searches for third generation squarks with atlas
play

Searches for third generation squarks with ATLAS Kerim Suruliz - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Searches for third generation squarks with ATLAS Kerim Suruliz (University of Sussex) on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration LHCP 2015, St. Petersburg Sep 1, 2015 1 / 26 Introduction The Higgs mass receives radiative corrections from scalar


  1. Searches for third generation squarks with ATLAS Kerim Suruliz (University of Sussex) on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration LHCP 2015, St. Petersburg Sep 1, 2015 1 / 26

  2. Introduction The Higgs mass receives radiative corrections from scalar partners of the top quark: δm 2 h ∼ y 2 t ( m 2 Q 3 + m 2 u 3 + | A t | 2 ) = ⇒ the stops need to be light for SUSY to solve the hierarchy problem. By SU (2) symmetry, the left-handed sbottom also needs to be light. 10 σ tot [ pb ] : pp → SUSY √ S = 8 TeV 1 q ˜g ˜ -1 10 q ˜q ˜ ˜ * ˜q q -2 χ o χ χ ˜ 2 ˜ 1 + ˜ 2 o g ˜ ˜ 1 t t ˜ 1* g ˜g ˜ 10 ν ˜ e ν ˜ e* ˜ e l l ˜ e* -3 10 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 m average [ GeV ] t/ ˜ Strongly (pair)-produced ˜ b with O ( fb − pb ) cross sections - subject of dedicated ATLAS searches since early Run 1 . Papucci et al, JHEP 1209 (2012) 035 2 / 26

  3. State of the art Summary of Run 1 searches reported in http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.08616, including three new analyses. Limits up to ∼ 700 GeV, depending on the mass hierarchies and decay modes. Recent focus on closing gaps in parameter space with dedicated searches and fully utilising Run 1 data by performing combinations of analyses. 3 / 26

  4. Overview searches for sbottoms searches for stops χ ± “bread and butter” decay modes: ˜ χ 0 t 1 → t ˜ 1 , b ˜ 1 1 compressed spectra 2 the second stop, ˜ t 2 3 light staus: ˜ t → ˜ τ 4 complex decay chains: pMSSM models prospects for 13 TeV and conclusions 4 / 26

  5. Searches for sbottoms ˜ χ 0 b 1 → b ˜ 1 bb +MET-like in the bulk of parameter space - use m CT variable for signal/background discrimination for compressed spectra, the monojet-like analysis ( ≤ 3 jets and large MET > 220 , > 340 GeV) is more sensitive JHEP 10 (2013) 189; Phys. Rev. D. 90, 052008 (2014); arXiv:1506.08616 5 / 26

  6. Stop with ˜ χ ± χ 0 t 1 → t ˜ 1 , b ˜ 1 Statistical combination of the 0L and 1L analyses. Many signal regions involved - re- solved/boosted top decays, etc. (Expected) gain about 50 GeV with respect to the individual 0L and 1L analyses for ˜ χ 0 t 1 → t ˜ 1 . arXiv:1506.08616 6 / 26

  7. Compressed stop spectra In the compressed region have competing 4-body ( ˜ χ 0 t 1 → blν ˜ 1 ) and stop → charm ( ˜ χ 0 t 1 → c ˜ 1 ) decays; their relative contributions are model dependent. Four different analyses combined based on best expected sensitivity: monojet-like c -tagged jet one soft lepton WW -like (two leptons) Results as a function of BR (˜ χ 0 t 1 → c ˜ 1 ) . arXiv:1506.08616 7 / 26

  8. WW -like stop search Past discrepancies (now mostly resolved) between measured WW x-sec and prediction motivated a search for a light stop model with WW -like final state (soft jets). Use events with two leptons - no requirements on jets. A number of discriminating variables: the stransverse mass, m T 2 ∆ X = ( p z ( l 1 ) + p z ( l 2 )) / √ s to reject WW E miss R 2 = T E miss + p T ( l 1 )+ p T ( l 2 ) T arXiv:1506.08616 8 / 26

  9. WW -like analysis: results Also sensitive to scenarios with 3-body ( ˜ χ 0 t 1 → bW ˜ 1 ) and 4-body ( ˜ χ 0 1 ) decays of the stop. t 1 → blν ˜ Nicely covers the interface region between 3-body and 4-body stop decays. arXiv:1506.08616 9 / 26

  10. Stealth stop Tricky m ˜ t 1 ∼ m t , low LSP mass region targeted by two SM measurement reinterpretations: top spin correlation top cross section Eur. Phys. J. C74 (2014) 3109, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 142001 (2015), arXiv:1506.08616 NEW : the top x-sec analysis now extended to 3-body scenarios. Excludes stop masses below 175 GeV for m ˜ 1 = 1 GeV. χ 0 Less sensitive at higher m ˜ 1 due to softer b -jets in signal. χ 0 10 / 26

  11. Summary of stop searches with only ˜ χ 0 t 1 and ˜ 1 present Parameter space well-covered by the various searches arXiv:1506.08616 11 / 26

  12. Searching for ˜ t 2 t 1 ∼ m t are hard: ˜ t 1 ˜ t 1 production looks like t ¯ Scenarios with m ˜ t . ⇒ ˜ t 2 should also be light, so consider ˜ t 2 → ˜ Naturalness = t 1 decays. Previously considered ˜ t 2 → ˜ t 1 Z ; now also ˜ t 2 → ˜ t 1 h Similar to a t ¯ th search; h → bb dominant decay mode SRs with 6 jets and 2,3 or 4 b -jets t ¯ t +HF an important background, constrained by data arXiv:1506.08616 12 / 26

  13. Searching for ˜ t 2 : results Signal with ∆ m (˜ χ 0 t 1 , ˜ 1 ) = 180 GeV con- sidered. Interpreted in the m ˜ t 2 – m ˜ 1 plane. χ 0 Exclude m ˜ t 2 < 600 GeV for a massless LSP. Can also interpret for various BRs of t 2 → ˜ ˜ t 1 Z , ˜ t 2 → ˜ t 1 h , ˜ χ 0 t 2 → t ˜ 1 by com- bining with the 3l and stop 0l/1l chan- nels. arXiv:1506.08616 13 / 26

  14. Stop decays via staus GMSB models with light stops and staus. 3-body decay ˜ t 1 → bν τ ˜ τ 1 possible τ 1 → τ ˜ followed by ˜ G − → 2 τ +2b+MET signature uses τ had τ had , τ had l and ll channels Stop masses up to 650 GeV excluded for very light ˜ G , depending on stau mass. 14 / 26

  15. pMSSM models Consider well-motivated models with complex phenomenology involving stops/sbottoms. Natural pMSSM h/Z -enriched pMSSM Well-tempered neutralino pMSSM Higgsino-like LSP, M 1 = 100 GeV satisfy DM m ˜ 1 , m ˜ 2 ≈ m ˜ χ ± χ 0 χ 0 vary µ and m ˜ q L3 or 1 constraint and low µ and m ˜ scan over µ and b R fine tuning m ˜ q L 3 often have µ ∼ − M 1 χ 0 χ 0 ˜ 2 → h ˜ 1 arXiv:1506.08616 t 1 , ˜ Limits of ∼ 600 − 700 GeV on the physical ˜ b 1 masses. 15 / 26

  16. 13 TeV expectations: sbottom pair production Conservative estimate of sensitivity with early 13 TeV data for ˜ χ 0 b 1 → b ˜ 1 and a light LSP. Retain the approach of the 8 TeV search consider higher m CT threshold ( > 400 GeV) also consider two scenarios for background systematic uncertainties: 20% and 40% ATL-PHYS-PUB-2015-005 16 / 26

  17. Conclusions Extensive searches for stops/sbottoms carried out with Run 1 LHC data. Large chunks of parameter space have been excluded and natural SUSY is under pressure. Sensitivity up to m ˜ b ∼ 700 GeV, depending on decay modes and mass t, ˜ hierarchies Limits are weaker for compressed spectra - dedicated analyses target those regions ATLAS-CONF-2015-033 Analysis of 13 TeV data is in progress - t ¯ t x-sec already measured. Exciting new results are coming up soon! 17 / 26

  18. Backup 18 / 26

  19. Other searches for sbottoms Other ˜ b 1 decays considered: ˜ χ ± b 1 → b ˜ 1 - targeted by the same-sign 2l/3l analysis ˜ χ 0 χ 0 χ 0 b 1 → b ˜ 2 , ˜ 2 → h ˜ 1 - many b ’s in final state; targeted by 3b analysis arXiv:1506.08616 19 / 26

  20. Summary exclusion plots for ˜ χ ± t 1 → b ˜ 1 Different assumptions for mass hierarchies considered. Small m ˜ 1 − m ˜ 1 (bb+MET like) χ ± χ 0 Small m ˜ t 1 − m ˜ χ ± 1 arXiv:1506.08616 20 / 26

  21. Summary exclusion plots for ˜ χ ± t 1 → b ˜ 1 Different assumptions for mass hierarchies considered. m ˜ 1 = 2 m ˜ 1 (gaugino mass unification) χ ± χ 0 fixed chargino mass, scan over m ˜ χ 0 1 arXiv:1506.08616 21 / 26

  22. pMSSM: exclusions for RH stop/sbottom The limits are somewhat weaker compared to the left-handed case. arXiv:1506.08616 22 / 26

  23. WW -like stop pair production? In the past measured WW cross section higher than theoretical predictions. However, most recent theory computations (NNLO) and measurements compatible with each other. Mar. 2015 CMS Preliminary CMS measurements 7 TeV CMS measurement (stat,stat+sys) vs. NLO theory (NNLO) 8 TeV CMS measurement (stat,stat+sys) γ γ ± ± , (NNLO th.) 1.06 0.01 0.12 5.0 fb -1 γ ± ± W 1.16 0.03 0.13 5.0 fb -1 γ ± ± -1 Z 0.98 0.01 0.05 5.0 fb γ ± ± -1 Z 0.98 0.01 0.05 19.5 fb ± ± -1 WW+WZ 1.05 0.13 0.15 4.9 fb 1.11 ± 0.04 ± 0.10 4.9 fb -1 WW ± ± WW, 1.01 0.02 0.08 19.4 fb -1 (NNLO th.) ± ± WZ 1.17 0.07 0.07 4.9 fb -1 ± ± -1 WZ 1.12 0.03 0.07 19.6 fb ± ± -1 ZZ 0.99 0.14 0.07 4.9 fb ± ± -1 ZZ 1.00 0.06 0.08 19.6 fb 0.5 1 1.5 2 All results at: σ σ 23 / 26 Production Cross Section Ratio: / http://cern.ch/go/pNj7 exp theo

  24. tb +MET search A dedicated analysis targeting naturalness-inspired scenarios with ˜ χ 0 1 , ˜ χ ± t 1 → t ˜ t 1 → b ˜ 1 and ˜ χ 0 1 , ˜ χ ± b 1 → b ˜ b 1 → t ˜ 1 all open with comparable BRs. Strategy Also assumes m ˜ 1 ∼ m ˜ 1 = ⇒ χ ± χ 0 1 ff ′ with soft f, f ′ = χ 0 m ˜ 1 → ˜ ⇒ χ ± tb +MET-like final state Signal regions “in-between” the tt+MET and bb+MET SRs One lepton required Uses m eff , E miss and E miss T T significance, m T , m bl and am T2 (asymmetric variant of m T2 ) as discriminants t ¯ t and W +jets backgrounds determined from control regions arXiv:1506.08616 24 / 26

  25. tb +MET search: results χ ± Interpreted for ˜ t 1 ˜ t 1 , ˜ χ 0 t 1 → t ˜ 1 , b ˜ 1 with varying BRs. Has good sensitivity in the “natu- ral pMSSM” model (Higgsino-like LSP, light stops and ˜ b 1 ). arXiv:1506.08616 25 / 26

  26. Stop to stau: analysis channels leptonic-hadronic channel hadronic-hadronic channel require 2 hadronic τ s require 1 hadronic τ +1 e/µ ≥ 1 b -jet ≥ 1 or 2 b -jets uses uses m T2 ( l, τ had ) , m T2 ( bl, bτ had ) , m T2 ( τ 1 had , τ 2 had ) , m sum ( τ 1 had , τ 2 had ) m T2 ( bl, b ) , m eff , H T /m eff T and E miss T 26 / 26

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend