Second Q Quarter er 20 2017 17 1 Disclaimer We make - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

second q quarter er 20 2017 17
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Second Q Quarter er 20 2017 17 1 Disclaimer We make - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Second Q Quarter er 20 2017 17 1 Disclaimer We make forward-looking statements in this presentation within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Second Q Quarter er 20 2017 17

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

PERFORMANCE & PERSPECTIVE

We make forward-looking statements in this presentation within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. You should not rely on them as predictions of future events. For these statements, we claim the protections of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in such Sections. You can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “seeks,” “approximately,” “intends,” “plans,” “estimates,” “contemplates,” “aims,” “continues,” “would” or “anticipates” or similar words or phrases in the positive or negative. For example, statements regarding potential growth in our portfolio, future results from operations, prospective acquisitions, projected leasing, and anticipated market conditions are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve numerous risks and uncertainties, and you should not rely on them as predictions of future events. They depend on assumptions, data or methods which may be incorrect or imprecise, and we may not be able to realize them. The following factors, among others, could cause actual results and future events to differ materially from those set forth or contemplated in the forward-looking statements: changes in our industry, the real estate markets, either nationally or in Manhattan or the greater New York metropolitan area; resolution of legal proceedings involving the company; reduced demand for office or retail space; new office development in our market; general volatility of the capital and credit markets and the market price of our Class A common stock and our publicly-traded operating partnership units; changes in our business strategy; changes in technology and market competition, which affect utilization of our broadcast or other facilities; changes in domestic or international tourism, including geopolitical events and currency exchange rates; defaults on, early terminations of, or non-renewal of leases by tenants; bankruptcy or insolvency of a major tenant or a significant number of smaller tenants; fluctuations in interest rates; increased operating costs; declining real estate valuations and impairment charges; termination or expiration of our ground leases; availability, terms and deployment of capital; our failure to obtain necessary outside financing, including our unsecured revolving credit facility; our leverage; decreased rental rates or increased vacancy rates; our failure to generate sufficient cash flows to service our outstanding indebtedness; our failure to redevelop and reposition properties successfully or on the anticipated timeline or at the anticipated costs; difficulties in identifying properties to acquire and completing acquisitions; risks of real estate development (including our Metro Tower development site), including the cost of construction delays and cost overruns; inability to manage our properties and our growth effectively; inability to make distributions to our securityholders in the future; impact of changes in governmental regulations, tax law and rates and similar matters;

  • ur failure to continue to qualify as a real estate investment trust, or REIT; a future terrorist event in the U.S.; environmental uncertainties and risks related to adverse

weather conditions and natural disasters; lack, or insufficient amounts, of insurance; misunderstanding of our competition; changes in real estate and zoning laws and increases in real property tax rates; inability to comply with the laws, rules and regulations applicable to similar companies; and risks associated with security breaches through cyberattacks, cyber intrusions or otherwise, as well as other significant disruptions of our technology (IT) networks related systems, which support our operations and our buildings. While forward-looking statements reflect our good faith beliefs, they are not guarantees of future performance. You should not place undue reliance on any forward- looking statements, which are based only on information currently available to us (or to third parties making the forward-looking statements). We disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement to reflect changes in underlying assumptions, new information, data or methods, future events or other changes after the date of this presentation, except as required by applicable law. For a further discussion of these and other factors that could impact our future results, performance or transactions, see the section entitled “Risk Factors" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, any subsequent reports on Forms 10-Q and 8-K and other risks described in documents we subsequently file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Disclaimer

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Investor Highlights

Pure-play Manhattan and greater New York metropolitan area

Embedded, de-risked growth potential from four drivers of growth

Strong and flexible balance sheet, lowest leverage among Office REIT peers

Proven management team

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Management Team

4 EXPERIENCED AND COMMITTED

Anthony E ny E. M Mal alkin

Chairman & Chief Executive Officer 28 ye years rs with E ESRT 28 ye years rs in i indust stry ry Bachelor’s degree from Harvard College

Dav avid d A. K Kar arp

Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer 5 ye years rs with E ESRT 34 ye 4 years rs in i indust stry ry

Bachelor’s degree from University of California, Berkeley and M.B.A. from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania

Tho homas as P. D Dur urels

Executive Vice President & Director of Leasing and Operations 27 ye years rs with E ESRT 33 ye years rs in i indust stry ry Bachelor’s degree from Lehigh University

Tho homas as N. K Keltner, Jr.

Executive Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary 39 ye years rs with E ESRT 39 ye years rs in i indust stry ry Bachelor’s degree from Harvard College and J.D. from Columbia Law School

John hn B

  • B. Kessler

President & Chief Operating Officer 2 ye years rs with E ESRT 28 ye years rs in i indust stry ry Bachelor’s degree from Harvard College and M.B.A. from the Booth School at the University of Chicago

Senior management team with an average of approximately 32 years of experience in real estate

Since IPO, management team bench has been deepened with key additions

Extensive experience in Greater New York area real estate, through several economic and real estate cycles

Management is aligned with shareholders

Senior management team owns a significant amount of stock

The Malkin Family, led by Anthony E. Malkin, has not sold any shares, either at or after IPO1

1 Excludes gifts to charitable foundations of less than 1% of their original holdings.
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Delivered on Promises

5 STEADY CASH NOI GROWTH; EXECUTING ON LEASING

thousand

1 Company data and filings as of March 31, 2017. Peer group includes Boston Properties, Paramount Group, SL Green and Vornado Realty Trust as of March 31,

2017.

2 Amounts in thousands. Company data and filings as of March 31, 2017. Cash NOI is a non-GAAP measure that is reconciled to its GAAP equivalent measure

in the appendix. 3Q 2014 partially excludes the benefit of the acquisitions on July 15, 2014 of the option properties at 1400 Broadway and 111 West 33rd Street.

› 200,992 SF of leasing › 22.4% spreads achieved on new Manhattan office leases › Signed larger leases for longer term with better credit tenants › Reported 8.3% same- store cash NOI growth year-over-year compared to peer group average of (0.4%)1 Q1 2017

85.0% 86.0% 87.0% 88.0% 89.0% 90.0% $240,000 $260,000 $280,000 $300,000 $320,000 $340,000 $360,000 $380,000 3Q 2014 4Q 2014 1Q 2015 2Q 2015 3Q 2015 4Q 2015 1Q 2016 2Q 2016 3Q 2016 4Q 2016 1Q 2017

Steady Cash NOI Growth Even With Fluctuating Occupancy2

TTM Cash NOI (left axis) Total Portfolio Occupancy (right axis)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Portfolio Overview

6 PURE-PLAY MANHATTAN AND GREATER NEW YORK METROPOLITAN AREA

10.1 Million Total Rentable Square Feet

Manhattan Office 74.6% GNYMA Office 18.4% Retail 7.0%

9.4 Million Rentable Square Feet of Office Space

Manhattan Office 80.2% GNYMA Office 19.8%

Company data and filings as of March 31, 2017.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Varied Tenant Base

7 DIVERSIFIED BY INDUSTRY

Industry diversification by annualized fully escalated rent. Company data and filings as of March 31, 2017.

Consumer Goods 21.2% Finance, Insurance, Real Estate 17.4% Professional Services 11.6% Retail 17.8% Legal Services 3.7% Technology 7.8% Media & Advertising 4.0% Other 11.9% Non-Profit 4.6%

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Manhattan Portfolio

8

One Grand Central Place 111 West 33rd Street 1359 Broadway 1400 Broadway Office Properties Retail Properties

slide-9
SLIDE 9

11.4% 0.9% 5.8% 7.7% 6.4% 8.2% 6.2% 53.4%

Available SLNC 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Thereafter

Tenant Lease Expirations

9 WELL LADDERED MANHATTAN OFFICE PORTFOLIO LEASE EXPIRATIONS

Company data and filings as of March 31, 2017.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Four Drivers of Embedded De-risked Growth

10 RELATIVE TO TTM CASH NOI OF $362M1

Lease up of vacant space $40 M $110 Million Free rent & signed leases not commenced2 $40 M Retail

  • pportunity

$9 M Redevelopment

  • pportunity

$21 M

1 Amounts reflect management’s estimates of additional revenues from the four drivers as of March 31, 2017 to be realized over the next 5-6 years. Cash NOI is a

non-GAAP measure that is reconciled to its GAAP equivalent measure in the appendix.

2 Signed leases not commenced is $5 million and the annual rent from leases that have commenced but are in their free rent period is $35 million, of which $23

million will have ended by December 31, 2017 and the remaining will substantially end by December 31, 2018. Company data and filings as of March 31, 2017.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Signed Leases Not Commenced

11

Company data and filings as of March 31, 2017.

Tenant SF 3/31/17 Escalated Annual Rent New Annual Rent Expected Commencement Date Incremental Annual Rent Michael Faillace & Assoc. 4,081 $0.00 M $0.27 M

  • Apr. 2017

$0.27 M Blue Bottle Coffee 434 0.00 M 0.25 M May 2017 0.25 M Mitsui Plastics 11,994 0.00 M 0.40 M May 2017 0.40 M Sisense 24,169 0.00 M 1.43 M

  • Jun. 2017

1.43 M Michael J. Fox Foundation 10,533 0.00 M 0.67 M

  • Jun. 2017

0.67 M Cayman Islands, Dept of Tourism 4,127 0.00 M 0.28 M

  • Jun. 2017

0.28 M Tenex Capital Management 3,387 0.00 M 0.24 M

  • Jun. 2017

0.24 M Prequin 7,642 0.00 M 0.42 M

  • Aug. 2017

0.42 M Other SLNC 11,247 0.00 M 0.61 M

  • Apr. 2017 – Sept.

2017 0.61 M To Total 77, 7,614 $0.0 0.00 M $4.57 57 M M $4.57 57 M M Tot

  • tal C

Cont

  • ntracted Annua

nnualized G Growth h $4 $4.57 7 M

slide-12
SLIDE 12

$ 49.04 $ 59.45 $ 48.88 $ 59.82

Prev. Escalated Rent PSF New Starting Base Rent PSF Prev. Escalated Rent PSF New Starting Base Rent PSF

2

Strong re-leasing spreads1

Superior Leasing Spreads

12 ILLUSTRATES MARK TO MARKET OPPORTUNITY

Compared to peer group

Manhattan office leasing spreads Q1 20173

Company data and filings as of March 31, 2017.

1 Based on Manhattan office portfolio. 2 Previous escalated rent PSF is adjusted for space remeasurement. 3 Reflects new and renewal leases. Peer group includes results for Paramount Group, SL Green and Vornado Realty Trust as of March 31, 2017.

New leas ases Q1 2 2017 All leas ases Q Q1 2 2017

2

21.2% 11.3% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% ESRT Peer Group

slide-13
SLIDE 13

PIO 0 SF 0% Undeveloped 0 SF 0% Off Market 24,000 SF 12% Broadcasting 6,000 SF 3% Storage 21,000 SF 10% Whitebox / Demo 52,000 SF 26% Prebuilt 101,000 SF 50% PIO 25,000 SF 3% Undeveloped 70,000 SF 8% Off Market 78,000 SF 9% Broadcasting 5,000 SF 1% Storage 37,000 SF 4% Whitebox / Demo 319,000 SF 37% Prebuilt 326,000 SF 38%

Vacant Office Space

13 MANHATTAN OFFICE PORTFOLIO

Current vacancy (Manhattan Office / ESB only) 860,000 SF / 203,000 SF Weighted average starting rent (Manhattan Office / ESB only) $60 PSF / $65 PSF

Weighted average starting rent is management’s estimate for new leases. Excludes SLNC. Vacant developed space consists of the sum of the categories of Whitebox/Demo, Prebuilt and PIO. PIO represents “Prepared for Immediate Occupancy.”

EMPIRE STATE BUILDING

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Leasing Opportunity

14 INVENTORY OF CURRENT VACANT SPACE AND EXPECTED SPACE TO BE VACATED BY YEAR-END 2017 Square Feet Total portfolio vacant space 1,140,000 Less signed leases not commenced (78,000) Total portfolio net vacant space 1,062,000 Retail vacant space 39,000 GNYMA vacant space 163,000 Manhattan office vacant space, excluding SLNC 860,000 Less current redeveloped Manhattan office space (670,000) Less space held off market for consolidation / redevelopment (78,000) Space being planned for redevelopment, storage and other 112,000 Manhattan office expected space to be vacated by year-end 2017 at fully escalated rent

  • f $47.00 PSF

287,000

Company data and filings as of March 31, 2017.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Manhattan Office Mark to Market

15 CURRENT 2017 MARKET RENT VS. CURRENT FULLY ESCALATED RENT

9 mos 2017 12 mos 2018 12 mos 2019 12 mos 2020 12 mos 2021 3 mos 2022

Current fully escalated rent PSF1 $50 $53 $48 $52 $50 $53 Leased square feet expiring2 437,175 582,316 483,648 622,262 472,307 118,511 Weighted average starting rent PSF3 $58 $58 $58 $60 $59 $59 Embedded growth4 16.0% 9.4% 20.8% 15.4% 18.0% 11.3%

1 Fully escalated rents are as of March 31, 2017, exclude SLNC and are adjusted for space re-measurement. 2 Excludes SLNC. 3 Starting rents reflect rates as of March 31, 2017 without ascribing any future growth. Weighted average starting rent is management’s estimate for new,

renewal and below market short term rentals for cash flow purposes and includes both office and storage. The above does not give consideration for downtime to vacate, redevelop and lease.

4 Reflects embedded growth as of March 31, 2017 without ascribing any future growth.
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Redevelopment Opportunity

16 EMBEDDED, DE-RISKED GROWTH

Tenant space to be redeveloped

Empire State Building 250,000 SF Balance of Manhattan office portfolio 870,000 SF Total 1,120,000 SF 100,000 200,000 300,000 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Occupied Retail Vacant

45,000 SF 215,000 SF 80,000 SF 160,000 SF

Probable Renovations of Undeveloped Space through 2021

(SF)

Based upon current views and assumptions, which are subject to change. Company data and filings as of March 31, 2017.

160,000 SF

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Creating Full Floor Availabilities

17 REDEVELOPMENT CASE STUDY

2014

Adjacent tenants are grouped by lease expiration dates Spaces are vacated as expired leases are not renewed Floors 55-58 leased to only 2 tenants Floors 55-58 originally had 42 tenants

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Redevelopment Capital Expenditures

18 NEARING SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION OF COMMON AREA RENOVATIONS, $739 MILLION SPENT TO DATE

Company data and filings as of March 31, 2017.

Before After Before After

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Superior Returns from Redevelopment

19 AN ILLUSTRATION OF THE RETURNS ON INVESTMENTS

1 While a white-box space when vacated typically requires a full new installation upon the signing of a new lease, pre-built spaces typically require small

refreshment costs of paint, carpet, and appliances at the end of each lease term, and are intended to last for up to 25 years of occupancy by one or more tenants over their lifetime.

2 Based on anticipated 2017 activity and current fully-escalated and market rents.

White Box Pre-Built

Low High Low High INVESTMENT PER SQUARE FOOT Tenant space: Base building $37 $65 $37 $65 Tenant allowance / improvement1 $75 $90 $115 $130 Leasing commission $24 $29 $15 $21 TOTAL AL I INVES NVESTMENT ENT $136 $184 $167 $216 RETURN - INCREMENTAL NOI PER SQUARE FOOT Mark-to-market future renovated space2 $13 $25 $10 $28 RETURN ON INVESTMENT (ROI) 7% 18% 5% 17%

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Manhattan Portfolio Proposition

20

Stock over 40 years old that needs base building renovation of approx. $100 PSF

Asking rents of $85-185 PSF1

New Build Class A Class B

Existing

Asking rents of $58-66 PSF1

Well-located, redeveloped for the 21st Century properties

New Build and Aged Trophy Class A costs more

Class B offers less

ESRT

DOMINANT POSITION WITH LITTLE COMPETITION

New construction

Asking rents of $100-230 PSF1

“Aged Trophy” Class A

1 Asking rents are for Midtown Manhattan.
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Tenants Relocating to ESRT

21 ATTRACTING TENANTS FROM ALL PARTS OF NYC AND BEYOND OVER PAST 12 MONTHS

From Outside Manhattan 14 Tenants Representing 59,529 SF From Midtown (East) (Grand Central, Murray Hill, Park Avenue) 21 Tenants Representing 162,159 SF From Midtown South and Downtown (Chelsea, Financial District, Madison Square, SoHo) 9 Tenants Representing 47,376 SF From Midtown (West) (Madison/Fifth, Penn Station/ Times Square South, Rockefeller Center, West Side) 21 Tenants Representing 142,118 SF From Internal Expansion/Renewals 23 Tenants Representing 77,951 SF

Company data as of March 31, 2017.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Retail Opportunity

708,468 SF of total retail space

94.4% occupied

Annualized fully escalated rent of $91.5 million

39,000 SF of retail space available to lease in 4 high traffic locations

Broadway corridor, Union Square and Empire State Building

22

Company data and filings as of March 31, 2017.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Retail Mark to Market

23 CURRENT 2017 MARKET RENT VS. CURRENT FULLY ESCALATED RENT Vacant 9 mos 2017 12 mos 2018 12 mos 2019 12 mos 2020 12 mos 2021 3 mos 2022 Current fully escalated rent PSF1 N/A $64 $110 $146 $135 $150 $166 Leased square feet expiring2 38,974 45,331 23,876 30,765 25,601 31,952 15,370 Weighted average starting rent PSF3 $123 $61 $110 $233 $178 $176 $172 Embedded growth4 N/A

  • 4.7%

0.0% 59.6% 31.9% 17.3% 3.6%

1 Fully escalated rents are as of March 31, 2017, exclude SLNC and are adjusted for space re-measurement. 2 Excludes SLNC. 3 Starting rents reflect rates as of March 31, 2017 without ascribing any future growth. Weighted average starting rent is management’s estimate for new,

renewal and below market short term rentals for cash flow purposes and includes both office and storage. The above does not give consideration for downtime to vacate, redevelop and lease.

4 Reflects embedded growth as of March 31, 2017 without ascribing any future growth.
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Retail Value Creation Case Study

88,513 SF on 3 floors leased to one tenant, including 2 levels of office and storage, for $2.2 million in fully escalated rent that expired in April 2016

The space was redeveloped into a multi- level retail space leased to 3 tenants

24

Company data and filings as of March 31, 2017.

SUCCESSFUL REPOSITIONING OF 112 W. 34th STREET

New leases were signed with Footlocker, Sephora and Target by March 2017 for annualized rent of $20.9 million Resulting in 846% Mark to Market

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Creating Value Through Sustainability

EMPIRE STATE BUILDING CASE STUDIES Utility costs represent the third largest component of tenant expenses after salaries and rent 3 ESB Tenant Energy Optimization Projects Examples 25 Coty Global Brands Group LinkedIn Energy reduction 31% 12% 38% ROI over lease term 328% 126% 93% IRR 44% 21% 24% Payback period (with incentives) 2.7 yrs 4.6 yrs 4.1 yrs

Annual savings

  • f $4.4 M

3.1 year payback

Energy Star 84

Quantifiable transparent results

Visit

www.esbsustainability .com

Visit: http:/ /tenantenergy.uli.org/case-studies/ Replicable Process Forms Basis for ULI’s Tenant Energy Optimization and EPA’s Tenant Star Program

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Sustainability Measures

26

› 100% of portfolio has undergone whole building energy retrofit analysis Energy Efficiency › 86% of portfolio has a robust or partial building management system in-place Building Certification › 100% of portfolio has waste recycling, green cleaning and pest control; low/no off-gassing paints and wall coverings; water conservation; and recycled paper product use Day to Day Green Practices › 100% of portfolio has annual and long-term sustainability targets Sustainability Programs Example

Visit www.esbsustainability.com and www.empirestaterealtytrust.com/about-us/sustainability for more details

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Greater NY Metropolitan Portfolio

27 QUALITY ASSETS AND TENANTS

95 684 287

Westport White Plains Harrison Stamford Norwalk

66-99 Main St 103-107 Main St ~30 miles to Midtown Manhattan

Highway Metro-North Railroad Metro-North Train Stop

First Stamford Place Metro Center 383 Main Avenue 10 Bank Street 500 Mamaroneck Avenue Office Standalone Retail

Company data and filings as of March 31, 2017.

Best assets located near major transportation hubs

Full amenities

15.7% of 1Q 2017 NOI

18.4% of total SF

90.7% occupied

91.3% leased

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Add

8.7% 0.6% 2.5% 12.7% 9.4% 12.3% 11.5% 42.3%

Available SLNC 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Thereafter

Tenant Lease Expirations

28 WELL LADDERED GREATER NY METROPOLITAN PORTFOLIO LEASE EXPIRATIONS

Company data and filings as of March 31, 2017.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

$25.0 $29.6 $33.4 $40.0 $50.1 $56.3 $62.9 $72.2 $71.6 $78.9 $80.6 $91.9 $101.8 $111.5 $112.2 $124.8 $21.2 $20.9

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Q1 2016 Q1 2017

Observatory Performance

29 CONSISTENT PERFORMANCE THROUGH ECONOMIC CYCLES AND NEW ATTRACTIONS

29

‘01 – ‘16 CAGR 11.3%

Source: NYC & Company.

Observatory annual revenue (millions)

Company Data and filings as of March 31, 2017.

Positive tourism trends to New York City (millions)

‘01 – ‘16 CAGR 3.7% 9/11 Top of the Rock Reopens 2.2 Million Visitors (estimated 2016) Financial Crisis Hits 9/11 Museum Opens 3 Million Visitors (estimated 2016) One World Observatory Opens 2.3 Million Visitors (estimated 2016)

35.2 35.3 37.8 39.9 42.7 43.8 46.0 47.1 45.8 48.8 50.9 52.7 54.3 56.5 58.5 60.7

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Who Visits the Observatory?

International vs. Domestic: 64% International, 36% Domestic Age Group: 55% 18-34 years old Male vs. Female: 59% Female, 41% Male

30

International 64% Domestic 36%

Data from ESRT customer polling from February 2016 through February 2017.

Top 6 foreign countries:

France Italy Canada Germany England/ Scotland/ Wales China

85% OF VISITORS DECIDE TO VISIT BEFORE LEAVING HOME

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Observatory Ticket Mix

Direct sales at full price is largest source

31 ACTIVE MANAGEMENT OF TICKET MIX TO MAXIMIZE MARGINS

Pricing – starting at Adult Senior (62+)

Child (6-12)

Main Deck Only (86th Floor) $34.00 $31.00 $27.00 Main Deck Only (86th Floor) Express $60.00 $60.00 $60.00 Main Deck + Top Deck (86th & 102nd Floors) $54.00 $51.00 $47.00 Main Deck + Top Deck Express (86th & 102nd Floors - No Waiting) $80.00 $80.00 $80.00 AM/PM Experience (86th Floor) $49.00 $49.00 $39.00 Sunrise Experience (86th Floor) $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 Premium Experience – Guided Tour (86th & 102nd Floors – No Waiting) $175.00 $175.00 $175.00

As of May 30, 2017.

Introduction of variable pricing during peak demand (key holidays and busy calendar periods)

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Valuing The Observatory

32 SUM OF THE PARTS VALUES BOTH RENTAL REVENUE AND RESIDUAL PROFIT STREAMS

If ESRT did not operate the Observatory and leased it to a third party, an operator would have to pay rent. Potential rent would be at least what ESRT pays in intercompany rent and this potential rent would be valued at an appropriate cap rate for Manhattan office and retail properties.

The residual NOI would be valued as an operating business similar to a gated attraction.

Intercompany Rent Capitalized at a Market Cap Rate Residual NOI Multiplied by a Gated Attraction Business Multiple Total Observatory Implied Value Observatory Results – 1Q 2017 Trailing Twelve Months In $MM Revenue $125 Less Operating Expenses 30 NOI 95 Intercompany rent expense 75 NOI after intercompany rent $20

Company Data and filings as of March 31, 2017.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Iconic NY Brand

VALUE OF THE EMPIRE STATE BUILDING BRAND 33

39B

MEDIA IMPRESSIONS1

$55MM

AD VALUE1,2

122MM

SOCIAL MEDIA IMPRESSIONS3

F Y 2 0 1 6 T O T A L R E S U L T S

85 years of brand references and popular cultural references make ESB an iconic brand

Branding yields millions in advertising value equivalent (AVE) annually representing effectively free advertising

ESB has a global brand recognition that would be difficult or expensive for others to recreate

1 Data for media impressions and ad value is from Cision. The number of media impressions includes approximately 10,000 North American print, online and

broadcast sources as well as international print and online sources in nearly 200 countries, but does not capture international broadcast sources.

2 The ad value equivalent (AVE) dollar figure does not include the value of the social media impressions. 3 Data for social media impressions is from Brandwatch.

Top of the Rock

One WTC

30 Hudson Yards

One Vanderbilt VS.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Harper’s Bazaar Projections

625MM MEDIA IMPRESSIONS 198MM SOCIAL MEDIA IMPRESSIONS 34

M E D I A C O V E R A G E

1.4B MEDIA IMPRESSIONS $1.6MM AD VALUE EQUIVALENCY 198MM TWITTER IMPRESSIONS

slide-35
SLIDE 35

FINANCIAL STRATEGY Access to a variety of forms

  • f capital

Low leverage with laddered debt maturities

Strong and Flexible Balance Sheet

35 CAPITAL STRUCTURE STRATEGY

Significant cash

  • n hand
slide-36
SLIDE 36

Fortress Balance Sheet

36 STEADY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH PERFORMANCE Net Debt / Enterprise Value

3.2x 6.3x

15% 38 38%

PEERS Net Debt / EBITDA

1 2013 based on fourth quarter EBITDA annualized. 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017 EBITDA are calculated based on trailing twelve months EBITDA. Net debt is as of

December 31, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 and as of March 31, 2017. Peer group includes Boston Properties, Paramount Group, SL Green, and Vornado Realty Trust as of March 31, 2017.

5.7X 5.4X 4.9X 3.1X 3.2X

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Net Debt to EBITDA1

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Improved Balance Sheet Flexibility

Repaid $580 million in mortgage loans, adding approximately 5.9 million square feet to the unencumbered pool since IPO

37 UNENCUMBERING THE PORTFOLIO

0% 50% 100%

Portfolio SF

At IPO

41% 59% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

Portfolio SF

March 2017

Repaid $580 million, including mortgage loans securing: › Empire State Building › 250 W. 57th St. › 500 Mamaroneck › 501 7th Avenue › 69-97 Main Street › 1359 Broadway › One Grand Central Place

99% <1% Encumbered Unencumbered Encumbered Unencumbered

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

$300 $103 $193 $88 $92 $381 $403 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024

Debt Maturity

WEIGHTED AVERAGE MATURITY INCREASED FROM 3.1 YEARS AT IPO TO 4.5 YEARS

($ millions)

$350 $128 $336 $262 $250 $0 $0 $265 $0 $478 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 and thereafter Unsecured private placement Mortage Debt Exchangable Notes Revolving Credit Facility Term Loan

CURRENT DEBT MATURITY PROFILE (AS OF MARCH 2017) Prior DEBT MATURITY PROFILE (AT IPO OCTOBER 2013)

($ millions)

Company data and filings as of March 31, 2017.

N / A N/A N / A

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Support for Future Growth

39 BALANCE SHEET STRENGTH AND FLEXIBILITY ›

Net debt / enterprise value: 15%

Net debt / EBITDA: 3.2x

Interest coverage: 4.9x

Attractive in place mortgage debt

Weighted average interest rate of 4.2%

Weighted average debt maturity of 4.5 years

$532 million cash and cash equivalents

$0 drawn on $1.1 billion unsecured credit facility with accordion feature allowing for maximum aggregate principal balance of $1.25 billion

Untapped debt capacity embedded in many low-levered assets

Well-laddered and long-dated debt maturities

Low Leverage Liquidity

Exchangeable Senior Unsecured Notes $250 mm 3% Senior Unsecured Notes $350 mm 4% $1.1bn Credit Facility $0 mm 0% Equity $6,200 mm 79% Senior Unsecured Term Loan $265 mm 3% Private Perpetual Preferred $26 mm <1% Mortgage Debt $750 mm 10%

Capital Structure1

1 Based on stock price of $20.64 as of March 31, 2017 and 300.3 million fully diluted shares outstanding. Net debt as of March 31, 2017 of $1.08 billion.
slide-40
SLIDE 40

ESRT Metrics Since IPO

Average Trading Volume in 2016: 984,876 shares Average Trading Volume in 2015: 844,333 shares Average Trading Volume in 2014: 590,317 shares Class A common shares now comprise 52% of the operating partnership, driven by conversion requests from OP units and Class B shares totaling 30.0 million Class A shares1 and the QIA investment in 29.6 million Class A shares 40 DAILY VOLUME, FLOAT, AND COMPARABLE PERFORMANCE

Daily Volume

1 As of March 31, 2017, the Company had conversion requests from operating partnership units and Class B common shares to Class A common shares

Totally 30.0 million shares, or approximately $619 million at the closing share price of $20.64 on March 31, 2017. This represents a 36% increase in the number of Class A shares since our IPO.

2 Data as of IPO Date 10/2/2013 to 04/21/2017.

Float Comparable Performance

ESRT Total Return Since IPO: 77.0%2 vs. RMS Total Return Since IPO: 47.5%2

slide-41
SLIDE 41

41

slide-42
SLIDE 42

42

Appendix

RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

Company data and filings as of March 31, 2017. Amounts in thousands.

Three Months Ended

Reconciliation of Net Income to NOI and Cash NOI

March 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 September 30, 2016 June 30, 2016 March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 September 30, 2015 June 30, 2015 March 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013 Net income $ 19,145 $ 33,008 $ 32,897 $24,640 $ 16,705 $ 19,370 $ 26,085 $26,585 $ 7,888 $ 10,964 $ 193,431 Add: General and administrative expenses 11,088 13,455 11,798 12,907 10,918 9,678 10,182 9,113 9,100 9,251 16,379 Depreciation and amortization 40,846 39,829 37,607 38,548 39,227 45,258 45,169 39,629 41,418 48,799 27,375 Interest expense 17,742 17,837 17,939 17,420 17,951 17,194 16,680 17,571 16,047 19,816 13,147 Loss from derivative financial instruments 247

  • Construction expenses
  • 353

2,869 5,423 5,468 Acquisition expenses

  • 98
  • 193
  • 138,140

Income tax expense (benefit) (468) 1,806 2,750 2,132 (542) 666 2,578 883 (178) 502 (1,125) Less: Construction revenue

  • (374)

(1,607) (4,918) (5,265) Third-party management and other fees (351) (394) (404) (423) (545) (475) (618) (594) (446) (451) (550) Acquisition break-up fee

  • (2,500)
  • Gain on settlement of lawsuit related to the Observatory
  • Gain on consolidation of non-controlled entities
  • (322,563)

Net operating income 88,249 105,541 102,587 95,224 83,812 91,691 97,769 93,166 75,091 89,386 64,437 Straight-line rent (5,998) (8,652) (9,619) (6,796) (5,080) (5,892) (5,441) (5,622) (4,102) (7,613) (8,932) Above/below-market lease amortization (1,428) (2,509) (1,210) (844) (4,231) (4,691) (4,795) (4,576) (5,291) (5,613) (1,903) Below-market ground lease amortization 1,958 1,958 1,957 1,958 1,958 1,958 1,957 1,958 1,958 2,001 398 Cash net operating income $ 82,781 $ 96,338 $ 93,715 $89,542 $ 76,459 $ 83,066 $ 89,490 $84,926 $ 67,656 $ 78,161 $ 54,000