{
searching for dark matter with icecube
{
Sven Lafebre Pennsylvania State University Rencontres de Moriond March 2010
{
searching for dark matter with icecube { Sven Lafebre - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
{ searching for dark matter with icecube { Sven Lafebre Pennsylvania State University Rencontres de Moriond March 2010 { amundsen-scott station Skiway Station IceCube drill camp IceCube lab South Pole (photo: henry malmgren) the
{
{
{
Station South Pole Skiway IceCube lab IceCube drill camp
(photo: henry malmgren)
Lab DeepCore
IceCube
DeepCore
IceTop
3
Photomultiplier
18% quantum eff. at 400 nm Digitizers
3 gain channels 300 MHz sampling 400 ns recording time
40 MHz sampling 6.4 ms recording time
4
detector
νµ interactions: km scale
(neutral-current, νe, ν): 10 m scale
ν µ
νi
W, Z i, νi
5
Tracks
Cascades
log(energy) Composites
double bangs
energy resolution
6
22 strings: 1.5º 40 strings: < 1.0º 80 strings: < 0.5º
7
22 strings: 1.5º 40 strings: < 1.0º 80 strings: < 0.5º
See arXiv:1002.4900
7
Simulated muon fluxes
from above
from all directions
8
Diffuse and point source searches active galactic nuclei, supernovae, gamma ray bursts, dark matter Use ‘background’ as signal cosmic rays & atmospheric neutrinos Exotic and other phenomena monopoles, supersymmetry & glaciology
(Sun, Galactic Center)
annihilation (GeV–TeV scale) χ
νµ
ll qq W±, Z, H
χχ χχ χχ χχ
νµ νµ νµ νµ
10
Trigger South Pole Angular cuts Track quality Advanced cuts Efficiency 10–2 10–4 10–6 1
Filtering steps:
quality cut
log likelihood, decision trees, support vector machines
Atmospheric νµ Signal (1 TeV hard) Total background Data Passing rates, 22 strings
11
amanda: 150.4 days
hide Sun azimuth
Sun below horizon
12
Neutralino mass (GeV) 10
2
10
3
10
4
10 )
2
Neutralino-proton SD cross-section (cm
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
CDMS(2008)+XENON10(2007)
lim SI
SI
2
h
CDMS (2008) COUPP (2008) KIMS (2007) SUPER-K 1996-2001 IceCube-22 2007 (soft) IceCube-22 2007 (hard)
10
2
10
3
10
4
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Soft Hard
probes spin- dependent neutralino-proton cross-section
models of dark matter density distribution and annihilation modes
Soft: bb
Allowed mssm models prl 102, 201302 (2009)
13
Neutralino mass (GeV) 10
2
10
3
10
4
10 )
2
Neutralino-proton SD cross-section (cm
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
CDMS(2008)+XENON10(2007)
lim SI
SI
2
h
CDMS (2008) COUPP (2008) KIMS (2007) SUPER-K 1996-2001 IceCube-22 2007 (soft) IceCube-22 2007 (hard)
10
2
10
3
10
4
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Soft Hard
probes spin- dependent neutralino-proton cross-section
models of dark matter density distribution and annihilation modes
Soft: bb
Allowed mssm models prl 102, 201302 (2009)
(Primary Neutrino Energy - GeV)
1
log 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3 )
2
E f f e c t i v e N e u t r i n
r e a ( m
10
10
10
10
10
10 1
Preliminary
8 s t r i n g s 80 strings + DeepCore
13
Kaluza-Klein dark matter
dimensions
mass is 0.3–1.0 TeV
model particles
‘traditional’ wimp search
See arXiv:0910.4480, prd accepted
14
horizon
and off-source
pick models, and constrain self-annihilation cross-section
On-source Off-source Galactic Center dΦ dE = 1 2⟨σAv⟩J(ψ) R⊙ρ2
⊙
4πm2
χ
dN dE
15
limit
density models
See arXiv:0912.5183
16
10−26 10−24 10−22 10−20 10−18 102 103 104 <σA v> [cm 3s−1] m [GeV]
natural scale unitarity bound bb bb WW WW
µµ NFW halo model IceCube 40 (GC) IceCube 22 (outer Galaxy)
Halo Model Uncertainty
Limits (90% C.L.) on the self annihilation cross section ( -> bb, WW, µµ, )
taking data starting April 1
dependent cross-sections
underway
sensitivity below 100 GeV
17
The IceCube Collaboration
36 institutions { 250 physicists
U.C. Berkeley Clark-Atlanta U.
Georgia Tech U.C. Irvine
Lawrence Berkeley Nat. Lab
Ohio State U. Pennsylvania State U. Southern U., Baton Rouge
RWTH Aachen
Vrije U. Brussel
DESY, Zeuthen
MPI Heidelberg Humboldt U., Berlin
Oxford U.
Stockholm U. Uppsala U.
Chiba U.
EPF Lausanne