searching for dark matter with icecube { Sven Lafebre - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

searching for dark matter with icecube
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

searching for dark matter with icecube { Sven Lafebre - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

{ searching for dark matter with icecube { Sven Lafebre Pennsylvania State University Rencontres de Moriond March 2010 { amundsen-scott station Skiway Station IceCube drill camp IceCube lab South Pole (photo: henry malmgren) the


slide-1
SLIDE 1

{

searching for dark matter with icecube

{

Sven Lafebre Pennsylvania State University Rencontres de Moriond March 2010

{

slide-2
SLIDE 2

amundsen-scott station

Station South Pole Skiway IceCube lab IceCube drill camp

(photo: henry malmgren)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

the icecube observatory

Lab DeepCore

IceCube

  • Cubic km detector volume
  • 1450–2450 m depth
  • 125 m string spacing
  • 17 m sensor spacing

DeepCore

  • 70 m string spacing
  • 7 m sensor spacing

IceTop

  • Surface cosmic ray detector

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

digital optical module

Photomultiplier

  • 10” Hamamatsu

18% quantum eff. at 400 nm Digitizers

  • ATWD

3 gain channels 300 MHz sampling 400 ns recording time

  • ADC

40 MHz sampling 6.4 ms recording time

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

detection principle

  • Neutrinos interact in or near

detector

  • Tracks from charged-current

νµ interactions: km scale

  • Cascades from other interactions

(neutral-current, νe, ν): 10 m scale

  • Detect Cherenkov radiation

ν µ

νi

W, Z i, νi

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

neutrino signatures

Tracks

  • Through-going muons
  • 1º pointing resolution

Cascades

  • Neutral current
  • Charged current νe, ν
  • 10% resolution in

log(energy) Composites

  • Starting tracks,

double bangs

  • Good directional and

energy resolution

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

pointing resolution

22 strings: 1.5º 40 strings: < 1.0º 80 strings: < 0.5º

{

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

pointing resolution

22 strings: 1.5º 40 strings: < 1.0º 80 strings: < 0.5º

{

See arXiv:1002.4900

7

slide-9
SLIDE 9

background & filtering

Simulated muon fluxes

  • Atmospheric muons

from above

  • Atmospheric neutrinos

from all directions

8

slide-10
SLIDE 10

science overview

Diffuse and point source searches active galactic nuclei, supernovae, gamma ray bursts, dark matter Use ‘background’ as signal cosmic rays & atmospheric neutrinos Exotic and other phenomena monopoles, supersymmetry & glaciology

slide-11
SLIDE 11

how to look for dark matter

  • Dark matter amasses in heavy objects

(Sun, Galactic Center)

  • Look for neutrinos produced in self-

annihilation (GeV–TeV scale) χ

νµ

ll qq W±, Z, H

χχ χχ χχ χχ

νµ νµ νµ νµ

10

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Trigger South Pole Angular cuts Track quality Advanced cuts Efficiency 10–2 10–4 10–6 1

Filtering steps:

  • Initial trigger
  • Quality cut at South Pole
  • Angular cuts
  • Track reconstruction

quality cut

  • Advanced cuts:

log likelihood, decision trees, support vector machines

wimps in the sun

Atmospheric νµ Signal (1 TeV hard) Total background Data Passing rates, 22 strings

11

slide-13
SLIDE 13

wimps in the sun

  • IceCube 22: 104.3 days

amanda: 150.4 days

  • Blind analysis

hide Sun azimuth

  • Select zenith 90º–120º

Sun below horizon

  • Remove muon background
  • 20% signal efficiency
  • 4º angular resolution
  • bserved flux is consistent with background expectations

12

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Neutralino mass (GeV) 10

2

10

3

10

4

10 )

2

Neutralino-proton SD cross-section (cm

  • 41

10

  • 40

10

  • 39

10

  • 38

10

  • 37

10

  • 36

10

  • 35

10

  • 34

10

  • 33

10

CDMS(2008)+XENON10(2007)

lim SI

  • <

SI

  • < 0.20

2

h

  • 0.05 <

CDMS (2008) COUPP (2008) KIMS (2007) SUPER-K 1996-2001 IceCube-22 2007 (soft) IceCube-22 2007 (hard)

10

2

10

3

10

4

10

  • 41

10

  • 40

10

  • 39

10

  • 38

10

  • 37

10

  • 36

10

  • 35

10

  • 34

10

  • 33

10

Soft Hard

wimps in the sun

  • Muon flux limit

probes spin- dependent neutralino-proton cross-section

  • Dependent on

models of dark matter density distribution and annihilation modes

  • Hard: W+W–

Soft: bb

Allowed mssm models prl 102, 201302 (2009)

13

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Neutralino mass (GeV) 10

2

10

3

10

4

10 )

2

Neutralino-proton SD cross-section (cm

  • 41

10

  • 40

10

  • 39

10

  • 38

10

  • 37

10

  • 36

10

  • 35

10

  • 34

10

  • 33

10

CDMS(2008)+XENON10(2007)

lim SI

  • <

SI

  • < 0.20

2

h

  • 0.05 <

CDMS (2008) COUPP (2008) KIMS (2007) SUPER-K 1996-2001 IceCube-22 2007 (soft) IceCube-22 2007 (hard)

10

2

10

3

10

4

10

  • 41

10

  • 40

10

  • 39

10

  • 38

10

  • 37

10

  • 36

10

  • 35

10

  • 34

10

  • 33

10

Soft Hard

wimps in the sun

  • Muon flux limit

probes spin- dependent neutralino-proton cross-section

  • Dependent on

models of dark matter density distribution and annihilation modes

  • Hard: W+W–

Soft: bb

Allowed mssm models prl 102, 201302 (2009)

(Primary Neutrino Energy - GeV)

1

log 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3 )

2

E f f e c t i v e N e u t r i n

  • A

r e a ( m

  • 6

10

  • 5

10

  • 4

10

  • 3

10

  • 2

10

  • 1

10 1

Preliminary

8 s t r i n g s 80 strings + DeepCore

13

slide-16
SLIDE 16

wimps in the sun

Kaluza-Klein dark matter

  • 5 universal space-time

dimensions

  • Lightest kk particle (lkp)

mass is 0.3–1.0 TeV

  • In equilibrium in the Sun
  • Annihilate to standard-

model particles

  • Result uses same dataset as

‘traditional’ wimp search

See arXiv:0910.4480, prd accepted

14

slide-17
SLIDE 17

wimps in the galaxy

  • Galactic Halo extends below

horizon

  • Compare equal areas on-source

and off-source

  • Measure flux difference,

pick models, and constrain self-annihilation cross-section

On-source Off-source Galactic Center dΦ dE = 1 2⟨σAv⟩J(ψ) R⊙ρ2

4πm2

χ

dN dE

15

slide-18
SLIDE 18

wimps in the galaxy

  • 90% confidence exclusion

limit

  • Width derives from various

density models

See arXiv:0912.5183

16

10−26 10−24 10−22 10−20 10−18 102 103 104 <σA v> [cm 3s−1] m [GeV]

natural scale unitarity bound bb bb WW WW

  • µµ

µµ NFW halo model IceCube 40 (GC) IceCube 22 (outer Galaxy)

Halo Model Uncertainty

p r e l i m i n a r y

Limits (90% C.L.) on the self annihilation cross section ( -> bb, WW, µµ, )

slide-19
SLIDE 19

conclusion

  • Construction ends next year
  • 79 strings in the ice;

taking data starting April 1

  • 22-string analyses limit spin-

dependent cross-sections

  • 40-string analyses are

underway

  • 59-string data available soon
  • DeepCore boosts wimp

sensitivity below 100 GeV

17

slide-20
SLIDE 20

thank you

The IceCube Collaboration

36 institutions { 250 physicists

  • U. of Alberta
  • U. of West Indies
  • U. Alabama, Tuscaloosa
  • U. Alaska, Anchorage

U.C. Berkeley Clark-Atlanta U.

  • U. Delaware/Bartol Inst.

Georgia Tech U.C. Irvine

  • U. of Kansas

Lawrence Berkeley Nat. Lab

  • U. of Maryland

Ohio State U. Pennsylvania State U. Southern U., Baton Rouge

  • U. of Wisconsin-Madison
  • U. of Wisconsin-River Falls

RWTH Aachen

  • U. Bonn

Vrije U. Brussel

  • U. Libre de Bruxelles

DESY, Zeuthen

  • U. Dortmund
  • U. Gent

MPI Heidelberg Humboldt U., Berlin

  • U. Mainz
  • U. de Mons-Hainaut

Oxford U.

  • RuhrU. Bochum

Stockholm U. Uppsala U.

  • U. Wuppertal

Chiba U.

  • U. of Canterbury, Christchurch

EPF Lausanne