually happens in schools

Ze Zero- Ba Based

No reference to previous year’s budget, each inclusion is justified, each section is a decision unit

Pr Pros

Staff involved in process, eliminates outdated, ineffective expenditures & resources, good when spending must be reduced

C

• C
• ns

Takes significant staff time, planning, paperwork, is very complex, limited in implementation

C O MPR E HE NS IVE MULTI- MODEL A PPROA CH…

Prog

• gram

am & & Planni nning ng

Expenditures based on programs Determines possible alterative cost or goal Combination of line item & performance- based

Pr Pros

Emphasizes district goals A llows for long range planning L

• oks at costs of services Provides

broad/summarized information

C

• C
• ns

Can be limited L ack of consensus on overall goals Difficulty with administration across the district

Perfor

• rman

ance- Ba Based

Uses narrative description of programs & activities included in budget

Pr Pros

Focus on measurement &

• utcomes, useful information for

administrators, flexibility for each school as long as the district goals are met

C

• C
• ns

Best for routine and measurable activities Can lack reliability

S i S ite- Ba Based

Formula allows money to follow student, budget determined by student needs Provides school autonomy with different levels of resources and services

Pr Pros

Transparent, offers flexibility in programming decisions, gives school staff members a voice in how resources are allocated

C

• C
• ns

Not always linked to outcome accountability May be difficult to re- direct monies/ resources

S tud udent nt- Ba Based

Money follows student School site budgets determined by student need Can result in different levels

• f resources & supports

Pr Pros

Transparent, flexible, can broaden spending from a narrowly- defined way

C

• C
• ns

Not always linked to

• utcome accountability

Cannot easily re- direct resources/staffing in more productive/effective ways

C O MPO NE NTS O F MULTIPLE MO DE LS R E PR E S E NTE D

S t S tudent- C en enter ered ed Decis isio ion- Making g

Increa ease e achiev evem emen ent & & improve e

• u
• utcom
• mes f

for

• r al

all st students s …IEP EP/504, English sh Le Learners, s, AP c cour urses, hi high h ris isk, t transit itio ion, et etc.

Per erformance e & S t S tudent- Ba Based Tran anspar arency

Line I e Item em Rev eview ew

Ba Based on

• ngo

going g bud budget rev eview ew o

• f

curre rrent & & past st spend nding ng

S ustain inabil ilit ity

C

• C
• st- ef

effec ectiven enes ess C

• ns

nsistent nt a application n

• f proven

en s strateg egies es

• ver

er a a multi- yea ear per eriod Identif ific icatio ion o

• f

alter ernatives es Most b ben enef efit f for chi hildren g n given t n the he costs

Prog

• gram

ams & & Planni nning ng C

• l
• llab

abor

• rat

ation

• n

S i S ite- base sed

Enco courage ges staff i input in e n each h school

• ol

C

• ntrac

actual al O blig igatio ions

% I % Increase se

Recu curring g an anticipat ated costs

O ver erview Budget et Prop

• pos
• sal

Fiscal al Y Year 201 8

S pec ecialized ed Med edical C

• ntracted

ed S er ervice Increase: $86,1 70.00 Additional designated medical support required as a result of the Team and Medical Provider’s recommendations to meet students medical needs. This service is eligible for 70%

• f FY1

8 C ircuit Breaker reimbursement They do not charge if student is absent

FTE Amount FTE Amount Aitken Martin 0.5 Art Teacher (For Full-Day Kind.) $28,354 0.5 Art Teacher (For Full-Day Kind.) $28,354 0.5 Music Teacher (For Full-Day Kind.) $28,354 0.5 Music Teacher (For Full-Day Kind.) $28,354 1.0

• Gr. 1 Teacher (If classes go over 20)

$56,708

• 1.0
• Gr. 4 Teacher (Move to Resource

Position)

• $66,680

1.0 Resource Teacher $56,708 1.0 Resource Teacher $66,680 1.5 Kindergarten Teachers $99,049 1.5 Kindergarten Teachers $98,857 1.5 Kindergarten Aides $27,506 1.5 Kindergarten Aides $27,506

• 0.5 Preschool Teacher
• $30,018

1.0 Preschool Teacher $60,036

• 0.5 Preschool Aide
• $8,235

2.0 Preschool Aides $31,860 5.0 $258,426 7.0 $274,967 Middle School High School 0.2 Supervisory Aides $6,336 1.0 Resource Teacher $56,708 0.1 Cross Country Coach $2,002 1.0 Instructional Aide $16,113 0.2 Nurse Clerical $4,905 0.5 $13,243 2.0 $72,821 System Totals 0.25 Behavioral Specialist $14,177 0.5 ESL Teacher $27,506 Total FTE 15.3 0.75 $41,683 Total Amount $661,140

FY18 PROPOSED POSITIONS

Teac aching S S al alar aries: I Increas ase $538,970 70

Position Aitken Martin HMS S HS S ystem G eneral $1 1 3,41 6

• $9,972

S PE D $56,708 $66,680 $56,708 $27,506 Kindergarten $99,049 $98,857 Pre- S chool

• $30,01

8 $60,036 Totals $239,1 55 $21 5,601 $56,708 $27,506

Non

• n- Teac

aching S S al alar aries: Increas ase $1 2 1 22,1 7 1 70

Position Aitken Martin HMS S HS S ystem Aides $1 9,271 $59,366 $6,336 $1 6,1 1 3 C

• ach

$2,002 Nurse C lerical $4,905 Behavior S pecialist $1 4,1 77 Totals $1 9,271 $59,366 $1 3,243 $1 6,1 1 3 $1 4,1 77

Kinder ergarten en

Exten ended ed D Day P PreS eS chool Initial R evenue = $1 40,800 Model S tudent tuition $7,800 S pecial E duc S tudents (2 ret/rem from O O D) $1 33,000 Initial Output = $67,820 One Teacher (less .5 currently in place) $30,018 Two Inst A ides (less .5 currently in place) $23,625 Half time (.25) Related Service (O T/ S LP) $14,177 Note: e: will add 5 weeks for E S Y for FY 201 8- 201 9

Textbook

• ok/Mat

aterial als: Increas ase $ 2 202,776 776 Librar ary Book

• oks: Increas

ase $ 23 23,080

Aitken Martin HMS S HS $65,661 $71 ,1 32 $5,674 $60,309 Aitken Martin HMS S HS $3,300 $5,000 $5,000 $9,780

Instruction

• nal

al H Har ardwar are: Increas ase $ 8 86,972 72 Instruction

• nal

al S S

• f
• ftwar

are: Increas ase $1 1 6 1 1 6,897

Aitken Martin HMS S HS $707 $1 2,567 $1 5,81 6 $57,882 Aitken Martin HMS S HS S ystem $1 4,970 $8,244 $1 3,561 $7,000 $73,1 22

Building ng M Maint ntena nanc nce C C

• nt

ntract S ervice – Increase $ $1 9 1 9,51 1

Additional funds needed for cost increases Funds: Fire sprinkler inspection, fire inspection, C hair lift/elevator, fire extinguisher, pest control, trash/recycling services, cooler/freezer, alarms, & septic system inspection

Aitken Martin HMS S HS $1 ,925 $1 1 ,658 $2,000 $3,927

S P S PED S u S ummer Prog

• gram

am: Increase: $4,000 S pecial E d E xtended S chool Year Program (E S Y) Additional Number of S tudents R equiring E S Y has expanded to include Martin E lementary and S HS . C

• st of In- District for S

tudents with S pecial Needs which will include Nursing.

S PE PED T Tuitions: I Increase: $577, 77,73 738

Non- Public MA $1 21 ,940 O ut of S tate $520,077 C

• llaborative
• $64,279

Nan ancy G ag agliar ardi

Ai Aitken Textbooks/Materials: New Math Program – Teachers piloted 4 new programs along with our current program. Math Committee doing a study to decide on the best program

Ai Aitken R eading S upplies: Funds R eading C

• nsumables and other materials to

strengthen instruction.

Ba Bart L Lush

Ma Martin Full Day Kindergarten: Adding .5FTE Art / .5FTE Music in order to meet the the needs of prep coverage. An additional teacher will be needed at both elementary schools. Additional 1 .5 FTE ’s – 3.0 FTE salaries contractual at each school and 3 Instructional A ides

Ma Martin S cience S upplies: New S tandards, each grade needs to adjust to changes. C reating new, engaging lessons to match change in standards.

• Dr. Willi

lliam Whale len

HM HMS Dues & Fees: NE LMS S potlight S chool Assessment The process with a visit from a NE LMS team that may result in HMS being recognized as a spotlight school.

HM HMS Positions: S upervisory aides to monitor the cafeteria daily to allow for core teachers to be released from lunch duty. Nurse C lerical Assistant to support HMS nurse.

• Dr. C

hr hristophe her J

• ne

nes

S H S HS Textbooks: S cience Textbooks - The last textbook replacement

• ccurred in 2007. The current books are outdated and

in poor condition. Math Textbooks - Present fundamentals class is using 2008 textbook. New as well as a teacher resource pack will provide a more rigorous curriculum and aligns with the new direction of MC AS /PAR C C .

S H S HS S pecial E ducation Psychologist S upplies: G

• ing forward, instead of ordering entirely new

questionnaire kits, the district will only need to purchase the online administration and scoring subscriptions, which cost less than the kits in their entirety.